Disaggregation of seismic hazard

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America

Volumn 89, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 501-520

  Bazzurro, Paolo ^a   Cornell, C Allin ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HAZARD ASSESSMENT; MATHEMATICAL METHOD; SEISMIC HAZARD;

EID: 0032799068     PISSN: 00371106     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Abrahamson, N. A. (1996). Personal communication. Pacific Gas & Electric Co., San Francisco, May.
2. Abrahamson, N. A. and W. J. Silva (1997). Empirical response spectra attenuation relations for shallow crustal earthquakes, Seism. Res. Lett. 68, 94-127.
3. Benreuter, D. L., A. C. Boissonnade, and C. M. Short (1996). Investigation of techniques for the development of seismic design basis using probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Rept. NUREG/CR-6606, prepared for U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission.
4. Boissonnade, A., N. Chokshi, D. Benreuter, and A. Murphy (1995). Determination of controlling earthquakes from probabilistic seismic hazard analysis for nuclear reactor sites, Proc. of the Thirteenth International Conference on Structural Mechanics in Reactor Technology, SMiRT 13, Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul, Porto Alegre, Brazil, August 13-18, 771-776.
5. Campbell, K. C. (1997). Empirical near-source attenuation of horizontal and vertical components of peak ground acceleration, peak ground velocity, and pseudo-absolute acceleration response spectra, Seism. Res. Lett. 68, 154-179.
6. Chapman, M. C. (1995). A probabilistic approach to ground-motion selection for engineering design, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 85, 937-942, June.
7. Cornell, C. A. (1968). Engineering seismic risk analysis, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 58, 1583-1606.
8. Cramer, C. H. and M. D. Petersen (1996). Predominant seismic source distance and magnitude maps for Los Angeles, Orange, and Ventura Counties, California, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 86, 1645-1649.
9. Ishikawa, Y. and H. Kameda (1988). Hazard-consistent magnitude and distance for extended seismic risk analysis, Proc. of Ninth World Conference on Earthquake Engineering II, 89-94.
10. Ishikawa, Y. and H. Kameda (1991). Probability-based determination of specific scenario earthquakes, Proc. of Fourth International Conference on Seismic Zonation II, 3-10.
11. Ishikawa, Y. and H. Kameda (1993). Scenario earthquakes vs. probabilistic seismic hazard, Proc. of Fourth International Conference on Structural Safely and Reliability 3, 2139-2146, Innsbruck, Austria.
12. Kameda, H., C. H. Loh, and M. Nakajima (1994a). A comparative study in Japan and Taiwan by means of probabilistic scenario earthquakes, Proc. of Fourth KAIST-NTU-KU Tri-Lateral Seminar/Workshop on Civil Engineering, Kyoto, Japan, November 22-23, 27-37.
13. Kameda, H., Y. Ishikawa, and W. Li (1994b). Probability based determination of scenario earthquakes, in Seismic Risk Assessment of Urban Facilities in a Sedimentary Region, Chap. 4, Natural Hazard Reduction and Mitigation in the East Asia, Final Rept. Part 3, March, 67-85.
14. Kimball, J. K. and H. Chander (1996). Department of Energy seismic siting and design decisions: consistent use of seismic hazard analysis, Proc. Twenty-Fourth Water Reactor Safety Information Meeting 3, 141-160, Bethesda, October 21-23, U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, NUREG/CP-0157.
15. Kramer, S. L. (1996). Geothecnical Earthquake Engineering, Prentice-Hall International Series in Civil Engineering and Engineering Mechanics, Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
16. McGuire, R. K. (1995). Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis and design earthquakes: closing the loop, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 85, 1275-1284.
17. McGuire, R. K. and K. M. Shedlock (1981). Statistical uncertainties in seismic hazard evaluations in the United States, Bull. Seism. Soc. Am. 71, 1287-1308.
18. National Research Council (NRC) (1988). Probabilistic seismic hazard analysis, Rept. of the Panel on Seismic Hazard Analysis, National Academy Press, Washington, D.C.
19. Risk Engineering, Inc. (REI) (1989). EQHAZARD primer, Special Rept. NP-6452-D, Research Project P101-46, prepared for Seismicity Owners Group and Electric Power Research Institute.
20. Savy, J. B. (1994). Seismic Hazard Characterization at the DOE Savannah River Site (SRS) Status Report, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Rept. UCRL-ID-117452, June 24.
21. Seed, H. B. and K. L. Lee (1966). Liquefaction of saturated sands during cyclic loading, J. Soil Mech. Found. Div. ASCE 92, 105-134.
22. Seed, H. B., I. M. Idriss, and I. Arango (1983). Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data, J. Geotech. Eng. ASCE 109, 458-482.
23. Senior Seismic Hazard Analysis Committee (SSHAC) (1997). Recommendations for probabilistic seismic hazard analysis: guidance on uncertainty and use of experts, NUREG/CR-6372, UCRL-ID-122160, Main Report 1, prepared for Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, April.
24. Somerville, P., N. F. Smith, R. W. Graves, and N. A. Abrahamson (1997). Modification of empirical strong motion attenuation relations to include the amplitude and duration effects of rupture directivity, Seism. Res. Lett. 68, 199-222.
25. Spudich, P. (1997). What seismology may be able to bring to future building codes, Proc. of the ATC-35 Ground Motion Initiative Workshop, Rancho Bernardo, California, July 30-31.
26. Stepp, J. C., W. J. Silva, R. K. McGuire, and R. T. Sewell (1993). Determination of earthquake design loads for high level nuclear waste repository facility, Proc. of Fourth DOE Natural Phenomena Hazard Mitigation Conference II, 651-657, Atlanta.
27. U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (U.S. NRC) (1997). Identification and Characterization of Seismic Sources and Determination of Safe Shutdown Earthquake Ground Motion, Regulations 10 CFR Part 100, Regulatory Guide 1.165, Appendix C, Washington, D.C., 1.165-17/ 1.165-23.
28. U.S. Department of Energy (U.S. DOE) (1996). Natural Phenomena Hazards Assessment Criteria, DOE-STD-1023-96, Washington, D.C.
29. Wessel, P. and W. H. F. Smith (1991). GMT free software helps map and display data, EOS 72, 441 and 445-446.