Patient-reported outcome measures in older people with hip fracture: a systematic review of quality and acceptability

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 26, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 799-812

  Haywood, K L ^a   Brett, J ^b   Tutton, E ^a,c   Staniszewska, S ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b OXFORD BROOKES UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c JOHN RADCLIFFE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Acceptability; Hip fracture; Older people; PROM quality; Systematic review

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; OXFORD HIP SCORE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PATIENT-REPORTED OUTCOME; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE ASSESSMENT; SHORT FORM 36; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; AGED; ELDERLY CARE; HIP FRACTURES; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT;

AGED; HEALTH SERVICES FOR THE AGED; HIP FRACTURES; HUMANS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME MEASURES;

EID: 84991822117     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: 15732649     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-016-1424-1     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. British Orthopaedic Association. (2007). The care of patients with fragility fracture (Blue book) BOA. http://www.bgs.org.uk/pdf_cms/pubs/.
2. Johnell, O., & Kanis, J. A. (2004). An estimate of the worldwide prevalence, mortality and disability associated with hip fracture. Osteoporosis International, 15, 897–902.
3. National Hip Fracture Database. (2011). NHFD (2010–2011) Annual report. https://data.gov.uk/dataset/national-hip-fracture-database-annual-report-2010-2011.
4. Ahmad, M. A., Xypnitos, F. N., & Giannoudis, P. V. (2011). Measuring hip outcomes: Common scales and checklists. Injury, 42(3), 259–264.
5. Hutchings, L., Fox, R., & Chesser, T. (2011). Proximal femoral fractures in the elderly: How are we measuring outcome? Injury, 42(11), 1205–1213.
6. Ahmed, S., Berzon, R., Revicki, D. A., et al. (2012). The use of patient reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: Implications for clinical practice and health care policy. Medical Care, 50(12), 1060–1070.
7. Basch, E., Abernethy, A. P., Mullins, C. D., et al. (2012). Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology. Journal of Clinical Oncology, 30(34), 4229–4255.
8. Basch, E. (2012). Beyond the FDA PRO guidance: Steps toward integrating meaningful patient reported outcomes into regulatory trials and US drug labels. Value in Health, 15, 401–403.
9. Barham, L., & Devlin, N. (2011). Patient reported outcome measures: Implications for nursing. Nursing Standard, 25(18), 42–45.
10. Bryant, D. M., Sanders, D. W., Coles, C. P., Petrisor, B. A., Jeray, K. J., & Laflamme, G. Y. (2009). Selection of outcome measures for patients with hip fracture. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 23(6), 434–441.
11. Terwee, C. B., Jansma, E. P., Riphagen, I. I., & de Vet, H. C. (2009). Development of a methodological PubMed search filter for finding studies on measurement properties of measurement instruments. Quality of Life Research, 18(8), 1115–1123.
12. Nilsdotter, A., & Bremander, A. (2011). Measures of hip function and symptoms: Harris hip score (HHS), hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS), Oxford hip score (OHS), Lequesne index of severity for osteoarthritis of the hip (LISOH), and American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) hip and knee questionnaire. Arthritis Care & Research, 63(S11), S200–S207.
13. Elbers, R. G., Reitberg, M. B., van Wegen, E. E., Verhoef, J., Kramer, S., Terwee, C. B., et al. (2012). Self-report fatigue questionnaires in multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease and stroke: A systematic review of measurement properties. Quality of Life Research, 21(6), 925–944.
14. Straus, S., Glasziou, M., Richardson, W., & Haynes, R. (2010). Evidence-based medicine: How to practice and teach it (4th ed.). Churchill Livinstone: Elsevier.
15. Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., Knol, D. L., Ostelo, R. W., Bouter, L. M., & de Vet, H. C. (2012). Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: A scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Quality of Life Research, 21(4), 651–657.
16. Haywood, K. L., Staniszewska, S., & Chapman, S. (2012). Quality and acceptability of patient reported outcome measures in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalitis (CFS/ME): A structured review. Quality of Life Research, 21(2), 35–52.
17. Streiner, D. L., & Norman, G. R. (2014). Health measurement scales: A practical guide to their development and use (5th ed.). USA: Oxford University Press.
18. de Vet, H., Terwee, C. B., Mokkink, L. B., & Knol, D. L. (2011). Measurement in medicine. A practical guide. Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511996214.
19. Terwee, C. B., Bot, S. D., de Boer, M. R., van der Windt, D. A., Knol, D. L., Dekker, J., et al. (2007). Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 60(1), 34–42.
20. Haywood, K. L., Collins, S., & Crawley, E. (2014). Assessing severity of illness and outcomes of treatment in children with chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalitis (CFS/ME): A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures. Child: Care, Health and Development, 40(6), 806–824.
