Selection of outcome measures for patients with hip fracture

Journal of Orthopaedic Trauma

Volumn 23, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 434-441

  Bryant, Dianne M ^a,b   Sanders, David W ^a   Coles, Chad P ^c   Petrisor, Brad A ^b   Jeray, Kyle J ^d   Laflamme, George Yves ^e  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO   (Canada)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c DALHOUSIE UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^d GREENVILLE HOSPITAL SYSTEM   (United States)

^e HÔPITAL DU SACRÉ COEUR DE MONTRÉAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

Health measurement; Hip fracture; Outcomes research; Reliability; Responsiveness; Validity

Indexed keywords

BARTHEL INDEX; BECK DEPRESSION INVENTORY; BONE DENSITY; BONE MINERAL; CLINICAL ASSESSMENT TOOL; CONFERENCE PAPER; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DAILY LIFE ACTIVITY; DUAL ENERGY X RAY ABSORPTIOMETRY; EUROPEAN QUALITY OF LIFE SCALE; EXERCISE TEST; FOLLOW UP; FUNCTIONAL ASSESSMENT; FUNCTIONAL INDEPENDENCE MEASURE; GAIT; HEALTH STATUS; HEALTH SURVEY; HIP FRACTURE; HIP RADIOGRAPHY; HUMAN; INTERNATIONAL CLASSIFICATION OF FUNCTIONING, DISABILITY AND HEALTH; LEG MOVEMENT; MEASUREMENT; MUSCLE STRENGTH; NOTTINGHAM HEALTH PROFILE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRE; RANGE OF MOTION; RATING SCALE; RELIABILITY; SELF REPORT; SHORT FORM 12; SHORT FORM 36; SICKNESS IMPACT PROFILE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VALIDITY;

EID: 67651071535     PISSN: 08905339     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BOT.0b013e318162aaf9     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (132)

1. Preamble to the Constitution of the World Health Organization as adopted by the International Health Conference. Official Records of the World Health Organization, no.2, p. 100 and entered into force on 7 April 1948 19-22 June, 1946; signed on 22 July 1946 by the representatives of 61 States; New York.
2. World Health Organization. International Classification of Impairments, Disabilities, and Handicaps: A manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva: World Health Organization; 1980.
3. World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability, and health: ICF The International Classification of Impairment, Disability and Health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002. Report No.: WHO/EIP/GPE/CAS/01.3.
4. Jackowski D, Guyatt G. A guide to health measurement. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;413:80-89.
5. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-483.
6. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247-263.
7. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, et al. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 1994;32:40-66.
8. Ware JEJ, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220-233. (Pubitemid 126433231)
9. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Kressel S, et al. The sickness impact profile: conceptual formulation and methodology for the development of a health status measure. Int J Health Serv. 1976;6:393-415.
10. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Pollard WE, et al. The sickness impact profile: validation of a health status measure. Med Care. 1976;14:57-67. (Pubitemid 8111232)
11. Bergner M, Bobbitt RA, Carter WB, et al. The Sickness Impact Profile: development and final revision of a health status measure. Med Care. 1981;19:787-805. (Pubitemid 11021288)
12. de Bruin AF, Buys M, de Witte LP, et al. The sickness impact profile: SIP68, a short generic version. First evaluation of the reliability and reproducibility. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:863-871. (Pubitemid 24268890)
13. de Bruin AF, Diederiks JP, de Witte LP, et al. Assessing the responsiveness of a functional status measure: the Sickness Impact Profile versus the SIP68. J Clin Epidemiol. 1997;50:529-540.
14. de Bruin AF, Diederiks JP, deWitte LP, et al. The development of a short generic version of the Sickness Impact Profile. J Clin Epidemiol. 1994;47:407-418. (Pubitemid 24123689)
15. EuroQol - a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. The EuroQol Group. Health Policy. 1990;16:199-208.
16. Brooks R. EuroQol: the current state of play. Health Policy. 1996;37:53-72.
17. Hunt SM, McEwen J. The development of a subjective health indicator. [Review] [62 refs]. Sociol Health Illn. 1980;2:231-246.
18. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, et al. The Nottingham Health Profile: subjective health status and medical consultations. Soc Sci Med [A]. 1981;15:221-229.
19. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, Williams J. Reliability of a population survey tool for measuring perceived health problems: a study of patients with osteoarthrosis. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1981;35:297-300. (Pubitemid 12166935)
20. Hunt SM, McKenna SP, McEwen J, et al. A quantitative approach to perceived health status: a validation study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 1980;34:281-286. (Pubitemid 11207401)
21. Hunt SM, McEwen J, McKenna SP. Measuring health status: a new tool for clinicians and epidemiologists. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1985;35:185-188.
22. McKenna SP, McEwen J, Hunt SM, et al. Changes in the perceived health of patients recovering from fractures. Public Health. 1984;98:97-102. (Pubitemid 14173859)
23. Drummond MF, Richardson WS, O'Brien BJ, et al. Users' guides to the medical literature. XIII. How to use an article on economic analysis of clinical practice. A. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-Based Medicine Working Group. JAMA. 1997;277:1552-1557.
24. Ledley RS, Lusted LB. Reasoning foundations of medical diagnosis. Science. 1959;130:9-21.
25. Sox HC. Decision analysis: a basic clinical skill? New Engl J Med. 1987;316:271-272.
26. Influence diagrams. In: Howard RA, Matheson JE, ed. The Principles and Applications of Decision-Analysis. Menlo Park, CA: Strategic Decisions Group; 1984.
27. Von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of games and economic behavior. 3rd ed. New York: Wiley; 1953.
28. Torrance GW, Thomas WH, Sackett DL. A utility maximization model for evaluation of health care programs. Health Serv Res. 1972;7:118-133.
29. Kaplan RM, Anderson JP. The Quality of Well-Being Scale: Rationale for a single quality of life index. In:Walkee SR, Rosser R, eds. Quality of Life: Assessment and Application. London: MTP Press; 1988:51-77.
30. O'Shea K, Bale E, Murray P. Cost analysis of primary total hip replacement. Ir Med J. 2002;95:177-180. (Pubitemid 36105230)
31. Donald Sherbourne C, Unutzer J, Schoenbaum M, et al. Can utility-weighted health-related quality-of-life estimates capture health effects of quality improvement for depression? Med Care. 2001;39:1246-1259.
32. Gabriel SE, Kneeland TS, Melton LJ 3rd, et al. Health-related quality of life in economic evaluations for osteoporosis: whose values should we use? Med Decis Making. 1999;19:141-148.
33. Brazier JE, Roberts J. The estimation of a preference-based measure of health from the SF-12. Med Care. 2004;42:851-859. (Pubitemid 39456916)
34. Bosch JL, Halpern EF, Gazelle GS. Comparison of preference-based utilities of the Short-Form 36 Health Survey and Health Utilities Index before and after treatment of patients with intermittent claudication. Med Decis Making. 2002;22:403-409.
35. Gabriel SE, Kneeland TS, Melton LJ 3rd, et al Health-related quality of life in economic evaluations for osteoporosis: whose values should we use? Med Decis Making. 1999;19:141-148.
36. Pickard AS, Wang Z, Walton SM, et al. Are decisions using cost-utility analyses robust to choice of SF-36/SF-12 preference-based algorithm? Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:11.
37. Shelbourne KD, Rask BP. The sequelae of salvaged nondegenerative peripheral vertical medial meniscus tears with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy. 2001;17:270-274. (Pubitemid 33586317)
38. Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, et al. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988;15:1833-1840. (Pubitemid 19037656)
39. Davies GM, Watson DJ, Bellamy N. Comparison of the responsiveness and relative effect size of the western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index and the short-form Medical Outcomes Study Survey in a randomized, clinical trial of osteoarthritis patients. Arthritis Care Res. 1999;12:172-179. (Pubitemid 29508666)
40. Ehrich EW, Davies GM, Watson DJ, et al. Minimal perceptible clinical improvement with the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities osteoarthritis index questionnaire and global assessments in patients with osteoarthritis. [see comment]. J Rheumatol. 2000;27:2635-2641.
41. Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ, Aharonoff GB, et al. A functional recovery score for elderly hip fracture patients: II. Validity and reliability. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14:26-30.
42. Zuckerman JD, Koval KJ, Aharonoff GB, et al. A functional recovery score for elderly hip fracture patients: I. Development. J Orthop Trauma. 2000;14:20-25.
43. Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA, et al. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network. Phys Ther. 1999;79:371-383.
44. Stratford PW, Binkley JM, Watson J, et al. Validation of the LEFS on patients with total joint arthroplasty. Physicotherapy Canada. 2000;52:97-105.
45. Linclau L, Dokter G, Debois JM, et al. The influence of radiation therapy on the Harris hip score in cementless total hip arthroplasty. Acta Orthop Belg. 1995;61:48-52.
46. Garellick G, Malchau H, Herberts P. Specific or general health outcome measures in the evaluation of total hip replacement. A comparison between the Harris hip score and the Nottingham Health Profile. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1998;80:600-606.
47. Soderman P, Malchau H. Is the Harris hip score system useful to study the outcome of total hip replacement? Clin Orthop. 2001;384:189-197.
48. Mahomed NN, Arndt DC, McGrory BJ, et al. The Harris hip score: comparison of patient self-report with surgeon assessment. J Arthroplasty. 2001;16:575-580.
49. Hoeksma HL, Van Den Ende CH, Ronday HK, et al. Comparison of the responsiveness of the Harris Hip Score with generic measures for hip function in osteoarthritis of the hip. Ann Rheum Dis. 2003;62:935-938.
50. Kili S, Wright I, Jones RS. Change in Harris hip score in patients on the waiting list for total hip replacement. Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2003;85:269-271. (Pubitemid 36873953)
51. Ovre S, Sandvik L, Madsen JE, et al. Comparison of distribution, agreement and correlation between the original and modified Merle d'Aubigne-Postel Score and the Harris Hip Score after acetabular fracture treatment: moderate agreement, high ceiling effect and excellent correlation in 450 patients. Acta Orthop. 2005;76:796-802.
52. Guyatt GH, Bombardier C, Tugwell PX. Measuring disease-specific quality of life in clinical trials. CMAJ. 1986;134:889-895. (Pubitemid 16013788)
53. Stratford PW, Goldsmith CH. Use of the standard error as a reliability index of interest: an applied example using elbow flexor strength data. Phys Ther. 1997;77:745-750.
54. Liang MH. Longitudinal construct validity: establishment of clinical meaning in patient evaluative instruments. [see comment]. [Review] [37 refs]. Med Care. 2000;38:84-90.
55. Kirshner B, Guyatt G. A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis. 1985;38:27-36. (Pubitemid 15136767)
56. Larson CB. Rating scale for hip disabilities. Clin Orthop. 1963;31:85-93.
57. Oberg U, Oberg B, Oberg T. Validity and reliability of a new assessment of lower-extremity dysfunction. Phys Ther. 1994;74:861-871. (Pubitemid 24288622)
58. Oberg U, Oberg T. Worse functional status among old people when admitted for arthroplasty - an evaluation with a new assessment system. Scand J Caring Sci. 1996;10:96-102. (Pubitemid 26231634)
59. Oberg U, Oberg T. Functional outcome after high tibial osteotomy: a study using individual goal achievement as the primary outcome variable. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2000;37:501-510. (Pubitemid 34118669)
60. Oberg T, Oberg U, Sviden G, et al. Functional capacity after hip arthroplasty: a comparison between evaluation with three standard instruments and a personal interview. Scand J Occup Ther. 2005;12:18-28. (Pubitemid 40394257)
61. Salvati A, Wilson D. Long-term results of femoral head replacement. J Bone Joint Surg. 1973;55A:516-524.
62. D'Aubigne RM, Postel M. Functional results of hip arthroplasty with acrylic prosthesis. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1954;36:451-475.
