Not Feeling Good in STEM: Effects of Stereotype Activation and Anticipated Affect on Women’s Career Aspirations

Sex Roles

Volumn 76, Issue 1-2, 2017, Pages 40-55

  Schuster, Carolin ^a   Martiny, Sarah E ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PASSAU   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TROMSØ   (Norway)

Author keywords

Anticipated affect; Emotional responses; Gender; Gender distribution; Human sex differences; Motivation; Occupational aspiration; Self efficacy; Sex roles; STEM; Stereotype threat

Indexed keywords

ASPIRATION; ATTENTION; CAREER; COLLEGE; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HIGH SCHOOL STUDENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MOTIVATION; PILOT STUDY; SEX DIFFERENCE; SEX ROLE; STEREOTYPY; UNIVERSITY;

EID: 84982129830     PISSN: 03600025     EISSN: 15732762     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11199-016-0665-3     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. American Psychological Association. (2010). Ethical principles of psychologists and code of conduct, effective June 2010. Available: http://www.apa.org/ethics/code/principles.pdf. Accessed 6 August 2014.
2. Anderson, D. R., Burnham, K. P., & Thompson, W. L. (2000). Null hypothesis testing: Problems, prevalence, and an alternative. The Journal of Wildlife Management, 64(4), 912–923. doi:10.2307/3803199.
3. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., DeWall, C. N., & Zhang, L. Q. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11(2), 167–203. doi:10.1177/1088868307301033.
4. Best, K. L., Sanwald, U., Ihsen, S., & Ittel, A. (2013). Gender and STEM in Germany: Policies enhancing women’s participation in academia. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 5(3), 292–304.
5. Cadinu, M., Maass, A., Frigerio, S., Impagliazzo, L., & Latinotti, S. (2003). Stereotype threat: The effect of expectancy on performance. European Journal of Social Psychology, 33(2), 267–285. doi:10.1002/Ejsp.145.
6. Cadinu, M., Maass, A., Rosabianca, A., & Kiesner, J. (2005). Why do women underperform under stereotype threat? Evidence for the role of negative thinking. Psychological Science, 16(7), 572–578. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.01577.x.
7. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1990). Origins and functions of positive and negative affect: A control-process view. Psychological Review, 97(1), 19–35. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.97.1.19.
8. Cheryan, S., Plaut, V. C., Davies, P. G., & Steele, C. M. (2009). Ambient belonging: How stereotypical cues impact gender participation in computer science. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97(6), 1045–1060. doi:10.1037/a0016239.
9. Cheryan, S., Siy, J. O., Vichayapai, M., Drury, B. J., & Kim, S. (2011). Do female and male role models who embody STEM stereotypes hinder women’s anticipated success in STEM? Social Psychological and Personality Science, 2(6), 656–664. doi:10.1177/1948550611405218.
10. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p <.05). American Psychologist, 49(12), 997–1003. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.49.12.997.
11. Croft, A., Schmader, T., & Block, K. (2015). An underexamined inequality: Cultural and psychological barriers to men’s engagement with communal roles. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(4), 343–370. doi:10.1177/1088868314564789.
12. Crombie, G., Sinclair, N., Silverthorn, N., Byrne, B., DuBois, D., & Trinneer, A. (2005). Predictors of young adolescents’ math grades and course enrollment intentions: Gender similarities and differences. Sex Roles, 52(5-6), 351–367. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-2678-1.
13. Cumming, G. (2014). The new statistics: Why and how. Psychological Science, 25(1), 7–29. doi:10.1177/0956797613504966.
14. Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., Quinn, D. M., & Gerhardstein, R. (2002). Consuming images: How television commercials that elicit stereotype threat can restrain women academically and professionally. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(12), 1615–1628. doi:10.1177/014616702237644.
15. Davies, P. G., Spencer, S. J., & Steele, C. M. (2005). Clearing the air: Identity safety moderates the effects of stereotype threat on women’s leadership aspirations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(2), 276–287. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.88.2.276.
16. Diekman, A. B., Brown, E. R., Johnston, A. M., & Clark, E. K. (2010). Seeking congruity between goals and roles: A new look at why women opt out of science, technology, engineering, and mathematics careers. Psychological Science, 21(8), 1051–1057. doi:10.1177/0956797610377342.
17. Diekman, A. B., Clark, E. K., Johnston, A. M., Brown, E. R., & Steinberg, M. (2011). Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to STEM careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 902–918. doi:10.1037/A0025199.
