Fitness consequences of polymorphic inversions in the zebra finch genome

Genome Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2016, Pages

  Knief, Ulrich ^a,b   Hemmrich Stanisak, Georg ^c   Wittig, Michael ^c   Franke, Andre ^c   Griffith, Simon C ^d,e   Kempenaers, Bart ^a   Forstmeier, Wolfgang ^a  

^a MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR ORNITHOLOGY   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF KIEL   (Germany)

^d MACQUARIE UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^e UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Embryo mortality; Heterosis; Inversion polymorphism; Miscarriage; Overdominance; Structural variant

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME INVERSION; EFFECT SIZE; EMBRYO MORTALITY; FINCH; FISH GENETICS; FITNESS; GENE FREQUENCY; GENE LINKAGE DISEQUILIBRIUM; GENE SEGREGATION; GENETIC ASSOCIATION; GENETIC SCREENING; GENETIC VARIATION; GENOTYPE; HETEROSIS; HETEROZYGOTE; MORPHOLOGICAL TRAIT; NONHUMAN; PHENOTYPE; POLYMORPHIC LOCUS; SEGREGATION DISTORTION; SINGLE NUCLEOTIDE POLYMORPHISM; ZEBRA FISH;

EID: 84989336841     PISSN: 14747596     EISSN: 1474760X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/s13059-016-1056-3     Document Type: Article

References (115)

1. White MJD. Animal cytology and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1977.
2. Conrad DF, Hurles ME. The population genetics of structural variation. Nat Genet. 2007;39:S30-6.
3. Hoffmann AA, Rieseberg LH. Revisiting the impact of inversions in evolution: from population genetic markers to drivers of adaptive shifts and speciation? Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2008;39:21-42.
4. Madan K. Paracentric inversions: a review. Hum Genet. 1995;96:503-15.
5. Anton E, Blanco J, Egozcue J, Vidal F. Sperm studies in heterozygote inversion carriers: a review. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2005;111:297-304.
6. Roberts PA. A positive correlation between crossing over within heterozygous pericentric inversions and reduced egg hatch of Drosophila females. Genetics. 1967;56:179-87.
7. Navarro A, Ruiz A. On the fertility effects of pericentric inversions. Genetics. 1997;147:931-3.
8. Navarro A, Betran E, Barbadilla A, Ruiz A. Recombination and gene flux caused by gene conversion and crossing over in inversion heterokaryotypes. Genetics. 1997;146:695-709.
9. Swanson CP, Merz T, Young WJ. Cytogenetics: the chromosome in division, inheritance, and evolution. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall; 1981.
10. Krimbas CB, Powell JR. Drosophila inversion polymorphism. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 1992.
11. Morel F, Laudier B, Guerif F, Couet ML, Royere D, Roux C, Bresson JL, Amice V, De Braekeleer M, Douet-Guilbert N. Meiotic segregation analysis in spermatozoa of pericentric inversion carriers using fluorescence in-situ hybridization. Hum Reprod. 2007;22:136-41.
12. Yapan CC, Beyazyurek C, Ekmekci CG, Kahraman S. The largest paracentric inversion, the highest rate of recombinant spermatozoa. Case report: 46, Xy, Inv(2)(Q21.2q37.3) and literature review. Balkan J Med Genet. 2014;17:55-61.
13. Bhatt S, Moradkhani K, Mrasek K, Puechberty J, Manvelyan M, Hunstig F, Lefort G, Weise A, Lespinasse J, Sarda P, et al. Breakpoint mapping and complete analysis of meiotic segregation patterns in three men heterozygous for paracentric inversions. Eur J Hum Genet. 2009;17:44-50.
14. Morgan DT. A cytogenetic study of inversions in Zea mays. Genetics. 1950;35:153-74.
15. Wang J, Wurm Y, Nipitwattanaphon M, Riba-Grognuz O, Huang YC, Shoemaker D, Keller L. A Y-like social chromosome causes alternative colony organization in fire ants. Nature. 2013;493:664-8.
16. Purcell J, Brelsford A, Wurm Y, Perrin N, Chapuisat M. Convergent genetic architecture underlies social organization in ants. Curr Biol. 2014;24:2728-32.
17. Joron M, Frezal L, Jones RT, Chamberlain NL, Lee SF, Haag CR, Whibley A, Becuwe M, Baxter SW, Ferguson L, et al. Chromosomal rearrangements maintain a polymorphic supergene controlling butterfly mimicry. Nature. 2011;477:203-7.
