Patient awareness of breast density and interest in supplemental screening tests: Comparison of an academic facility and a county hospital

Journal of the American College of Radiology

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2015, Pages 249-255

  Trinh, Long ^a   Ikeda, Debra M ^a   Miyake, Kanae K ^a   Trinh, Jennifer ^b   Lee, Kevin K ^b   Dave, Haatal ^c   Hanafusa, Kei ^b   Lipson, Jafi ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b SANTA CLARA VALLEY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

breast cancer; Breast density notification law; mammography; socioeconomic status; supplement screening tests

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST DENSITY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRAST ENHANCED SPECTRAL MAMMOGRAPHY; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; COUNTY HOSPITAL; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; PATIENT ATTITUDE; SCREENING TEST; SOCIAL STATUS; SUPPLEMENTAL SCREENING TEST; UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALIFORNIA; DISEASE NOTIFICATION; EARLY CANCER DIAGNOSIS; ECONOMICS; EPIDEMIOLOGY; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HEALTH LITERACY; INFORMED CONSENT; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; PHOTON ABSORPTIOMETRY; PUBLIC HOSPITAL; SOCIOECONOMICS; STATISTICS AND NUMERICAL DATA; UTILIZATION;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTERS; ADULT; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALIFORNIA; DISEASE NOTIFICATION; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEYS; HEALTH LITERACY; HOSPITALS, COUNTY; HUMANS; INFORMED CONSENT; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; SOCIOECONOMIC FACTORS;

