Systematic review of oncological outcomes following surgical management of localised renal cancer

European Urology

Volumn 61, Issue 5, 2012, Pages 972-993

  MacLennan, Steven ^a   Imamura, Mari ^a   Lapitan, Marie C ^b   Omar, Muhammad Imran ^a   Lam, Thomas B L ^a,c   Hilvano Cabungcal, Ana M ^b   Royle, Pam ^a   Stewart, Fiona ^a   MacLennan, Graeme ^d   MacLennan, Sara J ^a   Canfield, Steven E ^e   McClinton, Sam ^c   Griffiths, T R Leyshon ^f   Ljungberg, Börje ^g   N'Dow, James ^a,c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^b UP PGH Medical Centre   (Philippines)

^c ABERDEEN ROYAL INFIRMARY   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^f LEICESTER GENERAL HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^g UMEÅ UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Adrenalectomy; Cryoablation; HIFU; Localised renal cancer; Lymphadenectomy; Meta analysis; Nephron sparing surgery; Oncological outcomes; Partial nephrectomy; Radical nephrectomy; Radiofrequency ablation; Systematic reviews

Indexed keywords

ADRENALECTOMY; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER SURVIVAL; DISTANT METASTASIS; HUMAN; KIDNEY CARCINOMA; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; METASTASIS; NEPHRECTOMY; OVERALL SURVIVAL; PARTIAL NEPHRECTOMY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOFREQUENCY ABLATION; RECURRENT CANCER; REVIEW; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

ADRENALECTOMY; BIAS (EPIDEMIOLOGY); CARCINOMA, RENAL CELL; FEMALE; HUMANS; KIDNEY NEOPLASMS; LAPAROSCOPY; LYMPH NODE EXCISION; MALE; NEPHRECTOMY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; SURVIVAL RATE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 84859428361     PISSN: 03022838     EISSN: 18737560     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.eururo.2012.02.039     Document Type: Review

References (62)