18. Fang Z, Pyhäjärvi T, Weber AL, Dawe RK, Glaubitz JC, González JDS, Ross-Ibarra C, Doebley J, Morrell PL, Ross-Ibarra J. Megabase-scale inversion polymorphism in the wild ancestor of maize. Genetics. 2012;191:883-94.
19. Küpper C, Stocks M, Risse JE, Dos Remedios N, Farrell LL, McRae SB, Morgan TC, Karlionova N, Pinchuk P, Verkuil YI, et al. A supergene determines highly divergent male reproductive morphs in the ruff. Nat Genet. 2015; in press.
20. Lamichhaney S, Fan G, Widemo F, Gunnarsson U, Thalmann DS, Hoeppner MP, Kerje S, Gustafson U, Shi C, Zhang H, et al. Structural genomic changes underlie alternative reproductive strategies in the ruff (Philomachus pugnax). Nat Genet. 2015; in press.
21. Lowry DB, Willis JH. A widespread chromosomal inversion polymorphism contributes to a major life-history transition, local adaptation, and reproductive isolation. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000500.
22. Tuttle EM, Bergland AO, Korody ML, Brewer MS, Newhouse DJ, Minx P, Stager M, Betuel A, Cheviron ZA, Warren WC, et al. Divergence and functional degradation of a sex chromosome-like supergene. Curr Biol. 2016;26:344-50.
23. Kirkpatrick M. How and why chromosome inversions evolve. PLoS Biol. 2010;8:e1000501.
24. Dobzhansky T. Genetics of the evolutionary process. New York: Columbia University Press; 1970.
25. Kirkpatrick M, Barton N. Chromosome inversions, local adaptation and speciation. Genetics. 2006;173:419-34.
26. Feder JL, Gejji R, Powell THQ, Nosil P. Adaptive chromosomal divergence driven by mixed geographic mode of evolution. Evolution. 2011;65:2157-70.
27. Umina PA, Weeks AR, Kearney MR, McKechnie SW, Hoffmann AA. A rapid shift in a classic clinal pattern in Drosophila reflecting climate change. Science. 2005;308:691-3.
28. Balanya J, Oller JM, Huey RB, Gilchrist GW, Serra L. Global genetic change tracks global climate warming in Drosophila subobscura. Science. 2006;313:1773-5.
29. McAllister BF, Sheeley SL, Mena PA, Evans AL, Schlotterer C. Clinal distribution of a chromosomal rearrangement: a precursor to chromosomal speciation? Evolution. 2008;62:1852-65.
30. Cheng CD, White BJ, Kamdem C, Mockaitis K, Costantini C, Hahn MW, Besansky NJ. Ecological genomics of Anopheles gambiae along a latitudinal cline: a population-resequencing approach. Genetics. 2012;190:1417-32.
31. Dubinin NP, Tiniakov GG. Seasonal cycle and inversion frequency in populations. Nature. 1946;157:23-4.
32. Kopp M, Hermisson J. The evolution of genetic architecture under frequency-dependent disruptive selection. Evolution. 2006;60:1537-50.
33. Nassar R, Muhs HJ, Cook RD. Frequency-dependent selection at Payne inversion in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution. 1973;27:558-64.
34. Gromko MH, Richmond RC. Modes of selection maintaining an inversion polymorphism in Drosophila paulistorum. Genetics. 1978;88:357-66.
35. Avelar AT, Perfeito L, Gordo I, Ferreira MG. Genome architecture is a selectable trait that can be maintained by antagonistic pleiotropy. Nat Commun. 2013;4:Artn 2235.
36. Lowther JK. Polymorphism in white-throated sparrow, Zonotrichia albicollis (Gmelin). Can J Zool. 1961;39:281-92.
37. Thorneycroft HB. Cytogenetic study of white-throated sparrow, Zonotrichia albicollis (Gmelin). Evolution. 1975;29:611-21.
38. Sturtevant AH, Mather E. The interrelations of inversions, heterosis and recombination. Am Nat. 1938;72:447-52.
39. Falconer D, Mackay T. Introduction to quantitative genetics. 4th ed. Harlow: Longmann; 1996.
40. Lyon MF. Transmission ratio distortion in mice. Annu Rev Genet. 2003;37:393-408.
41. Traulsen A, Reed FA. From genes to games: cooperation and cyclic dominance in meiotic drive. J Theor Biol. 2012;299:120-5.
