Persuasion: From Single to Multiple to Metacognitive Processes

Perspectives on Psychological Science

Volumn 3, Issue 2, 2008, Pages 137-147

  Petty, Richard E ^a   Briñol, Pablo ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84993690157     PISSN: 17456916     EISSN: 17456924     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6916.2008.00071.x     Document Type: Article

References (88)

1. Asch S.E. (1948). The doctrine of suggestion, prestige, and imitation in social psychology. Psychological Review,55,250–276.
2. Baker S.M. Petty R.E. (1994). Majority and minority influence: Source advocacy as a determinant of message scrutiny. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,67,5–19.
3. Beck A.T. Greenberg R.L. (1994). Brief cognitive therapies. In Ed. Bergin A.E. Garfield S.L. (Eds.),Handbook of psychotherapy and behavior change (pp. 230–249). New York: Wiley.
4. Briñol P. Petty R.E. (2003). Overt head movements and persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,84,1123–1139.
5. Briñol P. Petty R.E. Barden J. (2007). Happiness versus sadness as a determinant of thought confidence in persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,93,711–727.
6. Briñol P. Petty R.E. Gallardo I. DeMarree K.G. (2007). The effects of self-affirmation in non-threatening persuasion domains: Timing affects the process. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,33,1533–1546.
7. Briñol P. Petty R.E. Tormala Z.L. (2004). The self-validation of cognitive responses to advertisements. Journal of Consumer Research,30,559–573.
8. Briñol P. Petty R.E. Valle C. Rucker D.D. Becerra A. (2007). The effects of message recipients' power before and after persuasion: A self-validation analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,93,1040–1053.
9. Brock T. (1967). Communication discrepancy and intent to persuade as determinants of counterargument production. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,3,269–309.
10. Burnkrant R.E. Unnava R. (1989). Self-referencing: A strategy for increasing processing of message content. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,15,628–638.
11. Cacioppo J.T. Petty R.E. (1979). The effects of message repetition and position on cognitive responses, recall, and persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,37,97–109.
12. Cacioppo J.T. Petty R.E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,42,116–131.
13. Cacioppo J.T. Priester J.R. Berntson G.G. (1993). Rudimentary determinants of attitudes: II. Arm flexion and extension have differential effects on attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,65,5–17.
14. Carver C.S. (2005). Impulse and constraint: Some perspectives from personality psychology, convergence with theory in other areas, and potential for integration. Personality and Social Psychology Review,9,312–333.
15. Chaiken S. (1980). Heuristic versus systematic information processing in the use of source versus message quest in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,39,752–766.
16. Chaiken S. Liberman A. Eagly A.H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In Ed. Uleman J.S. Bargh J.A. (Eds.),Unintended thought (pp. 212–252). New York: Guilford Press.
17. Chaiken S. Maheswaran D. (1994). Heuristic processing can bias systematic processing: Effects of source credibility, argument ambiguity, and task importance on attitude judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,66,460–473.
18. Chaiken S. Trope Y. (Eds.). (1999). Dual process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford Press.
19. DeBono K.G. Harnish R.J. (1988). Source expertise, source attractiveness, and processing or persuasive information: A functional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,55,541–546.
20. DeSteno D. Petty R.E. Wegener D.T. Rucker D.D. (2000). Beyond valence in the perception of likelihood: The role of emotion specificity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,78,397–416.
21. Dijksterhuis A. Nordgren L.F. (2006).A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science,1,95–109.
22. Eagly A.H. Chaiken S. (1993). The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt, Brace, Jovanovich.
23. Epstein S. (2003). Cognitive-experiential self-theory of personality. In Ed. Millon T. Lerner M.J. (Eds.),Handbook of psychology (Vol. 5, pp. 159–184). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
24. Fazio R.H. (1986). How do attitudes guide behavior? In Ed. Sorrentino R.M. Higgins E.T. (Eds.),The handbook of motivation and cognition: Foundations of social behavior (pp. 204–243). New York: Guilford Press.
25. Fazio R.H. Williams C.J. (1986). Attitude accessibility as a moderator of the attitude-perception and attitude-behavior relations: An investigation of the 1984 presidential election. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51,505–514.
26. Fazio R.H. Zanna M.P. (1978). Attitudinal qualities relating to the strength of the attitude-behavior relationship. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,14,398–408.
27. Festinger L. (1957).A theory of cognitive dissonance. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
28. Festinger L. Macoby M. (1964). On resistance to persuasive communication. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,68,359–366.
