Innovation and Opportunities for Citizen Participation in Spanish Smart Cities

Public Administration and Information Technology

Volumn 11, Issue , 2016, Pages 367-392

  Mahou Lago, Xosé María ^a   Varela Álvarez, Enrique José ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIGO   (Spain)

Author keywords

Citizen participation; Governance; Smart cities; Spanish cities; Usability; Web portal

Indexed keywords

EID: 84991739170     PISSN: 25121812     EISSN: 25121839     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-17620-8_20     Document Type: Chapter

References (68)

1. AMETIC. (2013). Smart cities 2012. Madrid: Ministerio de Industria..
2. Batlle, J., Abadal, E., & Blat, J. (2011). Benchmarking del e-gobierno local: Limitaciones de los métodos de evaluación comparativa. El Profesional de la Información, 20(3), 251–259.
3. Batty, M., Axhausen, K. W., Giannotti, F., Pozdnoukhov, A., Bazzani, A., Wachowicz, M., et al. (2012). Smart cities of the future. The European Physical Journal Special Topics, 214(1), 481–518.
4. Belissent, J. (2011). The core of a smart city must be smart governance. Cambridge: Forrester Research, Inc.
5. Beynon-Davies, P., & Williams, M. D. (2003). Evaluating electronic local government in the UK. Journal of Information Technology, 18(2), 137–149.
6. Bouzas, R., & Mahou, X. (2013). The study of the functionality of government portals. A methodological proposal from the e-health. Gestión y Política Pública, temático, 261–308.
7. Buckley, J. (2003). E-service quality and the public sector. Managing Service Quality, 13(6), 453–462.
8. Byun, D., & Gavin, F. (2011). Evaluating usability, user satisfaction and intention to revisit for successful e-government websites. Electronic Government (An International Journal), 8(1), 1–19
9. Calzada, I. (2013). Critical social innovation in the smart city era for a city-regional European Horizon 2020. P3T, Journal of Public Policies and Territories, Social Innovation and Territory, 6, 1–20.
10. Capgemini Consulting, & Fundación Orange. (2013). Estudio Comparativo 2013 de los Servicios Públicos online en 25 ayuntamientos españoles. Madrid: Capgemini Consulting & Fundación Orange.
11. Carrillo, E. (2002). Los gobiernos locales. In P. Román (coord) (Ed.), Sistema Político Español (pp. 315–338). Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
12. CGLU. (2012). SMART CITIES STUDY: Estudio internacional sobre la situación de las TIC, la innovación y el Conocimiento en las ciudades. http://www.uclg.org/es/media/noticias/nuevo-estudio-de-smart-cities-sobre-la-situaci%C3%B3n-de-las-tic-innovaci%C3%B3n-y-conocimiento. Accessed 10 Dec 2013.
13. Chen, D.-Y., Huang, T.-Y., & Hsiao, N. (2004). Citizen participation, e-government, and public management: A case of Taipeu city mayor’s e-mail box. International Symposium of Digital Divide and Digital Opportunity, February 20–21, Taipei (Taiwan), 1–20.
14. Chourabi, H., Gil-García, J. R., Pardo, T. A., Nam, T., Melloili, S., Scholl, H. J., et al. (2012). Understanding smart cities: An integrative framework. 2012 45th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Accessed 15 Jan 2014. doi:10.1109/HICSS.2012.615.
15. Christmas, L. (2011). A new age of transparency and let the public know. British Journalism Review, 22(4), 20–22.
16. Criado, J. I. (2012). Redes sociales y Open Government. Hacia unas Administraciones locales en red y abiertas. Revista Democracia y Gobierno Local, 18–19.
17. Dhillon, G. S., Weerakkody, V., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2008). Realising transformational stage e-government: A UK local authority perspective. Electronic Government (An International Journal), 5(2), 162–180.
18. Eschenfelder, K. R. (2004). Behind the web site: An inside look at the production of web-based textual government information. Government Information Quarterly, 21, 337–358.
19. European Unión. (2011). Cities of tomorrow. Challenges, visions, ways forward. Brussels: European Commission, Directorate General for Regional Policy.
20. Fernandez, A., Insfran, E., & Abrahão, S. (2011). Usability evaluation methods for the web: A systematic mapping study. Information and Software Technology, 53, 789–817.
21. Fernández, Y., Gutiérrez, C., & Fernández, J. M. (2011). E-gobierno en las entidades públicas: Conocimiento, utilidad y valoración de las páginas Web de los Ayuntamientos. Un caso de estudio. Auditoría Pública, 53, 109–119.
