The divide between breast density notification laws and evidence-based guidelines for breast cancer screening legislating practice

JAMA Internal Medicine

Volumn 175, Issue 9, 2015, Pages 1439-1440

  Haas, Jennifer S ^a   Kaplan, Celia P ^b  

^a BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BREAST BIOPSY; BREAST CANCER; BREAST DENSITY; CANCER RISK; CANCER SCREENING; COST EFFECTIVENESS ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; ECHOMAMMOGRAPHY; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATIENT CARE; PREVENTIVE HEALTH SERVICE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITY ADJUSTED LIFE YEAR; SHORT SURVEY; BREAST NEOPLASMS; EVIDENCE BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; LEGISLATION AND JURISPRUDENCE; MASS SCREENING;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, MAMMARY;

EID: 84941247913     PISSN: 21686106     EISSN: 21686114     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2015.3040     Document Type: Short Survey

References (10)

1. Cappello NM. Decade of "normal" mammography reports: the happygram. J Am Coll Radiol. 2013;10(12):903-908.
2. Are You Dense Advocacy, Inc. Are you dense? advocacy because your life matters. Published 2015. http://areyoudenseadvocacy.org/. Accessed May 4, 2015.
3. Sprague BL, Gangnon RE, Burt V, et al. Prevalence of mammographically dense breasts in the United States. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2014;106(10):106.
4. Rhodes DJ, Radecki Breitkopf C, Ziegenfuss JY, Jenkins SM, Vachon CM. Awareness of breast density and its impact on breast cancer detection and risk. J Clin Oncol. 2015;33(10):1143-1150.
5. Tice JA, Cummings SR, Smith-Bindman R, Ichikawa L, Barlow WE, Kerlikowske K. Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(5):337-347.
6. Tice JA, Ollendorf DA, Lee JM, Pearson SD. The Comparative Clinical Effectiveness and Value of Supplemental Screening Tests Following Negative Mammography in Women with Dense Breast Tissue: A Technology Assessment. San Francisco: California Technology Assessment Forum; November 4, 2013.
7. Sprague BL, Stout NK, Schechter C, et al. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162(3):157-166.
8. Friedewald SM, Rafferty EA, Rose SL, et al. Breast cancer screening using tomosynthesis in combination with digital mammography. JAMA. 2014;311(24):2499-2507.
9. US Preventive Services Task Force. Draft recommendation statement: Breast cancer: screening. Published April 2015. http://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/Page/Document/RecommendationStatementDraft/breast-cancer-screening1. Accessed April 25, 2015
10. US Preventive Services Task Force. Screening for breast cancer: U. S. Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(10):716-726, W-236.