Analytical versus observational fragilities: the case of Pettino (L’Aquila) damage data database

Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 13, Issue 4, 2015, Pages 1161-1181

  De Luca, Flavia ^a   Verderame, Gerardo M ^a   Manfredi, Gaetano ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

EMS98; FAST method; Infills; L Aquila earthquake; Observational fragilities

Indexed keywords

CALIBRATION; EARTHQUAKES;

ANALYTICAL METHODOLOGY; ANALYTICAL RESULTS; EMS98; FAST METHODS; FRAGILITY CURVES; INFILLS; OBSERVATIONAL DATA; OBSERVATIONAL FRAGILITIES;

REINFORCED CONCRETE;

EID: 84924851616     PISSN: 1570761X     EISSN: 15731456     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10518-014-9658-1     Document Type: Article

References (46)

1. American Society of Civil Engineers, ASCE (2007) Seismic rehabilitation of existing buildings, ASCE/SEI 41–06. Reston, Virginia.
2. Bal I, Crowley H, Pinho R, Gulay G (2006). Structural characterisation of Turkish R/C building stock for loss assessment applications. In: Proceedings of 1st European conference of earthquake engineering and Seismology. Geneva.
3. Baggio C, Bernardini A, Colozza R, Della Bella M, Di Pasquale G, Dolce M, Goretti A, Martinelli A, Orsini G, Papa F, Zuccaro G (2000) Field manual for the I level post-earthquake damage, usability and emergency counter measures form. National Seismic Survey and National Group for Defence against Earthquakes (in Italian).
4. Calvi GM, Bolognini D, Penna A (2004) Seismic performance of masonry-infilled RC frames-benefits of slight reinforcements. Invited lecture to “Sísmica 2004—6$${\circ }$$∘ Congresso Nacional de Sismologia e Engenharia Sísmica”, Guimarães, Portugal, April 14–16.
5. Chioccarelli E, De Luca F, Iervolino I (2009) Preliminary study on L’Aquila earthquake ground motion records, V5.20. http://www.reluis.it/.
6. CEN (2004) European Standard EN1998-1:2004. Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels.
7. Circolare del Ministero dei Lavori Pubblici n. 617 del 2/2/2009 (2009) Istruzioni per l’applicazione delle “Nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni” di cui al D.M. 14 gennaio 2008. G.U. n. 47 del 26/2/2009 (in Italian).
8. Colangelo F (2003) Experimental evaluation of member-by-member models and damage indices for infilled frames. J Earthq Eng 7(1):25–50.
9. Colangelo F (2012) A simple model to include fuzziness in the seismic fragility curve and relevant effect compared with randomness. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 41:969–986.
10. Decanini LD, De Sortis A, Goretti A, Liberatore L, Mollaioli F, Bazzurro L (2004) Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the 2002 Molise, Italy, earthquake. Earthq Spectra 20(S1):S221–S255.
11. De Luca F, Verderame GM, Gómez-Martínez F, Pérez-García Agustín (2013a) The structural role played by masonry infills on RC building performances after the 2011 Lorca. Spain, earthquake. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9500-1.
12. De Luca F, Verderame GM, Manfredi G. (2013) FAST vulnerability approach: a simple solution for damage assessment of RC infilled buildings. VEESD, Vienna, Austria, 28–30 August.
13. Dolce M, Cardone D, Ponzo FC, Valente C (2005) Shaking table tests on reinforced concrete frames without and with passive control systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34:1687–1717.
14. Dolšek M, Fajfar P (2004) Inelastic spectra for infilled reinforced concrete frames. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 33(15):1395–1416.
15. Dolšek M., Fajfar P (2005) Simplified non-linear seismic analysis of infilled reinforced concrete frames. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 34:49–66.
16. Dolšek M, Fajfar P (2008) The effect of masonry infills on the seismic response of a four storey reinforced concrete frame: a probabilistic assessment. Eng Struct 30(11):3186–3192.
17. Erdik M, Durukal E, Siyahi B, Fahjan Y, Sesetyan K, Demircioglu M, Akman H (2004) Earthquake risk mitigation in Istanbul, Chap 7. In: Mulargia F, Geller RJ (eds) Earthquake science and seismic risk reduction. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
18. Fardis MN (1997) Experimental and numerical investigations on the seismic response of RC infilled frames and recommendations for code provisions. Report ECOEST-PREC8 No. 6. Prenormative research in support of Eurocode 8.
19. Goretti A, Di Pasquale G (2006) Technical emergency management. In: Oliveira CS, Roca A, Goula X (eds) Assessing and managing earthquake risk, chapter 16. Springer.
20. Grünthal G, Musson RMW, Schwarz J, Stucchi M (1998) European Macroseismic Scale 1998. Luxembourg, Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie 15.
