Recommendations for incorporating patient-reported outcomes into clinical comparative effectiveness research in adult oncology

Journal of Clinical Oncology

Volumn 30, Issue 34, 2012, Pages 4249-4255

  Basch, Ethan ^a   Abernethy, Amy P ^b   Mullins, C Daniel ^d   Reeve, Bryce B ^c   Smith, Mary Lou ^f   Coons, Stephen Joel ^g   Sloan, Jeff ^h   Wenzel, Keith ^j   Chauhan, Cynthia ^h   Eppard, Wayland ⁱ   Frank, Elizabeth S ^k   Lipscomb, Joseph ^m   Raymond, Stephen A ^l   Spencer, Merianne ^e   Tunis, Sean ^e  

^a MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING CANCER CENTER   (United States)

^b DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^e Center for Medical Technology Policy   (United States)

^f Research Advocacy Network   (United States)

^g CRITICAL PATH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^h MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

ⁱ North Central Cancer Treatment Group Rochester   (United States)

^j North Central Cancer Treatment Group Patient Advocacy Committee ^*  (United States)

^k DANA FARBER CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^l PHT Corporation   (United States)

^m EMORY UNIVERSITY   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADVANCED CANCER; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS; EDMONTON SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT SCALE; EUROPEAN ORGANISATION FOR RESEARCH AND TREATMENT OF CANCER QUALITY OF LIFE QUESTIONNAIRE; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT OF CHRONIC ILLNESS; FUNCTIONAL STATUS; HEALTH STATUS; HUMAN; LINEAR ANALOG SELF-ASSESSMENT; MD ANDERSON SYMPTOM INVENTORY; MEMORIAL SYMPTOM ASSESSMENT SCALE; METASTASIS; NAMED INVENTORIES, QUESTIONNAIRES AND RATING SCALES; NEOPLASM; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT CARE MONITOR; PATIENT REPORTED OUTCOME; PERSONAL EXPERIENCE; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRO MEASUREMENT INFORMATION SYSTEM; PRO VERSION OF THE COMMON TERMINOLOGY CRITERIA FOR ADVERSE EVENTS; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; QUALITY OF LIFE; REVIEW; ROTTERDAM SYMPTOM CHECKLIST; SELF REPORT; SYMPTOM DISTRESS SCALE; TEST RETEST RELIABILITY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS RESEARCH; HUMANS; MEDICAL ONCOLOGY; NEOPLASMS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); RESEARCH DESIGN; SELF REPORT;

