Outcomes of high-complexity renal tumours with a Preoperative Aspects and Dimensions Used for an Anatomical (PADUA) score of ≥10 after robot-assisted partial nephrectomy with a median 46.5-month follow-up: a tertiary centre experience

BJU International

Volumn 118, Issue 5, 2016, Pages 770-778

  Abdel Raheem, Ali ^a,b   Alatawi, Atalla ^a   Kim, Dae K ^c   Sheikh, Abulhasan ^a   Alabdulaali, Ibrahim ^a   Han, Woong K ^a   Choi, Young D ^a   Rha, Koon H ^a  

^a Yonsei University College of Medicine   (South Korea)

^b TANTA UNIVERSITY   (Egypt)

^c CHA University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

PADUA score; partial nephrectomy; robotic surgery

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CANCER FREE SURVIVAL; CANCER SPECIFIC SURVIVAL; CANCER SURVIVAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HIGH COMPLEXITY RENAL TUMOR; HUMAN; INTESTINE INJURY; KIDNEY ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY TUMOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PERIOPERATIVE PERIOD; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PREOPERATIVE ASPECTS AND DIMENSIONS USED FOR ANATOMICAL SCORE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RENAL VEIN INJURY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ROBOT ASSISTED PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; ROBOT ASSISTED SURGERY; SCORING SYSTEM; TERTIARY CARE CENTER; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR VOLUME; URETER INJURY; VEIN INJURY; AGED; COMPARATIVE STUDY; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; PATHOLOGY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; PROCEDURES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURE; TIME FACTOR;

