Investigating Students' Reasoning about Acid-Base Reactions

Journal of Chemical Education

Volumn 93, Issue 10, 2016, Pages 1703-1712

  Cooper, Melanie M ^a   Kouyoumdjian, Hovig ^b   Underwood, Sonia M ^c  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b YORK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c FLORIDA INTERNATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Acid Base Reactions; Chemistry Education Research; Mechanistic Explanations; Testing Assessment; Undergraduate College Chemistry

Indexed keywords

EID: 84991079699     PISSN: 00219584     EISSN: 19381328     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jchemed.6b00417     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Hand, B. M.; Treagust, D. F. Application of a Conceptual Conflict Teaching Strategy to Enhance Student Learning of Acids and Bases Res. Sci. Educ. 1988, 18 (1) 53-63 10.1007/BF02356580
2. Hand, B. M.; Treagust, D. F. Student Achievement and Science Curriculum Development Using a Constructive Framework Sch. Sci. Math. 1991, 91 (4) 172-176 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1991.tb12073.x
3. Hand, B. M. Student Understandings of Acids and Bases: A Two Year Study Res. Sci. Educ. 1989, 19 (1) 133-144 10.1007/BF02356853
4. Ross, B.; Munby, H. Concept Mapping and Misconceptions: A Study of High-School Students' Understandings of Acids and Bases Int. J. Sci. Educ. 1991, 13 (1) 11-23 10.1080/0950069910130102
5. Demerouti, M.; Kousathana, M.; Tsaparlis, G. Acid-Base Equilibria, Part I. Upper Secondary Students' Misconceptions and Difficulties Chem. Educ. 2004, 9 (2) 122-131
6. Demircioglu, G.; Ayas, A.; Demircioglu, H. Conceptual Change Achieved through a New Teaching Program on Acids and Bases Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2005, 6 (1) 36-51 10.1039/B4RP90003K
7. Demerouti, M.; Kousathana, M.; Tsaparlis, G. Acid-Base Equilibria, Part II. Effect of Developmental Level and Disembedding Ability on Students' Conceptual Understanding and Problem-Solving Ability Chem. Educ. 2004, 9 (2) 132-137
8. Sheppard, K. High School Students' Understanding of Titrations and Related Acid-Base Phenomena Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2006, 7 (1) 32-45 10.1039/B5RP90014J
9. Lin, J.-W.; Chiu, M.-H. Exploring the Characteristics and Diverse Sources of Students' Mental Models of Acids and Bases Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2007, 29 (6) 771-803 10.1080/09500690600855559
10. Rahayu, S.; Chandrasegaran, A. L.; Treagust, D. F.; Kita, M.; Ibnu, S. Understanding Acid-base Concepts: Evaluating the Efficacy of a Senior High School Student-Centred Instructional Program in Indonesia Int. J. Sci. Math. Educ. 2011, 9 (6) 1439-1458 10.1007/s10763-010-9272-x
11. Carr, M. Model Confusion in Chemistry Res. Sci. Educ. 1984, 14 (1) 97-103 10.1007/BF02356795
12. Cros, D.; Maurin, M.; Amouroux, R.; Chastrette, M.; Leber, J.; Fayol, M. Conceptions of First-Year University Students of the Constituents of Matter and the Notions of Acids and Bases Eur. J. Sci. Educ. 1986, 8 (3) 305-313 10.1080/0140528860080307
13. Nakhleh, M. B.; Krajcik, J. S. Influence of Levels of Information as Presented by Different Technologies on Students' Understanding of Acid, Base, and pH Concepts J. Res. Sci. Teach. 1994, 31 (10) 1077-1096 10.1002/tea.3660311004
14. Maeyer, J.; Talanquer, V. The Role of Intuitive Heuristics in Students' Thinking: Ranking Chemical Substances Sci. Educ. 2010, 94 (6) 963-984 10.1002/sce.20397
15. McClary, L.; Talanquer, V. College Chemistry Students' Mental Models of Acids and Acid Strength J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2011, 48 (4) 396-413 10.1002/tea.20407
16. McClary, L.; Talanquer, V. Heuristic Reasoning in Chemistry: Making Decisions about Acid Strength Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2011, 33 (10) 1433-1454 10.1080/09500693.2010.528463
