Patient and public engagement in health-related quality of life and patient-reported outcomes research: what is important and why should we care? Findings from the first ISOQOL patient engagement symposium

Quality of Life Research

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2015, Pages 1069-1076

  Haywood, Kirstie ^a   Brett, Jo ^a   Salek, Sam ^b   Marlett, Nancy ^c   Penman, Colin ^c   Shklarov, Svetlana ^c   Norris, Colleen ^d   Santana, Maria Jose ^c   Staniszewska, Sophie ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WARWICK   (United Kingdom)

^b CARDIFF UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALGARY   (Canada)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ALBERTA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Health related quality of life research; ISOQOL; Patient and public involvement; Patient engagement in research; Patient reported outcomes; World caf

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; AUTHORITY; CULTURAL FACTOR; EMPOWERMENT; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; EXPECTATION; EXPLORATORY BEHAVIOR; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; MEDICAL RESEARCH; METHODOLOGY; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT INFORMATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; QUALITY OF LIFE; REWARD; SELECTION BIAS; SOCIAL ASPECT; SUPPORT GROUP; SYMPOSIUM; THEMATIC ANALYSIS; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HEALTH STATUS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; ORGANIZATION; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PROCEDURES; SELF REPORT;

CONGRESSES AS TOPIC; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HEALTH STATUS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; SELF REPORT;

EID: 84928780482     PISSN: 09629343     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11136-014-0796-3     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Staniszewska, S., & Denegri, S. (2013). Patient and public involvement in research: future challenges. Evidence Based Nursing,16(3), 69.
2. Devine, E. B., et al. (2013). A model for incorporating patient and stakeholder voices in a learning health care network: Washington State’s Comparative Effectiveness Research Translation Network. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,66(8 Suppl), S122–S129.
3. Deverka, P. A., et al. (2012). Stakeholder participation in comparative effectiveness research: defining a framework for effective engagement. Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research,1(2), 181–194.
4. Staniszewska, S., et al. (2012). Patient and public involvement in patient-reported outcome measures: evolution not revolution. Patient,5(2), 79–87.
5. Guise, J. M., et al. (2013). A practice-based tool for engaging stakeholders in future research: A synthesis of current practices. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology,66(6), 666–674.
6. Brown, J. I. D. (2005). The World Cafe. Shaping Our Futures Through Conversations That Matter (p. 765). Berrett-Koehler Publishers. Inc.
7. Wilkinson, J. E., et al. (2012). A creative approach to the development of an agenda for knowledge utilization: outputs from the 11th international knowledge utilization colloquium (KU 11). Worldviews on Evidence Based Nursing,9(4), 195–199.
8. Howitt, D. C. D. (2008). Introduction to Research Methods in Psychology (2nd Edition). Pearson Education Ltd.
9. Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. CA: Sage.
10. Beresford, P., & Campbell, J. (1994). Disabled people, service users, user involvement and representation. Disability and Society,9(3), 315–325.
11. Gooberman-Hill, R., Horwood, J., & Calnan, M. (2008). Citizens’ juries in planning research priorities: Process, engagement and outcome. Health Expectations,11(3), 272–281.
12. Hanley, B., Bradburn, J., Gorin, S. et al. (2000). Involving consumers in research and development in the NHS: Briefing notes for researchers.
13. Marlett, N. J., & Emes, C. (2010). Grey Matters: A guide to collaborative research with seniors. Calgary: University of Calgary Press.
14. Nicklin, J., et al. (2010). Collaboration with patients in the design of patient-reported outcome measures: capturing the experience of fatigue in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Care and Research,62(11), 1552–1558.
15. Kirwan, J. R., et al. (2009). Progress on incorporating the patient perspective in outcome assessment in rheumatology and the emergence of life impact measures at OMERACT 9. Journal of Rheumatology,36(9), 2071–2076.
16. Brett, J., et al. (2012). Mapping the impact of patient and public involvement on health and social care research: a systematic review. Health Expect. doi:10.1111/j.1369-7625.2012.00795.x.
17. de Wit, M., Abma, T., Koelewijn-van Loon, M., Collins, S., & Kirwan, J. (2013). Facilitating and inhibiting factors for long-term involvement of patients at outcome conferences–lessons learnt from a decade of collaboration in OMERACT: a qualitative study. BMJ Open,3(8), e003311. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2013-003311.
18. de Wit, M., Abma, T., Koelewijn-van Loon, M., Collins, S., & Kirwan, J. (2013). Involving patient research partners has a significant impact on outcomes research: A responsive evaluation of the international OMERACT conferences. BMJ Open,3(5). pii: e002241. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002241.
19. de Wit, M. P., et al. (2013). If i wasn’t this robust: Patients’ expectations and experiences at the outcome measures in rheumatology conference 2010. Patient,6(3), 179–187.
20. Mullins, C. D., Abdulhalim, A. M., & Lavallee, D. C. (2012). Continuous patient engagement in comparative effectiveness research. JAMA,307(15), 1587–1588.
21. Concannon, T. W., et al. (2012). A new taxonomy for stakeholder engagement in patient-centered outcomes research. Journal of General Internal Medicine,27(8), 985–991.
22. Mockford, C., et al. (2012). The impact of patient and public involvement on UK NHS health care: A systematic review. International Journal for Quality in Health Care,24(1), 28–38.
23. Staniszewska, S., et al. (2011). The GRIPP checklist: strengthening the quality of patient and public involvement reporting in research. International Journal of Technology Assessment in Health Care,27(4), 391–399.
24. Staniszewska, A. A., Barber, R., Beresford, P., Brady, L. M., Brett, J., Elliott, J., et al. (2011). Developing the evidence base of patient and public involvement in health and social care research: The case for measuring impact. International Journal of Consumer Studies.,35, 628–632.
25. Calvert, M., et al. (2013). Reporting of patient-reported outcomes in randomized trials: the CONSORT PRO extension. JAMA,309(8), 814–822.
26. Haywood, K. L., Collin, S. M., & Crawley, E. (2014). Assessing severity of illness and outcomes of treatment in children with Chronic Fatigue Syndrome/Myalgic Encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME): A systematic review of patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). Child Care Health and Development. doi:10.1111/cch.12135.
27. Haywood, K. L., Staniszewska, S., & Chapman, S. (2012). Quality and acceptability of patient-reported outcome measures used in chronic fatigue syndrome/myalgic encephalomyelitis (CFS/ME): A systematic review. Quality of Life Research,21(1), 35–52.