Surgical navigation technology based on augmented reality and integrated 3D intraoperative imaging a spine cadaveric feasibility and accuracy study

Spine

Volumn 41, Issue 21, 2016, Pages E1303-E1311

  Elmi Terander, Adrian ^a   Skulason, Halldor ^a   Soderman, Michael ^a   Racadio, John ^b   Homan, Robert ^c   Babic, Drazenko ^c   Van Der Vaart, Nijs ^c   Nachabe, Rami ^c  

^a KAROLINSKA UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Sweden)

^b CINCINNATI CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c PHILIPS HEALTHCARE   (United States)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Augmented reality; Hybrid operating room; Integrated navigation; Occupational radiation dose; Pedicle screw

Indexed keywords

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CADAVER; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INTRAOPERATIVE PERIOD; MINIMALLY INVASIVE PROCEDURE; MORPHOMETRICS; PEDICLE SCREW; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SURGICAL NAVIGATION SYSTEM; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VERTEBRA BODY; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; LUMBAR VERTEBRA; ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY; PROCEDURES; SURGERY; THORACIC VERTEBRA;

FEASIBILITY STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; PEDICLE SCREWS; SURGERY, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; THORACIC VERTEBRAE;

EID: 84981156413     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000001830     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Tian NF, Huang QS, Zhou P, et al. Pedicle screw insertion accuracy with different assisted methods: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies. Eur Spine J 2011;20:846-59.
2. Helm P, Teichman R, Hartmann S, et al. Spinal navigation and imaging: history, trends, and future. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2015;34:1738-46.
3. Kosmopulos V, Schizas C. Pedicle screw placement accuracy: a meta-analysis. Spine 2007;32:111-20.
4. Shin BJ, James AR, Njoku IU, et al. Pedicle screw navigation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of perforation risk for computer-navigated versus freehand insertion. J Neurosurg Spine 2012;17:113-22.
5. Waschke A, Walter J, Duenisch P, et al. CT-navigation versus fluoroscopy-guided placement of pedicle screws at the thoraco-lumbar spine: single center experience of 4500 screws. Eur Spine J 2013;22:654-60.
6. Kraus M, Weiskopf J, Dreyhaupt J, et al. Computer-aided surgery does not increase the accuracy of dorsal pedicle screw placement in the thoracic and lumbar spine: a retrospective analysis of 2003 pedicle screws in a level I trauma center. Global Spine J 2015;5:93-101.
7. Tabaraee E, Gibson AG, Karahalios DG, et al. Intraoperative cone beam computed tomography with navigation (O-arm) versus conventional fluoroscopy (C-arm). A cadaveric study comparing accuracy, efficiency, and safety for spinal instrumentation. Spine 2013;38:1953-8.
8. Akazawa T, Kotani T, Sakuma T, et al. Evaluation of pedicle screw placement by pedicle channel grade in adolescent idiopathic sco-liosis: should we challenge narrow pedicles? J Orthop Sci 2015;20:818-22.
9. Gautshi OP, Schalto B, Shaller K, et al. Clinically relevant complications related to pedicle screw placement in thoracolumbar surgery and their management: a literature review of 35630 pedicle screws. Neurosurg focus 2011;31: 1-9.
10. DeRuiter QM, Moll FL, Gijsberts CM, et al. AlluraClarity radiation dose reduction technology in the hybrid operating room during endovascular aneurysm repair. J Endovasc Ther 2016;23:130-8.
11. Fandino J, Taussky P, Marbacher S, et al. The concept of a hybrid operating room: applications in cerebrovascular surgery. Acta Neurochir Suppl 2013;115:113-7.
12. Braak SJ, Zuurmond K, Aerts HC, et al. Feasibility study of needle placement in percutaneous vertebroplasty: cone-beam computed tomography guidance versus conventional fluoroscopy. Cadiovasc Intervent Radiol 2013;36:1120-6.
13. Gertzbein SD, Robbins SE. Accuracy of pedicular screw placement in vivo. Spine 1990;15:11-4.
14. Zindrick MR, Wiltse LL, Doornik. et al. Analysis of the morpho-metric characteristics of the thoracic and lumbar pedicles. Spine 1987;12:160-6.
15. Schrout PE, Fleiss JL. Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol Bull 1979;86:150-5.
16. Scheufler KM, Franke J, Eckardt A, et al. Accuracy of image-guided pedicle screw placement using intraoperative computed tomography-based navigation with automated referencing. Part II: thoracolumbar spine. Neurosurgery 2011;69:1307-17.
17. Lekovic G, Potts E, Karahalios. et al. A comparison of two techniques in image-guided thoracic pedicle screw placement: a retrospective study of 37 patients and 277 pedicle screws. J Neuro-surg Spine 2007;7:393-8.
18. Sakai Y, Matsuyama Y, Nakamura H, et al. Segmental pedicle screwing for idiopathic scoliosis using computer-assisted surgery. J Spinal Disorder Tech 2008;21:181-6.
19. Cui G, Wang Y, Kao TH, et al. Application of intraoperative computed tomography with or without navigation system in surgical correction of spinal deformity. Spine 2012;37: 891-900.
20. Allam Y, Silbermann J, Riese F, et al. Computer tomography assessment of pedicle screw placement in thoracic spine: comparison between free hand and a generic 3D-based navigation tech-niques. Eur Spine J 2013;22:648-53.
21. Jin M, Liu Z, Liu X, et al. Does intraoperative navigation improve the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the apical region of dystrophic scoliosis secondary to neurofibromatosis type I: comparison between O-arm navigation and free hand-technique. Eur Spine J 2016;25:1729-37.
22. Aoude AA, Fortin M, Figueiredo R, et al. Methods to determine pedicle screw placement accuracy in spine surgery: a systematic review. Eur Spine J 2015;24:990-1004.
23. Rivkin MA, Yocom SS. Thoracolumbar instrumentation with CT-guided navigation (O-arm) in 270 consecutive patients: accuracy rates and lessons learned. Neurosurg Focus 2014;36:E7.
24. Ryang YM, Villard J, Obermuller T, et al. Learning curve of 3D fluoroscopy image-guided pedicle screw placement in the thora-columbar spine. Spine J 2015;15:467-76.