Life-cycle cost assessment of optimally designed reinforced concrete buildings under seismic actions

Reliability Engineering and System Safety

Volumn 96, Issue 10, 2011, Pages 1311-1331

  Mitropoulou, Chara Ch ^a   Lagaros, Nikos D ^a   Papadrakakis, Manolis ^a  

^a NATIONAL TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF ATHENS   (Greece)

Author keywords

Incremental dynamic analysis; Life cycle cost assessment; Nonlinear static analysis; Performance based design; Reinforced concrete buildings; Single and multi objective optimization; Uncertainties

Indexed keywords

INCREMENTAL DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; LIFECYCLE COSTS; MULTI OBJECTIVE; NON-LINEAR STATIC ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN; UNCERTAINTIES;

CIVIL ENGINEERING; CONCRETE BUILDINGS; CONCRETE CONSTRUCTION; COST ACCOUNTING; COSTS; DESIGN; DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; EARTHQUAKES; LIFE CYCLE; MULTIOBJECTIVE OPTIMIZATION; OCEAN STRUCTURES; RATING; REINFORCED CONCRETE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 79961009617     PISSN: 09518320     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ress.2011.04.002     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. D.A. Arditi, and H.M. Messiha Life-cycle costing in municipal construction projects Journal of Infrastruct Syst 2 1 1996 5 14 (Pubitemid 126591242)
2. Y. Asiedu, and P. Gu Product life cycle cost analysis: state of the art review Int. J. Prod. Res. 36 1998 883 908 (Pubitemid 128553180)
3. Y.K. Wen, and Y.J. Kang Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria. II: applications J Struct. Eng 127 3 2001 338 346 (Pubitemid 32873569)
4. M. Sanchez-Silva, and R. Rackwitz Socioeconomic implications of life quality index in design of optimum structures to withstand earthquakes J Struct Eng 130 6 2004 969 977 (Pubitemid 40265025)
5. J.L. Beck, K.A. Porter, and R.V. Shaikhutdinov Simplified estimation of seismic life-cycle costs D.M. Frangopol, E. Bruhwiler, M.H. Faber, B. Adey, Life-cycle performance of deteriorating structures: assessment, design, and management 2003 pp. 229236
6. Y. Takahashi, A. Der Kiureghian, and AH-S. Ang Life-cycle cost analysis based on a renewal model of earthquake occurrences Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 33 2004 859 880 (Pubitemid 38688674)
7. D.M. Frangopol, and M. Liu Maintenance and management of civil infrastructure based on condition, safety, optimization, and life-cycle cost Struct Infrastruct Eng 3 1 2007 29 41
8. A.J. Kappos, and E.G. Dimitrakopoulos Feasibility of pre-earthquake strengthening of buildings based on cost-benefit and life-cycle cost analysis, with the aid of fragility curves Nat Hazards 45 1 2008 33 54 (Pubitemid 351314917)
9. S. Pei, and J.W. Van De Lindt Methodology for earthquake-induced loss estimation: an application to woodframe buildings Struct Saf 31 1 2009 31 42
10. D. Vamvatsikos, and C.A. Cornell Incremental dynamic analysis Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 31 3 2002 491 514 (Pubitemid 34140538)
11. M. Dolsek Incremental dynamic analysis with consideration of modelling uncertainties Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 38 6 2009 805 825
12. FEMA-350 Recommended seismic design criteria for new steel moment-frame buildings 2000 Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington DC
13. FEMA-356. Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Federal Emergency Management Agency, Washington DC, SAC Joint Venture; 2000.
14. C.A. Cornell, F. Jalayer, R.O. Hamburger, and D.A. Foutch Probabilistic basis for 2000 SAC federal emergency management agency steel moment frame guidelines J Struct Eng 129 4 2002 526 533 (Pubitemid 34491013)
15. AH-S. Ang, and J-C. Lee Cost optimal design of RC buildings Reliab Eng Syst Saf 73 2001 233 238
16. L. Esteva, O. Díaz-López, J. García-Pérez, G. Sierra, and E. Ismael Life-cycle optimization in the establishment of performance-acceptance parameters for seismic design Struct Saf 24 24 2002 187 204 (Pubitemid 34724823)
17. M. Liu, S.A. Burns, and Y.K. Wen Optimal seismic design of steel frame buildings based on life cycle cost considerations Earthquake Eng Struct. Dyn 32 2003 1313 1332 (Pubitemid 36971754)
18. D.M. Frangopol, and K. Maute Life-cycle reliability-based optimization of civil and aerospace structures Comput Struct 81 7 2003 397 410
19. S.-I. Yanga, D.M. Frangopol, Y. Kawakamib, and L.C. Nevesa The use of lifetime functions in the optimization of interventions on existing bridges considering maintenance and failure costs Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91 2006 698 705
20. A. Joanni, and R. Rackwitz Costbenefit optimization for maintained structures by a renewal model Reliab Eng Syst Saf 93 2008 489 499 (Pubitemid 47599944)