17. Bretz, S. L.; McClary, L. Students' Understandings of Acid Strength: How Meaningful Is Reliability When Measuring Alternative Conceptions? J. Chem. Educ. 2015, 92 (2) 212-219 10.1021/ed5005195
18. Cartrette, D. P.; Mayo, P. M. Students' Understanding of Acids/bases in Organic Chemistry Contexts Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2011, 12 (1) 29-39 10.1039/C1RP90005F
19. Stoyanovich, C.; Gandhi, A.; Flynn, A. B. Acid-base Learning Outcomes for Students in an Introductory Organic Chemistry Course J. Chem. Educ. 2015, 92 (2) 220-229 10.1021/ed5003338
20. Bhattacharyya, G. Practitioner Development in Organic Chemistry: How Graduate Students Conceptualize Organic Acids Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2006, 7 (4) 240-247 10.1039/B5RP90024G
21. Watters, D. J.; Watters, J. J. Student Understanding of pH: "i Don't Know What the Log Actually Is, I Only Know Where the Button Is on My Calculator. Biochem. Mol. Biol. Educ. 2006, 34 (4) 278-284 10.1002/bmb.2006.494034042628
22. Orgill, M.; Sutherland, A. Undergraduate Chemistry Students' Perceptions of and Misconceptions about Buffers and Buffer Problems Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2008, 9 (2) 131-143 10.1039/B806229N
23. Furió-Más, C.; Luisa Calatayud, M.; Guisasola, J.; Furió-Gómez, C. How Are the Concepts and Theories of Acid-base Reactions Presented? Chemistry in Textbooks and as Presented by Teachers Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2005, 27 (11) 1337-1358 10.1080/09500690500102896
24. McClary, L.; Bretz, S. L. Development and Assessment of a Diagnostic Tool to Identify Organic Chemistry Students' Alternative Conceptions Related to Acid Strength Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2012, 34, 2317-2341 10.1080/09500693.2012.684433
25. Shaffer, A. A. Let Us Give Lewis Acid-Base Theory the Priority It Deserves J. Chem. Educ. 2006, 83 (12) 1746 10.1021/ed083p1746
26. Treagust, D. F.; Chittleborough, G.; Mamiala, T. L. Students' Understanding of the Role of Scientific Models in Learning Science Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2002, 24 (4) 357-368 10.1080/09500690110066485
27. Justi, R.; Gilbert, J. Models and Modeling in Chemical Education. In Chemical Education: Towards Research-Based Practice; Gilbert, J.; De Jong, O.; Justi, R.; Treagust, D. F.; Van Driel, J. H., Eds.; Kluwer Academic Publisher: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2003; pp 47-68.
28. Gilbert, J. K.; Boulter, C. Developing Models in Science Education; Springer Science & Business Media: Berlin, 2012.
29. National Research Council. A Framework for K-12 Science Education: Practices, Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2012.
30. Bamberger, Y. M.; Davis, E. A. Middle-School Science Students' Scientific Modelling Performances across Content Areas and within a Learning Progression Int. J. Sci. Educ. 2013, 35 (2) 213-238 10.1080/09500693.2011.624133
31. Paik, S.-H. Understanding the Relationship Among Arrhenius, Brønsted-Lowry, and Lewis Theories J. Chem. Educ. 2015, 92 (9) 1484-1489 10.1021/ed500891w
32. Chi, M. T.; Slotta, J. D.; De Leeuw, N. From Things to Processes: A Theory of Conceptual Change for Learning Science Concepts Learn. Instr. 1994, 4 (1) 27-43 10.1016/0959-4752(94)90017-5
33. McMurray, J. E. Organic Chemistry, John E. McMurry-Cengage Learning 978-0840054449, 8 th ed.; Cengage Learning: Boston, MA, 2012.
34. Wade & Simek, Organic Chemistry, 9 th ed.; https://www.pearsonhighered.com/program/Wade-Organic-Chemistry-Plus-Mastering-Chemistry-with-e-Text-Access-Card-Package-9th-Edition/PGM203813.html (accessed July 18, 2016).
35. Krist, C.; Schwarz, C.; Reiser, B. J. Proposing a Framework for Identifying and Supporting Mechanistic Reasoning in Middle School Science. Manuscript in preparation.
36. Grove, N. P.; Cooper, M. M.; Rush, K. M. Decorating with Arrows: Toward the Development of Representational Competence in Organic Chemistry J. Chem. Educ. 2012, 89, 844-849 10.1021/ed2003934
