Damage scenarios for RC buildings during the 2012 Emilia (Italy) earthquake

Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering

Volumn 66, Issue , 2014, Pages 385-400

  Verderame, Gerardo M ^a   Ricci, Paolo ^a   De Luca, Flavia ^a   Del Gaudio, Carlo ^a   De Risi, Maria Teresa ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NAPLES FEDERICO II   (Italy)

Author keywords

Cumulative damage; Damage scenario; Emilia earthquake; Fragility curves; Masonry infills; RC buildings

Indexed keywords

CONCRETE BUILDINGS; EARTHQUAKES; POPULATION STATISTICS; REINFORCED CONCRETE; BUILDINGS; SEISMOLOGY;

CUMULATIVE DAMAGE; DAMAGE SCENARIOS; FRAGILITY CURVES; MASONRY INFILLS; RC BUILDINGS;

DAMAGE DETECTION;

BENCHMARKING; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; DYNAMIC RESPONSE; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; EARTHQUAKE EVENT; OBSERVATIONAL METHOD; REINFORCED CONCRETE; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STIFFNESS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE; MASONRY;

EMILIA-ROMAGNA; ITALY;

EMILIA;

EID: 84907345794     PISSN: 02677261     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.soildyn.2014.06.034     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Chioccarelli E, De Luca F, Iervolino I. Preliminary study of Emilia (May 20th 2012) earthquake ground motion records V2.11. Available at: ; 2012. http://www.reluis.it.
2. EPICentre field observation report no. EPI-FO-200512. The 20th May 2012 EmiliaRomagna earthquake. Available at: ; 2012. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucestor/research-earthquake/EPICentre_Report_EPI-FO-200512-v2.pdf.
3. EPICentre field observation report no. EPI-FO-290512. The 29th May 2012 EmiliaRomagna earthquake. Available at: ; 2012. http://www.ucl.ac.uk/~ucestor/research-earthquake/EPICentre_Report_EPI-FO-290512.pdf.
4. Liberatore L, Sorrentino L, Liberatore D, Decanini LD. Performance of reinforced concrete residential buildings during the Emilia (Italy) 2012 Earthquakes. In: Proceedings of the SE-50EEE international conference on earthquake engineering. Paper 409. Skopje (Macedonia); 29-31 May 2013.
5. Parisi F, De Luca F, Petruzzelli F, De Risi R, Chioccarelli E, Iervolino I. Field inspection after the May 20th and 29th 2012 Emilia-Romagna earthquakes. Available at: ; 2012. http://www.reluis.it.
6. Erberik M.A. Fragility-based assessment of typical mid-rise and low-rise RC buildings in Turkey. Eng Struct 2008, 30(5):1360-1374.
7. Fiorini E, Borzi B, Iaccino R. Real time damage scenario: case study for the L'Aquila earthquake. In: Proceedings of the 15th world conference on earthquake engineering. Paper 3707. Lisbon (Portugal); 24-28 September 2012.
8. Kappos A.J., Lekidis V., Panagopoulos G., Sous I., Theodulidis N., Karakostas C.h., et al. Estimation of economic loss for buildings in the area struck by the 1999 Athens earthquake and comparison with actual repair costs. Earthq Spectra 2007, 23(2):333-355.
9. Lin L, Giovinazzi S, Pampanin S. Loss estimation in Christchurch CBD following recent earthquakes: validation and refinement of current procedures. In: Proceedings of the 2012 NZSEE annual conference. Paper 82. New Zealand Society for Earthquake Engineering (University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand); 13-15 April 2012.
10. Spence R., Bommer J., Del Re D., Bird J., Aydinoǧlu N., Tabuchi S. Comparing loss estimation with observed damage: a study of the 1999 Kocaeli earthquake in Turkey. Bull Earthq Eng 2003, 1(1):83-113.
11. w 6.3 earthquake. ismic hazard assessment (2 2011, 9(1):67-80.
12. Dolšek M., Fajfar P. Inelastic spectra for infilled reinforced concrete frames. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2004, 33(15):1395-1416.
13. Grünthal G (Ed.). European Macroseismic Scale 1998 (EMS-98). Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et de Séismologie 15, Helfent-Betrange (Luxembourg); 1998.
14. ISTAT. 14th Censimento generale della popolazione e delle abitazioni (14th general census of population and dwellings). Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (Italian National Instistute of Statistics); 2001.
