Using HHsearch to tackle proteins of unknown function: A pilot study with PH domains

Traffic

Volumn 17, Issue 11, 2016, Pages 1214-1226

  Fidler, David R ^a   Murphy, Sarah E ^a   Courtis, Katherine ^a   Antonoudiou, Pantelis ^a   El Tohamy, Rana ^a   Ient, Jonathan ^a   Levine, Timothy P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

GRAM domains; Gyp7p; pleckstrin homology (PH) domains; profile profile search; Saccharomyces cerevisiae; secondary structure prediction; structural bioinformatics; TBC1D15; Vid27p, Vps13p; YJL016W; YJL181C; YJR030C

Indexed keywords

FUNGAL PROTEIN; PLECKSTRIN; PROTEOME; MEMBRANE PROTEIN; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; DATA BASE; NONHUMAN; PILOT STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DOMAIN; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN SECONDARY STRUCTURE; STRUCTURAL HOMOLOGY; YEAST; BIOLOGY; CHEMISTRY; PLECKSTRIN HOMOLOGY DOMAIN; PROCEDURES; PROTEIN DATABASE; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY; SOFTWARE;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DATABASES, PROTEIN; MEMBRANE PROTEINS; PILOT PROJECTS; PLECKSTRIN HOMOLOGY DOMAINS; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS; SEQUENCE HOMOLOGY, AMINO ACID; SOFTWARE;

EID: 84990882578     PISSN: 13989219     EISSN: 16000854     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/tra.12432     Document Type: Article

References (75)