21. Mokkink, L. B., Terwee, C. B., Patrick, D. L., Alonso, J., Stratford, P. W., Knol, D. L., et al. (2010). The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 63(7), 737–745.
22. Staniszewska, S., Haywood, K. L., Brett, J., & Tutton, L. (2012). Patient and public involvement in patient-reported outcome measures: Evolution not revolution. Patient, 5(2), 79–87.
23. Mattsson, P., Alberts, A., Dahlberg, G., Sohlman, M., Hyldahl, H. C., & Larsson, S. (2005). Resorbable cement for the augmentation of internally-fixed unstable trochanteric fractures. A prospective, randomised multicentre study. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 87(9), 1203–1209.
24. Conijn, A. P., Jens, S., Terwee, C. B., Breek, J. C., & Koelemay, M. J. W. (2015). Assessing the quality of available patient reported outcome measures for intermittent claudication: A systematic review using the COSMIN checklist. European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, 49(3), 316–334.
25. Nelson, E., Wasson, J., Kirk, J., Keller, A., Clark, D., Dietrich, A., et al. (1987). Assessment of function in routine clinical practice: description of the COOP Chart method and preliminary findings. Journal of Chronic Diseases, 40(Suppl 1), 55S–69S.
26. Hunt, S. M., McKenna, S. P., McEwen, J., Backett, E. M., Williams, J., & Papp, E. (1980). A quantitative approach to perceived health status: A validation study. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 34(4), 281–286.
27. Burkhardt, C., & Naderson, K. (2003). The quality of life scale: Reliability, validity and utilisation. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes, 1, 60.
28. Ware, J. E., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1994). SF-36 physical and mental health summary scales—a users’ manual. Boston: The Health Institute.
29. Ware, J., Kosinski, M., & Keller, S. D. (1996). A 12-item short-form health survey: Construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Medical Care, 34(3), 220–233.
30. WHOQOL. Group. (1998). WHOQOL manual. Division of mental health and prevention of substance abuse.
31. Group TE. (1990). EuroQol–a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy (Amsterdam, Netherlands), 16(3), 199–208.
32. Torrence, G. W., Feeny, D. H., Furlong, W. J., Barr, R. D., Zhang, Y., & Wang, Q. (1996). Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Medical Care, 34, 702–722.
33. Feeney, D., Furlong, W., Torrence, G. W., & Goldsmith, C. H. (2002). Multiattribute and single attribute utility functions for Health Utility Index Mark 3 system. Medical Care, 40, 113–128.
34. Brazier, J. E., & Roberts, J. R. (2004). The estimation of a preference-based index from the SF-12. Medical Care, 42(9), 851–859.
35. Coast, J., Flynn, T. N., Natarajan, L., et al. (2008). Valuing the ICECAP capability index for older people. Social Science and Medicine, 67, 874–882.
36. Charnley, J. (1972). Long term results of low friction arthroplasty of the hip performed as a primary intervention. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 54, 61–76.
37. Harris, W. H. (1969). Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation in acetabular fractures treatment by mold arthroplasty. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. American Volume, 51, 737–755.
38. Dawson, J., Fitzpatrick, R., Carr, A., & Murray, D. (1996). Oxford hip score: Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement. Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery. British Volume, 78, 185–190.
39. Silverman, S. L. (2000). The Osteoporosis Assessment Questionnaire (OPAQ): A reliable and valid disease-targeted measure of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in osteoporosis. Quality of Life Research, 9, 767–774.
40. Bellamy, N., Buchanan, W. W., Goldsmith, C. H., Campbell, J., & Stitt, L. (1988). Validation study of the WOMAC: A health status instrument for measuring clinically-important patient-relevant outcomes following total hip or knee arthroplasty in osteoarthritis. The Journal of Orthopaedic Rheumatology, 1, 95–108.
41. Brink, T. L., Yesavage, J. A., Lum, O., Heersema, P., Adey, M. B., & Rose, T. L. (1982). Screening tests for geriatric depression. Clinical Gerontologist, 1, 37–44.
42. Hamilton, M. (1960). A rating scale for depression. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 23, 56–62.
43. Zung, W. (1965). A self-rating depression scale. Archives of General Psychiatry, 12(1), 63–70.
44. Mahoney, F. I., & Barthel, D. W. (1965). Functional evaluation: The Barthel index. Maryland State Medical Journal, 14, 61–65.
45. Baker, N. L., Cook, M. N., Arrighi, H. M., & Bullock, R. (2011). Hip fracture risk and subsequent mortality among Alzheimer’s disease patients in the United Kingdom, 1988–2007. Age and Ageing, 40(1), 49–54.
46. Pfeiffer, E., Johnson, T. M., & Chiofolo, R. C. (1981). Functional assessment of elderly subjects in four service settings. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 29, 433–437.
