Life-cycle cost and seismic reliability analysis of 3D systems equipped with FPS for different isolation degrees

Engineering Structures

Volumn 125, Issue , 2016, Pages 349-363

  Castaldo, P ^a   Palazzo, B ^a   Della Vecchia, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALERNO   (Italy)

Author keywords

FP bearings; Isolation degree; Joint PDF; Life cycle cost analysis; Seismic reliability; Structural performance

Indexed keywords

COST ACCOUNTING; COSTS; EARTHQUAKES; FRICTION; LIFE CYCLE; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; RELIABILITY; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

ISOLATION DEGREE; JOINT PDF; LIFE CYCLE COST ANALYSIS; SEISMIC RELIABILITY; STRUCTURAL PERFORMANCE;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; RELIABILITY ANALYSIS; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC ISOLATION; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 84990060839     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: 18737323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.06.056     Document Type: Article

References (68)

1. [1] Christopoulos, C., Filiatrault, A., Principles of passive supplemental damping and seismic isolation. 2006, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
2. [2] Zayas, V.A., Low, S.S., Mahin, S.A., A simple pendulum technique for achieving seismic isolation. Earthq Spectra 6 (1990), 317–333.
3. [3] Jangid, R.S., Optimum frictional elements in sliding isolation systems. Comput Struct 76 (2000), 651–661.
4. [4] Chen, Y., Ahmadi, G., Stochastic earthquake response of secondary systems in base-isolated structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 21 (1992), 1039–1057.
5. [5] Chen, Y., Ahmadi, G., Wind effects on base-isolated structures. J Eng Mech ASCE 118 (1992), 1708–1727.
6. [6] Lin, Y.K., Cai, G.Q., Probabilistic structural dynamics—advanced theory and applications. 1995, McGraw-Hill, NY.
7. [7] Chen, J., Liu, W., Peng, Y., Li, J., Stochastic seismic response and reliability analysis of base-isolated structures. J Earthq Eng 11 (2007), 903–924.
8. [8] Fan, F.G., Ahmadi, G., Random response analysis of frictional base isolation system. J Eng Mech 116:9 (1990), 1881–1901.
9. [9] Su, L., Ahmadi, G., Response of frictional base isolation systems to horizontal–vertical random earthquake excitations. Probab Eng Mech 3:1 (1988), 12–21.
10. [10] Alhan, C., Gavin, H.P., Reliability of base isolation for the protection of critical equipment from earthquake hazards. Eng Struct 27 (2005), 1435–1449.
11. [11] Zou, X.K., Wang, Q., Li, G., Chan, C.M., Integrated reliability-based seismic drift design optimization of base-isolated concrete buildings. J Struct Eng 136 (2010), 1282–1295.
12. [12] Mishra, S.K., Roy, B.K., Chakraborty, S., Reliability-based-design-optimization of base isolated buildings considering stochastic system parameters subjected to random earthquakes. Int J Mech Sci 75 (2013), 123–133.
13. [13] Zhao, C., Chen, J., Numerical simulation and investigation of the base isolated NPPC building under three-directional seismic loading. Nucl Eng Des 265 (2013), 484–496.
14. [14] Castaldo, P., Tubaldi, E., Influence of fps bearing properties on the seismic performance of base-isolated structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 44 (2015), 2817–2836.
15. [15] Palazzo, B., Castaldo, P., Della Vecchia, P., Seismic reliability analysis of base-isolated structures with friction pendulum system. 2014 IEEE workshop on environmental, energy and structural monitoring systems proceedings Napoli September 17–18, 2014.
16. [16] Palazzo, B., Castaldo, P., Della Vecchia, P., Seismic reliability of base-isolated structures with friction pendulum isolators (FPS). 2nd European conference on earthquake engineering and seismology, Istanbul August 25–29, 2014.
17. [17] Castaldo, P., Palazzo, B., Della Vecchia, P., Seismic reliability of base-isolated structures with friction pendulum bearings. Eng Struct 95 (2015), 80–93.
