Impact of breast density notification legislation on radiologists' practices of reporting breast density: A multi-state study

Radiology

Volumn 280, Issue 3, 2016, Pages 701-706

  Bahl, Manisha ^a   Baker, Jay A ^a   Bhargavan Chatfield, Mythreyi ^b   Brandt, Eugenia K ^b   Ghate, Sujata V ^a  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b AMERICAN COLLEGE OF RADIOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DENSITY; BREAST DENSITY NOTIFICATION LEGISLATION; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; DATA BASE; HUMAN; INFORMED CONSENT; LAW; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL PRACTICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIOLOGIST; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; ADULT; AGED; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISEASE NOTIFICATION; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; FEMALE; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; MIDDLE AGED; MULTICENTER STUDY; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST DENSITY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DISEASE NOTIFICATION; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PRACTICE PATTERNS, PHYSICIANS'; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84986220651     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016152457     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Sickles EA, D'Orsi CJ, Bassett LW, et al. ACR BI-RADS mammography. In: ACR BIRADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2013.
2. Freer PE, Slanetz PJ, Haas JS, et al. Breast cancer screening in the era of density notification legislation: summary of 2014 Massachusetts experience and suggestion of an evidence-based management algorithm by multi-disciplinary expert panel. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2015;153(2):455-464.
3. Wang AT, Vachon CM, Brandt KR, Ghosh K. Breast density and breast cancer risk: a practical review. Mayo Clin Proc 2014;89(4):548-557.
4. Freer PE. Mammographic breast density: impact on breast cancer risk and implications for screening. RadioGraphics 2015; 35(2):302-315.
5. Lee CI, Bassett LW, Lehman CD. Breast density legislation and opportunities for patient-centered outcomes research. Radiology 2012;264(3):632-636.
6. Ray KM, Price ER, Joe BN. Breast density legislation: mandatory disclosure to patients, alternative screening, billing, reimbursement. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2015;204(2):257-260.
7. Price ER, Hargreaves J, Lipson JA, et al. The California breast density information group: a collaborative response to the issues of breast density, breast cancer risk, and breast density notification legislation. Radiology 2013;269(3):887-892.
8. Are You Dense? Are You Dense Advocacy. http://www.areyoudenseadvocacy.org/. Accessed November 8, 2015.
9. Sullivan CL, Pandya A, Min RJ, Drotman M, Hentel K. The development and implementation of a patient-centered radiology consultation service: a focus on breast density and additional screening options. Clin Imaging 2015;39(5):731-734.
10. Trinh L, Ikeda DM, Miyake KK, et al. Patient awareness of breast density and interest in supplemental screening tests: comparison of an academic facility and a county hospital. J Am Coll Radiol 2015;12(3):249-255.
11. Gard CC, Aiello Bowles EJ, Miglioretti DL, Taplin SH, Rutter CM. Misclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BI-RADS) mammographic density and implications for breast density reporting legislation. Breast J 2015;21(5):481-489.
12. Pertuz S, McDonald ES, Weinstein SP, Conant EF, Kontos D. Fully automated quantitative estimation of volumetric breast density from digital breast tomosynthesis images: preliminary results and comparison with digital mammography and MR imaging. Radiology 2015 Oct 21:150277. [Epub ahead of print]
13. Haas JS, Kaplan CP. The divide between breast density notification laws and evidence-based guidelines for breast cancer screening: legislating practice. JAMA Intern Med 2015;175(9):1439-1440.
14. Price ER, Hargreaves J, Lipson JA, et al. Response. Radiology 2014;271(3):927-928.
15. Gur D, Klym AH, King JL, Bandos AI, Sumkin JH. Impact of the new density reporting laws: radiologist perceptions and actual behavior. Acad Radiol 2015;22(6):679-683.
16. Sprague BL, Gangnon RE, Burt V, et al. Prevalence of mammographically dense breasts in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst 2014;106(10):dju255.
17. Gierach GL, Ichikawa L, Kerlikowske K, et al. Relationship between mammographic density and breast cancer death in the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. J Natl Cancer Inst 2012;104(16):1218-1227.
18. Zhang S, Ivy JS, Diehl KM, Yankaskas BC. The association of breast density with breast cancer mortality in African American and white women screened in community practice. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2013;137(1):273-283.
19. Kerlikowske K, Zhu W, Tosteson AN, et al. Identifying women with dense breasts at high risk for interval cancer: a cohort study. Ann Intern Med 2015;162(10):673-681.
20. Nicholson BT, LoRusso AP, Smolkin M, Bovbjerg VE, Petroni GR, Harvey JA. Accuracy of assigned BI-RADS breast density category definitions. Acad Radiol 2006;13(9):1143-1149.
21. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, et al. Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. J Natl Cancer Inst 1998;90(23):1801-1809.
22. MQSA National Statistics. http://www.fda. gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/MammographyQualityStandardsActandProgram/FacilityScorecard/ucm113858.htm. Accessed January 5, 2016.