Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural analysis

Earthquake Spectra

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 579-599

  Baker, Jack W ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EARTHQUAKES; GEOPHYSICS; GEOTECHNICAL ENGINEERING;

ASSESSMENT APPROACHES; DYNAMIC STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; FRAGILITY CURVES; FRAGILITY FUNCTION; INCREMENTAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; INTENSITY LEVELS; SEISMIC ASSESSMENT; STATISTICAL INFERENCE;

STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; EFFICIENCY MEASUREMENT; ESTIMATION METHOD; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84922690668     PISSN: 87552930     EISSN: 19448201     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1193/021113EQS025M     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Agresti, A., 2012. Categorical Data Analysis, Wiley, New York.
2. Applied Technology Council, 2012. ATC-58, Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings, 100% Draft, Redwood City, CA, 266 pp.
3. Aslani, H., and Miranda, E., 2005. Fragility assessment of slab-column connections in existing non-ductile reinforced concrete buildings, Journal of Earthquake Engineering 9, 777-804.
4. Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A., 2005a. A vector-valued ground motion intensity measure consisting of spectral acceleration and epsilon, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 34, 1193-1217.
5. Baker, J. W., and Cornell, C. A., 2005b. Vector-Valued Ground Motion IntensityMeasures for Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis, Report No. 150, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford, CA, 321 pp.
6. Basoz, N. I., and Kiremidjian, A. S., 1998. Evaluation of Bridge Damage Data from the Loma Prieta and Northridge, California Earthquakes, Technical Report MCEER (98-0004), Multi-disciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research (MCEER), Buffalo, NY.
7. Bradley, B. A., 2010. A generalized conditional intensity measure approach and holistic ground-motion selection, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 39, 1321-1342.
8. Bradley, B. A., 2013. Practice-oriented estimation of the seismic demand hazard using ground motions at few intensity levels, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 42, 2167-2185.
9. Bradley, B. A., and Dhakal, R. P., 2008. Error estimation of closed-form solution for annual rate of structural collapse, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 37, 1721-1737.
10. Calvi, G. M., Pinho, R., Magenes, G., Bommer, J. J., Restrepo-Velez, L. F., and Crowley, H., 2006. Development of seismic vulnerability assessment methodologies over the past 30 years, ISET Journal of Earthquake Technology 43, 75-104.
11. Eads, L., Miranda, E., Krawinkler, H., and Lignos, D. G., 2013. An efficient method for estimating the collapse risk of structures in seismic regions, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 42, 25-41.
12. Federal Emergency Management Agency, 2009. Quantification of Building Seismic Performance Factors (FEMA P695, ATC-63), Washington, D.C., 421 pp.
13. Gehl, P., Douglas, J., and Seyedi, D. M., 2015. Influence of the number of dynamic analyses on the accuracy of structural response estimates, Earthquake Spectra 31, 97-113.
14. Ghafory-Ashtiany, M., Mousavi, M., and Azarbakht, A., 2011. Strong ground motion record selection for the reliable prediction of the mean seismic collapse capacity of a structure group, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 40, 91-708.
15. Haselton, C. B., and Deierlein, G. G., 2007. Assessing Seismic Collapse Safety of Modern Reinforced Concrete Moment Frame Buildings, Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Center Technical Report 2007/08, Berkeley, CA.
16. Ibarra, L. F., and Krawinkler, H., 2005. Global Collapse of Frame Structures under Seismic Excitations, John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center, Stanford, CA, 324.
17. Lervolino, I., Giorgio, M., Galasso, C., and Manfredi, G., 2010. Conditional hazard maps for secondary intensity measures, Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America 100, 3312-3319.
18. Jalayer, F., 2003. Direct Probabilistic Seismic Analysis: Implementing Non-Linear Dynamic Assessments, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
19. Kennedy, R. P., and Ravindra, M. K., 1984. Seismic fragilities for nuclear power plant risk studies, Nuclear Engineering and Design 79, 47-68.
20. Kim, S.-H., and Shinozuka, M., 2004. Development of fragility curves of bridges retrof itted by column jacketing, Probabilistic Engineering Mechanics 19, 105-112.
21. Klugman, S. A., Panjer, H. H., and Willmot, G. E., 2012. Loss Models: From Data to Decisions, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
22. Liel, A. B., and Deierlein, G. G., 2008. Assessing the Collapse Risk of California's Existing Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures: Metrics for Seismic Safety Decisions, John A Blume Earthquake Engineering Center Report #166, Stanford University, Stanford, CA.
23. Lin, T., Haselton, C. B., and Baker, J. W., 2013. Conditional spectrum-based ground motion selection-Part I: Hazard consistency for risk-based assessments, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 42, 1847-1865.
24. Petersen, M. D., Frankel, A. D., Harmsen, S. C., Mueller, C. S., Haller, K. M., Wheeler, R. L., Wesson, R. L., Zeng, Y., Boyd, O. S., Perkins, D. M., Luco, N., Field, E. H., Wills, C. J., and Rukstales, K. S., 2008. Documentation for the 2008 Update of the United States National Seismic Hazard Maps, U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 2008-1128, U.S. Geological Survey, Washington, D.C.
25. Porter, K., Kennedy, R., and Bachman, R., 2007. Creating fragility functions for performance-based earthquake engineering, Earthquake Spectra 23, 471-489.
26. R Team, 2012. The R Project for Statistical Computing, available at http://www.r-project.org/.
27. Rice, J. A. 1995. Mathematical Statistics and Data Analysis, Duxbury Press, Belmont, CA.
28. Shafei, B., Zareian, F., and Lignos, D. G., 2011. A simplified method for collapse capacity assessment of moment-resisting frame and shear wall structural systems, Engineering Structures 33, 1107-1116.
29. Shinozuka, M., Feng, M. Q., Lee, J., and Naganuma, T., 2000. Statistical analysis of fragility curves, Journal of Engineering Mechanics 126, 1224-1231.
30. Shome, N., 1999. Probabilistic Seismic Demand Analysis of Nonlinear Structures, Ph.D. Thesis, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford University.
31. Straub, D., and Der Kiureghian, A., 2008. Improved seismic fragility modeling from empirical data, Structural Safety 30, 320-336.
32. The Mathworks, 2012. MATLAB 2012b Release, Statistics Toolbox, available at http://www.mathworks.com/products/matlab/.
33. Vamvatsikos, D., and Cornell, C. A., 2002. Incremental dynamic analysis, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 31, 491-514.
34. Vamvatsikos, D., and Cornell, C. A., 2004. Applied incremental dynamic analysis, Earthquake Spectra 20, 523-553.
35. Villaverde, R., 2007. Methods to assess the seismic collapse capacity of building structures: State of the art, Journal of Structural Engineering 133, 57-66.
36. Yun, S.-Y., Hamburger, R. O., Cornell, C. A., and Foutch, D. A., 2002. Seismic performance evaluation for steel moment frames, Journal of Structural Engineering 128, 12.
37. Zareian, F., and Krawinkler, H., 2007. Assessment of probability of collapse and design for collapse safety, Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 36, 1901-1914.