Longitudinal construct validity of the Health Utilities Indices Mark 2 and Mark 3 in hip fracture

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 23, Issue 3, 2014, Pages 805-813

  Jones, C Allyson ^a   Pohar, Sheri L ^b   Feeny, David H ^a,c   Eng, Ken ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

^b CANADIAN AGENCY FOR DRUGS AND TECHNOLOGIES IN HEALTH   (Canada)

^c Health Utilities Incorporated   (Canada)

^d INSTITUTE OF HEALTH ECONOMICS   (Canada)

Author keywords

Functional Independence Measure; Health Utilities Index; Health related quality of life; Hip fracture; Measurement; Validation

Indexed keywords

AGED; ARTICLE; CANADA; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEALTH STATUS INDICATOR; HIP FRACTURE; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MALE; MENTAL HEALTH; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMETRY; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; REPRODUCIBILITY; SELF CARE; STANDARD; TIME; VALIDATION STUDY; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ALBERTA; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HEALTH STATUS INDICATORS; HIP FRACTURES; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS AS TOPIC; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; MENTAL STATUS SCHEDULE; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; PSYCHOMETRICS; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SELF CARE; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 84896945621     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-013-0531-5     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Bentler, S. E.; Liu, L.; Obrizan, M.; Cook, E. A.; Wright, K. B.; Geweke, J. F.; et al. (2009). The aftermath of hip fracture: Discharge placement, functional status change, and mortality. American Journal of Epidemiology, 170, 1290-1299.
2. Jette, A. M.; Harris, B. A.; Cleary, P. D.; & Campion, E. W. (1987). Functional recovery after hip fracture. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 68, 735-740.
3. Magaziner, J.; Simonsick, E. M.; Kashner, T. M.; Hebel, J. R.; & Kenzora, J. E. (1990). Predictors of functional recovery one year following hospital discharge for hip fracture: A prospective study. Journal of Gerontology, 45, M101-M107.
4. Mossey, J. M.; Mutran, E.; Knott, K.; & Craik, R. (1989). Determinants of recovery 12 months after hip fracture: The importance of psychosocial factors. American Journal of Public Health, 79, 279-286.
5. Lyons, A. R. (1997). Clinical outcomes and treatment of hip fractures. American Journal of Medicine, 103, 51S-63S.
6. Tidermark, J.; Zethraeus, N.; Svensson, O.; Tornkvist, H.; & Ponzer, S. (2002). Femoral neck fractures in the elderly: Functional outcome and quality of life according to EuroQol. Quality of Life Research, 11, 473-481.
7. Hallberg, I.; Rosenqvist, A. M.; Kartous, L.; Lofman, O.; Wahlstrom, O.; & Toss, G. (2004). Health-related quality of life after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporosis International, 15, 834-841.
8. Tseng, M. Y.; Shyu, Y. I.; & Liang, J. (2012). Functional recovery of older hip-fracture patients after interdisciplinary intervention follows three distinct trajectories. Gerontologist, 52, 833-842.
9. Revicki, D. A.; Osoba, D.; Fairclough, D.; Barofsky, I.; Berzon, R.; Leidy, N. K.; et al. (2000). Recommendations on health-related quality of life research to support labeling and promotional claims in the United States. Quality of Life Research, 9, 887-900.
10. Guyatt, G. H.; Jaeschke, R.; Feeny, D. H.; & Patrick, D. L. (1996). Measurement in clinical trials: Choosing the right approach. In B. Spilker (Ed.), Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (pp. 41-48). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers.
11. Fayers, P. M.; & Machin, D. (2007). Quality of life: The assessment, analysis and interpretation of patient-reported outcomes. Chicherster: Wiley.
12. Cranney, A. B.; Coyle, D.; Hopman, W. M.; Hum, V.; Power, B.; & Tugwell, P. S. (2005). Prospective evaluation of preferences and quality of life in women with hip fractures. Journal of Rheumatology, 32, 2393-2399.
13. Kavirajan, H.; Hays, R. D.; Vassar, S.; & Vickrey, B. G. (2009). Responsiveness and construct validity of the health utilities index in patients with dementia. Medical Care, 47, 651-661.
14. Naglie, G.; Tomlinson, G.; Tansey, C.; Irvine, J.; Ritvo, P.; Black, S. E.; et al. (2006). Utility-based quality of life measures in Alzheimer's disease. Quality of Life Research, 15, 631-643.
15. Folstein, M. F.; Folstein, S. E.; & McHugh, P. R. (1975). "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198.
16. (1997) Guide for the uniform data set for medical rehabilitation ver 5.1. State University of New York at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214.
17. Petrella, R. J.; Overend, T.; & Chesworth, B. (2002). FIM after hip fracture: Is telephone administration valid and sensitive to change? American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81, 639-644.
18. Torrance, G. W.; Feeny, D. H.; Furlong, W. J.; Barr, R. D.; Zhang, Y.; & Wang, Q. (1996). Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Medical Care, 34, 702-722.
19. Feeny, D. H.; Torrance, G. W.; & Furlong, W. J. (1996). Health Utilities Index. In B. Spilker (Ed.), Quality of life and pharmacoeconomics in clinical trials (pp. 239-252). Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven Publishers.
20. Furlong, W.; Feeny, D.; Torrance, G. W.; Goldsmith, C.; Depauw, S.; Boyle, M.; et al. (1998). Multiplicative Multi-attribute Utility Function for the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 (HUI3) System: A Technical Report. 98-11. (1998). McMaster University Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis Working Paper.
