Empirical fragility curves from damage data on RC buildings after the 2009 L’Aquila earthquake

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2017, Pages 1425-1450

  Del Gaudio, Carlo ^a   De Martino, Giuseppina ^a   Di Ludovico, Marco ^a   Manfredi, Gaetano ^a   Prota, Andrea ^a   Ricci, Paolo ^a   Verderame, Gerardo Mario ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

AeDES form; Building classes; Damage data; EMS 98; Fragility curves; L Aquila earthquake; RC buildings

Indexed keywords

CONCRETE BUILDINGS; EARTHQUAKE EFFECTS; EARTHQUAKES; GEOPHYSICS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; SURVEYS;

BUILDING CHARACTERISTICS; DAMAGE DATA; DAMAGE PROBABILITY MATRICES; EMS-98; FRAGILITY CURVES; NON-STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS; PEAK GROUND ACCELERATION; RC BUILDINGS;

BUILDINGS;

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; DATABASE; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; GROUND MOTION; PEAK ACCELERATION; PROBABILITY;

ABRUZZI; ITALY; L'AQUILA;

AQUILA;

EID: 84991106641     PISSN: 1570761X     EISSN: 15731456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-016-0026-1     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Ambraseys NN, Simpson KA, Bommer JJ (1996) Prediction on horizontal response spectra in Europe. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 25(4):371–400
2. Amiri GG, Jalalian M, Amrei SAR (2007) Derivation of vulnerability functions based on observational data for Iran. In: Proceedings of international symposium on innovation and sustainability of structures in civil engineering, Tongji University, China
3. Baggio C, Bernardini A, Colozza R, Coppari S, Corazza L, Della Bella M, Di Pasquale G, Dolce M, Goretti A, Martinelli A, Orsini G, Papa F, Zuccaro G (2007) Field manual for post-earthquake damage and safety assessment and short term countermeasures (Pinto A, Taucer F eds), Translation from Italian: Goretti A, Rota M, JRC Scientific and technical reports, EUR 22868 EN-2007
4. Baker JW (2015) Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis. Earthq Spectra 31(1):579–599
5. Bommer JJ, Elnashai AS, Weir AG (2000) Compatible acceleration and displacement spectra for seismic design codes. In: Proceedings of the 12th world conference on earthquake engineering, Auckland, New Zeland, paper no. 207.2000
6. Borzi B, Pinho R, Crowley H (2008) Simplified pushover-based vulnerability analysis for large scale assessment of RC buildings. Eng Struct 30(3):804–820
7. Braga F, Dolce M, Liberatore D (1982) A statistical study on damaged buildings and an ensuing review of the MSK-76 scale. In: Proceedings of the 7th European conference on earthquake engineering, Athens, Greece, pp 431–450
8. Calvi GM (1999) A displacement-based approach for vulnerability evaluation of classes of buildings. J Earthq Eng 3(3):411–438
9. CEN (2003) Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance—Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels
10. Cosenza E, Manfredi G, Polese M, Verderame GM (2005) A multi-level approach to the capacity assessment of existing RC buildings. J Earthq Eng 9(1):1–22
11. Crowley H, Pinho R, Bommer JJ (2004) A probabilistic displacement-based vulnerability assessment procedure for earthquake loss estimation. Bull Earthq Eng 2(2):173–219
12. De Luca F, Verderame GM, Manfredi G (2015) Analytical versus observational fragilities: the case of Pettino (L’Aquila) damage data database. Bull Earthq Eng 13(4):1161–1181
13. Del Gaudio C, Ricci P, Verderame GM, Manfredi G (2015) Development and urban-scale application of a simplified method for seismic fragility assessment of RC buildings. Eng Struct 91:40–57. doi:10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.01.031
14. Del Gaudio C, Ricci P, Verderame GM, Manfredi G (2016) Observed and predicted earthquake damage scenarios: the case study of Pettino (L’Aquila) after the 6th April 2009 event. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-9919-2
15. Di Ludovico M, Prota A, Moroni C, Manfredi G, Dolce M (2016a) a, “Reconstruction process of damaged residential buildings outside the historical centres after L’Aquila earthquake—part I: “light damage” reconstruction. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-9877-8
16. Di Ludovico M, Prota A, Moroni C, Manfredi G, Dolce M (2016b) b. Reconstruction process of damaged residential buildings outside historical centres after the L’aquila earthquake—part II: “heavy damage” reconstruction. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-016-9979-3
17. Dolce M, Goretti A (2015) Building damage assessment after the 2009 Abruzzi earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng 13(8):2241–2264
18. Dolce M, Masi A, Goretti A (1999) Damage to buildings due to 1997 Umbria–Marche earthquake. In: Bernardini A (ed) Seismic damage to masonry buildings. Balkema, Rotterdam
19. Goretti A, Di Pasquale G (2004) Building inspection and damage data for the 2002 Molise, Italy earthquake. Earthq Spectra 20(S1):167–190
20. Grünthal G (1998) Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie: volume 15—European Macroseismic Scale 1998. European Center for Geodynamics and Seismology, Luxembourg
21. Iervolino I, Manfredi G, Polese M, Verderame GM, Fabbrocino G (2007) Seismic risk of R.C. building classes. Eng Struct 29(5):813–820