47. Macaulay, W., Nellans, K. W., Garvin, K. L., Iorio, R., Healy, W. L., Rosenwasser, M. P., et al. (2008). Prospective randomized clinical trial comparing hemiarthroplasty to total hip arthroplasty in the treatment of displaced femoral neck fractures: Winner of the Dorr award. The Journal of Arthroplasty, 23(6), 2–8.
48. Jette, A. M., & Cleary, P. D. (1986). Functional disability assessment. Physical Therapy, 67, 1854–1859.
49. Lawton, M. P., Moss, M., Fulcomer, M., & Kleban, M. H. (1982). A research and service oriented multilevel assessment instrument. Journal of Gerontology, 37, 91–99.
50. Katz, J. N., Phillips, C. B., Poss, R., Harrast, J. J., Fossel, A. H., Liang, M. H., et al. (1995). The validity and reliability of a total hip arthroplasty outcome evaluation questionnaire. Journal of Bone & Joint Surgery—American, 77(10), 1528–1534.
51. Fillenbaum, G. G., & Smyer, M. A. (1981). The development, validity, and reliability of the OARS multidimensional functional assessment questionnaire. Journal of Gerontology, 36(4), 426–434.
52. Jones, C. A., & Feeney, D. H. (2005). Agreement between patient and proxy responses of health-related quality of life after hip fracture. Journal of American Geriatrics Society, 53, 1227–1233.
53. Jones, C. A., & Feeny, D. H. (2006). Agreement between patient and proxy responses during recovery after hip fracture: Evidence for the FIM instrument. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87(10), 1382–1387.
54. Parsons, N., Griffin, X. L., Achten, J., & Costa, M. L. (2014). Outcome assessment after hip fracture: Is EQ-5D the answer? Bone & Joint Research, 3(3), 69–75.
55. Borgquist, L., Nilsson, L. T., Lindelöw, G., Wiklund, I., & Thorngren, K. G. (1992). Perceived health in hip-fracture patients: A prospective follow-up of 100 patients. Age and Aging, 21(2), 109–116.
56. Tidermark, J., Zethraeus, N., Svensson, O., Tornkvist, H., & Ponzer, S. (2002). Quality of life related to fracture displacement among elderly patients with femoral neck fractures treated with internal fixation. Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma, 16, 34–38.
57. Tidermark, J., Bergstrom, G., Svensson, O., Tornkvist, H., & Ponzer, S. (2003). Responsiveness of the EuroQol (EQ-5D) and SF-36 in elderly patients with displaced femoral neck fractures. Quality of Life Research, 12(8), 1069–1079.
58. Van Balen, R., Essink-Bot, M. L., Steyerberg, E., Cools, H., & Habbema, D. F. (2003). Quality of life after hip fracture: A comparison of four health status measures in 208 patients. Disability and Rehabilitation, 25(10), 507–519.
59. Inngul, C., Hedbeck, C.-J., Blomfeldt, R., Lapidus, G., Ponzer, S., & Enocson, A. (2013). Unipolar hemiarthroplasty versus bipolar hemiarthroplasty in patients with displaced femoral neck fractures: A four-year follow-up of a randomised controlled trial. International Orthopaedics, 37(12), 2457–2464.
60. Cranney, A. B., Coyle, D., Hopman, W. M., Hum, V., Power, B., & Tugwell, P. S. (2005). Prospective evaluation of preferences and quality of life in women with hip fractures. The Journal of Rheumatology, 32(12), 2393–2399.
61. Latham, N. K., Mehta, V., Nguyen, A. M., Jette, A. M., Olarsch, S., Papanicolaou, D., et al. (2008). Performance-based or self-report measures of physical function: Which should be used in clinical trials of hip fracture patients? Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 89(11), 2146–2155.
62. Jones, C. A., Pohar, S. L., Feeny, D. H., & Eng, K. (2014). Longitudinal construct validity of the Health Utilities Indices Mark 2 and Mark 3 in hip fracture. Quality of Life Research: An International Journal of Quality of Life Aspects of Treatment, Care and Rehabilitation, 23(3), 805–813.
63. Mendelsohn, M. E., Leidl, D. S., Overend, T. J., & Petrella, R. J. (2003). Specificity of functional mobility measures in older adults after hip fracture: A pilot study. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 82(10), 766–774.
64. Tidermark, J., & Bergström, G. (2007). Responsiveness of the EuroQol (EQ-5D) and the Nottingham Health Profile (NHP) in elderly patients with femoral neck fractures. Quality of Life Research, 16(2), 321–330.
65. Hobart, J. C., & Cano, S. J. (2010). Effect sizes can be misleading: Is it time to change the way we measure change? Quality of Life Research, 19, 41.
