Influence of FPS bearing properties on the seismic performance of base-isolated structures

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 44, Issue 15, 2015, Pages 2817-2836

  Castaldo, Paolo ^a   Tubaldi, Enrico ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALERNO   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITÀ POLITECNICA DELLE MARCHE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Friction pendulum isolators; Nondimensional form; Performance based engineering; Seismic isolation

Indexed keywords

DEGREES OF FREEDOM (MECHANICS); EQUATIONS OF MOTION; FRICTION; PENDULUMS; SEISMIC WAVES; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; TRIBOLOGY;

FRICTION PENDULUM; NONDIMENSIONAL; NONLINEAR RESPONSE HISTORY ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE OF BUILDINGS; PERFORMANCE-BASED ENGINEERING; SEISMIC ISOLATION; SUPERSTRUCTURE FLEXIBILITY; TWO-DEGREE-OF-FREEDOM MODELS;

SEISMOLOGY;

BEARING CAPACITY; BUILDING; SEISMIC ISOLATION; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL COMPONENT;

EID: 84946494255     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.2610     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Christopoulos C, Filiatrault A. Principles of Passive Supplemental Damping and Seismic Isolation. IUSS Press: Pavia, Italy, 2006.
2. Su L, Ahmadi G, Tadjbakhsh IG. Comparative study of base isolation systems. Journal of Engineering Mechanic 1989; 115(9):1976-92.
3. Zayas VA, Low SS, Mahin SA. A simple pendulum technique for achieving seismic isolation. Earthquake Spectra 1990; 6(2):317-33.
4. Mosqueda G, Whittaker AS, Fenves GL. Characterization and modeling of friction pendulum bearings subjected to multiple components of excitation. Journal of Structural Engineering 2004; 130(3):433-442.
5. Mokha A, Constantinou MC, Reinhorn AM. Teflon bearings in base isolation I: testing. Journal of Structural Engineering 1990; 116(2):438-454.
6. Constantinou MC, Mokha A, Reinhorn AM. Teflon bearings in base isolation. II: modeling. Journal of Structural Engineering 1990; 116(2):455-474.
7. Constantinou MC, Whittaker AS, Kalpakidis Y, Fenz DM, Warn GP. Performance of seismic isolation hardware under service and seismic loading. Technical Report MCEER-07-0012, 2007.
8. Almazàn JL, De la Llera JC. Physical model for dynamic analysis of structures with FPS isolators. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2003; 32(8):1157-1184.
9. Jangid RS. Optimum frictional elements in sliding isolation systems. Computers and Structures 2000; 76(5):651-661.
10. Jangid RS. Optimum friction pendulum system for near-fault motions. Engineering Structures 2005; 27(3):349-359.
11. Chung LL, Kao PS, Yang CY, Wu LY, Chen HM. Optimal frictional coefficient of structural isolation system. Journal of Vibration and Control 2013Early view. DOI:10.1177/1077546313487938.
12. Iemura H, Taghikhany T, Jain S. Optimum design of resilient sliding isolation system for seismic protection of equipments. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2007; 5(1):85-103.
13. Barroso LR. Performance evaluation of vibration controlled steel structures under seismic loads. PhD thesis, Stanford University, California, US, 1999.
14. Barroso LR, Winterstein S. Probabilistic seismic demand analysis of controlled steel moment-resisting frame structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31(12):2049-2066.
15. Bucher C. Probability-based optimization of friction-based seismic isolation devices. Structural Safety 2009; 31(6):500-507.
16. Palazzo B, Castaldo P, Della Vecchia P. Seismic reliability analysis of base-isolated structures with friction pendulum system, 2014 IEEE Workshop on Environmental, Energy and Structural Monitoring Systems Proceedings Napoli September 17-18, 2014.
17. Palazzo B, Castaldo P, Della Vecchia P. Seismic reliability of base-isolated structures with friction pendulum isolators (FPS). 2nd European Conference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Istanbul August 25-29, 2014.
