Genome evolution in the allotetraploid frog Xenopus laevis

Nature

Volumn 538, Issue 7625, 2016, Pages 336-343

  Session, Adam M ^a,b   Uno, Yoshinobu ^c   Kwon, Taejoon ^d,e   Chapman, Jarrod A ^b   Toyoda, Atsushi ^f   Takahashi, Shuji ^g   Fukui, Akimasa ^h   Hikosaka, Akira ⁱ   Suzuki, Atsushi ^g   Kondo, Mariko ^j   Van Heeringen, Simon J ^k   Quigley, Ian ^l   Heinz, Sven ^l   Ogino, Hajime ^m   Ochi, Haruki ⁿ   Hellsten, Uffe ^b   Lyons, Jessica B ^a   Simakov, Oleg ^o   Putnam, Nicholas ^p   Stites, Jonathan ^p   Kuroki, Yoko ^q   Tanaka, Toshiaki ^r   Michiue, Tatsuo ^j   Watanabe, Minoru ^s   Bogdanovic, Ozren ^t   Lister, Ryan ^t   Georgiou, Georgios ^k   Paranjpe, Sarita S ^k   Van Kruijsbergen, Ila ^k   Shu, Shengquiang ^b   Carlson, Joseph ^b   Kinoshita, Tsutomu ^u   Ohta, Yuko ^v   Mawaribuchi, Shuuji ^w   Jenkins, Jerry ^b,x   Grimwood, Jane ^b,x   Schmutz, Jeremy ^b,x   Mitros, Therese ^a   Mozaffari, Sahar V ^y   Suzuki, Yutaka ^j   Haramoto, Yoshikazu ^z   Yamamoto, Takamasa S ^aa   Takagi, Chiyo ^aa   Heald, Rebecca ^a   Miller, Kelly ^a   Haudenschild, Christian ^ab   Kitzman, Jacob ^ac   Nakayama, Takuya ^ad   Izutsu, Yumi ^ae   Robert, Jacques ^af   Fortriede, Joshua ^ag   Burns, Kevin ^ag   Lotay, Vaneet ^ah   Karimi, Kamran ^ah   Yasuoka, Yuuri ^o   Dichmann, Darwin S ^a   Flajnik, Martin F ^v   Houston, Douglas W ^ai   Shendure, Jay ^ac   Dupasquier, Louis ^aj   Vize, Peter D ^ah   Zorn, Aaron M ^ag   Ito, Michihiko ^w   Marcotte, Edward M ^d   Wallingford, John B ^d   Ito, Yuzuru ^z   Asashima, Makoto ^z   Ueno, Naoto ^aa,ak   Matsuda, Yoichi ^c   Veenstra, Gert Jan C ^k   Fujiyama, Asao ^f,ak,al   Harland, Richard M ^a   Taira, Masanori ^j,am   Rokhsar, Daniel S ^a,b,o   more..

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b U S DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY   (United States)

^c NAGOYA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^e Ulsan National Institute of Science and Technology   (South Korea)

^f NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF GENETICS   (Japan)

^g HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^h HOKKAIDO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

ⁱ HIROSHIMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^j UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^k RADBOUD UNIVERSITY NIJMEGEN   (Netherlands)

^l SALK INSTITUTE FOR BIOLOGICAL STUDIES   (United States)

^m NAGAHAMA INSTITUTE OF BIO SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

ⁿ YAMAGATA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^o OKINAWA INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY GRADUATE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^p Dovetail Genomics   (United States)

^q NATIONAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOR CHILD HEALTH AND DEVELOPMENT   (Japan)

^r TOKYO INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (Japan)

^s UNIVERSITY OF TOKUSHIMA   (Japan)

^t UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^u RIKKYO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^v UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^w KITASATO UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^x HUDSONALPHA INSTITUTE FOR BIOTECHNOLOGY   (United States)

^y UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO   (United States)

^z NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF ADVANCED INDUSTRIAL SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AIST   (Japan)

