Creativity research and the classroom: From pitfalls to potential

Creativity: A Handbook for Teachers

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 101-114

  Beghetto, Ronald A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OREGON   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84988637974     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1142/9789812770868_0006     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Aljughaiman, A and Mowrer-Reynolds, E (2005). Teachers’ conceptions of creativity and creative students.Journal of Creative Behavior,39, 17-34.
2. Amabile, TM (1996).Creativity in Context: Update to The Social Psychology of Creativity.Boulder, Co: Westview.
3. Ames, C (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation.Journal of Educational Psychology,84, 261-271.
4. Baer, J (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity.Creativity Research Journal,11, 173-177.
5. Beghetto, RA (2005). Does assessment kill student creativity?The Educational Forum,69,254-263.
6. Beghetto, RA (2006). Creative justice? The relationship between prospective teachers’ prior schooling experiences and perceived importance of promoting student creativity.Journal of Creative Behavior,40, 149-162.
7. Beghetto, RA and Kaufman, JC (2006). Creativity and learning: A case for “mini-c” creativity. Paper presented at the2006 Annual Conference of the American Educational Research Association, April 8th, 2006, San Francisco, CA.
8. Beghetto, RA and Plucker, JA (2006). The relationship among schooling, learning, and creativity: “All roads lead to creativity” or “You can’t get there from here”? In JC Kaufman and J. Baer (eds.).Creativity and Reason in Cognitive Development, pp. 316-332. New York: Cambridge University Press.
9. Cohen, LM (1989). A continuum of adaptive creative behaviors. CreativityResearch Journal,2, 169-183.
10. Collins, MA and Amabile, TM (1999). Motivation and Creativity. In RJ Sternberg (ed.), Handbook of Human Creativity(pp. 297-312). New York: Cambridge.
11. Csikszentmihalyi, M (1999). Implications of a systems perspective for the study of creativity. In RJ Sternberg (ed.), Handbook of Human Creativity, pp. 313-338. New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Feist, GJ (1998). A meta-analysis of personality in scientific and artistic creativity.Personality and Social Psychology Review,2, 290-309.
13. Gardner, H (1993).Creative Minds.New York: Basic Books.
14. Kaplan, A, Middleton, MJ, Urdan, T and Midgley, C (2002). Achievement goals and goal structures. In C Midgley (ed.), Goals, Goal Structures and Patterns ofAdaptive Learning, pp. 21-54. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Kaufman, JC and Baer, J (2004). The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) model of creativity.Korean Journal of Thinking and Problem Solving,14, 15-25.
16. Kaufman, JC and Baer, J (eds.) (2005).Creativity Across Domains: Faces of the Muse.Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
17. Kennedy, M (2005).Inside Teaching: How Classroom Life Undermines Reform.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
18. Nickerson, RS (1999). Enhancing creativity. In RJ Sternberg (ed.), Handbook of Human Creativity, pp. 392-430. New York: Cambridge University Press.
19. Piirto, J (2004).Understanding Creativity.Scottsdale, AZ: Great Potential Press.
20. Pintrich, PR and Schunk, DH (2002).Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Applications(2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill-Prentice Hall.
21. Plucker, JA (1998). Beware of simple conclusions: The case for content generality of creativity.Creativity Research Journal,11, 179-182.
22. Plucker, JA and Beghetto, RA (2004). Why creativity is domain general, Why it looks domain specific, and why the distinction doesn’t matter. In RJ Sternberg, EL Grig-orenko and JL Singer (eds.), Creativity: From Potential to Realization, pp. 153-168. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
23. Plucker, JA, Beghetto, RA and Dow, GT (2004). Why isn’t creativity more important to educational psychologists? Potentials, pitfalls, and future directions in creativity research.Educational Psychologist,39, 83-96.
24. Runco, MA (2003). Creativity, cognition, and their educational implications. In JC Houtz (ed.), The Educational Psychology of Creativity.Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press.
25. Runco, MA (2004a). Creativity.Annual Review of Psychology,55, 657-687.
26. Runco, MA (2004b). Everyone has creative potential. In RJ Sternberg, EL Grig-orenko and JL Singer (eds.), Creativity: From Potential to Realization, pp. 21-30. Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
27. Runco, MA and Richards R (eds.) (1997).Eminent Creativity, Everyday Creativity, and Health.Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
28. Scott, CL (1999). Teachers’ biases toward creative children.Creativity Research Journal,12, 321-328.
29. Scott, G, Leritz, LE and Mumford, MD (2005). The effectiveness of creativity training: A quantitative review.Creativity Research Journal,16, 361-388.
30. Simonton, DK (1984).Genius, Creativity, And Leadership: Historiometric Inquiries.Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
31. Simonton, DK (2004). Creativity as a constrained stochastic process. In RJ Sternberg, EL Grigorenko and JL Singer (eds.), Creativity: From Potential to Realization,(pp. 83-101). Washington, D.C.: American Psychological Association.
32. Sternberg, RJ (1985). Implicit theories of intelligence, creativity, and wisdom.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,49, 607-627.
33. Sternberg, RJ (2003). Creative thinking in the classroom.Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research,47, 325-338.
34. Sternberg, RJ and Grigorenko, EL (2004). Successful intelligence in the classroom.Theory into practice,43, 274-280.
35. Sternberg, RJ and Lubart, TI (1995).Defying the Crowd.New York: Free Press.
36. Westby, EL and Dawson, VL (1995). Creativity: Asset or burden in the classroom.Creativity Research Journal,8, 1-10.