Practitioner development in organic chemistry: How graduate students conceptualize organic acids

Chemistry Education Research and Practice

Volumn 7, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 240-247

  Bhattacharyya, Gautam ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

^b CLEMSON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

CER; Organic acids and bases; Organic chemistry; Practitioner knowledge; Theories in use, model eliciting activity (MEA)

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750418087     PISSN: 11094028     EISSN: 11094028     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1039/B5RP90024G     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bhattacharyya G. and Bodner G.M., (2005), "It gets me to the product": how students propose organic mechanisms, Journal of Chemical Education, 82, 1402-1407.
2. Bodner G.M., Gardner D.E. and Briggs M.W., (2005), in N. Pienta, M. Cooper, and T. Greenbowe, (Eds.), Chemists' guide to effective teaching, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
3. Bower G.H. and Morrow D.G., (1990), Mental models in narrative comprehension, Science, 247, 44-48.
4. th Ed., Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
5. Coll R.K. and Treagust D.F., (2002), Exploring tertiary students' understanding of covalent bonding, Research in Science and Technological Education, 20, 241-267.
6. Ericsson K.A. and Simon H.A., (1984), Protocol analysis: verbal reports as data, MIT Press, Cambridge, MA.
7. Fleming I., (1976), Frontier orbitals and organic chemical reactions, John Wiley & Sons, West Sussex, England.
8. Gilbert J.K., (1997), Exploring models and modelling in science education and technology education, The University of Reading, Reading, England.
9. Greca I.M. and Moreira M.A., (2000), Mental models, conceptual models, and modelling, International Journal of Science Education, 22, 1-11.
10. Knorr-Cetina K.D., (1983). The ethnographic study of scientific work: towards a constructivist interpretation of science. In K.D. Knorr-Cetina and M. Mulkay (Eds.), Science observed: perspectives on the social study of science (pp. 115-140), Beverly Hills, CA, Sage.
11. Knorr-Cetina K.D., (1999), Epistemic cultures: how the sciences make knowledge, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
12. nd Ed., University of Chicago Press, London.
13. Lesh R., Hoover M., Hole B., Kelly A. and Post T., (2000), In A. Kelly and R. Lesh (Eds.), Handbook of research design in mathematics and science education, Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
14. Preece Stucky A. and Bond-Robinson J., (2004), Empirical studies of scientists at work: analysis of authentic inquiry experiences, Presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Meeting, Vancouver, BC.
15. Samarapungavan A., Westby E.L. and Bodner G.M., (2006), Contextual epistemic development in science: a comparison of chemistry students and research chemists, Science Education, 90, 468-495.
16. Schön D.A., (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions., Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
17. Senge P., (1994), The fifth discipline fieldbook, Doubleday, New York.