1. Pena-Castillo L, Hughes TR. Why are there still over 1000 uncharacterized yeast genes? Genetics. 2007;176:7-14.
2. Brenner SE, Chothia C, Hubbard TJ. Assessing sequence comparison methods with reliable structurally identified distant evolutionary relationships. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:6073-6078.
3. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25:3389-3402.
4. Panchenko AR. Finding weak similarities between proteins by sequence profile comparison. Nucleic Acids Res. 2003;31:683-689.
5. Yona G, Levitt M. Within the twilight zone: a sensitive profile-profile comparison tool based on information theory. J Mol Biol. 2002;315:1257-1275.
6. Jaroszewski L, Li Z, Krishna SS, et al. Exploration of uncharted regions of the protein universe. PLoS Biol. 2009;7:e1000205.
7. Shi J, Blundell TL, Mizuguchi K. FUGUE: sequence-structure homology recognition using environment-specific substitution tables and structure-dependent gap penalties. J Mol Biol. 2001;310:243-257.
8. Tang CL, Xie L, Koh IY, Posy S, Alexov E, Honig B. On the role of structural information in remote homology detection and sequence alignment: new methods using hybrid sequence profiles. J Mol Biol. 2003;334:1043-1062.
9. Soding J. Protein homology detection by HMM-HMM comparison. Bioinformatics. 2005;21:951-960.
10. Krishnadev O, Srinivasan N. AlignHUSH: alignment of HMMs using structure and hydrophobicity information. BMC Bioinform. 2011;12:275.
11. Blundell TL, Sibanda BL, Sternberg MJ, Thornton JM. Knowledge-based prediction of protein structures and the design of novel molecules. Nature. 1987;326:347-352.
12. Jones DT. Protein secondary structure prediction based on position-specific scoring matrices. J Mol Biol. 1999;292:195-202.
13. Mariani V, Kiefer F, Schmidt T, Haas J, Schwede T. Assessment of template based protein structure predictions in CASP9. Proteins. 2011;79(Suppl 10):37-58.
14. Mayor LR, Fleming KP, Muller A, Balding DJ, Sternberg MJ. Clustering of protein domains in the human genome. J Mol Biol. 2004;340:991-1004.
15. Orengo CA, Swindells MB, Michie AD, et al. Structural similarity between the pleckstrin homology domain and verotoxin: the problem of measuring and evaluating structural similarity. Protein Sci. 1995;4:1977-1983.
16. Lemmon MA. Pleckstrin homology (PH) domains and phosphoinositides. Biochem Soc Symp. 2007;74:81-93.
17. Zhou MM, Ravichandran KS, Olejniczak EF, et al. Structure and ligand recognition of the phosphotyrosine binding domain of Shc. Nature. 1995;378:584-592.
18. Begley MJ, Taylor GS, Kim SA, Veine DM, Dixon JE, Stuckey JA. Crystal structure of a phosphoinositide phosphatase, MTMR2: insights into myotubular myopathy and Charcot-Marie-Tooth syndrome. Mol Cell. 2003;12:1391-1402.
19. Gervais V, Lamour V, Jawhari A, et al. TFIIH contains a PH domain involved in DNA nucleotide excision repair. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2004;11:616-622.
20. Jin R, Junutula JR, Matern HT, Ervin KE, Scheller RH, Brunger AT. Exo84 and Sec5 are competitive regulatory Sec6/8 effectors to the RalA GTPase. EMBO J. 2005;24:2064-2074.
21. D'Angelo I, Welti S, Bonneau F, Scheffzek K. A novel bipartite phospholipid-binding module in the neurofibromatosis type 1 protein. EMBO Rep. 2006;7:174-179.
22. Teo H, Gill DJ, Sun J, et al. ESCRT-I core and ESCRT-II GLUE domain structures reveal role for GLUE in linking to ESCRT-I and membranes. Cell. 2006;125:99-111.
23. VanDemark AP, Blanksma M, Ferris E, Heroux A, Hill CP, Formosa T. The structure of the yFACT Pob3-M domain, its interaction with the DNA replication factor RPA, and a potential role in nucleosome deposition. Mol Cell. 2006;22:363-374.
24. Troffer-Charlier N, Cura V, Hassenboehler P, Moras D, Cavarelli J. Functional insights from structures of coactivator-associated arginine methyltransferase 1 domains. EMBO J. 2007;26:4391-4401.
25. Baek K, Knodler A, Lee SH, et al. Structure-function study of the N-terminal domain of exocyst subunit Sec3. J Biol Chem. 2010;285:10424-10433.
26. Xu Q, Bateman A, Finn RD, et al. Bacterial pleckstrin homology domains: a prokaryotic origin for the PH domain. J Mol Biol. 2010;396:31-46.
