Effects of autonomous vehicle ownership on trip, mode, and route choice

Transportation Research Record

Volumn 2493, Issue , 2015, Pages 29-38

  Levin, Michael W ^a   Boyles, Stephen D ^a  

^a The University of Texas at Austin   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PARKING; TRAFFIC CONGESTION; VEHICLES;

AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES; HOUSEHOLD MEMBERS; LINK CAPACITIES; NETWORK CONGESTIONS; PARKING FEES; ROAD CAPACITY; ROUTE CHOICE; TRAVELER BEHAVIORS; TRIP MODE CHOICES; VEHICLE OWNERSHIP;

COST FUNCTIONS;

EID: 84976350999     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: 21694052     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/2493-04     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. de la Escalera, A., J. M. Armingol, and M. Mata. Traffic Sign Recognition and Analysis for Intelligent Vehicles. Image and Vision Computing, Vol. 21, No. 3, 2003, pp. 247-258.
2. Li, Q., N. Zheng, and H. Cheng. Springrobot: A Prototype Autonomous Vehicle and Its Algorithms for Lane Detection. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 5, No. 4, 2004, pp. 300-308.
3. Buehler, M., K. Iagnemma, and S. Singh (eds.). The DARPA Urban Challenge: Autonomous Vehicles in City Traffic. Springer, Berlin, 2009.
4. Oakley, E. The Race to the Autonomous Car. Berkeley Political Review, Feb 7, 2014.
5. Dresner, K., and P. Stone. Multiagent Traffic Management: A Reservation-Based Intersection Control Mechanism. Proc., 3rd International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents and Multiagent Systems, Vol. 2, IEEE Computer Society, 2004, pp. 530-537.
6. van Arem, B., C. M. J. Tampère, and K. M. Malone. Modelling Traffic Flows with Intelligent Cars and Intelligent Roads. Proc., IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium, 2003, pp. 456-461.
7. NHTSA, U. S. Department of Transportation. Economic Impact of U. S. Motor Vehicle Crashes Reaches $230. 6 Billion, New NHTSA Study Shows. NHTSA Press Release 38-02. May 2002. http://www. nhtsa. dot. gov.
8. Pendyala, R., and C. Bhat. Setting the Stage: Activity-Travel Behavior Impacts of Driverless Cars. Presented at 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. C., 2014.
9. Polzin, S., J. Walker, H. Mahmassani, and B. Charlton. Potential Activity-Travel and Land Use Impacts of Driverless Cars. Presented at 93rd Annual Meeting of the Transportation Research Board, Washington, D. C., 2014.
10. Greenshields, B. D., W. Channing, and H. Miller. A Study of Traffic Capacity. Highway Research Board Proceedings, Vol. 14, 1935.
11. Dresner, K., and P. Stone. Traffic Intersections of the Future. Proc., 16th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Orlando, Fla., Vol. 21, No. 2, Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence, Palo Alto, Calif., 1999, p. 1593.
12. Dresner, K. M., and P. Stone. Sharing the Road: Autonomous Vehicles Meet Human Drivers. Proc., 20th International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence, Hyderabad, India, Vol. 7, 2007, pp. 1263-1268.
13. Fajardo, D., T.-C. Au, S. T. Waller, P. Stone, and D. Yang. Automated Intersection Control: Performance of Future Innovation Versus Current Traffic Signal Control. In Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, No. 2259, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D. C., 2011, pp. 223-232.
14. Carlino, D., M. Depinet, P. Khandelwal, and P. Stone. Approximately Orchestrated Routing and Transportation Analyzer: Large-Scale Traffic Simulation for Autonomous Vehicles. Proc., 15th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Anchorage, Alaska, IEEE, New York, 2012, pp. 334-339.
15. Vasirani, M., and S. Ossowski. A Market-Based Approach to Accommodate User Preferences in Reservation-Based Traffic Management. 2010. http://www. ia. urjc. es/?matteo/resources/papers/att2010. pdf.
16. Vasirani, M., and S. Ossowski. A Market-Inspired Approach for Intersection Management in Urban Road Traffic Networks. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, Vol. 43, No. 1, 2012, pp. 621-659.
17. van Arem, B., C. J. van Driel, and R. Visser. The Impact of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Traffic-Flow Characteristics. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 7, No. 4, 2006, pp. 429-436.