EID: 84924422341     PISSN: 15461440     EISSN: 1558349X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2014.10.027     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. T.B. Bevers, B.O. Anderson, and E. Bonaccio NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer screening and diagnosis J Natl Compr Canc Netw 7 2009 1060 1096
2. R.A. Smith, D. Manassaram-Baptiste, and D. Brooks Cancer screening in the United States 2014: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines and current issues in cancer screening CA Cancer J Clin 64 2014 30 51
3. R.A. Smith, S.W. Duffy, R. Gabe, L. Tabar, A.M. Yen, and T.H. Chen The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned? Radiol Clin North Am 42 2004 793 806
4. L. Tabár, B. Vitak, and T.H. Chen Swedish Two-County Trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades Radiology 260 2011 658 663
5. E.A. Sickles, C.J. D'Orsi, and L.W. Bassett ACR BI-RADS Mammography C.J. D'Orsi, ACR BI-RADS Atlas, Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System 5th ed. 2013 American College of Radiology Reston, Virginia
6. T.M. Kolb, J. Lichy, and J.H. Newhouse Comparison of the performance of screening mammography, physical examination, and breast US and evaluation of factors that influence them: an analysis of 27,825 patient evaluations Radiology 225 2002 165 175
7. M.T. Mandelson, N. Oestreicher, and P.L. Porter Breast density as a predictor of mammographic detection: comparison of intercal- and screen-detected cancers J Natl Cancer Inst 92 2000 1081 1087
8. P.A. Carney, D.L. Miglioretti, and B.C. Yankaskas Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography Ann Intern Med 138 2003 168 175
9. K. Kerlikowske, D. Grady, J. Barclay, E.A. Sickles, and V. Ernster Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography JAMA 276 1996 33 38
10. E.A. Sickles The use of breast imaging to screen women at high risk for cancer Radiol Clin North Am 48 2010 859 878
11. N.F. Boyd, J.W. Byng, and R.A. Jong Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study J Natl Cancer Inst 87 1995 670 675
12. C. Byrne, C. Schairer, and J. Wolfe Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status J Natl Cancer Inst 87 1995 1622 1629
13. N.F. Boyd, H. Guo, and L.J. Martin Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer N Engl J Med 356 2007 227 236
14. HR 3404, Breast Density and Mammography Reporting Act of 2013. Available at: https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/113/hr3404. Accessed February 2, 2014.
15. D. Saslow, C. Boetes, and W. Burke American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography CA Cancer J Clin 57 2007 75 89
16. L.S. Karliner, C. Patricia Kaplan, T. Juarbe, R. Pasick, and E.J. Pérez-Stable Poor patient comprehension of abnormal mammography results J Gen Intern Med 20 2005 432 437
17. B.A. Jones, K. Reams, L. Calvocoressi, A. Dailey, S.V. Kasl, and N.M. Liston Adequacy of communicating results from screening mammograms to African American and White women Am J Public Health 97 2007 531 538
18. E.N. Marcus, D. Drummond, and N. Dietz Urban women's preferences for learning of their mammogram result: a qualitative study J Cancer Educ 27 2012 156 164
19. P.J. Lin, M.J. Cangelosi, D.W. Lee, and P.J. Neumann Willingness to pay for diagnostic technologies: a review of the contingent valuation literature Value Health 16 2013 797 805
20. US Census Bureau. 2012 American community survey 1-year estimates. Available at: http://factfinder2.census.gov/faces/nav/jsf/pages/searchresults.xhtml?refresh=t. Accessed December 18, 2013.
21. New Choice Health. Breast ultrasound cost and procedure information. Available at: http://www.newchoicehealth.com/Directory/Procedure/58/Breast%20Ultrasound. Accessed February 1, 2012.
22. New Choice Health. Breast mammogram - both breasts (mammogram) cost and procedure information. Available at: http://www.newchoicehealth.com/Directory/Procedure/28/Breast%20Mammogram%20-%20Both%20Breasts%20%28Mammogram%29. Accessed February 1, 2012.
23. R.J. Hooley, K.L. Greenberg, R.M. Stackhouse, J.L. Geisel, R.S. Butler, and L.E. Philpotts Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41 Radiology 265 2012 59 69
24. W.A. Berg, J.D. Blume, and J.B. Cormack Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer JAMA 299 2008 2151 2163
25. R. Smith-Bindman, D.L. Miglioretti, and N. Lurie Does utilization of screening mammography explain racial and ethnic differences in breast cancer? Ann Intern Med 14 2006 541 553
26. S.A. Adams, E.R. Smith, J. Hardin, I. Prabhu-Das, J. Fulton, and J.R. Hebert Racial differences in follow-up of abnormal mammography findings among economically disadvantaged women Cancer 115 2009 5788 5797
27. B.A. Jones, A. Dailey, and L. Calvocoressi Inadequate follow-up of abnormal screening mammograms: findings from the race differences in screening mammography process study (United States) Cancer Causes Conrtol 16 2005 809 821
28. R. Press, O. Carrasquillo, R.R. Sciacca, and E.G. Giardina Racial/ethnic disparities in time to follow-up after an abnormal mammogram J Womens Health (Larchmt) 17 2008 923 930
29. P. Lantz, M. Mujahid, and K. Schwartz The influence of race, ethnicity, and individual socioeconomic factors on breast cancer stage at diagnosis Am J Public Health 96 2006 2173 2178
30. D.R. Lannin, H.F. Mathews, J. Mitchell, M.S. Swanson, F.H. Swanson, and M.S. Edwards Influence of socioeconomic and cultural factors on racial differences in late-stage presentation of breast cancer JAMA 279 1998 1801 1807
31. C.J. Bradley, C.W. Given, and C. Roberts Race, socioeconomic status, and breast cancer treatment and survival J Natl Cancer Inst 94 2002 490 496
32. I.K. Komenaka, M.E. Martinez, and R.E. Pennington Jr. Race and ethnicity and breast cancer outcomes in an underinsured population J Natl Cancer Inst 102 2010 1178 1187
33. C.R. Baquet, and P. Commiskey Socioeconomic factors and breast carcinoma in multicultural women Cancer 88 2000 1256 1264
34. J.A. Stein, S.A. Fox, and P.J. Murata The influence of ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and psychological barriers on use of mammography J Health Soc Behav 32 1991 101 113