Accuracy of Assigned BI-RADS Breast Density Category Definitions

Academic Radiology

Volumn 13, Issue 9, 2006, Pages 1143-1149

  Nicholson, Brandi T ^a   LoRusso, Alexander P ^a   Smolkin, Mark ^a   Bovbjerg, Viktor E ^a   Petroni, Gina R ^a   Harvey, Jennifer A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

BI RADS; breast cancer; Breast density; mammography

Indexed keywords

ANALYTIC METHOD; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST IMAGING REPORTING AND DATA SYSTEM; CANCER MODEL; CANCER RISK; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONSENSUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; RADIOLOGIST; VALIDATION PROCESS;

ABSORPTIOMETRY, PHOTON; BREAST NEOPLASMS; DENSITOMETRY, X-RAY; FALSE NEGATIVE REACTIONS; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; MAMMOGRAPHY; OBSERVER VARIATION; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; REFERENCE STANDARDS; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33747799014     PISSN: 10766332     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.acra.2006.06.005     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. American College of Radiology. Breast imaging reporting and data system (BI-RADS) (2003), American College of Radiology, Reston, Va
2. Harvey J.A., and Bovbjerg V.E. Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density. relationship with breast cancer risk. Radiology 230 (2004) 29-41
3. Byrne C., Schairer C., Wolfe J., et al. Mammographic features and breast cancer risk. effects with time, age, and menopause status. J Natl Cancer Inst 87 (1995) 1622-1629
4. Vacek P.M., and Geller B.M. A prospective study of breast cancer risk using routine mammographic breast density measurements. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13 (2004) 715-722
5. Byng J.W., Yaffe M.J., Jong R.A., et al. Analysis of mammographic density and breast cancer risk from digitized mammograms. Radiographics 18 (1998) 1587-1598
6. Ursin G., Parisky Y.R., Pike M.C., et al. Mammographic density changes during the menstrual cycle. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 10 (2001) 141-142
7. Berg W.A., Campassi C., Langenberg P., et al. Breast imaging reporting and data system. inter- and intraobserver variability in feature analysis and final assessment. AJR Am J Roentgenol 174 (2000) 1769-1777
8. Kerlikowske K., Grady D., Barclay J., et al. Variability and accuracy in mammographic interpretation using the American College of Radiology breast imaging reporting and data system. J Natl Cancer Inst 90 (1998) 1801-1809
9. Harvey J.A. Quantitative assessment of percent breast density. analog versus digital acquisition. Technol Cancer Res Treat 3 (2004) 611-616
10. Boyd N.F., Byng J.W., and Jong R.A. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk. results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study. J Natl Cancer Inst 87 (1995) 670-675
11. Vacek P.M., and Geller B.M. A prospective study of breast cancer risk using routine mammographic breast density measurements. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev 13 (2004) 715-722
12. Harvey J.A., Cowan J., and LoRusso A.P. Increase in mammographic breast density associated with use of domperidone. Breast J 10 (2004) 256-258
13. Dillis C.L., and Schreiman J.S. Change in mammographic breast density associated with the use of Depo-Provera. Breast J 9 (2003) 312-315
14. Sivaramakrishna R., Obuchowski N.A., Chilcote W.A., et al. Automated segmentation of mammographic density. Acad Radiol 8 (2001) 250-256
15. Zhou C., Chan H.P., Petrick N., et al. Computerized image analysis. estimation of breast density on mammograms. Med Phys 28 (2001) 1056-1069
16. Chang Y.H., Wang X.H., Hardesty L.A., et al. Computerized assessment of tissue composition on digitized mammograms. Acad Radiol 9 (2002) 899-905
17. Shepard J.A., Kerlikowske K.M., Smith-Bindman R., et al. Measurement of breast density with dual x-ray absorptiometry. feasibility. Radiology 223 (2002) 554-557
18. Venta L.A., Hendrick R.E., Adler Y.T., et al. Rates and causes of disagreement in interpretation of full-field digital mammography and film-screen mammography in a diagnostic setting. AJR Am J Roentgenol 176 (2001) 1241-1248
19. Van Gils C.H., Hendricks J.H.C.L., Holland R., et al. Changes in mammographic breast density and concomitant changes in breast cancer risk. Eur J Cancer Prev 8 (1999) 509-515