Prevalence of mammographically dense breasts in the United States

Journal of the National Cancer Institute

Volumn 106, Issue 10, 2014, Pages

  Sprague, Brian L ^a   Gangnon, Ronald E ^b,c   Burt, Veronica ^b   Trentham Dietz, Amy ^b,c   Hampton, John M ^c   Wellman, Robert D ^f   Kerlikowske, Karla ^d   Miglioretti, Diana L ^e,f  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VERMONT COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AND PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^f CENTER FOR HEALTH STUDIES   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BODY MASS; BREAST DENSITY; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE SURVEY; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MAMMOGRAPHY; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; UNITED STATES; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGING; BREAST; BREAST TUMOR; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITION; PATHOLOGY; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR;

ADULT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; AGED; AGING; BODY MASS INDEX; BREAST; BREAST NEOPLASMS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; NUTRITION SURVEYS; PREVALENCE; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 84985017702     PISSN: 00278874     EISSN: 14602105     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/jnci/dju255     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Boyd NF, Guo H, Martin LJ, et al. Mammographic density and the risk and detection of breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(3):227-236.
2. Tice JA, Cummings SR, Smith-Bindman R, Ichikawa L, Barlow WE, Kerlikowske K. Using clinical factors and mammographic breast density to estimate breast cancer risk: development and validation of a new predictive model. Ann Intern Med. 2008;148(5):337-347.
3. Kerlikowske K, Grady D, Barclay J, Sickles EA, Ernster V. Effect of age, breast density, and family history on the sensitivity of first screening mammography. JAMA. 1996;276(1):33-38.
4. Buist DS, Porter PL, Lehman C, Taplin SH, White E. Factors contributing to mammography failure in women aged 40-49 years. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2004;96(19):1432-1440.
5. Carney PA, Miglioretti DL, Yankaskas BC, et al. Individual and combined effects of age, breast density, and hormone replacement therapy use on the accuracy of screening mammography. Ann Intern Med. 2003;138(3):168-175.
6. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med. 2005;353(17):1773-1783.
7. Lee CI, Bassett LW, Lehman CD. Breast density legislation and opportunities for patient-centered outcomes research. Radiology. 2012;264(3):632-636.
8. U.S. Congress. H.R. 3404 Breast Density and Mammography Reporting Act of 2013. U.S. Congress; 2013.
9. American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADS®-Mammography. 4th Edition. ACR Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System, Breast Imaging Atlas. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2003.
10. Brisson J, Morrison AS, Kopans DB, et al. Height and weight, mammographic features of breast tissue, and breast cancer risk. Am J Epidemiol. 1984;119(3):371-381.
11. Boyd NF, Lockwood GA, Byng JW, Little LE, Yaffe MJ, Tritchler DL. The relationship of anthropometric measures to radiological features of the breast in premenopausal women. Br J Cancer. 1998;78(9):1233-1238.
12. Vachon CM, Kuni CC, Anderson K, Anderson VE, Sellers TA. Association of mammographically defined percent breast density with epidemiologic risk factors for breast cancer (United States). Cancer Causes Control. 2000;11(7):653-662.
13. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Data. Hyattsville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey Anthropometry Procedures Manual (http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nhanes/nhanes-09-10/BodyMeasures-09. pdf). Atlanta, GA; 2009.
15. Raghunathan TE, Lepkowski JM, Van Hoewyk J, Solenberger P. A multivariate technique for multiply imputing missing values using a sequence of regression models. Survey Methodology. 2001;27(1):85-95.
16. Survey Methodology Program. IVEWARE. Survey Research Center, Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
17. Rubin DB. Multiple imputation for nonresponse in surveys. New York: John Wiley & Sons; 1987.
18. DeAngelis CD, Fontanarosa PB. US Preventive Services Task Force and breast cancer screening. JAMA. 2010;303(2):172-173.
19. Quanstrum KH, Hayward RA. Lessons from the mammography wars. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(11):1076-1079.
20. National Center for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2011: With Special Feature on Socioeconomic Status and Health. Hyattsville, MD; 2012.
21. Sickles EA, Miglioretti DL, Ballard-Barbash R, et al. Performance benchmarks for diagnostic mammography. Radiology. 2005;235(3):775-790.
22. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Mammography Quality Standards Act and Program Document Archives. 2013.
23. Harvey JA, Gard CC, Miglioretti DL, et al. Reported mammographic density: film-screen versus digital acquisition. Radiology. 2013;266(3):752-758.
24. Greenland S, Finkle WD. A critical look at methods for handling missing covariates in epidemiologic regression analyses. Am J Epidemiol. 1995;142(12):1255-1264.
25. American College of Radiology. ACR BI-RADS®-Mammography. 5th Edition. ACR BI-RADS Atlas: Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System. Reston, VA: American College of Radiology; 2013.
26. Spayne MC, Gard CC, Skelly J, Miglioretti DL, Vacek PM, Geller BM. Reproducibility of BI-RADS breast density measures among community radiologists: a prospective cohort study. Breast J. 2012;18(4):326-333.
27. Wang J, Azziz A, Fan B, et al. Agreement of mammographic measures of volumetric breast density to MRI. PLoS One. 2013;8(12):e81653.
28. Berg WA, Blume JD, Cormack JB, et al. Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer. JAMA. 2008;299(18):2151-2163.
29. Hooley RJ, Greenberg KL, Stackhouse RM, Geisel JL, Butler RS, Philpotts LE. Screening US in patients with mammographically dense breasts: initial experience with Connecticut Public Act 09-41. Radiology. 2012;265(1):59-69.
30. Gartlehner G, Thaler K, Chapman A, et al. Mammography in combination with breast ultrasonography versus mammography for breast cancer screening in women at average risk. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;4:CD009632.
31. Bleyer A, Welch HG. Effect of three decades of screening mammography on breast-cancer incidence. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(21):1998-2005.
32. Esserman LJ, Thompson IM Jr., Reid B. Overdiagnosis and overtreatment in cancer: an opportunity for improvement. JAMA. 2013;310(8):797-798.