Linking the Organizational Health of Middle Grades Schools to Student Achievement

NASSP Bulletin

Volumn 91, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 289-321

  Roney, Kathleen ^a   Coleman, Howard ^a   Schlichting, Kathleen A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA WILMINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

academic emphasis; collegial leadership; middle schools; organizational health; student achievement in reading

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993708255     PISSN: 01926365     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0192636507310161     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. Alliance for Excellent Education. (2007). Adolescent literacy. Retrieved June 8, 2007, from http://www.all4ed.org/adolescent_literacy/index.html
2. Alvermann, D.E. (2001). E fective literacy instruction for adolescents: Executive summary and paper commissioned by the National Reading Conference. Retrieved October 20, 2006, from http://www.nrconline.org/index.html
3. Anfara, V.A., Jr., Andrews, P.G., Hough, D.L., Mertens, S.B., Mizelle, N.B., & White, G.P. (2003). Research and resources in support of this we believe. Westerville, OH: National Middle School Association.
4. Anfara, V.A., Jr., & Roney, K. (in press). Interview protocol for case study data collection. In K. Roney, V. A. Anfara Jr., & K. M. Brown (Eds.), The middle school concept and student achievement: Creating healthy and e fective middle schools. Westerville, OH: National Middle School Association.
5. Ashton, P.T., & Webb, R.B. (1986). Teachers' sense of efficacy, classroom behavior, and student achievement. In P. T. Ashton & R. B. Webb (Eds.), Teachers' sense of e ficacy and student achievement (pp. 125–144). New York: Longman.
6. Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28(2), 117–148.
7. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-e ficacy: The exercise of control. New York: Freeman.
8. Barnard, C. (1938). The functions of the executive. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
9. Biancarosa, G., & Snow, C.E. (2004). Reading next: A vision for action and research in middle and high school literacy. A report to the Carnegie Corporation of New York. Washington, DC: Alliance for Excellent Education.
10. Black, S. (2005). Reaching the older reader [Electronic version]. American School Board Journal, 192(4), 50–70.
11. Bossert, S.T. (1988). School effects. In N. Boyan (Ed.), Handbook of research on educational administration (pp. 341–352). New York: Longman.
12. Brown, K.M., Roney, K., & Anfara, V.A., Jr. (2003). Organizational health directly influences student performance at the middle level. Middle School Journal, 34(5), 5–15.
13. Chester, M.D., & Beaudin, B.Q. (1996). Efficacy beliefs of newly hired teachers in urban schools. American Educational Research Journal, 33(1), 233–257.
14. Coburn, C. (2005). Shaping teacher sensemaking: School leaders and the enactment of reading policy. Educational Policy, 19(3), 476–509.
15. Comer, J.P. (1980). School power. New York: Free Press.
16. Creswell, J.W. (2003). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
17. Etzioni, A. (1975). A comparative analysis of complex organizations: On power, involvement, and their correlates (2nd ed.). New York: Free Press.
18. Felner, R.D., Jackson, A.W., Kasak, D., Mulhall, P., Brand, S., & Flowers, N. (1997). The impact of school reform for the middle years: Longitudinal study of a network engaged in Turning Points—based comprehensive school transformation. Phi Delta Kappan, 78(7), 528–532, 541–550.
19. Goddard, R.D., Sweetland, S.R., & Hoy, W.K. (2000). Academic emphasis of urban elementary schools and student achievement in reading and mathematics: A multilevel analysis. Educational Administration Quarterly, 36(5), 683–702.
20. Gronn, P. (2003). The new work of educational leaders: Changing leadership practice in an era of school reform. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
21. Grosin, L. (1991, January). School climate, achievement, and behavior in eight Swedish junior high schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the International Congress for School Effectiveness and Improvement, Cardiff, Wales, United Kingdom.