66. Griffin, X. L., Parsons, N., Achten, J., Fernandez, M., & Costa, M. L. (2015). Recovery of health-related quality of life in a United Kingdom hip fracture population: The Warwick hip trauma evaluation—a prospective cohort study. The Bone & Joint Journal, 97-B(3), 372–382. doi:10.1302/0301-620X.97B3.35738.
67. Buecking, B., Struewer, J., Waldermann, A., Horstmann, K., Schubert, N., Balzer-Geldsetzer, M., et al. (2014). What determines health-related quality of life in hip fracture patients at the end of acute care?—a prospective observational study. Osteoporosis International, 25(2), 475–484. doi:10.1007/s00198-013-2415-5. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
68. Mishra, V., Thomas, G., & Sibly, T. F. (2004). Results of displaced subcapital fractures treated by primary total hip replacement. Injury, 35(2), 157–160.
69. Randell, A. J., Nguyen, T. V., Bhalerao, N., Silverman, S. L., Sambrook, P. N., & Eisman, J. A. (2000). Deterioration in quality of life following hip fracture: A prospective study. Osteoporosis International, 11, 460–466.
70. Rohde, G., Haugeberg, G., Mengshoel, A. M., Moum, T., & Wahl, A. K. (2010). Two-year changes in quality of life in elderly patients with low-energy hip fractures. A case-control study. BMC Musculoskeletal Disorders, 11, 226.
71. Hall, S. E., Williams, J. A., Senior, J. A., Goldswain, P. R., & Criddle, R. A. (2000). Hip fracture outcomes: Quality of life and functional status in older adults living in the community. Australian and New Zealand Journal of Medicine, 30(3), 327–332.
72. Shepherd, S. M., & Prescott, R. J. (1996). Use of standardised assessment scales in elderly hip fracture patients. Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of London, 30(4), 335–343.
73. Griffiths, F., Mason, V., Boardman, F., Dennick, K., Haywood, K., et al. (2015). Evaluating recovery following hip fracture: A qualitative study of what is important to patients. BMJ Open, 5(1), e005406.
74. Haywood, K., Brett, J., Salek, S., Marlett, N., Penman, C., Shklarov, S., et al. (2015). Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: What’s important and why should we care? Quality of Life Research, 24(5), 1069–1076.
75. Seitz, D. P., Adunuri, N., Gill, S. S., & Rochon, P. A. (2011). Prevalence of dementia and cognitive impairment among older adults with hip fractures. Journal of the American Medical Directors Association, 12, 556–564.
76. Allan, L. M., Ballard, C. G., Rowan, E. N., & Kenny, R. A. (2009). Incidence and prediction of falls in dementia: A prospective study in older people. PLoS One, 4(5), e5521.
77. Jones, C. A., & Feeny, D. H. (2006). Agreement between patient and proxy responses during recovery after hip fracture: Evidence for the FIM Instrument. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1382–1387.
78. Fitzpatrick, R., Davey, C., Buxton, M. J., & Jones, D. R. (1998). Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technology Assessment (Winchester, England) 2(14).
79. Binder, E. F., Brown, M., & Sinacore, D. R. (2004). Effects of extended outpatient rehabilitation after hip fracture a randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 292(7), 837–846.
80. Pusic, A. L., Chen, C. M., Cano, S., Klassen, A., McCarthy, C., Collins, E. D., et al. (2007). Measuring quality of life in cosmetic and reconstructive breast surgery: A systematic review of patient-reported outcomes instruments. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, 120(4), 823–837.
81. Garratt, A., Schmidt, L., Mackintosh, A., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2002). Quality of life measurement: Bibliography study of patient assessed health outcome measures. BMJ, 324(7351), 1417.
82. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Food and Drug Administration. (2009). Guidance for industry patient-reported outcome measures: Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/…/Guidances/UCM193282.pdf.
83. Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M., Gray, J. A., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn’t. BMJ, 312(7023), 71–72.
84. Boonen, S., Autier, P., Barette, M., Vanderschueren, D., Lips, P., & Haentjens, P. (2004). Functional outcome and quality of life following hip fracture in elderly women: A prospective controlled study. Osteoporosis International, 15, 87–94.
85. Haywood, K. L., Griffin, X. L., Achten, J., & Costa, M. L. (2014). Developing a care outcome set for hip fracture trials. The Bone & Joint Journal, 96-B(8), 1016–1023.
86. Connell, J., O’Cathain, A., & Brazier, J. (2014). Measuring quality of life in mental health: Are we asking the right questions? Social Science and Medicine, 120, 12–20.
87. Duppils, G. S., & Wikblad, K. (2004). Cognitive function and health-related quality of life after delirium in connection with hip surgery: A six-month follow-up. Orthopaedic Nursing, 23(3), 195–203.