1. S.F. Altekruse, L. Huang, and J.E. Cucinelli Spatial patterns of localized-stage prostate cancer incidence among white and black men in the southeastern United States, 1999-2001 Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 19 2010 1460 1467
2. C.J. Robson, B.M. Churchill, and W. Anderson The results of radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma J Urol 101 1969 297 301
3. I. Leibovitch, G. Raviv, Y. Mor, O. Nativ, and B. Goldwasser Reconsidering the necessity of ipsilateral adrenalectomy during radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma Urology 46 1995 316 320
4. R. Paul, J. Mordhorst, R. Busch, H. Leyh, and R. Hartung Adrenal sparing surgery during radical nephrectomy in patients with renal cell cancer: a new algorithm J Urol 166 2001 59 62 (Pubitemid 32565342)
5. S. Siemer, J. Lehmann, and J. Kamradt Adrenal metastases in 1635 patients with renal cell carcinoma: outcome and indication for adrenalectomy J Urol 171 2004 2155 2159 (Pubitemid 38625424)
6. B. Ljungberg, N.C. Cowan, and D.C. Hanbury EAU guidelines on renal cell carcinoma: the 2010 update Eur Urol 58 2010 398 406
7. J.S. Lam, O. Shvarts, and M. Alemozaffarder Nephron-sparing surgery as the new gold standard for T1 <= 7 cm renal cell carcinoma: results of a contemporary UCLA series J Urol 171 Suppl 2004 469
8. J.H.M. Blom, H. Van Poppel, and J.M. Maréchal Radical nephrectomy with and without lymph-node dissection: final results of European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) randomized phase 3 trial 30881 Eur Urol 55 2009 28 34
9. R.G. Uzzo, and A.C. Novick Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes J Urol 166 2001 6 18 (Pubitemid 32565331)
10. T. Klatte, B. Grubmüller, M. Waldert, P. Weibl, and M. Remzi Laparoscopic cryoablation versus partial nephrectomy for the treatment of small renal masses: systematic review and cumulative analysis of observational studies Eur Urol 60 2011 435 443
11. H. Van Poppel, F. Becker, and J.A. Cadeddu Treatment of localised renal cell carcinoma Eur Urol 60 2011 662 672
12. Guideline for management of the clinical stage 1 renal mass. American Urological Association Web site. http://www.auanet.org/resources.cfm?ID=442. Accessed May 2011.
13. Imamura M, MacLennan S, Lapitan MC, et al. Systematic review of the clinical effectiveness of surgical management for localised renal cell carcinoma. University of Aberdeen, Academic Urology Unit, 2011. European Association of Urology Web site. http://www.uroweb.org/?id=217&tyid= 1&oid=4.
14. Higgins JPT, Green S. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions v.5.0.2. The Cochrane Collaboration, 2011. http://www.cochrane- handbook.org/. Accessed May 2011.
15. Reeves B, Shea B, Wells G. Classifying non-randomised studies (NRS) and the assessing the risk of bias for a systematic review. Paper presented at: Workshop at 18th Cochrane Colloquium; 2010; Keystone, CO, USA.
16. J.P. Higgins, S.G. Thompson, J.J. Deeks, and D.G. Altman Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses BMJ 327 2003 557 560 (Pubitemid 37088507)
17. Rodgers M, Arai L, Britten N, et al. Guidance on the conduct of narrative synthesis in systematic reviews: a comparison of guidance-led narrative synthesis versus meta-analysis. Paper presented at: 14th Cochrane Colloquium; October 2006; Dublin, Ireland.
18. L. Zini, P. Perrotte, and C. Jeldres A population-based comparison of survival after nephrectomy vs nonsurgical management for small renal masses BJU Int 103 2009 899 904
19. A.K. Hemal, A. Kumar, and R. Kumar Laparoscopic versus open radical nephrectomy for large renal tumors: a long-term prospective comparison J Urol 177 2007 862 866 (Pubitemid 46216353)
20. C. Gratzke, M. Seitz, and F. Bayrle Quality of life and perioperative outcomes after retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy (RN), open RN and nephron-sparing surgery in patients with renal cell carcinoma BJU Int 104 2009 470 475
21. M.M. Desai, B. Strzempkowski, and S.F. Matin Prospective randomized comparison of transperitoneal versus retroperitoneal laparoscopic radical nephrectomy J Urol 173 2005 38 41 (Pubitemid 39627667)
22. T. Nambirajan, S. Jeschke, and H. Al-Zahrani Prospective, randomized controlled study: transperitoneal laparoscopic versus retroperitoneoscopic radical nephrectomy Urology 64 2004 919 924 (Pubitemid 39469506)
23. R.B. Nadler, S. Loeb, and J.Q. Clemens A prospective study of laparoscopic radical nephrectomy for T1 tumors - is transperitoneal, retroperitoneal or hand assisted the best approach? J Urol 175 2006 1230 1233
24. A.H. Gabr, Y. Gdor, S.A. Strope, W.W. Roberts, and J.S. Wolf Jr. Approach and specimen handling do not influence oncological perioperative and long-term outcomes after laparoscopic radical nephrectomy J Urol 182 2009 874 880
25. A.K. Hemal, and A. Kumar A prospective comparison of laparoscopic and robotic radical nephrectomy for T1-2N0M0 renal cell carcinoma World J Urol 27 2009 89 94
26. N. Soga, M. Kato, and S. Masui Comparison of radical nephrectomy techniques in one center: minimal incision portless endoscopic surgery versus laparoscopic surgery Int J Urol 15 2008 1018 1021
27. A. Herrlinger, K.M. Schrott, G. Schott, and A. Sigel What are the benefits of extended dissection of the regional renal lymph nodes in the therapy of renal cell carcinoma J Urol 146 1991 1224 1227
28. B.R. Lane, H.Y. Tiong, and S.C. Campbell Management of the adrenal gland during partial nephrectomy J Urol 181 2009 2430 2436
29. M. D'Armiento, R. Damiano, and B. Feleppa Elective conservative surgery for renal carcinoma versus radical nephrectomy: a prospective study Br J Urol 79 1997 15 19 (Pubitemid 28318836)
30. B.P. Butler, A.C. Novick, D.P. Miller, S.A. Campbell, and M.R. Licht Management of small unilateral renal cell carcinomas: radical versus nephron-sparing surgery Urology 45 1995 34 40
31. J.H. Lee, C.H. You, and G.E. Min Comparison of the surgical outcome and renal function between radical and nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinomas Korean J Urol 48 2007 671 676 (Pubitemid 47180219)