15. Ricci P., De Luca F., Verderame G.M. 6th April 2009 L'Aquila earthquake, Italy - reinforced concrete building performance. Bull Earthq Eng 2011, 9(1):285-305.
16. De Marco R, Marsan P (Eds.). Atlante della classificazione sismica del territorio nazionale. Istituto Poligrafico e Zecca dello Stato Italiano (Roma): Servizio Sismico del Consiglio Superiore dei Lavori Pubblici; 1986.
17. Ordinanza del Presidente del Consiglio dei Ministri n. 3274 del 20/3/2003. Primi elementi in materia di criteri generali per la classificazione sismica del territorio nazionale e di normative tecniche per le costruzioni in zona sismica. G.U. n. 105 dell'8/5/2003; 2003 (in Italian).
18. Decreto Ministeriale del 16/1/1996. Norme tecniche per le costruzioni in zone sismiche. Gazzetta Ufficiale della Repubblica Italiana, 29 del 5/2/1996; 1996 (in Italian).
19. Manfredi G, Prota A, Verderame GM, De Luca F, Ricci P. 2012 Emilia earthquake, Italy: reinforced concrete buildings response. Bull Earthq Eng 2014, http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10518-013-9512-x.
20. Decreto Ministeriale del 14/1/2008. Approvazione delle nuove norme tecniche per le costruzioni. G.U. n. 29 del 4/2/2008.
21. Stucchi M., Meletti C., Montaldo V., Crowley H., Calvi G.M., Boschi E. Seismic hazard assessment (2003-2009) for the Italian building code. Bull Seismol Soc Am 2011, 101(4):1885-1911.
22. Di Capua G, Peppoloni S, Amanti M, Cipolloni C, Conte G, Avola D, et al. Il Progetto SEE-GeoForm: uno strumento per la consultazione di dati geologici e di pericolosità sismica riferiti all'intero territorio nazionale. In: Proceedings of the XIV convegno di ingegneria sismica (ANIDIS). Bari; 18-22 Settembre 2011 (in Italian).
23. Iervolino I., De Luca F., Chioccarelli E. Engineering seismic demand in the 2012 Emilia sequence: preliminary analysis and model compatibility assessment. Ann Geophys 2012, 55(4):639-645.
24. De Luca F., Verderame G.M. A practice-oriented approach for the assessment of brittle failures in existing RC elements. Eng Struct 2012, 48:373-388.
25. CEN. European standard EN1998-1:2004. Eurocode 8: design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings. Comité Européen de Normalisation, Brussels; 2004.
26. Shing P.B., Mehrabi A.B. Behaviour and analysis of masonry-infilled frames. Prog Struct Eng Mater 2002, 4:320-331.
27. Verderame G.M., De Luca F., Ricci P., Manfredi G. Preliminary analysis of a soft-storey mechanism after the 2009 L'Aquila earthquake. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2011, 40(8):925-944.
28. Verderame GM, Iervolino I, Ricci P. Report on the damages on buildings following the seismic event of 6th of April 2009 time 1.32 (UTC) - L'Aquila M=5.8, V1.20. Available at: ; 2009. http://www.reluis.it/.
29. Panagiotakos TB, Fardis MN. Seismic response of infilled RC frames structures. In: Proceedings of the 11th world conference on earthquake engineering. Paper no. 225. Acapulco (México); 23-28 June 1996.
30. Regio Decreto Legge n. 2229 del 16/11/1939. Norme per la esecuzione delle opere in conglomerate cementizio semplice od armato. G.U. n. 92 del 18/04/1940 (in Italian).
31. Verderame G.M., Polese M., Mariniello C., Manfredi G. A simulated design procedure for the assessment of seismic capacity of existing reinforced concrete buildings. Adv Eng Softw 2010, 41:323-335.
32. Verderame GM, Manfredi G, Frunzio G (2001) Le proprietà meccaniche dei calcestruzzi impiegati nelle strutture in cemento armato realizzate negli anni '60. Atti del X congresso nazionale ANIDIS "L'ingegneria Sismica in Italia", Potenza-Matera, Italy, September 9-13 (in Italian).
33. Verderame GM, Ricci P, Esposito M, Manfredi G. STIL v1.0 - software per la caratterizzazione delle proprietà meccaniche degli acciai da c.a. tra il 1950 e il 2000. Available at: ; 2012. http://www.reluis.it/.
34. Fardis M.N., Panagiotakos T.B. Seismic design and response of bare and masonry-infilled reinforced concrete buildings. Part II: infilled structures. J Earthq Eng 1997, 1(3):475-503.
