Allura clarity radiation dose-reduction technology in the hybrid operating room during endovascular aneurysm repair

Journal of Endovascular Therapy

Volumn 23, Issue 1, 2016, Pages 130-138

  De Ruiter, Quirina M B ^a   Moll, Frans L ^a   Gijsberts, Crystel M ^a,b   Van Herwaarden, Joost A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b INTERUNIVERSITY CARDIOLOGY INSTITUTE OF THE NETHERLANDS   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Abdominal aortic aneurysm; C arm image intensifier; Digital subtraction angiography; Dose reduction; Endovascular aneurysm repair; Fluoroscopy; Imaging technology; Kerma area product; Radiation dose; Radiation physics

Indexed keywords

AGED; AORTIC ANEURYSM ENDOVASCULAR GRAFT; ARTICLE; DIGITAL SUBTRACTION ANGIOGRAPHY; ENDOVASCULAR ANEURYSM REPAIR; FEMALE; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE PROCESSING; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION DOSE REDUCTION; ADVERSE EFFECTS; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTOGRAPHY; BLOOD VESSEL TRANSPLANTATION; BODY MASS; COMPUTER ASSISTED DIAGNOSIS; DEVICES; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; INTERVENTIONAL RADIOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATING ROOM; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PREVENTION AND CONTROL; RADIATION DOSE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; RISK FACTOR; STATISTICAL MODEL; VERY ELDERLY;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANGIOGRAPHY, DIGITAL SUBTRACTION; AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; AORTOGRAPHY; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; BODY MASS INDEX; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; FEMALE; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OPERATING ROOMS; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE INTERPRETATION, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; RADIOGRAPHY, INTERVENTIONAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK FACTORS;

EID: 84957811452     PISSN: 15266028     EISSN: 15451550     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1526602815622433     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Kaneko T, Davidson MJ. Use of the hybrid operating room in cardiovascular medicine. Circulation. 2014;130:910-917.
2. Eder SP, Register JL. 10 management considerations for implementing an endovascular hybrid OR. AORN J. 2014;100:260-270.
3. Fossaceca R, Brambilla M, Guzzardi G, et al. The impact of radiological equipment on patient radiation exposure during endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Eur Radiol. 2012;22:2424-2431.
4. Majewska N, Stanisic MG, Klos MA, et al. Patients' radiation doses during thoracic stent-graft implantation: the problem of long-lasting procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. 2012;93:465-472.
5. Tacher V, Lin M, Desgranges P, et al. Image guidance for endovascular repair of complex aortic aneurysms: comparison of two-dimensional and three-dimensional angiography and image fusion. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013;24:1698-1706.
6. Thakor AS, Winterbottom A, Mercuri M, et al. The radiation burden from increasingly complex endovascular aortic aneurysm repair. Insights Imaging. 2011;2:699-704.
7. Panuccio G, Greenberg RK, Wunderle K, et al. Comparison of indirect radiation dose estimates with directly measured radiation dose for patients and operators during complex endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53:885-894.e1.
8. Kirkwood ML, Arbique GM, Guild JB, et al. Surgeon education decreases radiation dose in complex endovascular procedures and improves patient safety. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58:715-721.
9. Dekker LR, van der Voort PH, Simmers TA, et al. New image processing and noise reduction technology allows reduction of radiation exposure in complex electrophysiologic interventions while maintaining optimal image quality: a randomized clinical trial. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10:1678-1682.
10. Söderman M, Mauti M, Boon S, et al. Radiation dose in neuroangiography using image noise reduction technology: a population study based on 614 patients. Neuroradiology. 2013;55:1365-1372.
11. Haas NA, Happel CM, Mauti M, et al. Substantial radiation reduction in pediatric and adult congenital heart disease interventions with a novel X-ray imaging technology. IJC Heart Vasculature. 2015;6:101-109.
12. Nakamura S, Kobayashi T, Funatsu A, et al. Patient radiation dose reduction using an X-ray imaging noise reduction technology for cardiac angiography and intervention [published online April 4, 2015]. Heart Vessels. doi:10.1007/s00380-015-0667-z.
13. Eloot L, Thierens H, Taeymans Y, et al. Novel X-ray imaging technology enables significant patient dose reduction in interventional cardiology while maintaining diagnostic image quality. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015;86:E205-E212.
14. van Strijen MJ, Grunhagen T, Mauti M, et al. Evaluation of a noise reduction imaging technology in iliac digital subtraction angiography: noninferior clinical image quality with lower patient and scatter dose. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;26:642-650.e1.
15. Mohapatra A, Greenberg RK, Mastracci TM, et al. Radiation exposure to operating room personnel and patients during endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2013;58:702-709.
16. Pitton MB, Kloeckner R, Schneider J, et al. Radiation exposure in vascular angiographic procedures. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2012;23:1487-1495.
17. Ketteler ER, Brown KR. Radiation exposure in endovascular procedures. J Vasc Surg. 2011;53(1 suppl):35S-38S.
18. Haqqani OP, Agarwal PK, Halin NM, et al. Minimizing radiation exposure to the vascular surgeon. J Vasc Surg. 2012;55:799-805.
19. Stecker MS, Balter S, Towbin RB, et al. Guidelines for patient radiation dose management. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009;20(7 suppl):S263-273.
20. Cousins C, Miller DL, Bernardi G, et al. Radiological protection in cardiology. ICRP Publication 120. Ann ICRP. 2013;42(1).
21. Geijer H, Larzon T, Popek R, et al. Radiation exposure in stent-grafting of abdominal aortic aneurysms. Br J Radiol. 2005;78:906-912.