Understanding social judgment: Multiple systems and processes

Psychological Inquiry

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 217-223

  Petty, Richard E ^a   Briñol, Pablo ^b  

^a OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSIDAD AUTÓNOMA DE MADRID   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33845327124     PISSN: 1047840X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Note

References (36)

1. Bem, D. J. (1972). Self-perception theory. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol 6, pp. 1-62). New York: Academic.
2. Cacioppo, J. T., Berntson, G. G., Lorig, T. S., Norris, C. J., Rickett, E., & Nusbaum, H. (2003). Just because you're imaging the brain doesn't mean you can stop using your head: A primer and set of first principles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 650-661.
3. Cacioppo, J. T., Gardner, W., & Berntsen, G. (1999). The affect system has parallel and integrative processing components: Form follows function. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 839-855.
4. Carver, C. S. (2005). Impulse and constraint: Some perspectives from personality psychology, convergence with theory in other areas, and potential for integration. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 9, 312-333.
5. Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processes within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford.
6. Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999) Dual-process theories in social psychology. New York: Guilford.
7. Dunn, J. C., & Kirsner, K. (2003). What can we infer from double dissociations? Cortex, 39, 1-7.
8. Fazio, R. H., Zanna, M. P., & Cooper, J. (1977). Dissonance and self-perception: An integrative view of each theory's proper domain of application. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 13, 464-479.
9. Festinger, L. (1957). A theory of cognitive dissonance. Evanston, IL: Row Peterson.
10. Fishbein, M., & Middlestadt, S. E. (1995). Noncognitive effects on attitude formation and change: Fact or artifact? Journal of Consumer Psychology, 6, 107-115.
11. Jacoby, L. L. (1991). A process-dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
12. Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice: Mapping bounded rationality. American Psychologist, 58, 697-720.
13. Kokis, J. V., McPherson, R., Toplak, M. E., Stanovich, R. F., & West, K. E. (2002). Heuristic and analytic processing: Age trends and associations with cognitive ability and cognitive style. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 83, 26-52.
14. Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1999). Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 83-109.
15. Larsen, J. T., McGraw, J. P., Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Can people feel happy and sad at the same time? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 684-696.
16. Lieberman, M. D. (2003). Reflexive and reflective judgmental processes: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. In J. P. Forgas, K. D. Williams, & W. von Hippel (Eds.), Social judgments: Implicit and explicit processes (pp. 44-67). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
17. Martin, L. L., Seta, J. J., & Crelia, R. A. (1990). Assimilation and contrast as a function of people's willingness and ability to expend effort in forming and impression. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 27-37.
18. Millar, M. G., & Tesser, A. (1992). The role of beliefs and feelings in guiding behavior: The mis-match model. In L. Martin & A. Tesser (Eds.), Construction of social judgment (pp. 277-300). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
19. Muller, D., Judd, C. M., & Yzerbyt, V. Y. (2005). When moderation is mediated and mediation is moderated. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 852-863.
20. Newby-Clark, I. R., McGregor, I., & Zanna, M. P. (2002). Thinking and caring about cognitive inconsistency: When and for whom does attitudinal ambivalence feel uncomfortable? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 82, 157-166.
21. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984a). The effects of involvement on response to argument quantity and quality: Central and peripheral routes to persuasion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 69-81.
22. Petty, R. E.. & Cacioppo, J. T. (1984b). Source factors and the elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. Advances in Consumer Research, 11, 668-672.
23. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The Elaboration Likelihood Model of persuasion. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205). New York: Academic.
24. Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1993). Flexible correction processes in social judgment: Correcting for context induced contrast. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 137-165.
25. Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The Elaboration Likelihood Model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 41-72). New York: Guilford.
26. Petty, R. E., Wheeler, S, C., & Bizer, G. Y. (1999). Is there one persuasion process or more? Lumping versus splitting in altitude change theories. Psychological Inquiry, 10, 156-163.
27. Priester, J. M., & Petty, R. E. (1996). The gradual threshold model of ambivalence: Relating the positive and negative bases of attitudes to subjective ambivalence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71, 431-449.
28. Sloman, S. A., (1996). The empirical case for two forms of reasoning. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 3-22.
29. Smith, E. R., & DeCoster, J. (2000). Dual process models in social and cognitive psychology: Conceptual integration and links to underlying memory Systems. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 4, 108-131.
30. Spencer, S. J., Zanna, M. P., & Fong, G. T. (2005). Establishing a causal chain: Why experiments are often more effective than mediational analyses in examining psychological processes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 845-851.
31. Strack, F., & Mussweiler, T. (2001). Resisting influence: Judgmental correction and its goals. In J. Forgas & K. Williams (Eds.), Social influence processes: Direct and indirect influences (pp. 199-212). New York: The Psychology Press.
32. Vargas, P. T. (2004). The relationship between implicit attitudes and behavior: Some lessons from the past and directions for the future. In G. Haddock & G. R. Maio (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on the psychology of attitudes (pp. 275-297). New York: Psychology Press.
33. Wegener, D. T., & Carlston, D. (2005). Cognitive processes in attitude formation and change. In D. Albarracin, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 403-542). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
34. Wegener, D. T., Clark, J. K., & Petty, R. E. (2006). Not all stereotyping is created equal: Differential consequences of thoughtful versus nonthoughtul stereotyping. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90, 42-59.
35. Wegener, D. T., & Petty, R. E. (1997). The flexible correction model: The role of naive theories of bias in bias correction. In M. P. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 29, pp. 141-208). San Diego: Academic.
36. Zajonc, R. B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 157-193.