22. Guthrie, J.T., & Davis, M.H. (2003). Motivating struggling readers in the middle school through an engagement model of classroom practice. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 19, 59–85.
23. Guthrie, J.T., & Wigfield, A. (1997). Reading engagement: A rationale for theory and teaching. In J. T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction (pp. 1–12). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
24. Heck, R.H., & Hallinger, P. (2005). The study of educational leadership and management. Educational Management, Administration & Leadership, 33(2), 229–244.
25. Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Synderman, B.B. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: John Wiley.
26. Hoy, W. (n.d.). The organizational health inventory (OHI-M). Retrieved September 10, 2004, from http://www.coe.ohio-state.edu/whoy/instruments_6.htm#HE
27. Hoy, W.K., & Clover, S.I.R. (1986). Elementary school climate: A revision of the OCDQ. Educational Administration Quarterly, 22, 93–110.
28. Hoy, W.K., & Feldman, J.A. (1987). Organizational health: The concept and its measure. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 20(4), 30–37.
29. Hoy, W.K., & Hannum, J.W. (1997). Middle school climate: An empirical assessment of organizational health and student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(3), 290–311.
30. Hoy, W.K., Hannum, J.W., & Tschannen-Moran, M. (1998). Organizational climate and student achievement: A parsimonious and longitudinal view. Journal of School Leadership, 8(4), 336–359.
31. Hoy, W.K., Hoffman, J., Sabo, D., & Bliss, J.R. (1996). Middle school climate: An empirical assessment of organizational health and student achievement. Working paper, The Ohio State University, Columbus.
32. Hoy, W.K., & Miskel, C.W. (1996). Educational administration: Theory into practice (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
33. Hoy, W., & Sabo, D. (1998). Quality middle schools: Open and healthy. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
34. Hoy, W.K., Sabo, D., & Barnes, K. (1996). Organizational health and faculty trust: A view from the middle level. Research in Middle Level Education Quarterly, 19, 21–39.
35. Hoy, W.K., & Tarter, C.J. (1997). The road to open and healthy schools: A handbook of change (Middle and secondary school ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
36. Hoy, W.K., Tarter, C.J., & Kottkamp, R.B. (1991). Open schools/healthy schools: Measuring organizational climate. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
37. Hoy, W.K., & Woolfolk, A.E. (1993). Teachers' sense of efficacy and the organizational health of schools. The Elementary School Journal, 93(4), 355–372.
38. Ivey, G., & Broaddus, K. (2000). Tailoring the fit: Reading instruction and the middle school readers. The Reading Teacher, 54, 68–78.
39. Jackson, A.W., & Davis, G.A. (2000). Turning points 2000: Educating adolescents in the 21st century. New York: Teachers College Press.
40. Knickerbocker, J.L., & Rycik, J.A. (2006). Reexamining literature study in the middle grades: A critical response framework. American Secondary Education, 34(3), 43–56.
41. Langer, J. (2000). Guidelines for teaching middle and high school students to read and write well: Six features of e fective instruction [Booklet]. Albany, NY: National Research Center on English Learning and Achievement.
42. Lenters, K. (2006). Resistance, struggle, and the adolescent reader. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 50(2), 136–146.
43. Maslow, A. (1943). A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 50(4), 370–396.
44. Mayo, E. (1933). The social problems of an industrialized civilization. New York: Free Press.
45. McGregor, D. (1960). The human side of the enterprise. New York: McGraw-Hill.
46. McPartland, J., Balfanze, R., Jordon, W., & Legters, N. (1998). Improving climate and achievement in troubled urban high schools through the talent development model. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 3(4), 337–361.
47. Mertens, S.B., & Flowers, N. (2003). Middle school practices improve student achievement in high poverty schools. Middle School Journal, 35(1), 33–43.
48. Miles, M.B. (1969). Planned change and organizational health: Figure and ground. In F. D. Carver & T. J. Sergiovanni (Eds.), Organizations and human behavior: Focus on schools (pp. 375–391). New York: McGraw-Hill.
