Seismic reliability of base-isolated structures with friction pendulum bearings

Engineering Structures

Volumn 95, Issue , 2015, Pages 80-93

  Castaldo, P ^a   Palazzo, B ^a   Della Vecchia, P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SALERNO   (Italy)

Author keywords

FP bearing; LHS method; Seismic reliability; Structural performance

Indexed keywords

AIR; DISTRIBUTION FUNCTIONS; FRICTION; FUNCTION EVALUATION; PENDULUMS; PROBABILITY; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTIONS; RANDOM VARIABLES; RELIABILITY; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMOLOGY; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS; TRIBOLOGY;

CUMULATIVE DISTRIBUTION FUNCTION; FRICTION PENDULUM BEARINGS; FRICTION PENDULUM SYSTEM; LHS METHOD; NON-LINEAR DYNAMIC ANALYSIS; PERFORMANCE BASED SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC RELIABILITY; STRUCTURAL PERFORMANCE;

EARTHQUAKES;

EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; PROBABILITY DENSITY FUNCTION; SEISMIC DESIGN; SEISMIC ISOLATION; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 84926434244     PISSN: 01410296     EISSN: 1873-7323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.03.053     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Christopoulos C., Filiatrault A. Principles of passive supplemental damping and seismic isolation 2006, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
2. Zayas V.A., Low S.S., Mahin S.A. A simple pendulum technique for achieving seismic isolation. Earthquake Spectra 1990, 6:317-333.
3. Almazàn J.L., De la Llera J.C. Physical model for dynamic analysis of structures with FPS isolators. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 2003, 32:1157-1184. 10.1002/eqe.266.
4. Jangid R.S. Optimum frictional elements in sliding isolation systems. Comput Struct 2000, 76:651-661.
5. Ayyub B.M., McCuen R.H. Probability, statistics, and reliability for engineers 2002, CRC Press, NY. 2nd ed.
6. Lin Y.K., Cai G.Q. Probabilistic structural dynamics-advanced theory and applications 1995, McGraw-Hill, NY.
7. Chen J., Liu W., Peng Y., Li J. Stochastic seismic response and reliability analysis of base-isolated structures. J Earthquake Eng 2007, 11:903-924.
8. Fan F.G., Ahmadi G. Random response analysis of frictional base isolation system. J Eng Mech 1990, 116(9):1881-1901.
9. Su L., Ahmadi G. Response of frictional base isolation systems to horizontal-vertical random earthquake excitations. Prob Eng Mech 1988, 3(1):12-21.
10. Alhan C., Gavin H.P. Reliability of base isolation for the protection of critical equipment from earthquake hazards. Eng Struct 2005, 27:1435-1449.
11. Zou X.K., Wang Q., Li G., Chan C.M. Integrated reliability-based seismic drift design optimization of base-isolated concrete buildings. J Struct Eng 2010, 136:1282-1295.
12. Mishra S.K., Roy B.K., Chakraborty S. Reliability-based-design-optimization of base isolated buildings considering stochastic system parameters subjected to random earthquakes. Int J Mech Sci 2013, 75:123-133.
13. Zhao C., Chen J. Numerical simulation and investigation of the base isolated NPPC building under three-directional seismic loading. Nucl Eng Des 2013, 265:484-496.
14. NTC08. Norme tecniche per le costruzioni. Gazzetta Ufficiale del 04.02.08, DM 14.01.08, Ministero delle Infrastructure.
15. Mokha A., Constantinou M.C., Reinhorn A.M. Teflon bearings in base isolation. I: Testing. J Struct Eng 1990, 116(2):438-454.
16. Constantinou M.C., Mokha A., Reinhorn A.M. Teflon bearings in base isolation. II: Modeling. J Struct Eng 1990, 116(2):455-474.
17. Constantinou MC, Whittaker AS, Kalpakidis Y, Fenz DM, Warn GP. Performance of seismic isolation hardware under service and seismic loading. Technical report MCEER-07-0012; 2007.