63. Matta JM, Mehne DK, Roffi R. Fractures of the acetabulum. Early results of a prospective study. Clin Orthop. 1986;205:241-250.
64. Finch E, Kennedy D. The lower extremity activity profile: a health status instrument for measuring lower extremity disability. Physiother Can. 1995;47:239-246.
65. Finch E, Walsh M, Thomas SG, et al. Functional ability perceived by individuals following total knee arthroplasty compared to age-matched individuals without knee disability. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;27:255-263.
66. Chatman AB, Hyams SP, Neel JM, et al. The Patient-Specific Functional Scale: measurement properties in patients with knee dysfunction. Phys Ther. 1997;77:820-829.
67. Stratford P, Gill C, Westaway M, et al. Assessing disability and change on individual patients: a report of a patient specific measure. Physiotherapy Canada. 1995;47:258-263.
68. Meenan RF, Gertman PM, Mason JH. Measuring health status in arthritis. The arthritis impact measurement scales. Arthritis Rheum. 1980;23:146-152.
69. Meenan RF, Gertman PM, Mason JH, et al. The arthritis impact measurement scales. Further investigations of a health status measure. Arthritis Rheum. 1982;25:1048-1053.
70. Meenan RF. The AIMS approach to health status measurement: conceptual background and measurement properties. J Rheumatol. 1982;9:785-788.
71. Meenan RF, Anderson JJ, Kazis LE, et al. Outcome assessment in clinical trials. Evidence for the sensitivity of a health status measure. Arthritis Rheum. 1984;27:1344-1352.
72. Meenan RF. New approaches to outcome assessment: the AIMS questionnaire for arthritis. Adv Intern Med. 1986;31:167-185.
73. Meenan RF, Mason JH, Anderson JJ, et al. AIMS2. The content and properties of a revised and expanded Arthritis Impact Measurement Scales Health Status Questionnaire. Arthritis Rheum. 1992;35:1-10.
74. Hughes SL, Edelman P, Chang RW, et al. The GERI-AIMS. Reliability and validity of the arthritis impact measurement scales adapted for elderly respondents. Arthritis Rheum. 1991;34:856-865.
75. Mahoney FI. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61-65.
76. Galatz LM, Ball CM, Teefey SA, et al. The outcome and repair integrity of completely arthroscopically repaired large and massive rotator cuff tears. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:219-224.
77. Roddey TS, Cook KF, O'Malley KJ, et al. The relationship among strength and mobility measures and self-report outcome scores in persons after rotator cuff repair surgery: impairment measures are not enough. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2005;14:95S-98S.
78. Stratford PW, Kennedy D, Pagura SM, et al. The relationship between self-report and performance-related measures: questioning the content validity of timed tests. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49:535-540. (Pubitemid 36988307)
79. Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Linacre JM, et al. Performance profiles of the functional independence measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;72:84-89. (Pubitemid 23144146)
80. Heinemann AW, Linacre JM, Wright BD, et al. Relationships between impairment and physical disability as measured by the functional independence measure. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:566-573.
81. Keith RA, Granger CV, Hamilton BB, et al. The functional independence measure: a new tool for rehabilitation. Adv Clin Rehabil. 1987;1:6-18.
82. Ottenbacher KJ, Hsu Y, Granger CV, et al. The reliability of the functional independence measure: a quantitative review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:1226-1232. (Pubitemid 26424833)
83. Ottenbacher KJ, Mann WC, Granger CV, et al. Inter-rater agreement and stability of functional assessment in the community-based elderly. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:1297-1301.
84. Stineman MG, Shea JA, Jette A, et al. The Functional Independence Measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77:1101-1108. (Pubitemid 26378626)
85. Sherbourne DC, Unutzer J, Schoenbaum M, et al. Can utility-weighted health-related quality-of-life estimates capture health effects of quality improvement for depression? Med Care. 2001;39:1246-1259.