^aa NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR BASIC BIOLOGY   (Japan)

^ab ILLUMINA INC   (United States)

^ac UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^ad UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^ae NIIGATA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^af UNIVERSITY OF ROCHESTER MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^ag CINCINNATI CHILDREN S HOSPITAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION   (United States)

^ah UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^ai UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

^aj UNIVERSITY OF BASEL   (Switzerland)

^ak GRADUATE UNIVERSITY FOR ADVANCED STUDIES   (Japan)

^al NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF INFORMATICS   (Japan)

^am Personalis   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA; MITOCHONDRIAL PROTEIN; PROTEIN; TRANSPOSON;

CHROMOSOME; FROG; GENE EXPRESSION; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; GENOME; PARTITIONING; PROTEIN;

ALLOPOLYPLOIDY; ANIMAL CELL; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIPLOIDY; DNA FLANKING REGION; DNA METHYLATION; EVOLUTIONARY RATE; FEMALE; GENE DELETION; GENE EXPRESSION; GENE LOSS; GENE REARRANGEMENT; GENE SEQUENCE; GENETIC CONSERVATION; GENOME; MULTIGENE FAMILY; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PSEUDOGENE; SEX CHROMOSOME; SEX DETERMINATION; TETRAPLOIDY; TRANSPOSON; UNINDEXED SEQUENCE; XENOPUS LAEVIS; XENOPUS TROPICALIS; ANIMAL; CHROMOSOME; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENETICS; KARYOTYPE; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; MOLECULAR GENETICS; MUTAGENESIS; PHYLOGENY; XENOPUS;

ANURA; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOMES; CONSERVED SEQUENCE; DIPLOIDY; DNA TRANSPOSABLE ELEMENTS; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; GENE DELETION; GENE EXPRESSION PROFILING; GENOME; KARYOTYPE; MOLECULAR SEQUENCE ANNOTATION; MUTAGENESIS; PHYLOGENY; PSEUDOGENES; TETRAPLOIDY; XENOPUS; XENOPUS LAEVIS;

EID: 84992376574     PISSN: 00280836     EISSN: 14764687     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/nature19840     Document Type: Article

References (57)