22. Ioannou I, Rossetto T, Grant DN (2012) Use of regression analysis for the construction of empirical fragility curves. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering, September 24––28, Lisbon, Portugal. Paper 2143
23. ISTAT (2011) 15° Censimento della popolazione e delle abitazioni 2011. Istituto Nazionale di Statistica. http://www.istat.it/it/censimento-popolazione/censimento-popolazione-2011
24. Lagomarsino G, Giovinazzi S (2006) Macroseismic and mechanical models for the vulnerability and damage assessment of current buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 4:415–443
25. Liel A, Lynch K (2012) Vulnerability of reinforced-concrete-frame buildings and their occupants in the 2009 L’Aquila, Italy, earthquake. Nat Hazards Rev 13(1):11–23
26. Margottini C, Molin D, Serva L (1992) Intensity versus ground motion: a new approach using Italian data. Eng Geol 33(1):45–58
27. Medvedev SV (1977) Seismic Intensity Scale MSK-76. Publication Institute of Geophysics of Poland, Academy of Sciences, Varsaw
28. Michelini A, Faenza L, Lauciani V, Malagnini L (2008) ShakeMap implementation in Italy. Seismol Res Lett 79(5):688–697
29. Orsini G (1999) A model for buildings’ vulnerability assessment using the Parameterless Scale of Seismic Intensity (PSI). Earthq Spectra 15(3):463–483
30. Polese M, Di Ludovico M, Marcolini M, Prota A, Manfredi G (2015) Assessing reparability: simple tools for estimation of costs and performance loss of earthquake damaged reinforced concrete buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 44(10):1539–1557
31. Regio Decreto Legge n. 431 del 13/3/1927 (1927) Norme tecniche ed igieniche di edilizia per le località colpite dai terremoti. G.U. n. 82 dell’8/4/1927 (in Italian)
32. Regio Decreto Legge n. 573 del 29/4/1915 (1915) Che riguarda le norme tecniche ed igieniche da osservarsi per i lavori edilizi nelle località colpite dal terremoto del 13 gennaio 1915. G.U. n. 117 dell’11/5/1915 (in Italian)
33. Ricci P, De Luca F, Verderame GM (2011) 6th April 2009 L’Aquila earthquake, Italy: reinforced concrete building performance. Bull Earthq Eng 9(1):285–305
34. Rossetto T (2004) Vulnerability curves for the seismic assessment of reinforced concrete structure populations. PhD Thesis, Imperial College, London, UK
35. Rossetto T, Elnashai A (2003) Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Eng Struct 25(10):1241–1263
36. Rossetto T, Ioannou I, Grant DN (2013) Existing empirical fragility and vulnerability functions: compendium and guide for selection. GEM technical report 2013-X, GEM Foundation, Pavia
37. Rossetto T, Ioannou I, Grant DN, Maqsood T (2014) Guidelines for empirical vulnerability assessment. GEM Technical Report 2014-X, GEM Foundation, Pavia
38. Rota M, Penna A, Strobbia CL (2008) Processing Italian damage data to derive typological fragility curves. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 28(10):933–947
39. Sabetta F, Goretti A, Lucantoni A (1998) Empirical fragility curves from damage surveys and estimated strong ground motion. In: Proceedings of the 11th European conference on earthquake engineering, Paris, France, September 6–11
40. Sieberg A (1930) Geologie der Erdbeben. Handbuch der Geophysik 2(4):552–555
41. Singhal A, Kiremidjian AS (1996) Method for probabilistic evaluation of seismic structural damage. ASCE J Struct Eng 122(12):1459–1467
42. Spence RJS, Coburn AW, Sakai S, Pomonis A (1991) A parameterless scale of seismic intensity for use in the seismic risk analysis and vulnerability assessment. In: International conference on earthquake, blast and impact, Manchester, UK, September 19–20, pp 19–30
43. Spence RJS, Coburn AW, Pomonis A (1992) Correlation of ground motion with building damage: the definition of a new damage-based seismic intensity scale. In: Proceedings of 10th world conference on earthquake engineering, Balkema, Rotterdam
44. Verderame G, Iervolino I, Ricci P (2009) Rapporto fotografico dei danni subiti dagli edifici a seguito dell’evento sismico del 6 aprile 2009 ore 1.32 (utc) – aquilano. Available at http://www.reluis.it (in Italian)
45. Verderame GM, De Luca F, Ricci P, Manfredi G (2011) Preliminary analysis of a soft-storey mechanism after the 2009 L’Aquila. Earthqu Eng Struct Dyn 40:925–944
46. Verderame GM, Ricci P, De Luca F, Del Gaudio C, De Risi MT (2014) Damage scenarios for RC buildings during the 2012 Emilia (Italy) earthquake. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 66:385–400
47. ® Manual, technical manual, users guide, and software guide. http://pubs.usgs.gov/tm/2005/12A01/pdf/508TM12-A1.pdf
48. Zuccaro G (2004) Progetto SAVE—Task1: inventario e vulnerabilità del patrimonio edilizio residenziale del territorio nazionale, mappe di rischio e perdite socio-economiche. INGV/GNDT (in Italian)
49. Zuccaro G, Cacace F (2009) Revisione dell’inventario a scala nazionale delle classi tipologiche di vulnerabilità ed aggiornamento delle mappe nazionali di rischio sismico. Atti del XIII Convegno ANIDIS “L’ingegneria sismica in Italia”, June 28–July 2, Bologna, Italy. Paper S14.39 (in Italian)
50. Zuccaro G, Cacace F (2015) Seismic vulnerability assessment based on typological characteristics. The first level procedure “SAVE”. Soil Dyn Earthq Eng 69:262–269