Minimum failure cost-based energy dissipation system designs for buildings in three seismic regions - Part I: Elements of failure cost analysis

Engineering Structures

Volumn 74, Issue , 2014, Pages 266-274

  Shin, H ^a   Singh, M P ^a  

^a VIRGINIA POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE AND STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Inter story drifts; Life cycle cost; Minimum failure cost; Multiple limit states; Optimal designs; Performance based design; Seismic designs; Viscous dampers

Indexed keywords

ARCHITECTURAL DESIGN; CIVIL ENGINEERING; COSTS; LIFE CYCLE; NUMERICAL METHODS; OPTIMAL SYSTEMS; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

FAILURE COST; INTERSTORY DRIFTS; LIFECYCLE COSTS; LIMIT STATE; OPTIMAL DESIGN; PERFORMANCE BASED DESIGN; VISCOUS DAMPERS;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

BUILDING; COST ANALYSIS; DAMPING; EARTHQUAKE DAMAGE; ENERGY DISSIPATION; FAILURE ANALYSIS; LIFE CYCLE ANALYSIS; LIMIT ANALYSIS; OPTIMIZATION; PERFORMANCE ASSESSMENT; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL RESPONSE;

EID: 84904568685     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2014.04.054     Document Type: Article

References (35)

1. SEAOC-Vision 2000 Committee. Vision 2000-a framework for performance based earthquake engineering, vol. 1. Sacramento (CA): Structural Engineers Association of California; 1995.
2. Wu B., Ou J.P., Soong T.T. Optimal placement of energy dissipation devices for three-dimensional structures. Eng Struct 1997, 19:113-125.
3. Moreschi L.M., Singh M.P. Designs with yielding metallic and friction dampers for optimal seismic performance. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 2003, 32(8):1291-1311.
4. Wongprasert N., Symans M.D. Application of a genetic algorithm for optimal damper distribution within the nonlinear seismic benchmark building. J Eng Mech 2004, 130(4):401-406.
5. ATC-58. ATC-58 project reports: seismic performance assessment of buildings-methodology. FEMA P-58-1. Redwood City (CA): Applied Technology Council; 2012.
6. ATC-58. ATC-58 project reports: seismic performance assessment of buildings-implementation guide. FEMA P-58-2. Redwood City: Applied Technology Council; 2012.
7. ATC. ATC-58 project reports: seismic performance assessment of buildings-supporting electronic materials and background documentation. FEMA P-58-3. Redwood City, CA: Applied Technology Council; 2012.
8. Wen Y.K., Kang Y.J. Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria I: methodology. J Struct Eng 2001, 127(3):330-337.
9. Wen Y.K., Kang Y.J. Minimum building life-cycle cost design criteria II: application. J Struct Eng 2001, 127(3):338-346.
10. Liu M., Wen Y.K., Burns S.A. Life-cycle cost oriented seismic design optimization of steel moment frame structures with risk-taking preference. Eng Struct 2004, 26:1407-1421.
11. Taflanidis A.A., Beck J.L. Life-cycle cost optimal design of passive dissipative devices. Struct Safety 2009, 31:508-522.
12. Wong K.K.F., Harris J.L. Seismic fragility and cost analyses of actively controlled structures. Struct Des Tall Special Build 2011, 22(7):569-583.
13. Lamprou A., Jia G., Taflanidis A.A. Life-cycle seismic loss estimation and global sensitivity analysis based. Eng Struct 2013, 54:192-206.
14. Porter K.A., Kiremidjian A.S., LeGrue J.S. Assembly-based vulnerability of buildings and its use in performance evaluation. Earthq Spectra 2001, 17(2):291-312.
15. Porter K.A., Beck J.L., Shaikhutdinov R.V. Simplified performance-based earthquake engineering estimation of economic risk for buildings. Earthq Spectra 2004, 20(4):1239-1263.
16. Porter K.A., Mirtrani-Reiser J., Beck J.L., Ching J.Y. Near-real-time loss estimation for instrumented buildings. Struct Des Tall Special Build 2006, 15(1):3-20.
17. Whiteman RV, Hong ST, Reed JW. Damage statistics for high-rise buildings in the vicinity of the San Fernando earthquake. Report no. 7 (R73-24). Cambridge: Department of Civil Engineering MIT; 1973.
18. ATC-13. Earthquake damage evaluation data for California. Redwood City (CA): Applied Technology Council; 1985.
19. FEMA-178. NEHRP handbook for the seismic evaluation of existing buildings. Washington (DC): Federal Emergency Management Agency; 1992.
20. FEMA-227. A benefit-cost model for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, vol. 1. Washington (DC): Federal Emergency Management Agency; 1992.
21. FEMA-228. A benefit-cost model for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, vol. 2. Washington (DC): Federal Emergency Management Agency; 1992.
22. Kircher C.A., Nassar A.A., Kustu O., Holmes W.T. Development of building damage functions for earthquake loss function. Earthq Spectra 1997, 13(4):663-682.
23. Shin H, Singh MP. Minimum failure cost-based energy dissipation system designs for buildings in three seismic regions - Part II: application to viscous damper. J Eng Struct 2014;74:275-82.
24. FEMA-355C. State of the art report on system performance of steel moment frames subject to earthquake ground shaking. Washington (DC): Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2000.
25. Maldonado G.O., Singh M.P. An improved response spectrum method for calculating seismic design response Part-2: non-classically damped structures. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 1991, 20:637-649.
26. Building Seismic Safety Council. NEHRP recommended seismic provisions for new buildings and other structures. FEMA P-750. Washington (DC): Federal Emergency Management Agency; 2010.
27. Chopra A.K. Dynamics of structures-theory and application to earthquake engineering 2000, Prentice Hall, NJ. 2nd ed.
28. Bommer J.J., Mendis R. Scaling of spectral displacement ordinates with damping ratios. Earthq Eng Struct Dynam 2005, 34:145-165.
29. Gasparini DA, Vanmarcke EH. Simulated earthquake motions compatible with prescribed response spectra. Report no 2. Cambridge: Department of Civil Engineering MIT; 1976.
30. Wen YK, Ang A H-S. Reliability and cost-effectiveness of structures with active control. In: Intelligent structures-2, monitoring and control; 1992. p. 63-71.
31. Ang A.H.-S., Leon D. Development of target reliability for design and upgrading of structures. Struct Safety 1997, 14(1):91-103. [Amsterdam].
32. http://opensees.berkeley.edu/OpenSees/copyright.php.
33. Ibarra LF, Krawinkler H. Global collapse of frame structures under seismic excitations. Technical report 152. Stanford (CA): The John A. Blume Earthquake Research Center, Department of Civil Engineering, Stanford University; 2005.
34. Means R.S. 2009 RS means building construction cost data 2008, Reed Construction Data, Kingston (MA). 67th ed.
35. Shin H. Life-cycle cost-based optimal seismic design of structures with energy dissipation devices. Ph.D thesis. Blacksburg: Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; 2010.