18. Castaldo P, Palazzo B, Della Vecchia P. Seismic reliability of base-isolated structures with friction pendulum bearings. Engineering Structures 2015; 95:80-93.
19. Ryan KL, Chopra AK. Estimating the seismic displacement of friction pendulum isolators based on non-linear response history analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2004; 33(3):359-373.
20. Tubaldi E, Ragni L, Dall'Asta A. Probabilistic seismic response assessment of linear systems equipped with nonlinear viscous dampers. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 2014. DOI:10.1002/eqe.2461.
21. Makris N, Black CJ. Dimensional analysis of rigid-plastic and elastoplastic structures under pulse type excitations. Journal of Engineering Mechanics (ASCE) 2004; 130(9):1006-1018.
22. Karavasilis TL, Seo CY, Makris N. Dimensional response analysis of bilinear systems subjected to non-pulselike earthquake ground motions. Journal of Structural Engineering 2011; 137(5):600-606.
23. Kelly JM. Earthquake-resistant Design with Rubber (2nd edn).. Springer-Verlag: Berlin and New York, 1997.
24. Palazzo B. Seismic behavior of base-isolated buildings. Proceedings of the International Meeting on earthquake Protection of Buildings, Ancona, 1991.
25. Aslani H, Miranda E. Probability-based seismic response analysis. Engineering Structures 2005; 27(8):1151-1163.
26. Porter KA. An overview of PEER's performance-based earthquake engineering methodology. Proceedings, Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Application of Statistics and Probability in Civil Engineering (ICASP9), San Francisco, California, 2003.
27. Shome N, Cornell CA, Bazzurro P, Carballo JE. Earthquake, records, and nonlinear responses. Earthquake Spectra 1998; 14(3):469-500.
28. Luco N, Cornell CA. Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Spectra 2007; 23(2):357-92.
29. Pinto PE, Giannini R, Franchin P. Seismic Reliability Analysis of Structures. IUSS Press: Pavia, Italy, 2003.
30. Ryan K, Chopra A. Estimation of seismic demands on isolators based on nonlinear analysis. Journal of Structural Engineering 2004; 130(3):392-402.
31. Mollaioli F, Lucchini A, Cheng Y, Monti G. Intensity measures for the seismic response prediction of base-isolated buildings. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering 2013; 11(5):1841-1866.
32. ATC-63. Quantification of building seismic performance factors. FEMAP695. Redwood City, CA, 2008.
33. European Committee for Standardization. Eurocode 8-design of structures for earthquake resistance. Part 1: general rules, seismic actions and rules for buildings, Brussels, 2004.
34. Jacobsen LS. Steady forced vibrations as influenced by damping. ASME Transactions 1930; 52(1):169-181.
35. Chopra AK. Dynamics of Structures: Theory and Applications to Earthquake Engineering (2nd edn).. Prentice Hall: Upper Saddle River, NJ, 2001.
36. Karavasilis T, Seo C. Seismic structural and non-structural performance evaluation of highly damped self-centering and conventional systems. Engineering Structures 2011; 33(8):2248-2258.
37. Cornell C, Jalayer F, Hamburger R, Foutch D. Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC Federal Emergency Management Agency steel moment frame guidelines. Journal of Structural Engineering 2002; 128(4):526-533.
38. Ang AHS, Tang WH. Probability Concepts in Engineering-emphasis on Applications to Civil and Environmental Engineering. John Wiley & Sons: New York, USA, 2007.
39. Math Works Inc. MATLAB - High Performance Numeric Computation and Visualization Software. User's Guide. Natick: MA, USA, 1997.
40. Inaudi JA, Kelly JM. Optimum damping in linear isolation systems. Earthquake Engineering & Structural Dynamics 1993; 22(7):583-598.
41. Takewaki I. Robustness of base-isolated high-rise buildings under code-specified ground motions. Structural Design of Tall Special Buildings 2008; 17:257-271. DOI:10.1002/tal.350.
42. Vamvatsikos D, Cornell CA. Incremental dynamic analysis. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2002; 31(3):491-514.