42. Shields GF. Comparative avian cytogenetics: a review. Condor. 1982;84:45-58.
43. Price T. Speciation in birds. Greenwood Village: Roberts and Company; 2008.
44. Huynh LY, Maney DL, Thomas JW. Chromosome-wide linkage disequilibrium caused by an inversion polymorphism in the white-throated sparrow (Zonotrichia albicollis). Heredity. 2011;106:537-46.
45. Christidis L. Chromosomal evolution within the family Estrildidae (Aves) I. The Poephilae Genetica. 1986;71:81-97.
46. Christidis L. Chromosomal evolution within the family Estrildidae (Aves) II. The Lonchurae Genetica. 1986;71:99-113.
47. Christidis L. Chromosomal evolution within the family Estrildidae (Aves) III. The Estrildae (waxbill finches). Genetica. 1987;72:93-100.
48. Itoh Y, Arnold AP. Chromosomal polymorphism and comparative painting analysis in the zebra finch. Chromosom Res. 2005;13:47-56.
49. Del Priore L, Pigozzi MI. Heterologous synapsis and crossover suppression in heterozygotes for a pericentric inversion in the Zebra Finch. Cytogenet Genome Res. 2015;147:154-60.
50. Itoh Y, Kampf K, Balakrishnan CN, Arnold AP. Karyotypic polymorphism of the zebra finch Z chromosome. Chromosoma. 2011;120:255-64.
51. Forstmeier W, Segelbacher G, Mueller JC, Kempenaers B. Genetic variation and differentiation in captive and wild zebra finches (Taeniopygia guttata). Mol Ecol. 2007;16:4039-50.
52. Balakrishnan CN, Edwards SV. Nucleotide variation, linkage disequilibrium and founder-facilitated speciation in wild populations of the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata). Genetics. 2009;181:645-60.
53. Bansal V, Bashir A, Bafna V. Evidence for large inversion polymorphisms in the human genome from HapMap data. Genome Res. 2007;17:219-30.
54. Stefansson H, Helgason A, Thorleifsson G, Steinthorsdottir V, Masson G, Barnard J, Baker A, Jonasdottir A, Ingason A, Gudnadottir VG, et al. A common inversion under selection in Europeans. Nat Genet. 2005;37:129-37.
55. Andolfatto P, Depaulis F, Navarro A. Inversion polymorphisms and nucleotide variability in Drosophila. Genet Res. 2001;77:1-8.
56. Warren WC, Clayton DF, Ellegren H, Arnold AP, Hillier LW, Kunstner A, Searle S, White S, Vilella AJ, Fairley S, et al. The genome of a songbird. Nature. 2010;464:757-62.
57. Knief U, Forstmeier W. Mapping centromeres of microchromosomes in the zebra finch (Taeniopygia guttata) using half-tetrad analysis. Chromosoma. 2016;125:757-68.
58. Backström N, Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H, Mellenius H, Nam K, Bolund E, Webster MT, Ost T, Schneider M, Kempenaers B, Ellegren H. The recombination landscape of the zebra finch Taeniopygia guttata genome. Genome Res. 2010;20:485-95.
59. Bandelt HJ, Forster P, Rohl A. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecific phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;16:37-48.
60. Browning SR, Browning BL. Rapid and accurate haplotype phasing and missing-data inference for whole-genome association studies by use of localized haplotype clustering. Am J Hum Genet. 2007;81:1084-97.
61. Rubin CJ, Zody MC, Eriksson J, Meadows JRS, Sherwood E, Webster MT, Jiang L, Ingman M, Sharpe T, Ka S, et al. Whole-genome resequencing reveals loci under selection during chicken domestication. Nature. 2010;464:587-93.
62. Fijarczyk A, Babik W. Detecting balancing selection in genomes: limits and prospects. Mol Ecol. 2015;24:3529-45.
63. Fisher RA. The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1930.
64. Cáceres A, González JR. Following the footprints of polymorphic inversions on SNP data: from detection to association tests. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43:e53.
65. de Jong S, Chepelev I, Janson E, Strengman E, van den Berg LH, Veldink JH, Ophoff RA. Common inversion polymorphism at 17q21.31 affects expression of multiple genes in tissue-specific manner. BMC Genomics. 2012;13:Artn 458.