32. M.N. Simmons, B.I. Chung, and I.S. Gill Perioperative efficacy of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for tumors larger than 4 cm Eur Urol 55 2009 199 208
33. W.C. Huang, E.B. Elkin, A.S. Levey, T.L. Jang, and P. Russo Partial nephrectomy versus radical nephrectomy in patients with small renal tumors - is there a difference in mortality and cardiovascular outcomes? J Urol 181 2009 55 61
34. L. Zini, P. Perrotte, and U. Capitanio Radical versus partial nephrectomy: effect on overall and noncancer mortality Cancer 115 2009 1465 1471
35. R.H. Thompson, S.A. Boorjian, and C.M. Lohse Radical nephrectomy for pT1a renal masses may be associated with decreased overall survival compared with partial nephrectomy J Urol 179 2008 468 471
36. J.J. Patard, K.C. Bensalah, and A.J. Pantuck Radical nephrectomy is not superior to nephron sparing surgery in PT1B-PT2N0M0 renal tumours: a matched comparison analysis in 546 cases Eur Urol Suppl 7 2008 194
37. J.J. Patard, O. Shvarts, and J.S. Lam Safety and efficacy of partial nephrectomy for all T1 tumors based on an international multicenter experience J Urol 171 2004 2181 2185 (Pubitemid 38625430)
38. R.H. Thompson, M. Kaag, and A. Vickers Contemporary use of partial nephrectomy at a tertiary care center in the United States J Urol 181 2009 993 997
39. A. Dash, A.J. Vickers, and L.R. Schachter Comparison of outcomes in elective partial vs radical nephrectomy for clear cell renal cell carcinoma of 4-7 cm BJU Int 97 2006 939 945
40. C.J. Weight, B.T. Larson, and A.F. Fergany Nephrectomy induced chronic renal insufficiency is associated with increased risk of cardiovascular death and death from any cause in patients with localized cT1b renal masses J Urol 183 2010 1317 1323
41. M. Crépel, C. Jeldres, and P. Perrotte Nephron-sparing surgery is equally effective to radical nephrectomy for T1BN0M0 renal cell carcinoma: a population-based assessment Urology 75 2010 271 275
42. I.S. Gill, L.R. Kavoussi, and B.R. Lane Comparison of 1800 laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomies for single renal tumors J Urol 177 Suppl 2007 165
43. B.R. Lane, and I.S. Gill 7-year oncological outcomes after laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy J Urol 183 2010 473 479
44. E.M. Gong, M.A. Orvieto, and K.C. Zorn Comparison of laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy in clinical T1a renal tumors J Endourol 22 2008 953 957 (Pubitemid 351693933)
45. M. Marszalek, H. Meixl, and M. Polajnar Laparoscopic and open partial nephrectomy: a matched-pair comparison of 200 patients Eur Urol 55 2009 1171 1178
46. S.D. Wu, D.P. Viprakasit, and J. Cashy Radiofrequency ablation-assisted robotic laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without renal hilar vessel clamping versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes J Endourol 24 2010 385 391
47. M.M. Desai, M. Aron, and I.S. Gill Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic cryoablation for the small renal tumor Urology 66 Suppl 2005 23 28 (Pubitemid 41356555)
48. R.L. O'Malley, A.D. Berger, and J.A. Kanofsky A matched-cohort comparison of laparoscopic cryoablation and laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for treating renal masses BJU Int 99 2007 395 398 (Pubitemid 46103123)
49. Y.H. Ko, H.S. Park, and D.G. Moon A matched-cohort comparison of laparoscopic renal cryoablation using ultra-thin cryoprobes with open partial nephrectomy for the treatment of small renal cell carcinoma Cancer Res Treat 40 2008 184 189
50. H. Van Poppel, L. Da Pozzo, and W. Albrecht A prospective, randomised EORTC intergroup phase 3 study comparing the oncologic outcome of elective nephron-sparing surgery and radical nephrectomy for low-stage renal cell carcinoma Eur Urol 59 2011 543 552
51. H.Y. Yu, B.K. Chen, and X.J. Zhang A comparative study of nephrectomy and radical nephrectomy for renal cell carcinoma [in Chinese] Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi 90 2010 1120 1122
52. T. Klatte, J. Mauermann, and G. Heinz-Peer Perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes of laparoscopic renal cryoablation and open partial nephrectomy: a matched pair analysis J Endourol 25 2011 991 997
53. Antonelli A, Ficarra V, Bertini R, et al. Elective partial nephrectomy is equivalent to radical nephrectomy in patients with clinical T1 renal cell carcinoma: results of a retrospective, comparative, multi-institutional study. BJU Int. In press. doi:10.1111/j.1464-410X.2011.10431.x.
54. S.J. Maclennan, S.J. Maclennan, and M. Imamura Urological cancer care pathways: development and use in the context of systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines World J Urol 29 2011 291 301
55. CEBM (Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine) Levels of Evidence. Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine Web site. http://www.cebm.net/index.aspx?o=5653. Accessed January 2012.
56. Guideline for management of the clinical stage 1 renal mass. American Urological Association Web site. http://www.auanet.org/resources.cfm?ID=442 [pp.13-4]. Accessed May 2011.
57. Guideline for management of the clinical stage 1 renal mass. American Urological Association Web site. http://www.auanet.org/resources.cfm?ID=442 [p. 14]. Accessed May 2011.
58. G.C. Hui, K. Tuncali, S. Tatli, P.R. Morrison, and S.G. Silverman Comparison of percutaneous and surgical approaches to renal tumor ablation: metaanalysis of effectiveness and complication rates J Vasc Interv Radiol 19 2008 1311 1320
59. G. Nabi, A. Cleves, and M. Shelley The necessity of adrenalectomy at the time of radical nephrectomy: a systematic review Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010 CD006579
60. R. Manikandan, V. Srinivasan, and A. Rane Which is the real gold standard for small-volume renal tumors? Radical nephrectomy versus nephron-sparing surgery J Endourol 18 2004 39 44 (Pubitemid 38295662)
61. D.A. Kunkle, and R.G. Uzzo Cryoablation or radiofrequency ablation of the small renal mass: a meta-analysis Cancer 113 2008 2671 2680
62. D.A. Kunkle, B.L. Egleston, and R.G. Uzzo Excise, ablate or observe: the small renal mass dilemma - a meta-analysis and review J Urol 179 2008 1227 1233