37. Bhattacharyya, G. From Source to Sink: Mechanistic Reasoning Using the Electron-Pushing Formalism J. Chem. Educ. 2013, 90, 1282-1289 10.1021/ed300765k
38. Bhattacharyya, G. Trials and Tribulations: Student Approaches and Difficulties with Proposing Mechanisms Using the Electron-Pushing Formalism Chem. Educ. Res. Pract. 2014, 15, 594-609 10.1039/C3RP00127J
39. Bhattacharyya, G.; Bodner, G. M. It Gets Me to the Product": How Students Propose Organic Mechanisms J. Chem. Educ. 2005, 82 (9) 1402 10.1021/ed082p1402
40. Cooper, M. M. Why Ask Why? J. Chem. Educ. 2015, 92, 1273-1279 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00203
41. National Research Council. Knowing What Students Know: The Science and Design of Educational Assessment; Pellegrino, J. W.; Chudowsky, N.; Glaser, R., Eds.; National Academies Press: Washington, DC, 2001.
42. Mislevy, R. J.; Riconscente, M. M. Evidence-Centered Assessment Design. In Handbook of Test Development; Downing, S.; Haladyna, T., Eds.; Erlbaum: Mahwah, NJ, 2011.
43. Jin, H.; Anderson, C. W. Developing Assessments for a Learning Progression on Carbon-Transforming Processes in Socio-Ecological Systems. In Learning Progressions in Science; Springer: Berlin, 2012; pp 151-181.
44. Lee, H.-S.; Liu, O. L.; Linn, M. C. Validating Measurement of Knowledge Integration in Science Using Multiple-Choice and Explanation Items Appl. Meas. Educ. 2011, 24, 115-136 10.1080/08957347.2011.554604
45. Cooper, M. M.; Klymkowsky, M. W. Chemistry, Life, the Universe and Everything: A New Approach to General Chemistry, and a Model for Curriculum Reform J. Chem. Educ. 2013, 90, 1116-1122 10.1021/ed300456y
46. Williams, L. C.; Underwood, S. M.; Klymkowsky, M. W.; Cooper, M. M. Are Noncovalent Interactions an Achilles Heel in Chemistry Education? A Comparison of Instructional Approaches J. Chem. Educ. 2015, 92, 1979-1987 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00619
47. Cooper, M. M.; Grove, N.; Underwood, S. M.; Klymkowsky, M. W. Lost in Lewis Structures: An Investigation of Student Difficulties in Developing Representational Competence J. Chem. Educ. 2010, 87, 869-874 10.1021/ed900004y
48. Cooper, M. M.; Underwood, S. M.; Hilley, C. Z.; Klymkowsky, M. W. Development and Assessment of a Molecular Structure and Properties Learning Progression J. Chem. Educ. 2012, 89, 1351-1357 10.1021/ed300083a
49. Cooper, M. M.; Corley, L. M.; Underwood, S. M. An Investigation of College Chemistry Students' Understanding of Structure-property Relationships J. Res. Sci. Teach. 2013, 50, 699-721 10.1002/tea.21093
50. Cooper, M. M.; Williams, L. C.; Underwood, S. M. Student Understanding of Intermolecular Forces: A Multimodal Study J. Chem. Educ. 2015, 92 (8) 1288-1298 10.1021/acs.jchemed.5b00169
51. Underwood, S. M.; Reyes-Gastelum, D.; Cooper, M. M. Answering the Questions of Whether and When Student Learning Occurs: Using Discrete-Time Survival Analysis to Investigate How College Chemistry Students' Understanding of Structure-Property Relationships Evolves Sci. Educ. 2015, 99, 1055-1072 10.1002/sce.21183
52. Bryfczynski, S. P. BeSocratic: An Intelligent Tutoring System for the Recognition, Evaluation, and Analysis of Free-Form Student Input. Doctoral Dissertation, Clemson University, 2012.
53. Cooper, M. M.; Underwood, S. M.; Bryfczynski, S. P.; Klymkowsky, M. W. A Short History of the Use of Technology To Model and Analyze Student Data for Teaching and Research. In Tools of Chemistry Education Research; Cole, R.; Bunce, D., Eds.; ACS Symposium Series; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, 2014; pp 219-239.
54. Cohen, J. Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences; 2 ed.; Lawrence Erlbaum Associates: Hillsdale, NJ, 1988.
55. Cooper, M. M.; Klymkowsky, M. W. CLUE: Chemistry, Life, the Universe & Everything; http://virtuallaboratory.colorado.edu/CLUE-Chemistry/ (accessed July 18, 2016).
56. Grove, N. P.; Cooper, M. M.; Cox, E. L. Does Mechanistic Thinking Improve Student Success in Organic Chemistry? J. Chem. Educ. 2012, 89, 850-853 10.1021/ed200394d