21. L. Esteva, D. Campos, and O. Diaz-Lopez Life-cycle optimization in earthquake engineering Struct Infrastruct Eng 7 1,2 2011 33 49
22. Eurocode 8. Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures. ENV1998, CEN European Committee for standardization, Brussels; 1996.
23. Eurocode 2. European Committee for Standardization. Draft for Development of Eurocode 2: Design of concrete structures. ENV 1992-1-1; 1992.
24. N.D. Lagaros, A.D. Fotis, and S.A. Krikos Assessment of seismic design procedures based on the total cost Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 35 11 2006 1381 1401 (Pubitemid 44383360)
25. T.J. Sullivan, G.M. Calvi, M.J.N. Priestley, and M.J. Kowalsky The limitations and performances of different displacement based design methods J Earthquake Eng 7 1 2003 201 241 (Pubitemid 36848319)
26. T.B. Panagiotakos, and M.N. Fardis A displacement-based seismic design procedure for RC buildings and comparison with EC8 Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 30 2001 1439 1462 (Pubitemid 32914301)
27. Ghobarah A. On drift limits associated with different damage levels. In: Proceedings of the international workshop on performance-based seismic design; June 28July 1, 2004.
28. P. Giovenale, C.A. Cornell, and L. Esteva Comparing the adequacy of alternative ground motion intensity measures for the estimation of structural responses Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 33 8 2004 951 979 (Pubitemid 38847533)
29. A. Ghobarah, H. Abou-Elfath, and A. Biddah Response-based damage assessment of structures Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 28 1 1999 79 104 (Pubitemid 29154366)
30. FEMA 273 NEHRP guidelines for seismic rehabilitation of buildings 1997 Federal Emergency Management Agency Washington, DC
31. A. Elenas, and K. Meskouris Correlation study between seismic acceleration parameters and damage indices of structures Eng Struct 23 2001 698 704 (Pubitemid 32378994)
32. F. Jalayer, and C.A. Cornell Alternative nonlinear demand estimation methods for probability-based seismic assessments Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 38 8 2009 951 972
33. Freeman SA, Development and use of capacity spectrum method. In: Proceedings of the 6 US national conference on earthquake engineering; 1998.
34. Y.K. Wen, and Y.J. Kang Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria. I: methodology J Struct Eng 127 3 2001 330 337 (Pubitemid 32873568)
35. N.D. Lagaros Life-cycle cost analysis of construction practices Bull Earthquake Eng 5 2007 425 442 (Pubitemid 47117909)
36. B.R. Ellingwood, and Y.-K. Wen Risk-benefit-based design decisions for low-probability/high consequence earthquake events in mid-America Prog Struct Eng Mater 7 2 2005 56 70 (Pubitemid 40708917)
37. ATC-13 Earthquake damage evaluation data for California 1985 Applied Technology Council Redwood City, CA
38. FEMA 227 A benefitcost model for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings 1992 Federal Emergency Management Agency, Building Seismic Safety Council Washington, DC
39. ChCh Mitropoulou, ND Lagaros, and M. Papadrakakis Building design based on energy dissipation: a critical assessment Bull Earthquake Eng 8 6 2010 1375 1396
40. R. Rackwitz The effect of discounting, different mortality reduction schemes and predictive cohort life tables on risk acceptability criteria Reliab Eng Syst Saf 91 4 2006 469 484 (Pubitemid 43031350)
41. 〈 http://earthquake.usgs.gov/hazards/designmaps/ 〉 US Geological Survey (USGS).
42. 〈 http://peer.berkeley.edu/smcat/search.html/ 〉 Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research (PEER) (last accessed February 2010).
43. M.D. McKay, R.J. Beckman, and W.J. Conover A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code Technometrics 21 2 1979 239 245 (Pubitemid 9452235)
44. F. McKenna, and G.L. Fenves The opensees command language manual - version 1.2 2001 Pacific Earthquake Engineering Research Centre, University of California Berkeley
45. D.C. Kent, and R. Park Flexural members with confined concrete J Struct Div 97 7 1971 1969 1990
46. Menegotto M, Pinto PE. Method of analysis for cyclically loaded reinforced concrete plane frames including changes in geometry and non-elastic behavior of elements under combined normal force and bending. In: Proceedings of the IABSE symposium on resistance and ultimate deformability of structures acted on by well defined repeated loads; 1973, p. 1522.
47. A. Marini, and E. Spacone Analysis of reinforced concrete elements including shear effects ACI Struct J 103 5 2006 645 655 (Pubitemid 44377599)
48. R.T. Marler, and J.S. Arora Survey of multi-objective optimization methods for engineering Struct Multidiscip Optim 26 6 2004 369 395
49. N.D. Lagaros, and M. Papadrakakis Robust seismic design optimization of steel structures Struct Multidiscip Optim 33 6 2007 457 469 (Pubitemid 46752123)