Usability evaluation methods for the web: A systematic mapping study

Information and Software Technology

Volumn 53, Issue 8, 2011, Pages 789-817

  Fernandez, Adrian ^a   Insfran, Emilio ^a   Abrahão, Silvia ^a  

^a UNIVERSITAT POLITÈCNICA DE VALÈNCIA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Systematic mapping; Usability evaluation methods; Web development

Indexed keywords

EVALUATION METHOD; INFORMATION CONCERNING; MAPPING STUDIES; RESEARCH ACTIVITIES; RESEARCH PAPERS; RESEARCH QUESTIONS; SYSTEMATIC MAPPING; USABILITY EVALUATION METHODS; USER TESTING; WEB APPLICATION; WEB APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT; WEB DEVELOPMENT; WEB USABILITY;

MAPPING; RATING; RESEARCH; USER INTERFACES; WORLD WIDE WEB;

USABILITY ENGINEERING;

EID: 79957507487     PISSN: 09505849     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.infsof.2011.02.007     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. S. Abrahão, E. Iborra, and J. Vanderdonckt Usability evaluation of user interfaces generated with a model-driven architecture tool E. Law, E. Hvannberg, G. Cockton, Maturing Usability: Quality in Software, Interaction and Value Springer-Kluwer International Series in Human-Computer Interaction Vol. 10 2007 Springer 3 32
2. M. Alva, A. Martínez, J.M. Cueva, C. Sagástegui, and B. López Comparison of methods and existing tools for the measurement of usability in the Web Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Web Engineering (ICWE'03), Spain 2003 Springer 386 389
3. S. Batra, and R.R. Bishu Web usability and evaluation: issues and concerns - usability and internationalization: HCI and culture Proceeding of the 2nd International Conference on Usability and Internationalization LNCS Vol. 4559 2007 Springer 243 249
4. S.A. Becker, and F.E. Mottay A global perspective on Web site usability IEEE Software 18 1 2001 54 61
5. N. Bevan International standards for usability should be more widely used Journal of Usability Studies 4 3 2009 106 113
6. D. Budgen, M. Turner, P. Brereton, B. Kitchenham, Using mapping studies in software engineering, in: Proceedings of PPIG 2008, Lancaster University, 2008, pp. 195-204.
7. S. Ceri, P. Fraternali, A. Bongio, Web modeling language (WebML): a modeling language for designing Web sites, in: Proceedings of the 9th World Wide Web Conference (WWW'09), 2000, pp. 137-157.
8. D. Cunliffe Developing usable Web sites - a review and model Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy 10 4 2000 295 307
9. N. Fenton, and S.L. Pfleeger Software Metrics: A Rigorous and Practical Approach Second ed. 1996 International Thomson Computer Press
10. J.L. Fleiss Statistical Methods for Rates and Proportions Second ed. 1981 John Wiley & Sons New York
11. A.P. Freire, R. Goularte, R.P.M. Fortes, Techniques for developing more accessible Web applications: a survey towards a process classifications, in: Proceedings of the 25th ACM International Conference on Design of communication, 2007, pp. 162-169. (Pubitemid 351528335)
12. W. Gray, and M. Salzman Damaged merchandise? A review of experiments that compare usability evaluation methods Human-Computer Interaction 13 1998 203 261 (Pubitemid 128469813)
13. J. Gomez, C. Cachero, and O. Pastor Modeling of device-independent Web applications IEEE MultiMedia 8 2 2001 26 39
14. H. Hartson, T. Andre, and R. Williges Criteria for evaluating usability evaluation methods International journal of Human-Computer Interaction 13 4 2001 373 410 (Pubitemid 33721369)
15. K. Hornbæk Current practice in measuring usability: challenges to usability studies and research International Journal of Human-Computer Studies 64 2006 79 102 (Pubitemid 41683147)
16. E. Insfran, and A. Fernández A systematic review of usability evaluation in Web development Proceedings of 2nd International Workshop on Web Usability and Accessibility (IWWUA'08), New Zealand LNCS Vol. 5176 2008 Springer 81 91
17. International Organization for Standardization, ISO/IEC 9241-10, Ergonomic Requirements for Office Work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs) - Part 10: Dialogue Principles, 1996.
18. International Organization for Standardization, ISO/IEC 9241-11: Ergonomic Requirements for Office work with Visual Display Terminals (VDTs) - Part 11: Guidance on Usability, 1998.
19. International Organization for Standardization, ISO/IEC 12207: Standard for Information Technology - Software Lifecycle Processes, 1998.
20. International Organization for Standardization, ISO/IEC 9126-1 Standard, Software Engineering - Product Quality - Part 1: Quality Model, 2001.
21. International Organization for Standardization, ISO/IEC 25000, Software Engineering - Software Product Quality Requirements and Evaluation (SQuaRE) - Guide to SQuaRE, 2005.
22. M.Y. Ivory, and M.A. Hearst The state of the art in automating usability evaluation of user interfaces ACM Computing Surveys 33 4 2001 470 516 (Pubitemid 33720523)
23. B. Kitchenham, Guidelines for Performing Systematic Literature Reviews in Software Engineering, Version 2.3, EBSE Technical Report, Keele University, UK, 2007.
24. E. Mendes, A Systematic Review of Web Engineering Research, in: Proceedings of the International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering (ISESE'05), 2005, pp. 498-507. (Pubitemid 44462634)
25. C.M. Neuwirth, and S.H. Regli IEEE Internet Computing Special Issue on Usability and the Web 6 2 2002
26. J. Nielsen J. Nielsen, R.L. Mack, Heuristic Evaluation 1994 Usability Inspection Methods NY
27. J. Offutt, Quality attributes of Web software applications, in: IEEE Software: Special Issue on Software Engineering of Internet Software, 2002, pp. 25-32. (Pubitemid 34249423)
28. K. Petersen, R. Feldt, M. Shahid, M. Mattsson, Systematic mapping studies in software engineering, in: 12th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (EASE), Department of Informatics, University of Bari, Italy, June 2008.
29. J. Somervell, D. McCrickard, Comparing generic vs. specific heuristics: Illustrating a new UEM comparison technique, in: Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 2004, pp. 2480-2484.
30. W3C: Web Content Accessibility Guidelines 2.0 (WCAG 2.0), in: Caldwell, B., Cooper, M., Guarino Reid, L., Vanderheiden, G. (Eds.), < http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20/ >.