Measuring acceptability through questionnaires and focus groups

Driver Acceptance of New Technology: Theory, Measurement and Optimisation

Volumn , Issue , 2014, Pages 89-104

  Mitsopoulos Rubens, Eve ^a   Regan, Michael A ^b  

^a MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 84901084246     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (18)

1. Boynton, P.M. 2004. Administering, analysing, and reporting your questionnaire. British Medical Journal, 328: 1372-5.
2. Boynton, P.M. and Greenhalgh, T. 2004. Selecting, designing, and developing your questionnaire. British Medical Journal, 328: 1312-15.
3. Chau, P.Y.K. 1996. An empirical assessment of a modified technology acceptance model. Journal of Management Information Systems, 13: 185-204.
4. Davis, F.D. 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13: 185-204.
5. Marshall, G. 2005. The purpose, design and administration of a questionnaire for data collection. Radiography, 11: 131-6.
6. Mitsopoulos, E., Regan, M.A. and Haworth, N. 2002. Acceptability of in-vehicle intelligent transport systems to Victorian car drivers. Proceedings of the 2002 Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference. Adelaide, Australia.
7. Mitsopoulos, E., Regan, M. A., Triggs, T. and Tierney, P. 2003. Evaluating multiple in-vehicle intelligent transport systems: The measurement of driver acceptability, workload, and attitudes in the TAC Safe Car on-road study. Proceedings of the 2003 Road Safety Research, Policing and Education Conference. Sydney, Australia.
8. Morgan, D.L. 1997. Focus groups as qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
9. Morgan, D.L. and Krueger, R.A. 1993. When to use focus groups and why. In Successful Focus Groups: Advancing the State of the Art, 3-19. Edited by D.L. Morgan. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
10. Neilsen, J. 1993. Usability Engineering. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
11. Neilsen, J. 1997. The use and misuse of focus groups. Available at http://www.useit.com/papers/focusgroups.html [accessed: 17 September 2012].
12. Regan, M.A., Mitsopoulos, E., Haworth, N. and Young, K. 2002. Acceptability of in-vehicle intelligent transport systems to Victorian car drivers (Report No. 02/02). Melbourne, Australia: Royal Automobile Club of Victoria Ltd.
13. Regan, M. A., Triggs, T. J., Young, K. L., Tomasevic, N., Mitsopoulos, E., Stephan, K. and Tingvall, C. 2006. On-road evaluation of Intelligent Speed Adaptation, Following Distance Warning and Seatbelt Reminder Systems: Final results of the Australian TAC Safe Car project (Report No. 253). Clayton, Australia: Monash University Accident Research Centre.
14. Riffenburgh, R.H. 2012. Statistics in Medicine (3rd edition). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
15. Stewart, D.W. and Shamdasani, P.N. 1998. Focus group research: Exploration and discovery. In Handbook of Applied Social Research Methods, 505-26. Edited by L. Bickman and D.J. Rog. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
16. Van der Laan, J.D., Heino, A. and De Waard, D. 1997. A simple procedure for the assessment of acceptance of advanced transport telematics. Transportation Research Part C, 5: 1-10.
17. Várhelyi, A. 2002. Speed management via in-car devices: Effects, implications, perspectives. Transportation, 29: 237-52.
18. Vlassenroot, S., Brookhuis, K., Marchau, V and Witlox, F. 2010. Towards defining a unified concept for the acceptability of Intelligent Transport Systems (ITS): A conceptual analysis based on the case of Intelligent Speed Adaptation (ISA). Transportation Research Part F, 13: 164-78.