35. Rossetto T., Elnashai A. A new analytical procedure for the derivation of displacement-based vulnerability curves for populations of RC structures. Eng Struct 2005, 7(3):397-409.
36. Calvi GM, Bolognini D, Penna A. Seismic performance of masonry-infilled RC frames - benefits of slight reinforcements. In: Invited lecture to sísmica 2004 - 6th congresso nacional de sismologia e engenharia sísmica. Guimarães (Portugal); 14-16 April 2004.
37. Biskinis D., Fardis M.N. Deformations at flexural yielding of members with continuous or lap-spliced bars. Struct Concr 2010, 11(3):128-138.
38. Ricci P., De Risi M.T., Verderame G.M., Manfredi G. Influence of infill distribution and design typology on seismic performance of low- and mid-rise RC buildings. Bull Earthq Eng 2013, 11(5):1585-1616.
39. Dolšek M. Development of computing environment for the seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete frames by using simplified nonlinear models. Bull Earthq Eng 2010, 8(6):1309-1329.
40. McKenna F, Fenves GL, Scott MH. OpenSees: open system for earthquake engineering simulation. Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center (University of California, Berkeley, CA, USA). ; 2004. http://opensees.berkeley.edu.
41. Celarec D., Ricci P., Dolšek M. The sensitivity of seismic response parameters to the uncertain modelling variables of masonry-infilled reinforced concrete frames. Eng Struct 2012, 35:165-177.
42. Ricci P. Seismic vulnerability of existing RC buildings 2010, (PhD thesis), University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy.
43. Dolšek M., Fajfar P. The effect of masonry infills on the seismic response of a four-storey reinforced concrete frame - a deterministic assessment. Eng Struct 2008, 30(7):1991-2001.
44. Dolšek M., Fajfar P. Simplified non-linear seismic analysis of infilled reinforced concrete frames. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2005, 34(1):49-66.
45. Berry M.P., Eberhard M.O. A practical performance model for bar buckling. ASCE J Struct Eng 2005, 131(7):1060-1070.
46. Panagiotakos T.B., Fardis M.N. Deformations of reinforced concrete members at yielding and ultimate. ACI Struct J 2001, 98(2):135-148.
47. Haselton CB, Liel AB, Taylor Lange S, Deierlein GG. Beam-column element model calibrated for predicting flexural response leading to global collapse of rc frame buildings. PEER report 2007/03. Pacific Engineering Research Center (University of California, Berkeley, California); 2008.
48. Verderame G.M., Ricci P., Manfredi G., Cosenza E. Ultimate chord rotation of RC columns with smooth bars: some considerations about EC8 prescriptions. Bull Earthq Eng 2010, 8(6):1351-1373.
49. McKay MD, Conover WJ, Beckman RJ. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input. 1979.
50. Vorechovsky M., Novak D. Correlation control in small-sample Monte Carlo type simulations I: a simulated annealing approach. Probab Eng Mech 2009, 24(3):452-462.
51. Pinto P.E., Giannini R., Franchin P. Seismic reliability analysis of structures 2004, IUSS Press, Pavia (Italy).
52. GNDT. Censimento di vulnerabilità a campione dell'edilizia corrente dei Centri abitati, nelle regioni Abruzzo, Basilicata, Calabria, Campania, Molise, Puglia e Sicilia. Rome (Italy): CNR-Gruppo Nazionale per la Difesa dai Terremoti; 2000.
53. Bazzurro P, Cornell CA, Menun C, Motahari M. Advanced seismic assessment guidelines. Report prepared for PG&E, PEER lifelines program. Task 507. September, 2006.
54. Luco N, Bazzurro P, Cornell CA. Dynamic versus static computation of the residual capacity of a mainshock-damaged building to withstand an aftershock. In: Proceedings of the 13th world conference on earthquake engineering. 2004.
55. Polese M, Di Ludovico M, Prota A, Manfredi G Damage-dependent vulnerability curves for existing buildings. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 2012, 42(6):853-870.
56. Vidic T., Fajfar P., Fischinger M. Consistent inelastic design spectra: strength and displacement. Earthq Eng Struct Dyn 1994, 23(5):507-521.