21. Feeny, D.; Furlong, W.; Torrance, G. W.; Goldsmith, C. H.; Zhu, Z.; Depauw, S.; et al. (2002). Multiattribute and single-attribute utility functions for the health utilities index mark 3 system. Medical Care, 40, 113-128.
22. Horsman, J. R.; Fluchel, M.; Furlong, W.; Castillo, L.; & Barr, R. D. (2003). Agreement of Health Utilities Index scores among survivors of cancer in childhood their parents and their doctors in Uruguay. Value in Health, 6, 233.
23. Downie, W. W.; Leatham, P. A.; Rhind, V. M.; Wright, V.; Branco, J. A.; & Anderson, J. A. (1978). Studies with pain rating scales. Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases, 37, 378-381.
24. Jones, C. A.; & Feeny, D. H. (2006). Agreement between patient and proxy responses during recovery after hip fracture: Evidence for the FIM instrument. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 1382-1387.
25. Furlong, W. J.; Feeny, D. H.; Torrance, G. W.; & Barr, R. D. (2001). The Health Utilities Index (HUI) system for assessing health-related quality of life in clinical studies. Annals of Medicine, 33, 375-384.
26. Papaioannou, A.; Kennedy, C. C.; Ioannidis, G.; Sawka, A.; Hopman, W. M.; Pickard, L.; et al. (2009). The impact of incident fractures on health-related quality of life: 5 years of data from the Canadian Multicentre Osteoporosis Study. Osteoporosis International, 20, 703-714.
27. Grootendorst, P.; Feeny, D.; & Furlong, W. (2000). Health Utilities Index Mark 3: Evidence of construct validity for stroke and arthritis in a population health survey. Medical Care, 38, 290-299.
28. Drummond, M. (2001). Introducing economic and quality of life measurements into clinical studies. Annals of Medicine, 33, 344-349.
29. Horsman, J.; Furlong, W.; Feeny, D.; & Torrance, G. (2003). The Health Utilities Index (HUI): Concepts, measurement properties and applications. Health Quality of Life Outcomes, 1, 54.
30. Maddigan, S. L.; Feeny, D. H.; & Johnson, J. A. (2003). A comparison of the Health Utilities Indices Mark 2 and Mark 3 in type 2 diabetes. Medical Decision Making, 23, 489-501.
31. Neumann, P. J.; Sandberg, E. A.; Araki, S. S.; Kuntz, K. M.; Feeny, D.; & Weinstein, M. C. (2000). A comparison of HUI2 and HUI3 utility scores in Alzheimer's disease. Medical Decision Making, 20, 413-422.
32. Granger, C. V.; Cotter, A. C.; Hamilton, B. B.; Fiedler, R. C.; & Hens, M. M. (1990). Functional assessment scales: A study of persons with multiple sclerosis. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 71, 870-875.
33. Beninato, M.; Gill-Body, K. M.; Salles, S.; Stark, P. C.; Black-Schaffer, R. M.; & Stein, J. (2006). Determination of the minimal clinically important difference in the FIM instrument in patients with stroke. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 32-39.
34. Latham, N. K.; Jette, D. U.; Warren, R. L.; & Wirtalla, C. (2006). Pattern of functional change during rehabilitation of patients with hip fracture. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 87, 111-116.
35. Ottenbacher, K. J.; Hsu, Y.; Granger, C. V.; & Fiedler, R. C. (1996). The reliability of the functional independence measure: A quantitative review. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77, 1226-1232.
36. Pollak, N.; Rheault, W.; & Stoecker, J. L. (1996). Reliability and validity of the FIM for persons aged 80 years and above from a multilevel continuing care retirement community. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77, 1056-1061.
37. Granger, C. V.; Hamilton, B. B.; Linacre, J. M.; Heinemann, A. W.; & Wright, B. D. (1993). Performance profiles of the functional independence measure. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 72, 84-89.
38. van der Putten, J. J.; Hobart, J. C.; Freeman, J. A.; & Thompson, A. J. (1999). Measuring change in disability after inpatient rehabilitation: Comparison of the responsiveness of the Barthel index and the Functional Independence Measure. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 66, 480-484.
39. Dodds, T. A.; Martin, D. P.; Stolov, W. C.; & Deyo, R. A. (1993). A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 74, 531-536.
40. Leino, K. A.; Kuusniemi, K. S.; Lertola, K. K.; & Olkkola, K. T. (2011). Comparison of four pain scales in patients with hip fracture or other lower limb trauma. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 55, 495-502.
41. Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155-159.
42. Bishara, A. J.; & Hittner, J. B. (2012). Testing the significance of a correlation with nonnormal data: Comparison of Pearson, Spearman, transformation, and resampling approaches. Psychological Methods, 17, 399-417.
43. Guyatt, G. H.; Berman, L. B.; Townsend, M.; Pugsley, S. O.; & Chambers, L. W. (1987). A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease. Thorax, 42, 773-778.
44. Feeny, D.; Huguet, N.; McFarland, B. H.; & Kaplan, M. S. (2009). The construct validity of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 in assessing mental health in population health surveys. Quality of Life Research, 18, 519-526.
45. Santana, M. J.; Feeny, D.; Ghosh, S.; Nador, R. G.; Weinkauf, J.; Jackson, K.; et al. (2010). The construct validity of the Health Utilities Index Mark 3 in assessing health status in lung transplantation. Health Quality of Life Outcomes, 8, 110.
46. Jones, C. A.; & Feeny, D. H. (2005). Agreement between patient and proxy responses of health-related quality of life after hip fracture. Journal of the American Geriatrics Society, 53, 1227-1233.
47. Bitsch, M.; Foss, N.; Kristensen, B.; & Kehlet, H. (2004). Pathogenesis of and management strategies for postoperative delirium after hip fracture: A review. Acta Orthopaedica Scandinavica, 75, 378-389.
48. Amador, L. F.; & Goodwin, J. S. (2005). Postoperative delirium in the older patient. Journal of the American College of Surgeons, 200, 767-773.