Open government: Connecting vision and voice

International Review of Administrative Sciences

Volumn 78, Issue 1, 2012, Pages 10-29

  Meijer, Albert J ^a   Curtin, Deirdre ^b   Hillebrandt, Maarten ^a  

^a UTRECHT UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

open government; participation; transparency

Indexed keywords

CITIZENSHIP; CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; GOVERNMENT; INTERNET;

EID: 84858057558     PISSN: 00208523     EISSN: 14617226     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0020852311429533     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Barber BRStrong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press; 1984:.
2. Bertot JC,Jaeger PT,Grimes JM.Using ICTs to create a culture of transparency. E-government and social media as openness and anti-corruption tools for society.Government Information Quarterly. 2010;27 (3): 264-271.
3. Best E.Transparency and European Governance: Clearly Not a Simple Matter.Increasing Transparency in the European Union? Conference papers. 2002;:91-118.
4. Beyers J.Voice and access: Political practices of European interest associations.European Union Politics. 2004;5 (2): 211-240.
5. Black JA Dictionary of Economics. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1997:.
6. Crombez C.The democratic deficit in the European Union: Much ado about nothing?.European Union Politics. 2003;4 (1): 101-120.
7. Curtin D,Meijers H.The principle of open government in Schengen and the European Union: Democratic retrogression?'.Common Market Law Review. 1995;32 (2): 391-442.
8. Curtin D,Mendes J.Transparence et Participation: des Principes Démocratiques Pour L'Administration de L'Union Européenne.Revue Française d'Administration Publique. 2011;:137-138.
9. De Fine LichtJNaurinD (2010) Open procedures and public legitimacy: An (incomplete) inventory of conditions and mechanisms. Workshop on Private and Public Debate and Voting, College de Paris, http://www.college-de-france.fr/media/rat_soc/UPL23795_Naurin_Open_procedures_and_public_legitimacy.pdf (accessed 15 November 2010).
10. Drew C,Nyerges T.Transparency of environmental decision making: A case study of soil cleanup inside the Hanford 100 area.Journal of Risk Research. 2004;7 (1): 33-71.
11. DrorY (1999) Transparency and openness of quality democracy. In: KellyM (ed.) Openness and Transparency in Governance: Challenges and Opportunities. Maastricht: NISPAcee forum. Available at: http://unpan1.un.org/intradoc/groups/public/documents/NISPAcee/UNPAN006507.pdf (accessed 12 May 2010).
12. Flanagan A.EU Freedom of Information: Determining Where the Interest Lies.European Public Law. 2007;13 (4): 595-632.
13. Florini AM.The end of secrecy.Foreign Policy. 1998;112:50-63.
14. Fung A,Weil DOpen Government. Collaboration, Transparency and Participation in Practice. Lathrop DRuma L, ed. Beijing: O'Reilly; 2010:105-113.
15. García Lorenzo A.The role of interest groups in the European Union decision-making process.European Journal of Law and Economics. 2003;15:251-261.
16. Hale TN.Transparency, accountability, and global governance.Global Governance. 2008;14:73-94.
17. Heald DTransparency: The Key to Better Governance?. Hood CHeald D, ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006a:25-43.
18. Heald DTransparency: The Key to Better Governance?. Hood CHeald D, ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 2006b:59-73.
19. Jubb PB.Whistleblowing: A restrictive definition and interpretation.Journal of Business Ethics. 1999;21:77-94.
20. Klijn EH,Edelenbos J,Kort M,van Twist MJW.Facing management dilemmas: An analysis of managerial choices in 18 complex environmental Public Private Partnership projects.International Review of the Administrative Sciences. 2008;74 (2): 251-282.
21. Open Government: Collaboration, Transparency and Participation in Practice. Lathrop DRuma L, ed. Beijing: O'Reilly; 2010a:.
22. Lathrop D,Ruma LOpen Government: Collaboration, Transparency and Participation in Practice. Lathrop DRuma L, ed. Beijing: O'Reilly; 2010b:xix-xxv.
23. Lee MEU Environmental Law: Challenges, Change and Decision-Making. Oxford: Hart Publishing; 2005:.
24. Lessig LCode and Other Laws of Cyberspace. New York: Basic Books; 1999:.
25. Meijer AJ.Publishing public performance results on the Internet. Do stakeholders use the Internet to hold Dutch public service organizations to account?.Government Information Quarterly. 2007;24 (1): 165-185.
26. Mendes JParticipation in EU Rulemaking: A Rights-based Approach. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011:.
27. Murray AHuman Rights in the Digital Age. Murray AKlang M, ed. London: The Glasshouse Press; 2004:191-202.
28. Noveck BSWiki Government: How Technology Can make Government Better, Democracy Stronger, and Citizens More Powerful. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press; 2009:.
29. O'Neill M.The rights of access to community-held documentation as a general principle of EC law.European Public Law. 1998;4 (3): 403-432.
30. O'Neill OA Question of Trust, The BBC Reith Lectures 2002. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2002:.
31. O'Reilly TOpen Government: Collaboration, Transparency and Participation in Practice. Lathrop DRuma L, ed. Beijing: O'Reilly; 2010:11-39.
32. Pasquier M,Villeneuve J-P.Organizational barriers to transparency: A typology and analysis of organizational behaviour tending to prevent or restrict access to information.International Review of Administrative Sciences. 2007;73 (1): 147-162.
33. Piotrowski SJGovernmental Transparency in the Path of Administrative Reform. Albany: State University of New York Press; 2007:.
34. Piotrowski SJ,Borry E.An analytic framework for open meetings and transparency.Public Administration and Management. 2010;15 (1): 138-176.
35. Pozen D.Deep Secrecy.Stanford Law Review. 2010;62 (2): 257-339.
36. Prat A.The wrong kind of transparency.American Economic Review. 2005;95 (3): 862-877.
37. Roberts A.National security and open government.Georgetown Public Policy Review. 2004;9 (2): 69-85.
38. Skivenes M,Trygstad SC.When whistle-blowing works: The Norwegian case.Human Relations. 2010;63 (7): 1071-1097.
39. StiglitzJE (1999) On liberty, the right to know, and public discourse: The role of transparency in public life. Oxford Amnesty Lecture, Oxford (UK). Available at: http://derechoasaber.org.mx/documentos/pdf0116.pdf (accessed 15 November 2010).
40. van Schendelen MPCMMachiavelli in Brussels: The Art of Lobbying the EU. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press; 2005:.
41. Wall S.Public justification and the transparency argument.Philosophical Quarterly. 1996;46:501-507.
42. WeinbergJ (2010) Presentation at the two-day workshop 'Open Government: Defining, Designing, and Sustaining Transparency'. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University. Available at: http://citp.princeton.edu/open-government-workshop/.
43. Welch EUtrecht School of Governance; 2010:.