86. Puhan MA, Guyatt GH, Montori VM, et al. The standard gamble demonstrated lower reliability than the feeling thermometer. J Clin Epidemiol. 2005;58:458-465.
87. Schunemann HJ, Armstrong D, Degl'innocenti A, et al. A randomized multicenter trial to evaluate simple utility elicitation techniques in patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Med Care. 2004;42:1132-1142.
88. Schunemann HJ, Goldstein R, Mador MJ, et al. Do clinical marker states improve responsiveness and construct validity of the standard gamble and feeling thermometer: a randomized multi-center trial in patients with chronic respiratory disease. Qual Life Res. 2006;15:1-14. (Pubitemid 43097583)
89. Schunemann HJ, Griffith L, Jaeschke R, et al. Evaluation of the minimal important difference for the feeling thermometer and the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire in patients with chronic airflow obstruction. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:1170-1176. (Pubitemid 37532803)
90. Schunemann HJ, Griffith L, Stubbing D, et al. A clinical trial to evaluate the measurement properties of 2 direct preference instruments administered with and without hypothetical marker states. Med Decis Making. 2003;23:140-149. (Pubitemid 36373396)
91. Torrance GW, Furlong W, Feeny D, et al. Multi-attribute preference functions. Health Utilities Index. [Review] [83 refs]. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995;7:503-520.
92. Torrance GW, Feeny DH, Furlong WJ, et al. Multiattribute utility function for a comprehensive health status classification system. Health Utilities Index Mark 2. Med Care. 1996;34:702-722.
93. Feeny D, Furlong W, Boyle M, et al. Multi-attribute health status classification systems. Health Utilities Index. Pharmacoeconomics. 1995;7:490-502.
94. Boyle MH, Furlong W, Feeny D, et al. Reliability of the Health Utilities Index - Mark III used in the 1991 cycle 6 Canadian General Social Survey Health Questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 1995;4:249-257.
95. Sangha O, Stucki G, Liang MH, et al. The Self-Administered Comorbidity Questionnaire: a new method to assess comorbidity for clinical and health services research. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;49:156-163. (Pubitemid 36418272)
96. Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI. Reintegration to Normal Living as a proxy to quality of life. J Chronic Dis. 1987;40:491-502. (Pubitemid 17084795)
97. Podsiadlo D, Richardson S. The timed "Up & Go": a test of basic functional mobility for frail elderly persons. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1991;39:142-148.
98. Butland RJ, Pang J, Gross ER, et al. Two-, six-, and 12-minute walking tests in respiratory disease. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982;284:1607-1608.
99. Connelly DM, Stevenson TJ, Vandercoort AA. Between- and within-rater reliability of walking tests in the frail elderly population. Physiotherapy Canada. 1996;48:47-51.
100. McGavin CR, Gupta SP, McHardy GJ. Twelve-minute walking test for assessing disability in chronic bronchitis. Br Med J. 1976;1:822-823.
101. Bassey EJ, Fentem PH, MacDonald IC, et al. Self-paced walking as a method for exercise testing in elderly and young men. Clin Sci Mol Med Suppl. 1976;51:609-612.
102. Singh SJ, Morgan MD, Scott S, et al. Development of a shuttle walking test of disability in patients with chronic airways obstruction. Thorax. 1992;47:1019-1024. (Pubitemid 23011018)
103. Berg K, Norman KE. Functional assessment of balance and gait. Clin Geriatr Med. 1996;12:705-723.
104. Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI. The Balance Scale: reliability assessment with elderly residents and patients with an acute stroke. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1995;27:27-36.
105. Berg KO, Maki BE, Williams JI, et al. Clinical and laboratory measures of postural balance in an elderly population. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;73:1073-1080.
106. Berg KO, Wood-Dauphinee SL, Williams JI, et al. Measuring balance in the elderly: validation of an instrument. Can J Public Health. 1992;83:S7-11.
107. Myers AM, Powell LE, Maki BE, et al. Psychological indicators of balance confidence: relationship to actual and perceived abilities. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1996;51:M37-43.