66. Deng LB, Zhang YZ, Kang J, Liu T, Zhao HB, Gao Y, Li CH, Pan H, Tang XL, Wang DM, et al. An unusual haplotype structure on human chromosome 8p23 derived from the inversion polymorphism. Hum Mutat. 2008;29:1209-16.
67. Ma JZ, Amos CI. Investigation of inversion polymorphisms in the human genome using principal components analysis. PLoS One. 2012;7:e40224.
68. Namjou B, Ni YZ, Harley ITW, Chepelev I, Cobb B, Kottyan LC, Gaffney PM, Guthridge JM, Kaufman K, Harley JB. The effect of inversion at 8p23 on BLK association with lupus in Caucasian population. PLoS One. 2014;9:e115614.
69. Hereford J, Hansen TF, Houle D. Comparing strengths of directional selection: how strong is strong? Evolution. 2004;58:2133-43.
70. Pritchard JK, Przeworski M. Linkage disequilibrium in humans: models and data. Am J Hum Genet. 2001;69:1-14.
71. Knief U, Hemmrich-Stanisak G, Wittig M, Franke A, Griffith SC, Kempenaers B, Forstmeier W. Quantifying realized inbreeding in wild and captive animal populations. Heredity. 2015;114:397-403.
72. Singhal S, Leffler EM, Sannareddy K, Turner I, Venn O, Hooper DM, Strand AI, Li QY, Raney B, Balakrishnan CN, et al. Stable recombination hotspots in birds. Science. 2015;350:928-32.
73. Nielsen R. Molecular signatures of natural selection. Annu Rev Genet. 2005;39:197-218.
74. Przeworski M. The signature of positive selection at randomly chosen loci. Genetics. 2002;160:1179-89.
75. Navarro A, Bardadilla A, Ruiz A. Effect of inversion polymorphism on the neutral nucleotide variability of linked chromosomal regions in Drosophila. Genetics. 2000;155:685-98.
76. Zhu X, Zhang S. Population-based association studies. In: Lin S, Zhao H, editors. Handbook on analyzing human genetic data: computational approaches and software. Berlin, Heidelberg, Germany: Springer. 2010;171-90.
77. Zhu XF, Zhang SL, Zhao HY, Cooper RS. Association mapping, using a mixture model for complex traits. Genet Epidemiol. 2002;23:181-96.
78. Petronczki M, Siomos MF, Nasmyth K. Un ménage à quatre: the molecular biology of chromosome segregation in meiosis. Cell. 2003;112:423-40.
79. Bolund E, Martin K, Kempenaers B, Forstmeier W. Inbreeding depression of sexually selected traits and attractiveness in the zebra finch. Anim Behav. 2010;79:947-55.
80. Forstmeier W, Schielzeth H, Mueller JC, Ellegren H, Kempenaers B. Heterozygosity-fitness correlations in zebra finches: microsatellite markers can be better than their reputation. Mol Ecol. 2012;21:3237-49.
81. Kojima KI, Tobari YN. Selective modes associated with karyotypes in Drosophila ananassae. II. Heterosis and frequency-dependent selection. Genetics. 1969;63:639-51.
82. Lewontin RC. A general method for investigating the equilibrium of gene frequency in a population. Genetics. 1958;43:420-34.
83. Cochran WG. The combination of estimates from different experiments. Biometrics. 1954;10:101-29.
84. Park JH, Wacholder S, Gail MH, Peters U, Jacobs KB, Chanock SJ, Chatterjee N. Estimation of effect size distribution from genome-wide association studies and implications for future discoveries. Nat Genet. 2010;42:570-U139.
85. Yang JA, Benyamin B, McEvoy BP, Gordon S, Henders AK, Nyholt DR, Madden PA, Heath AC, Martin NG, Montgomery GW, et al. Common SNPs explain a large proportion of the heritability for human height. Nat Genet. 2010;42:565-U131.
86. Kraft P, Zeggini E, Ioannidis JPA. Replication in genome-wide association studies. Stat Sci. 2009;24:561-73.
87. Knief U, Schielzeth H, Ellegren H, Kempenaers B, Forstmeier W. A prezygotic transmission distorter acting equally in female and male zebra finches Taeniopygia guttata. Mol Ecol. 2015;24:3846-59.
88. Griffith SC, Pryke SR, Mariette M. Use of nest-boxes by the Zebra Finch (Taeniopygia guttata): implications for reproductive success and research. EMU. 2008;108:311-9.
89. Mariette MM, Griffith SC. Conspecific attraction and nest site selection in a nomadic species, the zebra finch. Oikos. 2012;121:823-34.
