Self-driving vehicles: Determinants of adoption and conditions of usage

Transportation Research Record

Volumn 2565, Issue , 2016, Pages 57-64

  Zmud, Johanna ^a   Sener, Ipek N ^a   Wagner, Jason ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY SYSTEM   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOPTION PATTERNS; BEHAVIOR DECISION; COLLECTION EFFORT; CONDITION; DATA COLLECTION; ONLINE SURVEYS; SELF DRIVINGS; TECHNOLOGY ACCEPTANCE MODEL; TRAVEL BEHAVIOUR; TRAVEL MODE CHOICES;

TAXICABS;

EID: 84988504055     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: 21694052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2565-07     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Preliminary Statement of Policy Concerning Automated Vehicles. NHTSA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 2013.
2. Regan, M., T. Horberry, and A. Stevens. Modelling Acceptance of Driver Assistance Systems: Application of the Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology. In Driver Acceptance of New Technology: Theory, Measurement, and Optimisation, Dorset Press, Dorchester, England, 2014, pp. 23-34.
3. Fischbein, M., and I. Ajzen. Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, Mass., 1975.
4. Davis, F., R. Bagozzi, and P. Warshaw. User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models. Management Science, Vol. 35, 1989, pp. 982-1003.
5. Turner, M., B. Kitchenham, P. Brereton, S. Charters, and D. Budgen. Does the Technology Acceptance Model Predict Actual Use? A Systematic Literature Review. Information and Software Technology, Vol. 52, 2009, pp. 463-479.
6. Venkatesh, V., M. Morris, G. Davis, and F. Davis. User Acceptance of Information Technology: Toward a Unified View. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 27, 2003, pp. 425-478.
7. Osswald, S., D. Wurhofer, S. Trosterer, E. Beck, and M. Tscheligi. Predicting Information Technology Usage in the Car: Towards a Car Technology Acceptance Model. In Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Automotive User Interfaces and Interactive Vehicular Applications, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, 2012, pp. 51-58.
8. Mitsopoulos-Rubens, E., and M. Regan. Measuring Acceptability Through Questionnaires and Focus Groups. In Driver Acceptance of New Technology: Theory, Measurement, and Optimisation, Dorset Press, Dorchester, England, 2014.
9. Schoettle, B., and M. Sivak. A Survey of Public Opinion about Autonomous and Self-Driving Vehicles in the U.S., U.K., and Australia. Report UMTRI-2014-21. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, July 2014.
10. Kyriakidis, M., R. Happee, and J. C. F. de Winter. Public Opinion on Automated Driving: Results of an International Questionnaire Among 5,000 Respondents. Transport Research Part F, Vol. 32, 2015, pp. 127-140.
11. Shin, J., C. R. Bhat, D. Yoo, V. M. Garikapati, and R. M. Pendyala. Consumer Preferences and Willingness to Pay for Vehicle Technology Options and Fuel Types. Presented at 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2015.
12. Brown, B., M. Drew, C. Erenguc, R. Hill, S. Schmith, and B. Gangula. 2014 Global Automotive Consumer Study: Exploring Consumers' Mobility Choices and Transportation Decisions. Deloitte Consulting, New York, 2014.
13. Sommer, K. Continental Mobility Study. Continental AG, 2013. http://www.continental-corporation.com/www/download/pressportal -com-en/themes/initiatives/channel-mobility-study-en/ov-mobility -study2013-en/download-channel/pres-mobility-study-en.pdf. Accessed July 28, 2015.
14. Howard, D., and D. Dai. Public Perceptions of Self-Driving Cars: The Case of Berkeley, California. Presented at 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2014.
15. Automotive Emerging Technologies Study Results. J. D. Power. http://www.jdpower.com/sites/default/files/2014057-US%20-Auto-ET.pdf. Accessed July 28, 2015.
16. Schoettle, B., and M. Sivak. Potential Impact of Self-Driving Vehicles on Household Vehicle Demand and Usage. Report UMTRI-2015-3. University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Feb. 2015.
17. Harper, C., S. Mangones, C. T. Hendrickson, and C. Samaras. Bounding the Potential Increases in Vehicle Miles Traveled for the Non-Driving and Elderly Populations and People with Travel-Restrictive Medical Conditions in an Automated Vehicle Environment. Presented at 94th Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2015.
18. Childress, S., B. Nichols, B. Charlton, and S. Coe. Using an Activity-Based Model to Explore Potential Impacts of Automated Vehicles. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2493, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2015, pp. 99-106.
19. Levin, M. W., and S. D. Boyles. Effects of Autonomous Vehicle Ownership on Trip, Mode, and Route Choice. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2493, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2015, pp. 29-38.
20. Fagnant, D. J., K. M. Kockelman, and P. Bansal. Operations of Shared Autonomous Vehicle Fleet for Austin, Texas, Market. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2536, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C., 2015, pp. 98-106.