The California breast density information group: A collaborative response to the issues of breast density, breast cancer risk, and breast density notification legislation

Radiology

Volumn 269, Issue 3, 2013, Pages 887-892

  Price, Elissa R ^a   Hargreaves, Jonathan ^b   Lipson, Jafi A ^d   Sickles, Edward A ^a   Brenner, R James ^a,e   Lindfors, Karen K ^b   Joe, Bonnie N ^a   Leung, Jessica W T ^f   Feig, Stephen A ^g   Bassett, Lawrence W ^h   Ojeda Fournier, Haydee ⁱ   Daniel, Bruce L ^d   Kurian, Allison W ^d   Love, Elyse ^c   Ryan, Lauren ^j   Walgenbach, Donna D ^c   Ikeda, Debra M ^d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d STANFORD UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^e Bay Imaging Consultants Inc   (United States)

^f CALIFORNIA PACIFIC MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^g UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^h UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

ⁱ UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN DIEGO   (United States)

^j Cancer Risk Program   (United States)

more..

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DENSITY; CANCER DIAGNOSIS; CANCER MORTALITY; CANCER RISK; HUMAN; LAW ENFORCEMENT; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL INFORMATION; MEDICAL LITERATURE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT EDUCATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK BENEFIT ANALYSIS; SCREENING TEST; UNITED STATES;

BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CALIFORNIA; DISEASE NOTIFICATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; PREGNANCY; RISK;