22. Frewer, L. J., & Rowe, G. (2005). Evaluating public participation exercises: Strategic and practical issues. In C. Joanne (Ed.), Evaluating public participation in policy making (pp. 85–106). Paris: OECD.
23. Giffinger, R., Fertner, C., Kramar, H., Kalasek, R., Pichler-Milanović, N., & Meijers, E. (2007). Smart cities ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna: Centre of Regional Science, Vienna UT.
24. Gil-Garcia, J. R., & Martinez-Moyano, I. (2007). Understanding the evolution of e-government: The influence of systems of rules on public sector dynamics. Government Information Quarterly, 24 (2), 266–290.
25. Granić, A., Mitrović y, I., & Marangunić, N. (2011). Exploring the usability of web portals: A Croatian case study. International Journal of Information Management, 31, 339–349.
26. Hassan, Y., Martín, F. J., & Iazza, G. (2004). Diseño Web Centrado en el Usuario: Usabilidad y Arquitectura de la Información. Hipertext.net. 2.
27. Heeks, R., & Foster, C. (2013). Innovation and scaling of ICT for the bottom-of-the-pyramid. Journal of Information Technology. Accessed 15 Jan 2014. doi:10.1057/jit.2013.19.
28. Heeks, R., & Stanforth, C. (2007). Understanding e-government project trajectories from an actor-network perspective. European Journal of Information Systems, 16(2), 165–177. Accessed 15 Jan 2014. doi:10.1057/palgrave.ejis.3000676.
29. Hemment, D., & Townsend, A. (2013). Here come the smart citizens. Manchester: FutureEverything.
30. Hüller, T. (2010). Playground or democratisation? New participatory procedures at the European Commission. Swiss Political Science Review, 16, 77–107.
31. Horst, M., Kuttschreuter, M., & Gutteling, J. M. (2007). Perceived usefulness, personal experiences, risk perception and trust as determinants of adoption of e-government services in The Netherlands. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(4), 1838–1852.
32. Iasulaitis, S., & Pineda, C. (2013). Una administración pública transparente, participativa y responsable: el uso de las TICs. IV Congreso Internacional en Gobierno, Administración Pública y Políticas Públicas (GIGAPP-IUIOG-INAP), Madrid, 23–24 September, pp. 1–33.
33. IDC. (2012). Análisis de las Ciudades Inteligentes en España 2012– El Viaje a la Ciudad Inteligente. http://www.slideshare.net/laltes/idc-smartcities-analysis-spain. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.
34. Janssen, M., Charalabidi, Y., & Zuiderwijk, A. (2012). Benefits, adoption barriers and myths of open data and open government. Information Systems Management, 29(4), 258–268. Accessed 15 Jan 2014. doi:10.1080/10580530.2012.716740.
35. Khan, G. F., Moon, J., Park, H. W., Swar, B., & Rho, J. J. (2010). A socio-technical perspective on e-government issues in developing countries: A scientometrics approach. Scientometrics, 1–20. Accessed 15 Jan 2014. doi:10.1007/s11192-010-0322-5.
36. Karkin, N. (2013). Herramientas Web 2.0 para la participación pública a través de los sitios de Internet del gobierno. Gestión y Política Pública, temático, 307–331.
37. Kelder, T. (2011). I love it when a plan comes together: Urban agendas in EU2020. Eixo Atlántico. Revista da Eurorrexión Galicia-Norte de Portugal, 18, 31–42.
38. Kingston, R. (2002). The role of e-government and public participation in the planning process. XVI AESOP Congress, Volos (Greece). July, 10–14 (2002), 1–14.
39. Libro Blanco Smart Cities. (2012). Enerlis, ernst and young, Ferrovial and Madrid Network. http://www.libroblancosmartcities.com/. Accessed 11 Jan 2014.
40. Lips, M. (2012). E-Government is dead: Long live Public Administration 2.0. Information Polity, 17, 239–250.
41. Luna-Reyes, L. F., Hernández García, J. M., & Gil-García, R. (2009). Hacia un modelo de los determinantes de éxito de los portales de gobierno estatal en México. Gestión y Política Pública, XVIII(2), 307–340.
42. McDermott, P. (2010). Building open government. Government Information Quarterly, 27(4), 401–413.
43. Meijer, A. J., Curtin, D., & Hillebrandt, M. (2012). Open government: Connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 10–29.
44. Moro, G. (2005). Citizen’s evaluation of public participation. In OECD (Ed.), Evaluating public participation in policy making (pp. 109–126). Paris: OECD.
45. Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011a). Conceptualizing smart city with dimension of technology, people, and institutions. The proceedings of the 12th annual international conference on digital government research, pp. 282–291.
46. Nam, T., & Pardo, T. A. (2011b). Smart city as urban innovation: Focusing on management, policy, and context. ICEGOV2011, September 26–28, Tallinn, Estonia, pp. 185–194.
47. Nielsen, J. (1994). Heuristic evaluation. In J. Nielsen & R. L. Mack. (Eds.), Usability inspection methods. New York: Wiley.
48. Nielsen, J. (2003). Usability 101: Introduction to usability. http://www.useit.com/alertbox/20030825. html. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.
49. OECD. (2003). Engaging citizens online for better policy making. Paris: OECD.
50. ONTSI. (2013a). Servicios utilizados por los usuarios de Internet. http://www.ontsi.red.es/ontsi/es/indicador/servicios-utilizados-por-los-usuarios-de-internet-1. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.
51. ONTSI. (2013b). Estudio de la demanda y uso de Gobierno Abierto en España. http://www. ontsi.red.es/ontsi/es/estudios-informes/estudio-de-la-demanda-y-uso-de-gobierno-abierto-en-espa%C3%B1-edici%C3%B3n-2013. Accessed 15 Jan 2014.
52. Parrado, S. (2002). Sistemas administrativos comparados. Madrid: Tecnos y Universidat Pompeu Fabra.
53. Prensky, M. (2001). Digital natives, digital immigrants. On the Horizon, 9(5), 1–6. (MCB University Press).
54. Ramió, C. (2004). E-Administración y nuevos modelos de gestión pública: Una propuesta de decálogo normativo. Revista Vasca de Administración Pública, 70, 321–338.
55. Ramió, C. (2009). Evaluación de la innovación institucional y gestión de las administraciones locales. Eixo Atlántico. Revista da Eurorrexión Galicia-Norte de Portugal, 15, 21–52.
56. Ramilo, M. C., & Fernández, R. (2012). Ciudadanía y Participación en la Sociedad de la Información y el Conocimiento. Working Papers GIGAPP-IUIOG 1–30.
57. Rhodes, R. A. W. (1997). Understanding governance. Policy networks, governance, reflexivity and accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
58. Rios, P. (2008). Creating “the smart city”. http://dspace.udmercy.edu:8080/dspace/bit-stream/10429/20/1/2008_rios_smart.pdf. Accessed 5 July 2014.
59. Sandoval-Almazán, R., & Gil-García, J. R. (2012). Are government internet portals evolving towards more interaction, participation, and collaboration? Revisiting the rhetoric of e-government among municipalities. Government Information Quarterly, 29(1), 72–81.
60. Sassen, S. (2001). The global city: New York (2nd ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
61. Schaffers, H., Komnimos, N., Pallot, M., Trousse, B., Nilsson, M., & Oliveira, A. (2011). Smart cities and future internet: Towards cooperation frameworks for open innovation. In J. Domingue, et al. (Eds.), Future internet assembly (pp. 431–446). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
62. Siddiqi, J., Akhgar, B., Gamble, T., & Zaefarian, G. (2006). A framework for increasing participation in e-Government. International Conference on e-Business, Enterprise Information Systems, e-Government & Outsourcing (EEE,06), pp. 1–7.
63. SOCITM, & IDEA. (2002). Local e-government now: A worldwide view. London: SOCITM and IDEA.
64. Spyros, A., Kitsios, F., & Papadopoulos, T. (2010). New service development in e-government: Identifying critical success factors. Transforming Government: People, Process and Policy, 4(1), 95–118.
65. Stephens, R. T. (2011). Web 2.0: Integration model with electronic commerce. In K. Malik & P. Choudhary (Eds.), Business organizations and collaborative web: Practices, strategies and patterns (pp. 18–30). Hershey: igi Global.
66. Tan, C., Benbasat, I., & Cenfetelli, R. T. (2013). IT-mediated customer service content and delivery in electronic governments: An empirical investigation of the antecedents of service quality. Journal MIS Quarterly, 37(1), 77–109.
67. Varela, E. 2011. Gobernanza urbana. Elementos de aprendizaje y estudios de casos. In M. Iglesias, M. Martí-Costa, J. Subirats, & M. Tomàs (Eds.), Políticas urbanas en España (pp. 363–386). Barcelona: Icaria.
68. Welle, D., DeJong, M., & Lentz, L. (2010). Usable guidelines for usable websites? An analysis of five e-government heuristics. Government Information Quarterly, 27, 254–263.