29. Forgas J. (1995). Mood and judgment: The affect infusion model (AIM). Psychological Bulletin,117,39–66.
30. Freud S. (1962). The ego and the id (J. Riviere, Trans.). New York: Norton. (Original work published 1923)
31. Friestad M. Wright P. (1995). Persuasion knowledge: Lay people's and researches' beliefs about the psychology of persuasion. Journal of Consumer Research,27,123–156.
32. Greenwald A.G. (1968). Cognitive learning, cognitive response to persuasion, and attitude change. In Ed. Greenwald A. Brock T. Ostrom T. (Eds.),Psychological foundations of attitudes (pp. 147–170). New York: Academic Press.
33. Greenwald A.G. Banaji M. (1995). Implicit social cognition: Attitudes, self-esteem, and stereotypes. Psychological Review,102,4–27.
34. Heesacker M.H. Petty R.E. Cacioppo J.T. (1983). Field dependence and attitude change: Source credibility can alter persuasion by affecting message-relevant thinking. Journal of Personality,51,653–666.
35. Hovland C.I. Janis I.L. Kelley H.H. (1953). Communication and persuasion: Psychological studies of opinion change. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
36. Jost J.T. Kruglanski A.W. Nelson T.O. (1998). Social meta-cognition: An expansionist review. Personality and Social Psychology Review,2,137–154.
37. Kahneman D. (2003).A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist,58,697–720.
38. Kelman H.C. (1958). Compliance, identification and internalization: Three processes of attitude change. Journal of Conflict Resolution,2,51–60.
39. Kelman H.C. Eagly A.H. (1965). Attitude toward the communicator, perception of communication content, and attitude change. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,1,68–78.
40. Kelman H.C. Hovland C.I. (1953).“Reinstatement” of the communicator in delayed measurement of opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,48,327–335.
41. Koriat A. Goldsmith M. (1996). Monitoring and control processes in the strategic regulation of memory accuracy. Psychological Review,103,490–517.
42. Kruglanski A.W. Erb H.P. Pierro A. Mannetti L. Chun W.Y. (2006). On parametric continuities in the world of binary either ors. Psychological Inquiry,17,153–165.
43. Kruglanski A.W. Raviv A. Bar-Tal D. Raviv A. Sharvit K. Ellis S., et al. (2005). Says who? Epistemic authority effects in social judgment. In Ed. Zanna M.P. (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 37, pp. 346–392). San Diego: Academic Press.
44. Kruglanski A.W. Thompson E.P. (1999). Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel. Psychological Inquiry,10,83–110.
45. Lieberman M.D. (2000). Intuition: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychological Bulletin,126,109–137.
46. Mackie D.M. Worth L.T. (1989). Cognitive deficits and the mediation of positive affect in persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,57,27–40.
47. Martin L.L. Ward D.W. Achee J.W. Wyer R.S. (1993). Mood as input: People have to interpret the motivational implications of their moods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,64,317–326.
48. McGuire W.J. (1969). The nature of attitudes and attitude change. In Ed. Lindzey G. Aronson E. (Ed.),Handbook of social psychology (Vol. 3, pp. 136–314). Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
49. McGuire W.J. (1985). Attitudes and attitude change. In Ed. Lindzey G. Aronson E. (Eds.),Handbook of social psychology (3rd ed.,Vol. 2, pp. 233–346). New York: Random House.
50. Murphy G. Murphy L.B. Newcomb T.N. (Eds.). (1937). Experimental social psychology. New York: Harper.
51. Nelson T.O. (1992). Meta-cognition: Core readings. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
52. Petty R.E. (1997). The evolution of theory and research in social psychology: From single to multiple effect and process models. In Ed. McGarty C. Haslam S.A. (Eds.),The message of social psychology: Perspectives on mind in society (pp. 268–290). Oxford, England: Blackwell.
53. Petty R.E. BriñolP. (2006). Understanding social judgment: Multiple systems and processes. Psychological Inquiry,17,217–223.
54. Petty R.E. Briñol P. Tormala Z.L. (2002). Thought confidence as a determinant of persuasion: The self-validation hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,82,722–741.
55. Petty R.E. Briñol P. Tormala Z.L. Wegener D.T. (2007). The role of meta-cognition in social judgment. In Ed. Higgins E.T. Kruglanski A.W. (Eds.),Social psychology: A handbook of basic principles (2nd ed., pp. 254–284). New York: Guilford Press.
56. Petty R.E. Cacioppo J.T. (1979). Issue involvement can increase or decrease persuasion by enhancing message-relevant cognitive responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,37,1915–1926.
57. Petty R.E. Cacioppo J.T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IA: William C. Brown.
58. Petty R.E. Cacioppo J.T. (1984). The effects of involvement on responses to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,46,69–81.
59. Petty R.E. Cacioppo J.T. (1986). Communication and persuasion: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York: Springer-Verlag.
60. Petty R.E. Cacioppo J.T. Goldman R. (1981). Personal involvement as a determinant of argument-based persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,41,847–855.
