The Cognitive Reflection Test: how much more than Numerical Ability?

Cooperative Minds: Social Interaction and Group Dynamics - Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, CogSci 2013

Volumn , Issue , 2013, Pages 1587-1592

  Welsh, Matthew B ^a   Burns, Nicholas R ^a   Delfabbro, Paul H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ADELAIDE   (Australia)

Author keywords

cognitive reflection; heuristics and biases; individual differences; intelligence; numerical ability

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING;

COGNITIVE REFLECTION; DECISION MAKING BIAS; DECISION STYLES; GENERAL INTELLIGENCE; HEURISTIC AND BIAS; INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES; INTELLIGENCE; METACOGNITIVES; NUMERICAL ABILITY; PREDICTIVE POWER;

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

EID: 85107517860     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (30)

1. Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. J. (1974). Working memory. The psychology of learning and motivation, 8, 47-89.
2. Bar-Hillel, M. (1980). The base-rate fallacy in probability judgments. Acta Psychologica, 44, 211-233.
3. Baumann, A. A., & Odum, A. L. (2012). Impulsivity, risk taking, and timing. Behavioural Processes, 90, 408-414.
4. Bennett, G. K., Seashore, H. G., & Wesman, A. G. (1989). Differential Aptitude Test. Marrickville, NSW: Psychological Corporation.
5. Bruine de Bruin, W., Parker, A.M., & Fischhoff, B. (2007). Individual differences in adult decision-making competence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 938-956.
6. Cacioppo, J. T., & Petty, R. E. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116-131.
7. Cattell, R.B. (1973). Personality and mood by questionnaire. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
8. Costa, P. T. J., & McCrae, R. R. (1992). NEO PI-R Professional Manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
9. Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in Intuitive-Experiential and Analytical-Rational Thinking Styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 390-405.
10. Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25-42.
11. Furnham, A., Boo, H.C. & McClelland, A. (2012). Individual differences and the susceptibility to the influence of anchoring cues. Journal of Individual Differences, 33(2), 89-93.
12. Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. C. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84-96.
13. Law, D.J., Morrin, K.A., Pellegrino, J.W. (1995). Training effects and working memory contributions to skill acquisition in a complex coordination task. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 207-234.
14. McGrew, K. S. (2005). The Cattell-Horn-Carroll theory of cognitive abilities: Past, present, and future. In D. P. Flanagan, J. L. Genshaft, & P. L. Harrison (Eds.), Contemporary intellectual assessment: Theories, tests, and issues (pp.136-182). New York: Guilford.
15. McPherson, J.L & Burns, N.R. (2005). A speeded coding task using a computer based mouse response. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 37, 538-544.
16. Odum, A.L. (2011). Delay discounting: trait variable? Behavioural Processes, 87, 1-9.
17. Robertson, I.H., Manly, T., Andrade, J., Baddeley, B.T., Yiend, J. (1997). 'Oops!': performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 35, 747-758.
18. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1998). Individual differences in rational thought. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 127(2), 161-188.
19. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2000). Individual differences in reasoning: implications for the rationality debate. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 23, 645-726.
20. Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (2008). On the relative independence of thinking biases and cognitive ability. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(4), 672-695.
21. Toplak, M.E., West, R.F. & Stanovich, K.E. (2011). The Cognitive Reflection Test as a predictor of performance on heuristics-and-biases tasks. Memory and Cognition, 39, 1275-1289.
22. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
23. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981). The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science, 211(4481), 453-458.
24. Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1983). Extensional versus intuitive reasoning: The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment. Psychological review, 90(4), 293.
25. Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence (WASI). San Antonio: Harcourt Brace, Psychological Corp.
26. Welsh, M.B., Burns, N.R., Delfabbro, P.H. & Begg, S.H. (2013). Individual differences in base rate neglect responses and susceptibility. Manuscript in preparation. www.adelaide.edu.au/directory/matthew.welsh.
27. th January 2013.
28. Welsh, M. B., & Navarro, D. J. (2012). Seeing is believing: priors, trust and base rate neglect. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 119(1), 1-14.
29. Wonderlic, E. F. (1973). Wonderlic Personnel Test. Los Angeles: Western Psychological Services.
30. Zaleskiewicz, T. (2001). Beyond risk seeking and risk aversion: Personality and the dual nature of economic risk taking. European Journal of Personality, 15, S105-S122.