27. Kemble DJ, Whitby FG, Robinson H, McCullough LL, Formosa T, Hill CP. Structure of the Spt16 middle domain reveals functional features of the histone chaperone FACT. J Biol Chem. 2013;288:10188-10194.
28. Blomberg N, Baraldi E, Nilges M, Saraste M. The PH superfold: a structural scaffold for multiple functions. Trends Biochem Sci. 1999;24:441-445.
29. Haslam RJ, Koide HB, Hemmings BA. Pleckstrin domain homology. Nature. 1993;363:309-310.
30. Doerks T, Strauss M, Brendel M, Bork P. GRAM, a novel domain in glucosyltransferases, myotubularins and other putative membrane-associated proteins. Trends Biochem Sci. 2000;25:483-485.
31. Hanawa-Suetsugu K, Kukimoto-Niino M, Mishima-Tsumagari C, Akasaka R, Ohsawa N, Sekine S, Ito T, Tochio N, Koshiba S, Kigawa T, Terada T, Shirouzu M, Kohda D, Nishikimi A, Fukui Y, et al. Structural basis of functional complex formation between DOCK2 and ELMO1 for Rac activation in lymphocyte chemotaxis Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2012;109:3305-3310.
32. Lu Q, Li J, Ye F, Zhang M. Structure of myosin-1c tail bound to calmodulin provides insights into calcium-mediated conformational coupling. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2015;22:81-88.
33. Im YJ, Raychaudhuri S, Prinz WA, Hurley JH. Structural mechanism for sterol sensing and transport by OSBP-related proteins. Nature. 2005;437:154-158.
34. Gough J, Chothia C. SUPERFAMILY: HMMs representing all proteins of known structure. SCOP sequence searches, alignments and genome assignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002;30:268-272.
35. Finn RD, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, et al. The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44:D279-D285.
36. Finn RD, Mistry J, Schuster-Bockler B, et al. Pfam: clans, web tools and services. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:D247-D251.
37. Eddy SR. Profile hidden Markov models. Bioinformatics. 1998;14:755-763.
38. Lees J, Yeats C, Redfern O, Clegg A, Orengo C. Gene3D: merging structure and function for a Thousand genomes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:D296-D300.
39. Finn RD, Clements J, Eddy SR. HMMER web server: interactive sequence similarity searching. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39:W29-W37.
40. Howe D, Costanzo M, Fey P, et al. Big data: The future of biocuration. Nature. 2008;455:47-50.
41. Hokanson DE, Laakso JM, Lin T, Sept D, Ostap EM. Myo1c binds phosphoinositides through a putative pleckstrin homology domain. Mol Biol Cell. 2006;17:4856-4865.
42. Feeser EA, Ignacio CM, Krendel M, Ostap EM. Myo1e binds anionic phospholipids with high affinity. Biochemistry. 2010;49:9353-9360.
43. Chen KY, Tsai PC, Hsu JW, et al. Syt1p promotes activation of Arl1p at the late Golgi to recruit Imh1p. J Cell Sci. 2010;123:3478-3489.
44. Jian X, Gruschus JM, Sztul E, Randazzo PA. The pleckstrin homology (PH) domain of the Arf exchange factor Brag2 is an allosteric binding site. J Biol Chem. 2012;287:24273-24283.
45. Hunter S, Apweiler R, Attwood TK, et al. InterPro: the integrative protein signature database. Nucleic Acids Res. 2009;37:D211-D215.
46. Cherry JM, Hong EL, Amundsen C, et al. Saccharomyces Genome Database: the genomics resource of budding yeast. Nucleic Acids Res. 2012;40:D700-D705.
47. Jaroszewski L, Rychlewski L, Li Z, Li W, Godzik A. FFAS03: a server for profile--profile sequence alignments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W284-W288.
48. Kelley LA, Sternberg MJ. Protein structure prediction on the Web: a case study using the Phyre server. Nat Protoc. 2009;4:363-371.
49. Knutson BA, Broyles SS. Expansion of poxvirus RNA polymerase subunits sharing homology with corresponding subunits of RNA polymerase II. Virus Genes. 2008;36:307-311.
50. Pei J, Grishin NV. Prediction of a caspase-like fold in Tannerella forsythia virulence factor PrtH. Cell Cycle. 2009;8:1453-1455.
51. Bateman A, Finn RD, Sims PJ, Wiedmer T, Biegert A, Soding J. Phospholipid scramblases and Tubby-like proteins belong to a new superfamily of membrane tethered transcription factors. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:159-162.