49. Mitchard, J. (2006, August 13). The popular newswoman as you've never seen her: Katie unplugged. Parade: The Sunday Newspaper Magazine, pp. 4–6.
50. Murphy, J., & Datnow, A. (2003). Leadership lessons from comprehensive school reforms. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
51. Murphy, J., & Hallinger, P. (1992). The principalship in an era of transformation. Journal of Educational Administration, 30(3), 77–88.
52. National Center for Educational Statistics. (2005). Long-term trends: Reading. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.
53. National Middle School Association. (2003). This we believe: Successful schools for young adolescents. Westerville, OH: Author.
54. National Middle School Association. (2006a). Federal policy brief on middle level education issues. Retrieved August 1, 2006, from http://nmsa.org/portals/0/pdf/advocacy/policy_guide/Federal_Policy_Brief.pdf
55. National Middle School Association. (2006b). Success in the middle: A policymaker's guide to achieving quality middle level education. Westerville, OH: Author.
56. Newmann, F.M., Rutter, R.A., & Smith, M.S. (1989). Organizational factors that affect school sense of efficacy, community and expectations. Sociology of Education, 62, 221–225.
57. North Carolina Department of Public Instruction. (2006). Statewide accountability standards. Retrieved July 16, 2006, from http://www.ncpublicschools.org/student_promotion/draft_standards.html
58. North Carolina School Report Card. (2006). NC school report cards, 2004–05. Retrieved July 15, 2006, from http://www.ncreportcards.org/src/main.jsp?pList=2&pYear=2004–2005
59. Parsons, T. (1958). Some ingredients of a general theory of formal organization. In A. Halpin (Ed.), Administrative theory in education (pp. 40–72). Chicago: University of Chicago, Midwest Administration Center.
60. Parsons, T., Bales, R.F., & Shils, E.A. (1953). Working papers in the theory of action. Glencoe, IL: Free Press.
61. Pitcher, S., Albright, L.K., DeLaney, C.J., Walker, N.T., Seunarinesingh, K., Mogge, S., et al. (2007). Assessing adolescents' motivation to read. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 50, 378–396.
62. Purkey, S.C., & Smith, M.S. (1983). Effective schools: A review. Elementary School Journal, 83, 427–453.
63. Ross, J.A. (1994). The impact of an inservice to promote cooperative learning on the stability of teacher efficacy. Teaching and Teacher Education, 10, 381–394.
64. Santa, C.M. (2006). A vision for adolescent literacy: Ours or theirs? Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 49, 466–476.
65. Stedman, L.C. (1987). It's time we changed the effective school formula. Phi Delta Kappan, 69, 214–224.
66. Stevens, R.J. (2001). Student team reading and writing: A cooperative learning approach to middle school literacy instruction. Educational Research and Evaluation, 9(2), 137–160.
67. Tagiuri, R. (1968). The concept of organizational climate. In R. Tagiuri & G. W. Litwin (Eds.), Organizational climate: Explorations of a concept (pp. 1–32). Boston: Harvard University, Graduate School of Business Administration, Division of Research.
68. Tarter, C.J., Sabo, D., & Hoy, W.J. (1995). Middle school climate, faculty trust, and effectiveness: A path analysis. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 29, 41–49.
69. Thompson, S. (2002). Reculturing middle schools to use cross-curricular portfolios to support integrated learning. In V. A. Anfara Jr. & S. L. Stacki (Eds.), Middle school curriculum, instruction, and assessment (pp. 157–179). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
70. Tschannen-Moran, M., Woolfolk Hoy, A., & Hoy, W.K. (1998). Teacher efficacy: Its meaning and measure. Review of Educational Research, 68, 202–248.
71. Vaca, R.T. (1998). Let's not marginalize adolescent literacy. Journal of Adolescent Literacy, 41, 604–609.
72. Watkins, J.M., Cox, P., Owen, J.M., & Burkhardt, G. (1992). Designing assessments for learner- and learning-centered schools. Andover, MA: Regional Laboratory for Educational Improvement of the Northeast and Islands.
73. Wise, B. (2005). Improving adolescent literacy. Middle Matters, 14(1). Retrieved October 4, 2007, from http://www.naesp.org/ContentLoad.do?contentId=1695
74. Wolk, S. (2003). Hearts and minds. Educational Leadership, 61(1), 14–18.