EID: 84870720349     PISSN: 0732183X     EISSN: 15277755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2012.42.5967     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Mullins CD, Montgomery R, Abernethy AP, et al: Recommendations for clinical trials of off-label drugs used to treat advanced stage cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:661-666, 2012
2. Basch E: The missing voice of patients in drug-safety reporting. N Engl J Med 362:865-869, 2010
3. Fromme EK, Eilers KM, Mori M, et al: How accurate is clinician reporting of chemotherapy adverse effects? A comparison with patient-reported symptoms from the Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30. J Clin Oncol 22:3485-3490, 2004
4. Pakhomov SV, Jacobsen SJ, Chute CG, et al: Agreement between patient-reported symptoms and their documentation in the medical record. Am J Manag Care 14:530-539, 2008
5. Abernethy AP, Herndon JE 2nd, Wheeler JL, et al: Feasibility and acceptability to patients of a longitudinal system for evaluating cancer-related symptoms and quality of life: Pilot study of an e/Tablet data-collection system in academic oncology. J Pain Symptom Manage 37:1027-1038, 2009
6. Basch E, Artz D, Dulko D, et al: Patient online self-reporting of toxicity symptoms during chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 23:3552-3561, 2005
7. Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, et al: Health-related quality-of-life assessments and patient-physician communication: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA 288:3027-3034, 2002
8. Detmar SB, Muller MJ, Schornagel JH, et al: Role of health-related quality of life in palliative chemotherapy treatment decisions. J Clin Oncol 20:1056-1062, 2002
9. Greenhalgh J, Meadows K: The effectiveness of the use of patient-based measures of health in routine practice in improving the process and outcomes of patient care: A literature review. J Eval Clin Pract 5:401-416, 1999
10. Snyder CF, Blackford AL, Brahmer JR, et al: Needs assessments can identify scores on HRQOL questionnaires that represent problems for patients: An illustration with the Supportive Care Needs Survey and the QLQ-C30. Qual Life Res 19:837-845, 2010
11. Taenzer P, Bultz BD, Carlson LE, et al: Impact of computerized quality of life screening on physician behaviour and patient satisfaction in lung cancer outpatients. Psychooncology 9:203-213, 2000
12. Velikova G, Booth L, Smith AB, et al: Measuring quality of life in routine oncology practice improves communication and patient well-being: A randomized controlled trial. J Clin Oncol 22:714-724, 2004
13. US Food and Drug Administration: Guidance for industry: Patient-reported outcome measures-Use in medical product development to support labeling claims. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/ Guidances/UCM193282.pdf
14. European Medicines Agency Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use: Preauthorisation evaluation of medicines for human use: Reflection paper on the regulatory guidance for the use of health-related quality of life (HRQL) measures in the evaluation of medicinal products. http://www.ispor.org/ workpaper/emea-hrql-guidance.pdf
15. Lipscomb J, Gotay CC, Snyder CF: Patient-reported outcomes in cancer: A review of recent research and policy initiatives. CA Cancer J Clin 57:278-300, 2007
16. National Cancer Institute: The Nation's Investment in Cancer Research: A Plan and Budget Proposal for Fiscal Year 2008. Bethesda, MD, National Cancer Institute, NIH publication 06-6090, 2008
17. American Cancer Society: 2015 goals of the American Cancer Society. http://relay.acsevents.org/site/DocServer/ACS%20Mission%20Statement- 2015%20Goals.pdf?docID=57443
18. Johnson JR, Williams G, Pazdur R: End points and United States Food and Drug Administration approval of oncology drugs. J Clin Oncol 21:1404-1411, 2003
19. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services: Report to Congress: National strategy for quality improvement in health care-March 2011. http://www. healthcare.gov/law/resources/reports/nationalqualitystrategy032011.pdf
20. National Institutes of Health: Patient-reported outcomes measurement information system: Dynamic tools to measure health outcomes from the patient perspective. http://www.nihPROMIS.org
21. Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. Pub Law 111-148, 111th Congress, 2010
22. Methodology Committee of the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute (PCORI): Methodological standards and patient-centeredness in comparative effectiveness research: The PCORI perspective. JAMA 307:1636-1640, 2012
23. Mullins CD, Montgomery R, Abernethy AP, et al: Recommendations for clinical trials of off-label drugs used to treat advanced-stage cancer. J Clin Oncol 30:661-666, 2012
24. Wilson JB, Cleary PD: Linking clinical variables with health-related quality of life: A conceptual model of patient outcomes. JAMA 273:59-65, 1995
25. Assessing health status and quality of life instruments: Attributes and review criteria. Qual Life Res 11:193-205, 2002
26. Abernethy AP, Herndon JE 2nd, Wheeler JL, et al: Improving health care efficiency and quality using tablet personal computers to collect research-quality, patient-reported data. Health Serv Res 43:1975-1991, 2008
27. Fortner B, Baldwin S, Schwartzberg L, et al: Validation of the Cancer Care Monitor items for physical symptoms and treatment side effects using expert oncology nurse evaluation. J Pain Symptom Manage 31:207-214, 2006
28. Fortner B, Okon T, Schwartzberg L, et al: The Cancer Care Monitor: Psychometric content evaluation and pilot testing of a computer administered system for symptom screening and quality of life in adult cancer patients. J Pain Symptom Manage 26:1077-1092, 2003
29. Basch E, Iasonos A, Barz A, et al: Long-term toxicity monitoring via electronic patient-reported outcomes in patients receiving chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol 25:5374-5380, 2007
30. Abernethy AP, Herndon JE 2nd, Wheeler JL, et al: Improving health care efficiency and quality using tablet personal computers to collect research-quality, patient-reported data. Health Serv Res 43:1975-1991, 2008
31. Coons SJ, Gwaltney CJ, Hays RD, et al: Recommendations on evidence needed to support measurement equivalence between electronic and paper-based patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures: ISPOR ePRO Good Research Practices Task Force report. Value Health 12:419-429, 2009
32. Gwaltney CJ, Shields AL, Shiffman S: Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: A meta-analytic review. Value Health 11:322-333, 2008
33. Farrar JT, Dworkin RH, Max MB: Use of the cumulative proportion of responders analysis graph to present pain data over a range of cut-off points: Making clinical trial data more understandable. J Pain Symptom Manage 31:369-377, 2006