Tumor complexity predicts malignant disease for small renal masses

Journal of Urology

Volumn 188, Issue 6, 2012, Pages 2072-2076

  Mullins, Jeffrey K ^a   Kaouk, Jihad H ^b   Bhayani, Sam ^c   Rogers, Craig G ^d   Stifelman, Michael D ^e   Pierorazio, Phillip M ^a   Tanagho, Youssef S ^c   Hillyer, Shahab P ^b   Kaczmarek, Bartosz F ^d   Chiu, Yichun ^e   Allaf, Mohamad E ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF PATHOLOGY   (United States)

^b LERNER RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d HENRY FORD HOSPITAL   (United States)

^e NEW YORK UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

carcinoma, renal cell; kidney; nephrectomy; risk; robotics

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CANCER GRADING; CANCER SURGERY; COHORT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HISTOPATHOLOGY; HUMAN; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; KIDNEY TUMOR; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PREDICTOR VARIABLE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; ROBOTICS; SMALL RENAL MASS;

CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; PROGNOSIS; RISK FACTORS; SEX FACTORS;

EID: 84869080532     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: 15273792     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2012.08.027     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. C.J. Kane, K. Mallin, J. Ritchey Renal cell cancer stage migration: analysis of the National Cancer Data Base Cancer 113 2008 78
2. M.M. Nguyen, I.S. Gill, L.M. Ellison The evolving presentation of renal carcinoma in the United States: trends from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program J Urol 176 2006 2397
3. I.S. Gill, M. Aron, D.A. Gervais Clinical practice Small renal mass N Engl J Med 362 2010 624
4. I. Frank, M.L. Blute, J.C. Cheville Solid renal tumors: an analysis of pathological features related to tumor size J Urol 170 2003 2217
5. M. Remzi, M. Ozsoy, H.C. Klingler Are small renal tumors harmless? Analysis of histopathological features according to tumors 4 cm or less in diameter J Urol 176 2006 896
6. M.M. Nguyen, I.S. Gill Effect of renal cancer size on the prevalence of metastasis at diagnosis and mortality J Urol 181 2009 1020
7. S. Choudhary, A. Rajesh, N.J. Mayer Renal oncocytoma: CT features cannot reliably distinguish oncocytoma from other renal neoplasms Clin Radiol 64 2009 517
8. A.B. Rosenkrantz, N. Hindman, E.F. Fitzgerald MRI features of renal oncocytoma and chromophobe renal cell carcinoma AJR Am J Roentgenol 195 2010 W421
9. P.L. Crispen, S.A. Boorjian, C.M. Lohse Outcomes following partial nephrectomy by tumor size J Urol 180 2008 1912
10. R. Venkatesh, K. Weld, C.D. Ames Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal masses: effect of tumor location Urology 67 2006 1169
11. S.K. Verma, D.G. Mitchell, R. Yang Exophytic renal masses: angular interface with renal parenchyma for distinguishing benign from malignant lesions at MR imaging Radiology 255 2010 501
12. A. Kutikov, R.G. Uzzo The R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score: a comprehensive standardized system for quantitating renal tumor size, location and depth J Urol 182 2009 844
13. A. Kutikov, M.C. Smaldone, B.L. Egleston Anatomic features of enhancing renal masses predict malignant and high-grade pathology: a preoperative nomogram using the RENAL Nephrometry score Eur Urol 60 2011 241
14. H.K. Wang, Y. Zhu, X.D. Yao External validation of a nomogram using RENAL nephrometry score to predict high grade renal cell carcinoma J Urol 187 2012 1555
15. S.A. Fuhrman, L.C. Lasky, C. Limas Prognostic significance of morphologic parameters in renal cell carcinoma Am J Surg Pathol 6 1982 655
16. P. Satasivam, S. Sengupta, N. Rajarubendra Renal lesions with low R.E.N.A.L nephrometry score are associated with more indolent renal cell carcinomas (RCCs) or benign histology: findings in an Australian cohort BJU Int 109 suppl. 2012 44
17. S.C. Campbell, A.C. Novick, A. Belldegrun Guideline for management of the clinical T1 renal mass J Urol 182 2009 1271
18. D. Canter, A. Kutikov, B. Manley Utility of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry scoring system in objectifying treatment decision-making of the enhancing renal mass Urology 78 2011 1089
19. G.J. Broughton, P.E. Clark, D.A. Barocas Tumour size, tumour complexity, and surgical approach are associated with nephrectomy type in small renal cortical tumours treated electively BJU Int 10 2011 1464
20. M.H. Hayn, T. Schwaab, W. Underwood RENAL nephrometry score predicts surgical outcomes of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy BJU Int 108 2011 876
21. H.M. Rosevear, P.T. Gellhaus, A.J. Lightfoot Utility of the RENAL nephrometry scoring system in the real world: predicting surgeon operative preference and complication risk BJU Int 109 2012 700
22. M.N. Hew, B. Baseskioglu, K. Barwari Critical appraisal of the PADUA classification and assessment of the R.E.N.A.L. nephrometry score in patients undergoing partial nephrectomy J Urol 186 2011 42
23. D.A. Kunkle, B.L. Egleston, R.G. Uzzo Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma - a meta-analysis and review J Urol 179 2008 1227
24. J.M. Woldrich, K. Mallin, J. Ritchey Sex differences in renal cell cancer presentation and survival: an analysis of the National Cancer Database, 1993-2004 J Urol 179 2008 1709
25. C.J. Weight, T.D. Atwell, R.T. Fazzio A multidisciplinary evaluation of inter-reviewer agreement of the nephrometry score and the prediction of long-term outcomes J Urol 186 2011 1223
26. S.B. Kolla, P.E. Spiess, W.J. Sexton Interobserver reliability of the RENAL nephrometry scoring system Urology 78 2011 592