18. Eccles, J. S. (2005). Studying gender and ethnic differences in participation in math, physical science, and information technology. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, 2005(110), 7–14. doi:10.1002/cd.146.
19. Emmons, R. A. (2003). Personal goals, life meaning, and virtue: Wellsprings of a positive life. In C. L. M. Keyes (Ed.), Flourishing: Positive psychology and the life well-lived (pp. 105–128). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
20. Evans, C. D., & Diekman, A. B. (2009). On motivated role selection: Gender beliefs, distant goals, and career interest. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33(2), 235–249. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01493.x.
21. Finch, S., Cumming, G., & Thomason, N. (2001). Reporting of statistical inference in the Journal of Applied Psychology: Little evidence of reform. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(2), 181–210. doi:10.1177/00131640121971167.
22. Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., Glick, P., & Xu, J. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.82.6.878.
23. Forbes, C. E., & Schmader, T. (2010). Retraining attitudes and stereotypes to affect motivation and cognitive capacity under stereotype threat. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99(5), 740–754. doi:10.1037/a0020971.
24. Good, C., Rattan, A., & Dweck, C. S. (2012). Why do women opt out? Sense of belonging and women’s representation in mathematics. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(4), 700–717. doi:10.1037/a0026659.
25. Goodman, J. K., Cryder, C. E., & Cheema, A. (2013). Data collection in a flat world: The strengths and weaknesses of Mechanical Turk samples. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 26(3), 213–224. doi:10.1002/bdm.1753.
26. Hayes, A. F. (2009). Beyond Baron and Kenny: Statistical mediation analysis in the new millennium. Communication Monographs, 76(4), 408–420. doi:10.1080/03637750903310360.
27. Hirschi, A., & Herrmann, A. (2012). Vocational identity achievement as a mediator of presence of calling and life satisfaction. Journal of Career Assessment, 20(3), 309–321. doi:10.1177/1069072711436158.
28. Hubbard, R. (1995). The earth is highly significantly round (p<.0001). American Psychologist, 50(12), 1098. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.50.12.1098.a.
29. IBM. (2013). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 22.0) [Computer software]. Armonk: IBM Corp.
30. Inzlicht, M., & Ben-Zeev, T. (2000). A threatening intellectual environment: Why females are susceptible to experiencing problem-solving deficits in the presence of males. Psychological Science, 11(5), 365–371. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00272.
31. Johns, M., Schmader, T., & Martens, A. (2005). Knowing is half the battle teaching stereotype threat as a means of improving women's math performance. Psychological Science, 16(3), 175–179. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2005.00799.
32. Johns, M., Inzlicht, M., & Schmader, T. (2008). Stereotype threat and executive resource depletion: Examining the influence of emotion regulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology-General, 137(4), 691–705. doi:10.1037/A0013834.
33. Keller, J., & Dauenheimer, D. (2003). Stereotype threat in the classroom: Dejection mediates the disrupting threat effect on women’s math performance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(3), 371–381. doi:10.1177/0146167202250218.
34. King, L. A., Hicks, J. A., Krull, J. L., & Del Gaiso, A. K. (2006). Positive affect and the experience of meaning in life. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 179–196. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.179.
35. Kronberger, N., & Horwath, I. (2013). The ironic costs of performing well: Grades differentially predict male and female dropout from engineering. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 35(6), 534–546. doi:10.1080/01973533.2013.840629.
36. Lesko, A. C., & Corpus, J. H. (2006). Discounting the difficult: How high math-identified women respond to stereotype threat. Sex Roles, 54(1), 113–125. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-8873-2.
37. Mellers, B. A., & McGraw, A. P. (2001). Anticipated emotions as guides to choice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 210–214. doi:10.1111/1467-8721.00151.
38. Murphy, M. C., Steele, C. M., & Gross, J. J. (2007). Signaling threat: How situational cues affect women in math, science, and engineering settings. Psychological Science, 18(10), 879–885. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01995.x.
39. Nguyen, H.-H. D., & Ryan, A. M. (2008). Does stereotype threat affect test performance of minorities and women? A meta-analysis of experimental evidence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 93(6), 1314–1334. doi:10.1037/a0012702.