18. Schakel, W. J., B. van Arem, and B. D. Netten. Effects of Cooperative Adaptive Cruise Control on Traffic Flow Stability. Proc., 13th Conference on International Intelligent Transportation Systems, Funchal, Portugal, IEEE, New York, 2010, pp. 759-764.
19. McNally, M. G. The Four-Step Model. In Handbook of Transport Modeling, Elsevier, Oxford, United Kingdom, 2008, pp. 22-38.
20. Bhat, C., and F. Koppelman. Activity-Based Modeling of Travel Demand. In Handbook of Transportation Science, Springer, Berlin, 1999, pp. 35-61.
21. Pool, M. Enhancing the Practical Usability of Dynamic Traffic Assignment. MS thesis. University of Texas at Austin, 2012.
22. Tung, R., Z. Wang, and Y.-C. Chiu. Integration of Dynamic Traffic Assignment in a Four-Step Model Framework: A Deployment Case Study in Seattle Model. Presented at 3rd Conference on Innovations in Travel Modeling, Tempe, Ariz., 2010.
23. Vovsha, P., B. Donnelly, M. Bradley, J. Bowman, H. Mahmassani, T. Adler, K. Small, D. Brownstone, K. Kockelman, J. Wolf, and F. Koppelman. SHRP 2 Report S2-C04-RW-1: Improving Our Understanding of How Highway Congestion and Price Affect Travel Demand. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D. C., 2012.
24. Duthie, J., N. Nezamuddin, N. Ruiz-Juri, T. Rambha, C. Melson, M. Pool, S. Boyles, S. T. Waller, and R. Kumar. Investigating Regional Dynamic Traffic Assignment Modeling for Improved Bottleneck Analysis: Final Report. Report FHWA/TX-13/0-6657-1. Texas Department of Transportation, Austin, 2013.
25. Rakha, H. A., K. Ahn, and K. Moran. INTEGRATION Framework for Modeling Eco-Routing Strategies: Logic and Preliminary Results. International Journal of Transportation Science and Technology, Vol. 1, No. 3, 2012, pp. 259-274.
26. Yao, E., and Y. Song. Study on Eco-Route Planning Algorithm and Environmental Impact Assessment. Journal of Intelligent Transportation Systems, Vol. 17, No. 1, 2013, pp. 42-53.
27. Marcotte, P., and L. Wynter. A New Look at the Multiclass Network Equilibrium Problem. Transportation Science, Vol. 38, No. 3, 2004, pp. 282-292.
28. van Aerde, M., and H. Rakha. Multivariate Calibration of Single Regime Speed-Flow-Density Relationships. Proc., 6th Vehicle Navigation and Information Systems Conference, Oslo, Norway, 1995, pp. 334-341.
29. Elefteriadou, L., D. Torbic, and N. Webster. Development of Passenger Car Equivalents for Freeways, Two-Lane Highways, and Arterials. In Transportation Research Record 1572, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D. C., 1997, pp. 51-58.
30. Gardner, L. M., M. Duell, and S. T. Waller. A Framework for Evaluating the Role of Electric Vehicles in Transportation Network Infrastructure Under Travel Demand Variability. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 49, 2013, pp. 76-90.
31. Office of Transportation and Air Quality. Motor Vehicle Emission Simulator: MOVES 2010 User Guide. Report EPA-420-B-09-041. U. S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, D. C., 2009.
32. Alternative Fuels Data Center, U. S. Department of Energy. Fuel Properties Comparison. http://www. Afdc. energy. gov/fuels/fuel-comparison -chart. pdf. Accessed June 21, 2013.
33. Transportation Research Circular E-C153: Dynamic Traffic Assignment: A Primer. Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, D. C., 2011. http://onlinepubs. Trb. org/onlinepubs /circulars/ec153. pdf.
34. Nagurney, A., and J. Dong. A Multiclass, Multicriteria Traffic Network Equilibrium Model with Elastic Demand. Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Vol. 36, No. 5, 2002, pp. 445-469.
35. Boyce, D. E., Y.-F. Zhang, and M. R. Lupa. Introducing "Feedback" into Four-Step Travel Forecasting Procedure Versus Equilibrium Solution of Combined Model. In Transportation Research Record 1443, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D. C., 1994, pp. 65-74.
36. Yang, H., and Q. Meng. Modeling User Adoption of Advanced Traveler Information Systems: Dynamic Evolution and Stationary Equilibrium. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Vol. 35, No. 10, 2001, pp. 895-912.
37. Huang, H. J., and Z. C. Li. A Multiclass, Multicriteria Logit-Based Traffic Equilibrium Assignment Model Under ATIS. European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 176, No. 3, 2007, pp. 1464-1477.