18. [18] Cornell, C.A., Krawinkler, H., Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. PEERCenter News 4:1 (2000), 1–3.
19. [19] Ang, A.H.-S., Lee, J.-C., Cost optimal design of RC buildings. Reliab Eng Syst Saf 73 (2001), 233–238.
20. [20] Esteva, L., Díaz-Lòpez, O., García Pérez, J., Sierra, G., Ismael, E., Life-cycle optimization in the establishment of performance-acceptance parameters for seismic design. Struct Saf 24:2–4 (2002), 187–204.
21. [21] Ang, A.H.-S., Leon, D.D., Determination of optimal target reliabilities for design and upgrading of structures. Struct Saf 19:1 (1997), 91–103.
22. [22] García-Pérez, J., Seismic zoning for initial- and total-cost minimization. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 29 (2000), 847–865.
23. [23] García-Pérez, J., Zenteno, M., Díaz, O., Vulnerability functions and the influence of seismic design parameters on initial costs for buildings provided with hysteretic energy-dissipating devices. Earthq Resistant Eng Struct 93:VI (2007), 3–12, 10.2495/ERES070011.
24. [24] Castaldo, P., De Iuliis, M., Optimal integrated seismic design of structural and viscoelastic bracing-damper systems. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 43:12 (2014), 1809–1827.
25. [25] Castaldo, P., Integrated seismic design of structure and control systems. 2014, Springer International Publishing, New York.
26. [26] Park, K.-S., Koh, H.-M., Hahm, D., Integrated optimum design of viscoelastically damped structural systems. Eng Struct 26 (2004), 581–591.
27. [27] Palazzo, B., Seismic behavior of base-isolated buildings. Proceedings of the international meeting on earthquake protection of buildings, 1991.
28. [28] Naeim, F., Kelly, J.M., Design of seismic isolated structures: from theory to practice. 1999, John Wiley & Sons Inc.
29. [29] NTC08. Norme tecniche per le costruzioni. Gazzetta Ufficiale del 04.02.08, DM 14.01.08. Ministero delle Infrastrutture.
30. [30] Constantinou MC, Whittaker AS, Kalpakidis Y, Fenz DM, Warn GP. Performance of seismic isolation hardware under service and seismic loading. Technical report MCEER-07-0012; 2007.
31. [31] Constantinou, M.C., Mokha, A., Reinhorn, A.M., Teflon bearings in base isolation. II: Modeling. J Struct Eng 116:2 (1990), 455–474.
32. [32] Mokha, A., Constantinou, M.C., Reinhorn, A.M., Teflon bearings in base isolation. I: Testing. J Struct Eng 116:2 (1990), 438–454.
33. [33] Mckey, M.D., Conover, W.J., Beckman, R.J., A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis from a computer code. Technometrics 21 (1979), 239–245.
34. [34] Dolsek, M., Incremental dynamic analysis with consideration of modelling uncertainties. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 38 (2009), 805–825.
35. [35] Vořechovský, M., Novák, D., Correlation control in small-sample Monte Carlo type simulations I: a simulated annealing approach. Probab Eng Mech 24:3 (2009), 452–462.
36. [36] Celarec, D., Dolšek, M., The impact of modelling uncertainties on the seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete frame buildings. Eng Struct 52 (2013), 340–354.
37. [37] Wen, Y.K., Kang, Y.J., Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria I: methodology. J Struct Eng 127:3 (2001), 330–337.
38. [38] Mitripoulou, Ch.Ch., Lagaros, N.D., Papadrakakis, M., Life-cycle cost assessment of optimally designed reinforced concrete buildings under seismic actions. Reliab Eng Struct Saf 96 (2011), 1330–1331.
39. [39] Shin, H., Singh, M.P., Minimum failure cost-based energy dissipation system design for buildings in three seismic regions – part I: elements of failure cost analysis. Eng Struct 74 (2014), 266–274.
40. [40] Clemente, P., Buffarini, G., Seismic isolation and protection systems. Base isolation: design and optimization criteria. J Anti-Seismic Syst Int Soc (ASSISi), 1(1), 2010.
41. [41] SEAOC-Vision 2000 Committee, Vision 2000-a framework for performance-based earthquake engineering, vol. 1, 1995, Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento (CA).