1. Van de Peer, Y., Maere, S., Meyer, A. The evolutionary significance of ancient genome duplications. Nat. Rev. Genet. 10, 725-732 (2009).
2. Holland, P. W., Garcia-Fernàndez, J., Williams, N. A., Sidow, A. Gene duplications and the origins of vertebrate development. Development Suppl., 125-133 (1994).
3. Muller, H. J. Why polyploidy is rarer in animals than in plants. Am. Nat. 59, 346-353 (1925).
4. Orr, H. A. 'Why polyploidy is rarer in animals than in plants' revisited. Am. Nat. 136, 759-770 (1990).
5. Berthelot, C. et al. The rainbow trout genome provides novel insights into evolution after whole-genome duplication in vertebrates. Nat. Commun. 5, 3657 (2014).
6. Woods, I. G. et al. The zebrafish gene map defines ancestral vertebrate chromosomes. Genome Res. 15, 1307-1314 (2005).
7. Glasauer, S. M. K., Neuhauss, S. C. F. Whole-genome duplication in teleost fishes and its evolutionary consequences. Mol. Genet. Genomics 289, 1045-1060 (2014).
8. Otto, S. P. The evolutionary consequences of polyploidy. Cell 131, 452-462 (2007).
9. Ohno, S. Evolution by Gene Duplication (Springer, 1970).
10. Kobel, H. R., Du Pasquier, L. Genetics of polyploid Xenopus. Trends Genet. 2, 310-315 (1986).
11. Harland, R. M., Grainger, R. M. Xenopus research: metamorphosed by genetics and genomics. Trends Genet. 27, 507-515 (2011).
12. Kuramoto, M. A list of chromosome numbers of anuran amphibians. Bull. Fukuoka Univ. Educ. 39, 83-127 (1990).
13. Bisbee, C. A., Baker, M. A., Wilson, A. C., Haji-Azimi, I., Fischberg, M. Albumin phylogeny for clawed frogs (Xenopus). Science 195, 785-787 (1977).
14. Uno, Y., Nishida, C., Takagi, C., Ueno, N., Matsuda, Y. Homoeologous chromosomes of Xenopus laevis are highly conserved after whole-genome duplication. Heredity 111, 430-436 (2013).
15. Uno, Y. et al. Inference of the protokaryotypes of amniotes and tetrapods and the evolutionary processes of microchromosomes from comparative gene mapping. PLoS One 7, e53027 (2012).
16. Matsuda, Y. et al. A new nomenclature of Xenopus laevis chromosomes based on the phylogenetic relationship to Silurana/Xenopus tropicalis. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 145, 187-191 (2015).
17. Yoshimoto, S. et al. A W-linked DM-domain gene, DM-W, participates in primary ovary development in Xenopus laevis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 2469-2474 (2008).
18. Zhang, X. et al. P instability factor: an active maize transposon system associated with the amplification of Tourist-like MITEs and a new superfamily of transposases. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 12572-12577 (2001).
19. Jurka, J., Kapitonov, V. V. PIFs meet Tourists and Harbingers: a superfamily reunion. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 98, 12315-12316 (2001).
20. Ahn, S. J., Kim, M.-S., Jang, J. H., Lim, S. U., Lee, H. H. MMTS, a new subfamily of Tc1-like transposons. Mol. Cells 26, 387-395 (2008).
21. Morin, R. D. et al. Sequencing and analysis of 10,967 full-length cDNA clones from Xenopus laevis and Xenopus tropicalis reveals post-tetraploidization transcriptome remodeling. Genome Res. 16, 796-803 (2006).
22. Hellsten, U. et al. Accelerated gene evolution and subfunctionalization in the pseudotetraploid frog Xenopus laevis. BMC Biol. 5, 31 (2007).
23. Bewick, A. J., Chain, F. J. J., Heled, J., Evans, B. J. The pipid root. Syst. Biol. 61, 913-926 (2012).
24. Cannatella, D. Xenopus in space and time: fossils, node calibrations, tip-dating, and paleobiogeography. Cytogenet. Genome Res. 145, 283-301 (2015).
25. Voss, S. R. et al. Origin of amphibian and avian chromosomes by fission, fusion, and retention of ancestral chromosomes. Genome Res. 21, 1306-1312 (2011).
26. Ferguson-Smith, M. A., Trifonov, V. Mammalian karyotype evolution. Nat. Rev. Genet. 8, 950-962 (2007).
27. Langham, R. J. et al. Genomic duplication, fractionation and the origin of regulatory novelty. Genetics 166, 935-945 (2004).
28. Haldane, J. B. S. The part played by recurrent mutation in evolution. Am. Nat. 67, 5-19 (1933).
29. Birchler, J. A., Veitia, R. A. Gene balance hypothesis: connecting issues of dosage sensitivity across biological disciplines. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 109, 14746-14753 (2012).