61. Petty R.E. Cacioppo J.T. Heesacker M. (1981). The use of rhetorical questions in persuasion: A cognitive response analysis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,40,432–440.
62. Petty R.E. Fabrigar L.R. Wegener D.T. (2003). Emotional factors in attitudes and persuasion. In Ed. Davidson R.J. Scherer K.R. Goldsmith H.H. (Eds.),Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 752–772). Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
63. Petty R.E. Haugtvedt C. Smith S.M. (1995). Elaboration as a determinant of attitude strength: Creating attitudes that are persistent, resistant, and predictive of behavior. In Ed. Petty R.E. Krosnick J.A. (Eds.),Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences (pp. 93–130). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
64. Petty R.E. Krosnick J.A. (Eds.). (1995). Attitude strength: Antecedents and consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
65. Petty R.E. Ostrom T.M. Brock T.C. (1981). Cognitive responses in persuasion. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
66. Petty R.E. Schumann D.W. Richman S.A. Strathman A.J. (1993). Positive mood and persuasion: Different roles for affect under high and low elaboration conditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,64,5–20.
67. Petty R.E. Wegener D.T. (1998). Attitude change: Multiple roles for persuasion variables. In Ed. Gilbert D. Fiske S. Lindzey G. (Eds.),The handbook of social psychology (4th ed.,Vol. 1, pp. 323–390). New York: McGraw-Hill.
68. Petty R.E. Wegener D.T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In Ed. Chaiken S. Trope Y. (Eds.),Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 41–72). New York: Guilford Press.
69. Petty R.E. Wells G.L. Brock T.C. (1976). Distraction can enhance or reduce yielding to propaganda: Thought disruption versus effort justification. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,34,874–884.
70. Petty R.E. Wheeler S.C. Bizer G.Y. (1999). Is there one persuasion process or more? Lumping versus splitting in attitude change theories. Psychological Inquiry,10,156–163.
71. Pierro A. Mannetti L. Kruglanski A.W. Sleeth-Keppler D. (2004). Relevance override: On the reduced impact of cues under high motivation conditions of persuasion studies. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,86,252–264.
72. Schneider W. Shiffrin R. (1977). Controlled and automatic information processing: I. Detection, search, and attention. Psychological Review,84,1–66.
73. Schwarz N. Bless H. Bohner G. (1991). Mood and persuasion: Affective status influence the processing of persuasive communications. In Ed. Zanna M. (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 24, pp. 161–197). San Diego, CA: Academia Press.
74. Sherif M. (1977). Crisis in social psychology: Some remarks towards breaking through the crisis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,3,368–382.
75. Slovic P. Finucane M.L. Peters E. Macgregor D.G. (2002). The affect heuristic. In Ed. Gilovich T. Griffin D. Kahneman D. (Eds.),Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment (pp. 397–420). New York: Cambridge University Press.
76. Smith E.R. DeCoster J. (2000). Dual process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review,4,108–131.
77. Smith S.M. Petty R.E. (1996). Message framing and persuasion: A message processing analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,22,257–268.
78. Strack F. Deutsch R. (2004). Reflective and impulsive determinants of social behavior. Personality and Social Psychology Review,8,220–247.
79. Tiedens L.Z. Linton S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,81,973–988.
80. Tom G. Pettersen P. Lau T. Burton T. Cook J. (1991). The role of overt head movement in the formation of affect. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,12,281–289.
81. Tormala Z.L. Briñol P. Petty R.E. (2006). When credibility attacks: The reverse impact of source credibility on persuasion. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology,42,684–691.
82. Tormala Z.L. Petty R.E. BriñolP. (2002). Ease of retrieval effects in persuasion: The roles of elaboration and thought-confidence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin,28,1700–1712.
83. Velten E. (1968).A laboratory task for induction of mood states. Behavior Research and Therapy,6,473–482.
84. Wegener D.T. Petty R.E. (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naive theories of bias in bias correction. In Ed. Zanna M.P. (Ed.),Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 141–208). San Diego: Academic Press.
85. Weiss W. (1953).A “sleeper” effect on opinion change. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology,48,173–180.
86. Wells G.L. Petty R.E. (1980). The effects of overt head movements on persuasion: Compatibility and incompatibility of responses. Basic and Applied Social Psychology,1,219–230.
87. Wood W.W. Kallgren C.A. Preisler R.M. (1985). Access to attitude relevant information in memory as a determinant of persuasion: The role of message attributes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,21,73–85.
88. Zajonc R.B. Markus H. (1982). Affective and cognitive factors in preferences. Journal of Consumer Research,9,123–131.