EID: 84890102289     PISSN: 00338419     EISSN: 15271315     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.13131217     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. D'Orsi CJ, Mendelson EB, Ikeda DM, et al. Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BI-RADS - breast imaging atlas. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2003.
2. D'Orsi CJ, Sickles EA, Mendelson EB, Morris EA. Breast imaging reporting and data system: ACR BI-RADS - breast imaging atlas. 5th ed. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology, 2013 (in press).
3. U.S. Census Bureau. State and county quickfacts. http://quickfacts. census.gov/qfd/states/06000.html. Accessed March 11, 2013.
4. Mammography Quality Standards Act and Programs; US Food and Drug Administration. http://www.fda.gov/Radiation-EmittingProducts/ MammographyQualityStandardsActandProgram/default.htm. Accessed March 11, 2013.
5. NCI-funded Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. (U01CA63740, U01CA86076, U01CA86082, U01CA63736, U01CA70013, U01CA69976, U01CA63731, U01CA70040, HHSN261201100031C). Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium Web site. http://breastscreening.cancer.gov/data/mammography-data.html. Accessed March 11, 2013.
6. Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R, et al. Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography. Radiology 2005;235(3):775-790.
7. Egan RL, Mosteller RC. Breast cancer mammography patterns. Cancer 1977;40(5):2087-2090.
8. Whitehead J, Carlile T, Kopecky KJ, et al. Wolfe mammographic parenchymal patterns: a study of the masking hypothesis of Egan and Mosteller. Cancer 1985;56(6): 1280-1286.
9. van Gils CH, Otten JD, Verbeek AL, Hendriks JH. Mammographic breast density and risk of breast cancer: masking bias or causality? Eur J Epidemiol 1998;14(4):315-320.
10. Buist DS, Porter PL, Lehman C, Taplin SH, White E. Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst 2004;96(19):1432-1440.
11. Jackson VP, Hendrick RE, Feig SA, Kopans DB. Imaging of the radiographically dense breast. Radiology 1993;188(2):297-301.
12. Pinsky RW, Helvie MA. Mammographic breast density: effect on imaging and breast cancer risk. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2010;8(10):1157-1164; quiz 1165.
13. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med 2003;138(3):168-175.
14. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA 1996;276(1):33-38.
15. Corsetti V, Houssami N, Ghirardi M, et al. Evidence of the effect of adjunct ultrasound screening in women with mammographynegative dense breasts: interval breast cancers at 1 year follow-up. Eur J Cancer 2011;47(7):1021-1026.
16. Leconte I, Feger C, Galant C, et al. Mammography and subsequent whole-breast sonography of nonpalpable breast cancers: the importance of radiologic breast density. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2003;180(6):1675-1679.
17. Sickles EA. The use of breast imaging to screen women at high risk for cancer. Radiol Clin North Am 2010;48(5):859-878.
18. Boyd NF, Byng JW, Jong RA, et al. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87(9):670-675.
19. Byrne C, Schairer C, Wolfe J, et al. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk: effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst 1995;87(21):1622-1629.
20. Ursin G, Ma H, Wu AH, et al. Mammographic density and breast cancer in three ethnic groups. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2003;12(4):332-338.
21. Vacek PM, Geller BM. A prospective study of breast cancer risk using routine mammographic breast density measurements. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2004;13(5):715-722.
22. Boyd NF, Martin LJ, Sun L, et al. Body size, mammographic density, and breast cancer risk. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 2006;15(11):2086-2092.
23. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2007;356(3):227-236.
24. Eddy D. Screening for breast cancer. In: Eddy D, ed. Common screening tests. Philadelphia, Pa: American College of Physicians, 1991; 229-254.
25. Tabár L, Vitak B, Chen TH, et al. Swedish two-county trial: impact of mammographic screening on breast cancer mortality during 3 decades. Radiology 2011;260(3):658-663.
26. Smith RA, Duffy SW, Gabe R, Tabar L, Yen AM, Chen TH. The randomized trials of breast cancer screening: what have we learned? Radiol Clin North Am 2004;42(5):793-806, v.
27. Smith RA, Brooks D, Cokkinides V, Saslow D, Brawley OW. Cancer screening in the United States, 2013: a review of current American Cancer Society guidelines, current issues in cancer screening, and new guidance on cervical cancer screening and lung cancer screening. CA Cancer J Clin 2013;63(2):88-105.
28. Saslow D, Boetes C, Burke W, et al. American Cancer Society guidelines for breast screening with MRI as an adjunct to mammography. CA Cancer J Clin 2007;57(2):75-89.
29. Mainiero MB, Lourenco A, Mahoney MC, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria breast cancer screening. J Am Coll Radiol 2013;10(1):11-14.
30. Bevers TB, Anderson BO, Bonaccio E, et al. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer screening and diagnosis. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 2009;7(10):1060- 1096.
31. Berg WA, Zhang Z, Lehrer D, et al. Detection of breast cancer with addition of annual screening ultrasound or a single screening MRI to mammography in women with elevated breast cancer risk. JAMA 2012;307(13):1394-1404.
32. Nothacker M, Duda V, Hahn M, et al. Early detection of breast cancer: benefits and risks of supplemental breast ultrasound in asymptomatic women with mammographically dense breast tissue - a systematic review. BMC Cancer 2009;9:335.
33. Sardanelli F, Podo F, Santoro F, et al. Multicenter surveillance of women at high genetic breast cancer risk using mammography, ultrasonography, and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (the high breast cancer risk Italian 1 study): final results. Invest Radiol 2011;46(2): 94-105.
34. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA 2008;299(18):2151-2163.
35. Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology 2012;265(1):59-69.
36. Skaane P, Bandos AI, Gullien R, et al. Comparison of digital mammography alone and digital mammography plus tomosynthesis in a population-based screening program. Radiology 2013;267(1):47-56.
37. Ciatto S, Houssami N, Bernardi D, et al. Integration of 3D digital mammography with tomosynthesis for population breast-cancer screening (STORM): a prospective comparison study. Lancet Oncol 2013;14(7): 583-589.
38. Lee CH, Dershaw DD, Kopans D, et al. Breast cancer screening with imaging: recommendations from the Society of Breast Imaging and the ACR on the use of mammography, breast MRI, breast ultrasound, and other technologies for the detection of clinically occult breast cancer. J Am Coll Radiol 2010;7(1):18-27.
39. Berg WA. Supplemental screening sonography in dense breasts. Radiol Clin North Am 2004;42(5):845-851, vi.
40. Kuhl CK, Schrading S, Leutner CC, et al. Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol 2005;23(33): 8469-8476.
41. Lehman CD, Isaacs C, Schnall MD, et al. Cancer yield of mammography, MR, and US in high-risk women: prospective multiinstitution breast cancer screening study. Radiology 2007;244(2):381-388.
42. Sardanelli F, Podo F, D'Agnolo G, et al. Multicenter comparative multimodality surveillance of women at genetic-familial high risk for breast cancer (HIBCRIT study): interim results. Radiology 2007;242(3): 698-715.
43. Warner E, Plewes DB, Hill KA, et al. Surveillance of BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers with magnetic resonance imaging, ultrasound, mammography, and clinical breast examination. JAMA 2004;292(11):1317-1325.
44. Weigert J, Steenbergen S. The connecticut experiment: the role of ultrasound in the screening of women with dense breasts. Breast J 2012;18(6):517-522.
45. Parris T, Wakefield D, Frimmer H. Real world performance of screening breast ultrasound following enactment of Connecticut Bill 458. Breast J 2013;19(1):64-70.