40. Osborne, J. W. (2001). Testing stereotype threat: Does anxiety explain race and sex differences in achievement? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(3), 291–310. doi:10.1006/ceps.2000.1052.
41. Preacher, K., & Hayes, A. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 36(4), 717–731. doi:10.3758/BF03206553.
42. Raudenbush, S. W., Bryk, A. S., & Congdon, R. (2004). HLM 6 for windows [Computer software]. Lincolnwood: Scientific Software International.
43. Richard, R., van der Pligt, J., & de Vries, N. (1996). Anticipated affect and behavioral choice. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 18(2), 111–129. doi:10.1207/s15324834basp1802_1.
44. Schuster, C., Martiny, S. E., & Schmader, T. (2015). Distracted by the unthought – Suppression and reappraisal of mind wandering under stereotype threat. PLoS ONE, 10(3), e0122207. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0122207.
45. Sekaquaptewa, D., & Thompson, M. (2003). Solo status, stereotype threat, and performance expectancies: Their effects on women’s performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 39(1), 68–74.
46. Shapiro, J. R. (2011). Different groups, different threats: A multi-threat approach to the experience of stereotype threats. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(4), 464–480. doi:10.1177/0146167211398140.
47. Shapiro, J. R., & Williams, A. M. (2012). The role of stereotype threats in undermining girls’ and women’s performance and interest in STEM fields. Sex Roles, 66(3-4), 175–183. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0051-0.
48. Smith, J. L., Lewis, K. L., Hawthorne, L., & Hodges, S. D. (2013). When trying hard isn’t natural: Women’s belonging with and motivation for male-dominated STEM fields as a function of effort expenditure concerns. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(2), 131–143. doi:10.1177/0146167212468332.
49. Smithson, M. (2001). Correct confidence intervals for various regression effect sizes and parameters: The importance of noncentral distributions in computing intervals. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 61(4), 605–632. doi:10.1177/00131640121971392.
50. Spencer, S. J., Steele, C. M., & Quinn, D. M. (1999). Stereotype threat and women’s math performance. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 35(1), 4–28. doi:10.1006/jesp.1998.1373.
51. Stangor, C., Carr, C., & Kiang, L. (1998). Activating stereotypes undermines task performance expectations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(5), 1191–1197. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.75.5.1191.
52. Statistisches Bundesamt (2012). Bildung und Kultur: Studierende an Hochschulen. [Education and Culture: Students in Higher Education]. Series 11, Vol. 4.1. Retrieved from https://www.destatis.de/DE/Publikationen/Thematisch/BildungForschungKultur/Hochschulen/StudierendeHochschulenEndg.html.
53. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test-performance of African-Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(5), 797–811. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.69.5.797.
54. Steele, C. M., Spencer, S. J., & Aronson, J. (2002). Contending with group image: The psychology of stereotype and social identity threat. In J. M. Olson & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 34, pp. 379–440). San Diego: Academic.
55. Steger, M. F., & Dik, B. J. (2009). If one is looking for meaning in life, does it help to find meaning in work? Applied Psychology: Health and Well-Being, 1(3), 303–320. doi:10.1111/j.1758-0854.2009.01018.x.
56. Stephens, E. J., & Pekrun, R. (2011). Anticipated achievement emotions as antecedents of achievement goals. Munich: Department of Personality and Educational Psychology, Ludwig-Maximilian-Universität.
57. Van Der Schalk, J., Bruder, M., & Manstead, A. (2012). Regulating emotion in the context of interpersonal decisions: The role of anticipated pride and regret. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 513, 1–9. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00513.
58. Wang, M.-T., & Degol, J. (2013). Motivational pathways to STEM career choices: Using expectancy–value perspective to understand individual and gender differences in STEM fields. Developmental Review, 33(4), 304–340. doi:10.1016/j.dr.2013.08.001.
59. Wang, M.-T., Eccles, J. S., & Kenny, S. (2013). Not lack of ability but more choice individual and gender differences in choice of careers in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Psychological Science, 24(5), 770–775. doi:10.1177/0956797612458937.
60. Woodcock, A., Hernandez, P. R., Estrada, M., & Schultz, P. W. (2012). The consequences of chronic stereotype threat: Domain disidentification and abandonment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103(4), 635–646. doi:10.1037/a0029120.
61. Wuensch, K. L. (2012). Using SPSS to obtain a confidence interval for Cohen’s d. Retrieved from http://core.ecu.edu/psyc/wuenschk/SPSS/CI-d-SPSS.pdf.