52. Kopec KO, Alva V, Lupas AN. Homology of SMP domains to the TULIP superfamily of lipid-binding proteins provides a structural basis for lipid exchange between ER and mitochondria. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:1927-1931.
53. Knutson BA. Insights into the domain and repeat architecture of target of rapamycin. J Struct Biol. 2010;170:354-363.
54. Hayes MJ, Bryon K, Satkurunathan J, Levine TP. Yeast homologues of three BLOC-1 subunits highlight KxDL proteins as conserved interactors of BLOC-1. Traffic. 2011;12:260-268.
55. Knutson BA, Hahn S. Yeast Rrn7 and human TAF1B are TFIIB-related RNA polymerase I general transcription factors. Science. 2011;333:1637-1640.
56. Pei J, Mitchell DA, Dixon JE, Grishin NV. Expansion of type II CAAX proteases reveals evolutionary origin of gamma-secretase subunit APH-1. J Mol Biol. 2011;410:18-26.
57. Levine TP, Daniels RD, Gatta AT, Wong LH, Hayes MJ. The product of C9orf72, a gene strongly implicated in neurodegeneration, is structurally related to DENN Rab-GEFs. Bioinformatics. 2013;29:499-503.
58. Levine TP, Daniels RD, Wong LH, Gatta AT, Gerondopoulos A, Barr FA. Discovery of new Longin and Roadblock domains that form platforms for small GTPases in ragulator and TRAPP-II. Small GTPases. 2013;4:62-69.
59. Hirst J, Schlacht A, Norcott JP, et al. Characterization of TSET, an ancient and widespread membrane trafficking complex. eLife. 2014;3:e02866.
60. Remmert M, Biegert A, Hauser A, Soding J. HHblits: lightning-fast iterative protein sequence searching by HMM-HMM alignment. Nat Methods. 2012;9:173-175.
61. Gerstein M. Measurement of the effectiveness of transitive sequence comparison, through a third 'intermediate' sequence. Bioinformatics. 1998;14:707-714.
62. Pei J, Grishin NV. The P5 protein from bacteriophage phi-6 is a distant homolog of lytic transglycosylases. Protein Sci. 2005;14:1370-1374.
63. Biegert A, Mayer C, Remmert M, Soding J, Lupas AN. The MPI Bioinformatics Toolkit for protein sequence analysis. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34:W335-W339.
64. Yu JW, Mendrola JM, Audhya A, et al. Genome-wide analysis of membrane targeting by S. cerevisiae pleckstrin homology domains. Mol Cell. 2004;13:677-688.
65. Murley A, Sarsam RD, Toulmay A, Yamada J, Prinz WA, Nunnari J. Ltc1 is an ER-localized sterol transporter and a component of ER-mitochondria and ER-vacuole contacts. J Cell Biol. 2015;209:539-548.
66. Gillooly DJ, Morrow IC, Lindsay M, et al. Localization of phosphatidylinositol 3-phosphate in yeast and mammalian cells. EMBO J. 2000;19:4577-4588.
67. Levine TP, Munro S. Targeting of Golgi-specific pleckstrin homology domains involves both PtdIns 4-kinase-dependent and -independent components. Curr Biol. 2002;12:695-704.
68. Park JS, Neiman AM. VPS13 regulates membrane morphogenesis during sporulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Cell Sci. 2012;125:3004-3011.
69. Lang AB, John Peter AT, Walter P, Kornmann B. ER-mitochondrial junctions can be bypassed by dominant mutations in the endosomal protein Vps13. J Cell Biol. 2015;210:883-890.
70. Park JS, Thorsness MK, Policastro R, et al. Yeast Vps13 promotes mitochondrial function and is localized at membrane contact sites. Mol Biol Cell. 2016;27:2435-2449.
71. Ingley E, Hemmings BA. Pleckstrin homology (PH) domains in signal transduction. J Cell Biochem. 1994;56:436-443.
72. Grille S, Zaslawski A, Thiele S, Plat J, Warnecke D. The functions of steryl glycosides come to those who wait: Recent advances in plants, fungi, bacteria and animals. Prog Lipid Res. 2010;49:262-288.
73. Rothman JH, Hunter CP, Valls LA, Stevens TH. Overproduction-induced mislocalization of a yeast vacuolar protein allows isolation of its structural gene. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 1986;83:3248-3252.
74. Soding J, Biegert A, Lupas AN. The HHpred interactive server for protein homology detection and structure prediction. Nucleic Acids Res. 2005;33:W244-W248.
75. Ashkenazy H, Erez E, Martz E, Pupko T, Ben-Tal N. ConSurf 2010: calculating evolutionary conservation in sequence and structure of proteins and nucleic acids. Nucleic Acids Res. 2010;38:W529-W533.