90. Bairlein F. Manual of field methods. Wilhelmshaven: European-African Songbird Migration Network; 1995.
91. Li H, Durbin R. Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform. Bioinformatics. 2009;25:1754-60.
92. Quinlan AR, Hall IM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics. 2010;26:841-2.
93. McKenna A, Hanna M, Banks E, Sivachenko A, Cibulskis K, Kernytsky A, Garimella K, Altshuler D, Gabriel S, Daly M, DePristo MA. The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data. Genome Res. 2010;20:1297-303.
94. Schlötterer C, Tobler R, Kofler R, Nolte V. Sequencing pools of individuals-mining genome-wide polymorphism data without big funding. Nat Rev Genet. 2014;15:749-63.
95. Chen K, Wallis JW, McLellan MD, Larson DE, Kalicki JM, Pohl CS, McGrath SD, Wendl MC, Zhang QY, Locke DP, et al. BreakDancer: an algorithm for high-resolution mapping of genomic structural variation. Nat Methods. 2009;6:677-U676.
96. Wang JM, Mullighan CG, Easton J, Roberts S, Heatley SL, Ma J, Rusch MC, Chen K, Harris CC, Ding L, et al. CREST maps somatic structural variation in cancer genomes with base-pair resolution. Nat Methods. 2011;8:652-U669.
97. Gogarten SM, Bhangale T, Conomos MP, Laurie CA, McHugh CP, Painter I, Zheng XW, Crosslin DR, Levine D, Lumley T, et al. GWASTools: an R/Bioconductor package for quality control and analysis of genome-wide association studies. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:3329-31.
98. Weir BS. Genetic data analysis II: methods for discrete population genetic data. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates; 1996.
99. Weir BS. Inferences about linkage disequilibrium. Biometrics. 1979;35:235-54.
100. Wellek S, Ziegler A. A genotype-based approach to assessing the association between single nucleotide polymorphisms. Hum Hered. 2009;67:128-39.
101. Zaykin DV, Pudovkin A, Weir BS. Correlation-based inference for linkage disequilibrium with multiple alleles. Genetics. 2008;180:533-45.
102. Price AL, Patterson NJ, Plenge RM, Weinblatt ME, Shadick NA, Reich D. Principal components analysis corrects for stratification in genome-wide association studies. Nat Genet. 2006;38:904-9.
103. Zheng XW, Levine D, Shen J, Gogarten SM, Laurie C, Weir BS. A high-performance computing toolset for relatedness and principal component analysis of SNP data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28:3326-8.
104. Kleinberg J, Tardos É. Algorithm design. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.; 2006.
105. Gabriel S, Ziaugra L, Tabbaa D. SNP genotyping using the Sequenom MassARRAY iPLEX platform. Curr Protoc Hum Genet. 2009;Chapter 2:Unit 2 12.
106. O'Connell JR, Weeks DE. PedCheck: a program for identification of genotype incompatibilities in linkage analysis. Am J Hum Genet. 1998;63:259-66.
107. Ihle M, Kempenaers B, Forstmeier W. Fitness benefits of mate choice for compatibility in a socially monogamous species. PLoS Biol. 2015;13:e1002248.
108. R Core Team. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 302nd ed. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013.
109. Gilmour AR, Gogel BJ, Cullis BR, Thompson R. Asreml user guide release 3.0. Hemel Hempstead: VSN International Ltd; 2009.
110. Vazquez AI, Bates DM, Rosa GJM, Gianola D, Weigel KA. Technical note: an R package for fitting generalized linear mixed models in animal breeding. J Anim Sci. 2010;88:497-504.
111. Lumley T. rmeta: Meta-analysis. 2012. https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rmeta/index.html.
112. Robinson MR, Santure AW, DeCauwer I, Sheldon BC, Slate J. Partitioning of genetic variation across the genome using multimarker methods in a wild bird population. Mol Ecol. 2013;22:3963-80.
113. Knief U, Schielzeth H, Kempenaers B, Ellegren H, Forstmeier W. QTL and quantitative genetic analysis of beak morphology reveals patterns of standing genetic variation in an Estrildid finch. Mol Ecol. 2012;21:3704-17.
114. Gelman A. Scaling regression inputs by dividing by two standard deviations. Stat Med. 2008;27:2865-73.
115. Schielzeth H. Simple means to improve the interpretability of regression coefficients. Methods Ecol Evol. 2010;1:103-13.