Validation of the preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) score in a robot-assisted partial nephrectomy series

World Journal of Urology

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2013, Pages 799-804

  Mottrie, Alexander ^a,b   Schatteman, Peter ^a   De Wil, Peter ^a   De Troyer, Bart ^a   Novara, Giacomo ^c   Ficarra, Vincenzo ^a,c  

^a OLV HOSPITAL   (Belgium)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

Author keywords

da Vinci Robot; Nephron sparing surgery; Partial nephrectomy; Renal Cell Carcinoma; Robot assisted partial nephrectomy

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DECISION MAKING; EVALUATION STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; ISCHEMIA; KIDNEY; KIDNEY TUMOR; MALE; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEPHRECTOMY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTIVE VALUE; RADIOGRAPHY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROBOTICS; VALIDATION STUDY;

DECISION MAKING; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; NEPHRECTOMY; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; ROBOTICS; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; WARM ISCHEMIA;

EID: 84881079626     PISSN: 07244983     EISSN: 14338726     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-010-0639-y     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Ljungberg B, Hanbury DC, Kuczyk MA et al (2010) Renal cell carcinoma guideline. Eur Urol 58: 398-406.
2. Novick AC, Campbell SC, Belldegrun A et al (2009) Guideline for management of the clinical stage 1 renal mass. American Urological Association Web site. http://www. auanet. org/content/guidelinesand-quality-care/clinical-guidelines/mainreports/renalmass09. pdf.
3. Ficarra V, Novara G, Secco S et al (2009) Preoperative aspects and dimensions used for an anatomical (PADUA) classification of renal tumours in patients who are candidates for nephron-sparing surgery. Eur Urol 56: 786-793.
4. Kutikov A, Uzzo RG (2009) The RENAL nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth. J Urol 182: 844-853.
5. Waldert M, Waalkes S, Klatte T et al (2010) External validation of the preoperative anatomical classification for prediction of complications related to nephron-sparing surgery. World J Urol 28(4): 531-535.
6. Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA (2004) Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6, 336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg 240: 205-213.
7. Greene FL, Page D, Fleming ID et al (2002) AJCC cancer staging manual, 6th edn. Springer-Verlag, New York, NY.
8. Eble JN, Sauter G, Epstein JI et al (2004) Pathology and genetics of tumors of the urinary system and male genital organs. World Health Organization classification of tumors. IARC Press, Lyon, France.
9. Touijer K, Jacqmin D, Kavoussi LR et al (2010) The expanding role of partial nephrectomy: a critical analysis of indications, results, and complications. Eur Urol 57: 214-222.
10. Gill IS, Kamoi K, Aron M, Desai MM (2010) 800 laparoscopic partial nephrectomies: a single surgeon series. J Urol 183: 34-42.
11. Gettman MT, Blute ML, Chow GK et al (2004) Robotic assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technique and initial clinical experience with Da Vinci robotic system. Urology 64: 914-918.
12. Becker F, van Poppel H, Hakenberg OW et al (2009) Assessing the impact of ischaemia time during partial nephrectomy. Eur Urol 56(4): 625-634.
13. Patel MN, Krane LS, Bhandari A et al (2010) Robotic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors larger than 4 cm. Eur Urol 57: 310-316.