30. Schnable, J. C., Springer, N. M., Freeling, M. Differentiation of the maize subgenomes by genome dominance and both ancient and ongoing gene loss. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 108, 4069-4074 (2011).
31. Sankoff, D., Zheng, C., Wang, B. A model for biased fractionation after whole genome duplication. BMC Genomics 13 (Suppl. 1), S8 (2012).
32. Garsmeur, O. et al. Two evolutionarily distinct classes of paleopolyploidy. Mol. Biol. Evol. 31, 448-454 (2014).
33. Sémon, M., Wolfe, K. H. Preferential subfunctionalization of slow-evolving genes after allopolyploidization in Xenopus laevis. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 105, 8333-8338 (2008).
34. Chain, F. J. J., Dushoff, J., Evans, B. J. The odds of duplicate gene persistence after polyploidization. BMC Genomics 12, 599 (2011).
35. Lee, A. P., Kerk, S. Y., Tan, Y. Y., Brenner, S., Venkatesh, B. Ancient vertebrate conserved noncoding elements have been evolving rapidly in teleost fishes. Mol. Biol. Evol. 28, 1205-1215 (2011).
36. Force, A. et al. Preservation of duplicate genes by complementary, degenerative mutations. Genetics 151, 1531-1545 (1999).
37. Meredith, R. W., Gatesy, J., Murphy, W. J., Ryder, O. A., Springer, M. S. Molecular decay of the tooth gene Enamelin (ENAM) mirrors the loss of enamel in the fossil record of placental mammals. PLoS Genet. 5, e1000634 (2009).
38. Kondrashov, F. A., Koonin, E. V. A common framework for understanding the origin of genetic dominance and evolutionary fates of gene duplications. Trends Genet. 20, 287-290 (2004).
39. Aury, J.-M. et al. Global trends of whole-genome duplications revealed by the ciliate Paramecium tetraurelia. Nature 444, 171-178 (2006).
40. Gout, J.-F., Kahn, D., Duret, L., Paramecium Post-Genomics Consortium. The relationship among gene expression, the evolution of gene dosage, and the rate of protein evolution. PLoS Genet. 6, e1000944 (2010).
41. Yanai, I., Peshkin, L., Jorgensen, P., Kirschner, M. W. Mapping gene expression in two Xenopus species: evolutionary constraints and developmental flexibility. Dev. Cell 20, 483-496 (2011).
42. Langley, A. R., Smith, J. C., Stemple, D. L., Harvey, S. A. New insights into the maternal to zygotic transition. Development 141, 3834-3841 (2014).
43. Marcet-Houben, M., Gabaldón, T. Beyond the whole-genome duplication: phylogenetic evidence for an ancient interspecies hybridization in the baker's yeast lineage. PLoS Biol. 13, e1002220 (2015).
44. McClintock, B. The significance of responses of the genome to challenge. Science 226, 792-801 (1984).
45. Chapman, J. A. et al. Meraculous: de novo genome assembly with short paired-end reads. PLoS One 6, e23501 (2011).
46. Chen, L. et al. Genome architectures revealed by tethered chromosome conformation capture and population-based modeling. Nat. Biotechnol. 30, 90-98 (2011).
47. Putnam, N. H. et al. Chromosome-scale shotgun assembly using an in vitro method for long-range linkage. Genome Res. 26, 342-350 (2016).
48. Chang, C. Y., Witschi, E. Genic control and hormonal reversal of sex differentiation in Xenopus. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. Med. 93, 140-144 (1956).
49. Gilchrist, M. J. From expression cloning to gene modeling: the development of Xenopus gene sequence resources. Genesis 50, 143-154 (2012).
50. Smit, A. F. A., Hubley, R & Green, P. RepeatMasker Open-4.0. http://www. repeatmasker.org.
51. Mitchell, A. et al. The InterPro protein families database: the classification resource after 15 years. Nucleic Acids Res. 43, D213-D221 (2015).
52. Kanehisa, M. et al. Data, information, knowledge and principle: back to metabolism in KEGG. Nucleic Acids Res. 42, D199-D205 (2014).
53. Calvo, S. E., Clauser, K. R., Mootha, V. K. MitoCarta2.0: an updated inventory of mammalian mitochondrial proteins. Nucleic Acids Res. 44, D1251-D1257 (2016).
54. Langfelder, P., Horvath, S. WGCNA: an R package for weighted correlation network analysis. BMC Bioinformatics 9, 559 (2008).
55. Edwards, N. S., Murray, A. W. Identification of Xenopus CENP-A and an associated centromeric DNA repeat. Mol. Biol. Cell 16, 1800-1810 (2005).
56. McLysaght, A. et al. Ohnologs are overrepresented in pathogenic copy number mutations. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 111, 361-366 (2014).
57. Tan, M. H. et al. RNA sequencing reveals a diverse and dynamic repertoire of the Xenopus tropicalis transcriptome over development. Genome Res. 23, 201-216 (2013).