108. Powell LE, Myers AM. The Activities-specific Balance Confidence (ABC) Scale. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 1995;50A:M28-34.
109. Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473-483.
110. McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Lu JF, et al. The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups. Med Care. 1994;32:40-66.
111. Ware J Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-Item Short-Form Health Survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220-233. (Pubitemid 126433231)
112. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, et al. Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery. Qual Health Care. 1996;5:81-88. (Pubitemid 126510382)
113. Fitzpatrick R, Morris R, Hajat S, et al. The value of short and simple measures to assess outcomes for patients of total hip replacement surgery. Qual Health Care. 2000;9:146-150. (Pubitemid 30728856)
114. Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Frost S, et al. Evidence for the validity of a patient-based instrument for assessment of outcome after revision hip replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83:1125-1129. (Pubitemid 33138678)
115. Fitzpatrick R, Norquist JM, Dawson J, et al. Rasch scoring of outcomes of total hip replacement. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56:68-74. (Pubitemid 36183317)
116. Norquist JM, Fitzpatrick R, Dawson J, et al. Comparing alternative Rasch-based methods vs raw scores in measuring change in health. Med Care. 2004;42:25-36.
117. Pynsent PB, Adams DJ, Disney SP. The Oxford hip and knee outcome questionnaires for arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005;87:241-248. (Pubitemid 40282568)
118. Wylde V, Learmonth ID, Cavendish VJ. The Oxford hip score: the patient's perspective. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2005;3:66. (Pubitemid 41631818)
119. Coast J, Peters TJ, Richards SH, et al. Use of the EuroQoL among elderly acute care patients. Qual Life Res. 1998;7:1-10. (Pubitemid 28113960)
120. Beck AT, Steer RA, Garbin MG. Psychometric properties of the Beck Depression inventory: Twenty-five years of evaluation. Clin Psychol Rev. 1988;8:77-100. (Pubitemid 18045797)
121. Beck AT, Ware CH, Mendelson M, et al. An inventory for measuring depression. Arch Gen Psychiatr. 1961;4:561-571.
122. Johanson NA, Liang MH, Daltroy L, et al. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons lower limb outcomes assessment instruments. Reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2004;86-A:902-909. (Pubitemid 38619787)
123. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1969;51:737-755.
124. Ovre S, Sandvik L, Madsen JE, et al. Comparison of distribution, agreement and correlation between the original and modified Merle d'Aubigne-Postel Score and the Harris Hip Score after acetabular fracture treatment: moderate agreement, high ceiling effect and excellent correlation in 450 patients. Acta Orthopaedica. 2005;76:796-802.
125. Binkley JM, Stratford PW, Lott SA, et al. The Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS): scale development, measurement properties, and clinical application. North American Orthopaedic Rehabilitation Research Network. Phys Ther. 1999;79:371-383.
126. Jaglal S, Lakhani Z, Schatzker J. Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the lower extremity measure for patients with a hip fracture. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000;82-A:955-962. (Pubitemid 30451934)
127. Boyle MH, Furlong W, Feeny D, et al. Reliability of the Health Utilities Index - Mark III used in the 1991 cycle 6 Canadian General Social Survey Health Questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 1995;4:249-257.
128. Engelberg R, Martin DP, Agel J, et al. Musculoskeletal Function Assessment instrument: criterion and construct validity. J Orthop Res. 1996;14:182-192. (Pubitemid 26145987)
129. Martin DP, Engelberg R, Agel J, et al. Development of a musculoskeletal extremity health status instrument: the Musculoskeletal Function Assessment instrument. J Orthop Res. 1996;14:173-181. (Pubitemid 26145986)
130. Fillenbaum GG, Smyer MA. The development, validity, and reliability of the OARS multidimensional functional assessment questionnaire. J Gerontol. 1981;36:428-434.
131. Fillenbaum GG. Screening the elderly. A brief instrumental activities of daily living measure. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985;33:698-706.
132. George LK, Fillenbaum GG. OARS methodology. A decade of experience in geriatric assessment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985;33:607-615.