21. Jalayer F, Beck JL, Zareian F (2012) Analyzing the sufficiency of alternative scalar and vector intensity measures of ground shaking based on information theory. ASCE J Eng Mech 138(3):307–316.
22. Kakaletsis DJ, Karayannis CG (2009) Experimental investigation of infilled reinforced concrete frames with openings. ACI Struct J 106(2):132–141.
23. Kircher CA, Nassar AA, Kutsu O, Holmes WT (1997) Development of building damage functions for earthquake loss estimation. Earthq Spectra 13(4):663–681.
24. Kullback S, Leibler RA (1951) On information and sufficiency. Ann Math Stat 22(1):79–86.
25. Kullback (1959) Information theory and statistics. Wiley, NY.
26. Liel AB, Lynch KP (2012) Vulnerability of Reinforced-Concrete- Frame Buildings and their occupants in the 2009 L’Aquila, Italy, Earthquake. Nat Hazards Rev 13(1):11–23.
27. Mainstone RJ (1971) On the stiffnesses and strengths of infilled frames. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineering, Supplement IV, pp 57–90.
28. Malhotra K (2006) Smooth spectra of horizontal and vertical ground motions. Bull Seismol Soc Am 96(2):506–518.
29. Manfredi G, Ricci P, Verderame GM (2012) Influence of infill panels and their distribution on seismic behavior of existing reinforced concrete buildings. Open Constr Build Technol J 6(Suppl 1–M1):236–253.
30. Manfredi G, Prota A, Verderame GM, Ricci P, De Luca F (2013) 2012 Emilia earthquake. reinforced concrete buildings response. Bull Earthq Eng Italy. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9512-x.
31. Polidoro B (2010) MSc Thesis. La valutazione della vulnerabilità sismica: il caso di Pettino (AQ), University of Naples Federico II. Advisors: Manfredi G, Iervolino I, Martinelli A, Verderame GM. http://wpage.unina.it/iuniervo (in Italian).
32. Porter K, Kennedy R, Bachman R (2007) Creating fragility functions for performance-based earthquake engineering. Earthq Spectra 23(2):471–489.
33. Ricci P (2010) Seismic vulnerability of existing RC buildings. Ph.D. Thesis. University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
34. Ricci P, De Luca F, Verderame GM (2011a) 6th April 2009 L’Aquila earthquake, Italy: reinforced concrete building performance. Bull Earthq Eng 9(1):285–305.
35. Ricci P, Verderame GM, Manfredi G (2011b) Analytical investigation of elastic period of infilled RC MRF buildings. Eng Struct 33(2):308–319.
36. Ricci P, De Risi MT, Verderame GM, Manfredi G (2013) Influence of infill distribution and design typology on seismic performance of low- and mid-rise RC buildings. Bull Earthq Eng. doi:10.1007/s10518-013-9453-4.
37. Rossetto T, Elnashai A (2003) Derivation of vulnerability functions for European-type RC structures based on observational data. Eng Struct 25:1241–1263.
38. Sezen H, Whittaker AS, Elwood KJ, Mosalam KM (2003) Performance of reinforced concrete buildings during the August 17, 1999 Kocaeli, Turkey earthquake, and seismic design and construction practise in Turkey. Eng Struct 25(1):103–114.
39. Tothong P, Cornell CA (2007) Probabilistic seismic demand analysis using advanced ground motion intensity measures, attenuation relationships, and near fault effects. In: John A. Blume (ed) Earthquake Engineering Center, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, CA.
40. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA (2006) Direct estimation of the seismic demand and capacity of oscillators with multi-linear static pushovers through Incremental Dynamic Analysis. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 35(9):1097–1117.
41. Vamvatsikos D, Fragiadakis M (2010) Incremental dynamic analysis for estimating seismic performance sensitivity and uncertainty. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 39:141–163.
42. Verderame GM, Polese M, Mariniello C, Manfredi G (2010) A simulated design procedure for the assessment of seismic capacity of existing reinforced concrete buildings. Adv Eng Softw 41:323–335.
43. Verderame GM, De Luca F, Ricci P, Manfredi G (2011) Preliminary analysis of a soft-storey mechanism after the 2009L’Aquila earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 40(8):925–944.
44. Verderame GM, De Luca F, De Risi MT, Del Gaudio C, Ricci P (2012) A three level vulnerability approach for damage assessment of infilled RC buildings: The Emilia 2012 case (V 1.0). http://www.reluis.it/.
45. Verderame GM, Ricci P, Esposito M, Manfredi G (2012b) STIL v1.0-Software per la caratterizzazione delle proprietà meccaniche degli acciai da c.a. tra il 1950 e il 2000. http://www.reluis.it/.
46. Walters RJ, Elliott JR, D’Agostino N, England PC, Hunstad I, Jackson JA, Parsons B, Philips RJ, Roberts G (2009) The 2009 L’Aquila earthquake (central Italy): a source mechanism and implications for seismic hazard. Geophys Res Lett 36:L17312.