A limitation of the Cognitive Reflection Test: Familiarity

PeerJ

Volumn 2016, Issue 9, 2016, Pages

  Stieger, Stefan ^a,b   Reips, Ulf Dietrich ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KONSTANZ   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

Author keywords

Age stratified sample; Cognitive Reflection Test; Cognitive vs. intuitive reflection; Dominance analysis; Test experience; Validity

Indexed keywords

CHILD; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MARRIED PERSON; SIBLING; STRATIFIED SAMPLE; VALIDITY;

EID: 84991735570     PISSN: None     EISSN: 21678359     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.2395     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Azen R, Budescu DV. 2003. The dominance analysis approach for comparing predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Methods 8(2):129-148 DOI 10.1037/1082-989X.8.2.129
2. Brañas-Garza P, Kujal P, Lenkei B. 2015. Cognitive Reflection Test: whom, how, when. Munich Personal RePEc Archive Paper No. 68049. Available at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/68049/
3. Brosnan M, Hollinworth M, Antoniadou K, Lewton M. 2014. Is empathizing intuitive and systemizing deliberative? Personality and Individual Differences 66:39-43 DOI 10.1016/j.paid.2014.03.006
4. Budescu DV. 1993. Dominance analysis: a new approach to the problem of relative importance of predictors in multiple regression. Psychological Bulletin 114(3):542-551 DOI 10.1037/0033-2909.114.3.542
5. Buhrmester M, Kwang T, Gosling SD. 2011. Amazon's Mechanical Turk: a new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science 6(1):3-5 DOI 10.1177/1745691610393980
6. Campitelli G, Gerrans P. 2014. Does the Cognitive Reflection Test measure cognitive reflection? A mathematical modeling approach. Memory & Cognition 42(3):434-447 DOI 10.3758/s13421-013-0367-9
7. Cohen J. 1988. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Second edition. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum
8. Deppe KD, Gonzales FJ, Neiman JL, Jacobs C, Pahlke J, Smith KB, Hibbings JR. 2015. Reflective liberals and intuitive conservatives: a look at the Cognitive Reflection Test and ideology. Judgment and Decision Making 10(4):314-331
9. Epstein S. 1994. Integration of the cognitive and psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist 49(8):709-724 DOI 10.1037/0003-066X.49.8.709
10. Frederick S. 2005. Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives 19(4):25-42 DOI 10.1257/089533005775196732
11. Gòmez-Chacòn I, Garcìa Madruga JA, Rodrìguez R, Vila JO, Elosù a R. 2012. Mathematical beliefs and cognitive reflection: do they predict academic achievement? In: Roesken B, Casper M, eds. Proceedings of the MAVI-17 Conference, September 17-20, 2011, Current State of Research on Mathematical Beliefs. Bochum: Ruhr-Universität Bochum, 64-73
12. Jensen AR. 1998. The g Factor: The Science of Mental Ability. Westport: Praeger
13. Juanchich M, Dewberry C, Sirota M, Narendran S. 2016. Cognitive reflection predicts reallife decision outcomes, but not over and above personality and decision-making styles. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 29(1):52-59 DOI 10.1002/bdm.1875
14. Kahneman D. 2011. Thinking, Fast and Slow. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux
15. LeBel EP, Paunonen SV. 2011. Sexy but often unreliable: the impact of unreliability on the replicability of experimental findings with implicit measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 37(4):570-583 DOI 10.1177/0146167211400619
16. Liberali JM, Reyna VF, Furlan S, Stein LM, Pardo ST. 2012. Individual differences in numeracy and cognitive reflection, with implications for biases and fallacies in probability judgment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 25(4):361-381 DOI 10.1002/bdm.752
17. Nimon K, Oswald FL. 2013. Understanding the results of multiple linear regression: beyond standardized regression coefficients. Organizational Research Methods 16(4):650-674 DOI 10.1177/1094428113493929
18. O'Brien RM. 2007. A caution regarding rules of thumb for variance inflation factors. Quality & Quantity 41(5):673-690 DOI 10.1007/s11135-006-9018-6
19. Pennycook G, Cheyne JA, Koehler DJ, Fugelsang JA. 2016. Is the Cognitive Reflection Test a measure of both reflection and intuition? Behavior Research Methods 48(1):341-348 DOI 10.3758/s13428-015-0576-1
20. Pennycook G, Cheyne JA, Seli P, Koehler DJ, Fugelsang JA. 2012. Analytic cognitive style predicts religious and paranormal belief. Cognition 123(3):335-346 DOI 10.1016/j.cognition.2012.03.003
21. Primi C, Morsanyi K, Chiesi F, Donati MA, Hamilton J. 2015. The development and testing of a new version of the Cognitive Reflection Test applying item response theory (IRT). Epub ahead of print 14 June 2015. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making DOI 10.1002/bdm.1883
22. Sinayev A, Peters E. 2015. Cognitive reflection vs. calculation in decision making. Frontiers in Psychology 6:532 DOI 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00532
23. Stanovich KE, West RF. 2000. Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 23(5):645-665
24. Stieger S, Burger C, Schiller FR, Schulze EK, Voracek M. 2014. Measuring implicit gender-role orientation: the gender initial preference task. Journal of Personality Assessment 96(3):358-367 DOI 10.1080/00223891.2013.825622
25. Toplak ME, West RF, Stanovich KE. 2014. Assessing miserly information processing: an expansion of the Cognitive Reflection Test. Thinking & Reasoning 20(2):147-168 DOI 10.1080/13546783.2013.844729
26. Weller JA, Dieckmann NF, Tusler M, Mertz CK, Burns WJ, Peters E. 2013. Development and testing of an abbreviated numeracy scale: a Rasch analysis approach. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 26(2):198-212 DOI 10.1002/bdm.1751
27. Welsh MB, Burns NR, Delfabbro PH. 2013. The Cognitive Reflection Test: how much more than numerical ability? In: Knauff M, Sebanz N, Pauen M, Wachsmuth I, eds. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. Berlin: Cognitive Science Society, 1587-1592
28. Williams RL. 2013. Overview of the Flynn effect. Intelligence 41(6):753-764 DOI 10.1016/j.intell.2013.04.010