18. Mckey M.D., Conover W.J., Beckman R.J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis from a computer code. Technometrics 1979, 21:239-245.
19. Dolsek M. Incremental dynamic analysis with consideration of modelling uncertainties. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 2009, 38:805-825.
20. Vořechovský M., Novák D. Correlation control in small-sample Monte Carlo type simulations I: A simulated annealing approach. Prob Eng Mech 2009, 24(3):452-462.
21. Celarec D., Dolšek M. The impact of modelling uncertainties on the seismic performance assessment of reinforced concrete frame buildings. Eng Struct 2013, 52:340-354.
22. SEAOC Vision 2000 Committee, Performance-based seismic engineering. Report prepared by Structural Engineers Association of California, Sacramento, CA; 1995.
23. Cornell C.A., Krawinkler H. Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment. PEER Center News 2000, 4(1):1-3.
24. Collins KR, Stojadinovic B. Limit states for performance-based design. 12WCEE; 2000.
25. Bertero R.D., Bertero V.V. Performance-based seismic engineering: the need for a reliable conceptual comprehensive approach. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 2002, 31:627-652. 10.1002/eqe.146.
26. Aoki Y, Ohashi Y, Fujitani H, Saito T, Kanda J, Emoto T, Kohno M. Target seismic performance levels in structural design for buildings. 12WCEE; 2000.
27. CEN - European Committee for Standardization, Eurocode 0: basis of structural design. Final draft. Brussels; 2006.
28. Saito T, Kanda J, Kani N. Seismic reliability estimate of building structures designed according to the current Japanese design code. In: Proceedings of the structural engineers world congress; 1998.
29. Building Seismic Safety Council, NEHRP commentary on the guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. Provisions (FEMA 274), Washington, DC; 1997.
30. Fenz DM, Constantinou MC. Mechanical behaviour of multi-spherical sliding bearings. Technical report MCEER-08-0007; 2008.
31. Zayas VA, Low SS, Mahin SA. The FPS earthquake resisting system. Report no. CB/EERC-87/01, Berkeley, California: Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California; 1987.
32. Naeim F., Kelly J.M. Design of seismic isolated structures: from theory to practice 1999, John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
33. Mokha A, Constantinou MC, Reinhorn AM. Teflon bearings in aseismic base isolation: experimental studies and mathematical modeling. Technical report NCEER-99-0038; 2008.
34. SAP 2000. Computers and Structures Inc., Berkley, CA; 2002.
35. Park Y.J., Wen Y.K., Ang A.H.S. Random vibration of hysteretic systems under bi-directional ground motions. Earthquake Eng Struct Dyn 1986, 14:543-557.
36. Nagarajaiah S, Reinhorn AM, Constantinou MC. 3D-Basis: non linear dynamic analysis of three-dimensional base isolated structures: Part II. Technical report NCEER-91-0005; 1991.
37. Palazzo B. Seismic behavior of base-isolated buildings. In: Proceedings of the international meeting on earthquake protection of buildings, Ancona; 1991.
38. Kulkarni J.A., Jangid R.S. Effects of superstructure flexibility on the response of base-isolated structures. Shock Vib 2003, 26:1-13.
39. Cornell C.A. Engineering seismic risk analysis. Bull Seismol Soc Am 1968, 58(5):1583-1606.
40. Bazzurro P., Cornell C.A. Disaggregation of seismic hazard. Bull Seismol Soc Am 1999, 89:501-520.
41. Shome N., Cornell C.A., Bazzurro P., Carballo J.E. Earthquake, records, and nonlinear responses. Earthquake Spectra 1998, 14(3):469-500.
42. Luco N., Cornell C.A. Structure-specific scalar intensity measures for near-source and ordinary earthquake ground motions. Earthquake Spectra 2007, 23(2):357-392.
43. Pinto P.E., Giannini R., Franchin P. Seismic reliability analysis of structures 2003, IUSS Press, Pavia, Italy.
44. ESMD http://www.isesd.hi.is/.