42. [42] FEMA-350, Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings. 2000, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
43. [43] Ghobarah, A., On drift limits associated with different damage levels. Proceedings of the international workshop on performance-based seismic design; June 28–July 1, 2004.
44. [44] FEMA-227, A benefit-cost model the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. 1992, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Building Seismic Safety Council, Washington, DC.
45. [45] ATC-13, Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. 1985, Applied Technology Council, Redwood City, CA.
46. [46] CEN – European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 0: basis of structural design. Final draft. Brussels; 2006.
47. [47] Building Seismic Safety Council. NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Provisions (FEMA-274). Washington, DC; 1997.
48. [48] Collins KR, Stojadinovic B. Limit states for performance-based design. 12WCEE; 2000.
49. [49] Aoki Y, Ohashi Y, Fujitani H, Saito T, Kanda J, Emoto T, Kohno M. Target seismic performance levels in structural design for buildings. 12WCEE; 2000.
50. [50] Saito, T., Kanda, J., Kani, N., Seismic reliability estimate of building structures designed according to the current Japanese design code. Proceedings of the structural engineers world congress, 1998.
51. [51] Bertero, R.D., Bertero, V.V., Performance-based seismic engineering: the need for a reliable conceptual comprehensive approach. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 31 (2002), 627–652, 10.1002/eqe.146.
52. [52] Almazàn, J.L., De la Llera, J.C., Physical model for dynamic analysis of structures with FPS isolators. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 32 (2003), 1157–1184, 10.1002/eqe.266.
53. [53] Kilar, V., Koren, D., Seismic behaviour of asymmetric base isolated structures with various distributions of isolators. Eng Struct 31 (2009), 910–921.
54. [54] SAP 2000. Computers and Structures Inc.: Berkley, CA; 2002.
55. [55] Zayas, V.A., Low, S.S., Mahin, S.A., The FPS earthquake resisting system. Report No. CB/EERC-87/01, 1987, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley, California.
56. [56] Park, Y.J., Wen, Y.K., Ang, A.H.S., Random vibration of hysteretic systems under bi-directional ground motions. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 14 (1986), 543–557.
57. [57] Nagarajaiah S, Reinhorn AM, Constantinou MC. 3D-basis: non linear dynamic analysis of three-dimensional base isolated structures: Part II. Technical report NCEER-91-0005; 1991.
58. [58] Tena-Colunga, A., Escamilla-Cruz, J.L., Torsional amplifications in asymmetric base-isolated structures. Eng Struct 29:2 (2007), 237–247.
59. [59] FEMA-356, Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. 2000, Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington, DC.
60. [60] Ripani, M., Etse, G., Vrech, S., Mroginski, J., Thermodynamic gradient-based poroplastic theory for concrete under high temperatures. Int J Plast 61 (2014), 157–177.
61. [61] Etse, G., Vrech, S.M., Ripani, M., Constitutive theory for Recycled Aggregate Concretes subjected to high temperature. Constr Build Mater 111 (2016), 43–53.
62. [62] Kulkarni, J.A., Jangid, R.S., Effects of superstructure flexibility on the response of base-isolated structures. Shock Vib 26 (2003), 1–13.
63. [63] Cornell, C.A., Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 58:5 (1968), 1583–1606.
64. [64] Bazzurro, P., Cornell, C.A., Disaggregation of seismic hazard. Bull Seismol Soc Am 89 (1999), 501–520.
65. [65] Shome, N., Cornell, C.A., Bazzurro, P., Carballo, J.E., Earthquake, records, and nonlinear responses. Earthq Spectra 14:3 (1998), 469–500.
66. [66] Luco, N., Cornell, C.A., Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions. Earthq Spectra 23:2 (2007), 357–392.
67. [67] ESMD < http://www.isesd.hi.is/>.
68. [68] Aslani, H., Miranda, E., Probability-based seismic response analysis. Eng Struct 27:8 (2005), 1151–1163.