Estimation of the Spontaneous Mutation Rate in Heliconius melpomene

Molecular Biology and Evolution

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2015, Pages 239-243

  Keightley, Peter D ^a   Pinharanda, Ana ^b   Ness, Rob W ^a   Simpson, Fraser ^c   Dasmahapatra, Kanchon K ^c,d   Mallet, James ^c,e   Davey, John W ^b   Jiggins, Chris D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^c UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF YORK   (United Kingdom)

^e HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Genome sequencing; Heliconius; Mutation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EFFECTIVE POPULATION SIZE; GENE SEQUENCE; HELICONIUS MELPOMENE; HETEROZYGOTE; INSECT; INSECT GENOME; MALE; MICROBIAL DIVERSITY; MOLECULAR CLOCK; MUTATION RATE; NATURAL SELECTION; NONHUMAN; PROGENY; SPONTANEOUS MUTATION; ANIMAL; BUTTERFLY; CLASSIFICATION; DNA SEQUENCE; FEMALE; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; GROWTH, DEVELOPMENT AND AGING; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION DENSITY; PROCEDURES;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; HELICONIUS; HELICONIUS ERATO; HELICONIUS MELPOMENE; HEXAPODA;

ANIMALS; BUTTERFLIES; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EVOLUTION, MOLECULAR; FEMALE; GENOME, INSECT; MALE; MUTATION RATE; PHYLOGENY; POPULATION DENSITY; SELECTION, GENETIC; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA;

EID: 84922371114     PISSN: 07374038     EISSN: 15371719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/molbev/msu302     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Chamary JV, Parmley JL, Hurst LD. 2006. Hearing silence: non-neutral evolution at synonymous sites in mammals. Nat Rev Genet. 7: 98-108.
2. Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D. 2010. Elements of evolutionary genetics. Greenwood Village (CO): Roberts &Co.
3. Conrad DF, Keebler JEM, DePristo MA, Lindsay SJ, Zhang Y, Casals F, Idaghdour Y, Hartl CL, Torroja C, Garimella KV, et al. 2011. Variation in genome-wide mutation rates within and between human families. Nat Genet. 43: 712-714.
4. DePristo MA, Banks E, Poplin R, Garimella KV, Maguire JR, Hartl C, Philippakis AA, del Angel G, Rivas MA, Hanna M, et al. 2011. A framework for variation discovery and genotyping using nextgeneration DNA sequencing data. Nat Genet. 43: 491-498.
5. Drake JW, Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D, Crow JF. 1998. Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics 148: 1667-1686.
6. Gillespie JH. 2001. Is the population size of a species relevant to its evolution. Evolution 55: 2161-2169.
7. Haag-Liautard C, Dorris M, Maside X, Macaskill S, Halligan DL, Houle D, Charlesworth B, Keightley PD. 2007. Direct estimation of per nucleotide and genomic deleterious mutation rates in Drosophila. Nature 445: 82-85.
8. Heliconius Genome Consortium. 2012. Butterfly genome reveals promiscuous exchange of mimicry adaptations among species. Nature 487: 94-98.
9. Keightley PD, Ness RW, Halligan DL, Haddrill PR. 2014. Estimation of the spontaneous mutation rate per nucleotide site in a Drosophila melanogaster full-sib family. Genetics 196: 313-320.
10. Keightley PD, Trivedi U, Thomson M, Oliver F, Kumar S, Blaxter ML. 2009. Analysis of the genome sequences of three Drosophila melanogaster spontaneousmutation accumulation lines. Genome Res. 19: 1195-1201.
11. Kong A, Frigge ML, Masson G, Besenbacher S, Sulem P, Magnusson G, Gudjonsson SA, Sigurdsson A, Jonasdottir A, Jonasdottir A, et al. 2012. Rate of de novo mutations and the importance of father's age to disease risk. Nature 488: 471-475.
12. Kozak KM, Wahlberg N, Neild A, Dasmahapatra KK, Mallet J, Jiggins CD. Forthcoming 2014. Multilocus species trees show the recent adaptive radiation of the mimetic Heliconius butterflies.
13. Leffler EM, Bullaughey K, Matute DR, Meyer WK, Segurel L, Venkat A, Andolfatto P, Przeworski M. 2012. Revisiting an old riddle: what determines genetic diversity levels within species. PLoS Biol. 10: e1001388.
14. Li H. 2011. A statistical framework for SNP calling, mutation discovery, association mapping and population genetical parameter estimation from sequencing data. Bioinformatics 27: 2987-2993.
15. Martin SH, Dasmahapatra KK, Nadeau NJ, Salazar C, Walters JR, Simpson F, Blaxter M, Manica A, Mallet J, Jiggins CD. 2013. Genome-wide evidence for speciation with gene flow in Heliconius butterflies. Genome Res. 11: 1817-1828.
16. Maynard-Smith JM, Haigh J. 1974. The hitch-hiking effect of a favourable gene. Genet Res. 23: 23-35.
17. Michaelson JJ, Shi Y, Gujral M, ZhengH,MalhotraD, Jin X, JianM, LiuG,Greer D, Bhandari A. 2012. Whole-genome sequencing in autism identifies hot spots for de novo germline mutation. Cell 151: 1431-1442.
18. Ness RW, Morgan AD, Colegrave N, Keightley PD. 2012. Estimate of the spontaneous mutation rate in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Genetics 192: 1447-1454.
19. Roach JC, Glusman G, Smit AFA, Huff CD, Hubley R, Shannon PT, Rowen L, Pant KP, Goodman N, Bamshad M. 2010. Analysis of genetic inheritance in a family quartet by whole-genome sequencing. Science 328: 636-639.
20. Schrider DR, Houle D, Lynch M, Hahn MW. 2013. Rates and genomic consequences of spontaneous mutational events in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 194: 937-954.
21. Thorvaldsdóttir H, Robinson JT, Mesirov JP. 2012. Integrative Genomics Viewer (IGV): high-performance genomics data visualization and exploration. Brief Bioinform. 14: 178-192.
22. Woodruff RC, Thompson JN Jr. 1992. Have premeiotic clusters of mutation been overlooked in evolutionary theory. J Evol Biol. 5: 457-464