AGED; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; PREOPERATIVE CARE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; ROBOTIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; TERTIARY CARE CENTERS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84991644096     PISSN: 14644096     EISSN: 1464410X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/bju.13501     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Ljungberg B, Bensalah K, Canfield S et al. EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: 2014 update. Eur Urol 2015; 67: 913–24
2. MacLennan S, Imamura M, Lapitan MC et al. Systematic review of oncological outcomes following surgical management of localized renal cancer. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 972–93
3. Van Poppel H, Da Pozzo L, Albrecht W et al. A prospective randomized EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low stage renal cell carcinomas. Eur Urol 2011; 59: 543–52
4. Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S et al. Perioperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 2009; 56: 786–93
5. Mottrie A, Schatteman P, De Wil P, De Troyer B, Novara G, Ficarra V. Validation of the preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) score in a robot-assisted partial nephrectomy series. World J Urol 2013; 31: 799–804
6. Tyritzis SI, Papadoukakis S, Katafigiotis L et al. Implementation and external validation of preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) score for predicting complications in 74 consecutive partial nephrectomies. BJU Int 2012; 109: 1813–8
7. Ficarra V, Bhayani S, Porter J et al. Predictors of warm ischemia and perioperative complications in a multicenter, international series of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2012; 61: 395–402
8. Minervini A, Vittori G, Salvi M et al. Analysis of surgical complications of renal tumor enucleation with standardized instruments and external validation of PADUA classification. Ann Surg Oncol 2013; 20: 1729–36
9. Khalifeh A, Autorino R, Hillyer SP et al. Comparative outcomes and assessment of trifecta in 500 robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy cases: a single surgeon experience. J Urol 2013; 189: 1236–42
10. Hung AJ, Cai J, Simmons MN, Gill IS. “Trifecta” in partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2013; 189: 36–42
11. Buffi N, Lista G, Larcher A et al. Margin, ischemia, and complications (MIC) score in partial nephrectomy: a new system for evaluating achievement of optimal outcomes in nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 2012; 62: 617–8
12. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 2004; 240: 205–13
13. Levey AS, Bosch JP, Lewis JB, Greene T, Rogers N, Roth D. A more accurate method to estimate glomerular filtration rate from serum creatinine: a new prediction equation. Modification of Diet in Renal Disease Study Group. Ann Intern Med 1999;130:461–70.
14. Levey AS, Coresh J, Balk E et al. National kidney function practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation, classification and stratification. Ann Intern Med 2003; 139: 137–47
15. Komninos C, Shin TY, Tuliao P et al. Robotic partial nephrectomy for completely endophytic renal tumors: complications and functional and oncologic outcomes during a 4-year median period of follow-up. Urology 2014; 84: 1367–73
16. Coffin G, Hupertan V, Taksin L et al. Impact of elective versus imperative indications on oncologic outcomes after open nephron sparing surgery for the treatment of sporadic renal cell carcinomas. Ann Surg Oncol 2011; 18: 1151–7
17. Choi JI, You JH, Kim DK, Rha KH, Lee SE. Comparison of perioperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Urol 2015; 67: 891–901
18. Wu Z, Li M, Liu B et al. Robotic versus open partial nephrectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 2014; 9: e94878
19. Volpe A, Garrou A, Amparore D et al. Perioperative and renal functional outcomes of elective robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) for renal tumours with high surgical complexity. BJU Int 2014; 114: 903–9
20. Serni S, Vittori G, Frizzi J et al. Simple enucleation for the treatment of highly complex renal tumors: perioperative, functional and oncological results. Eur J Surg Oncol 2015; 41: 934–40
21. Tomaszewski JJ, Smaldone MC, Mehrazin R et al. Anatomic complexity quantitated by nephrometry score is associated with prolnged warm ischemia time during robotic partial nephrectomy. Urology 2014; 84: 340–4
22. Mullins JK, Kaouk JH, Bhayani S et al. Tumor complexity predicts malignant disease for small renal masses. J Urol 2012; 188: 2072–6
23. Lee JW, Cho SY, Jeon C, Ko K, Kim HH. The association between the anatomical features of renal tumours and the functional outcomes of robot-assisted partial nephrectomy. Can Urol Assoc J 2014; 8: 810–4
24. Kobayashi K, Saito T, Kitamura Y et al. The RENAL nephrometry score and the PADUA classification for the prediction of perioperative outcomes in patients receiving nephron sparing surgery: feasible tools to predict intraoperative conversion to nephrectomy. Urol Int 2013; 91: 261–8
25. Lista G, Buffi NM, Lughezzani G et al. Margin, ischemia, and complications system to report perioperative outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy: a European Multicenter Observational Study (EMOS Project). Urology 2015; 85: 589–95
26. Kopp RP, Mehrazin R, Palazzi KL et al. Survival outcomes after radical and partial nephrectomy for clinical T2 renal tumors categorized by renal nephrometry score. BJU Int 2014; 114: 708–18
27. Long CJ, Canter DJ, Kutikov A et al. Partial nephrectomy for renal masses ≥ 7 cm: technical, oncological and functional outcomes. BJU Int 2012; 109: 1450–6
28. Ani I, Finelli A, Alibhai SM, Timilshina N, Fleshner N, Abouassaly R. Prevalence and impact on survival of positive surgical margins in partial nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma: a population-based study. BJU Int 2013; 111: 300–5
29. Yossepowitch O, Thompson RH, Leibovich BC et al. Positive surgical margins at partial nephrectomy: predictors and oncological outcomes. J Urol 2008; 179: 2158–63
30. Zhang ZY, Tang Q, Li X et al. Clinical analysis of the PADUA and the RENAL scoring systems for renal neoplasms: a retrospective study of 245 patients undergoing laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. Int J Urol 2014; 21: 40–4
31. Gupta GN, Boris R, Chung P, Linehan WM, Pinto PA, Bratslavsky W. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors greater than 4 cm and high nephrometry score: feasibility, renal functional and oncological outcomes with minimum 1 year follow-up. Urol Oncol 2013; 31: 51–6
32. Becker F, Van Poppel H, Hakenberg OW et al. Assessing the impact of ischaemia time during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 2009; 56: 625–35
33. Desai MM, Gill IS, Ramani AP, Spaliviero M, Rybicki L, Kaouk JH. The impact of warm ischaemia on renal function after laparoscopic partial nephrectomy. BJU Int 2005; 95: 377–83
34. Parekh DJ, Weinberg JM, Ercole B et al. Tolerance of the human kidney to isolated controlled ischemia. J Am Soc Nephrol 2013; 24: 506–17
35. Benoit T, Nouhaud FX, Roumiguié M, et al. [Does a tumor size higher than 7cm impact partial nephrectomy outcomes for the treatment of renal cancer?]. Prog Urol 2015; 25: 138–44
36. Zargar H, Rogers C, Bhayani S et al. Trifecta outcomes of robotic partial nephrectomy for T1b renal masses: a multi-institutional analysis. J Urol 2015; 193 (Suppl. 4S): e790–1
37. Komninos C, Shin TY, Tuliao P et al. R-LESS partial nephrectomy trifecta outcome is inferior to multiport robotic partial nephrectomy: comparative analysis. Eur Urol 2014; 66: 512–7