Intraoperative cone beam-computed tomography with navigation (O-ARM) versus conventional fluoroscopy (C-ARM): A cadaveric study comparing accuracy, efficiency, and safety for spinal instrumentation

Spine

Volumn 38, Issue 22, 2013, Pages 1953-1958

  Tabaraee, Ehsan ^a   Gibson, Anthony G ^a   Karahalios, Dean G ^b   Potts, Eric A ^c   Mobasser, Jean Pierre ^c   Burch, Shane ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b RUSH MEDICAL COLLEGE   (United States)

^c Goodman Campbell Brain and Spine   (United States)

Author keywords

image guided surgery; intraoperative imaging.; O ARM; radiation; radiation exposure

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CADAVER; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEFORMITY; DOSIMETER; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIGHT; LUMBAR SPINE; MEDICAL TECHNOLOGY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; PEDICLE SCREW; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RADIATION EXPOSURE; RADIATION HAZARD; SPINE SURGERY; SURGEON; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; THORACIC SPINE;

BONE SCREWS; CADAVER; CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY; FLUOROSCOPY; HUMANS; LUMBAR VERTEBRAE; MONITORING, INTRAOPERATIVE; ORTHOPEDIC PROCEDURES; RADIATION DOSAGE; RADIOMETRY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SACRUM; SPINE; SURGICAL PROCEDURES, MINIMALLY INVASIVE; THORACIC VERTEBRAE;

EID: 84886099106     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182a51d1e     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Esses SI, Sachs BL, Dreyzin V. Complications associated with the technique of pedicle screw fixation. A selected survey of ABS members. Spine 1993; 18: 2231-8; discussion 8-9.
2. Brown CA, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Complications of pedi-atric thoracolumbar and lumbar pedicle screws. Spine 1998; 23: 1566-71. (Pubitemid 28459961)
3. Zheng X, Chaudhari R, Wu C, et al. Subaxial cervical pedicle screw insertion with newly defined entry point and trajectory: accuracy evaluation in cadavers. Eur Spine J 2010; 19: 105-12.
4. Wood M, Mannion R. A comparison of CT-based navigation techniques for minimally invasive lumbar pedicle screw placement. J Spinal Disord Tech 2011; 24: E1-5.
5. Van de Kelft E, Costa F, Van der Planken D, et al. A prospective multicenter registry on the accuracy of pedicle screw placement in the thoracic, lumbar, and sacral levels with the use of the O-ARM imaging system and StealthStation navigation. Spine 2012; 37: E1580-7.
6. Kim YJ, Lenke LG, Bridwell KH, et al. Free hand pedicle screw placement in the thoracic spine: is it safe? Spine 2004; 29: 333-43; discussion 42.
7. Gaines RW, Jr. The use of pedicle-screw internal fixation for the operative treatment of spinal disorders. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2000; 82-A: 1458-76.
8. Foley KT, Holly L T, Schwender JD. Minimally invasive lumbar fusion. Spine 2003; 28 (suppl 15): S26-35.
9. Mirza SK, Wiggins GC, Kuntz CT, et al. Accuracy of thoracic vertebral body screw placement using standard fl uoroscopy, fl uoro-scopic image guidance, and computed tomographic image guidance: a cadaver study. Spine 2003; 28: 402-13. (Pubitemid 36232625)
10. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography-an increasing source of radiation exposure. NEJM 2007; 357: 2277-84. (Pubitemid 350190758)
11. Sanders R, Koval KJ, DiPasquale T, et al. Exposure of the orthopaedic surgeon to radiation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1993; 75: 326-30. (Pubitemid 23137935)
12. Mehlman CT, DiPasquale TG. Radiation exposure to the orthopaedic surgical team during fl uoroscopy: how far away is far enough?. J Orthop Trauma 1997; 11: 392-8. (Pubitemid 127728684)
13. Tian NF, Xu HZ. Image-guided pedicle screw insertion accuracy: a meta-analysis. Int Orthop 2009; 33: 895-903.
14. Yang BP, Wahl MM, Idler CS. Percutaneous lumbar pedicle screw placement aided by computer-assisted fl uoroscopy-based navigation: perioperative results of a prospective, comparative, multicenter study. Spine 2012; 37: 2055-60.
15. Vaccaro AR, Rizzolo SJ, Balderston RA, et al. Placement of pedicle screws in the thoracic spine. Part II: an anatomical and radiographic assessment. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1995; 77: 1200-06.
16. Waschke A, Walter J, Duenisch P, et al. CT-navigation versus fl u-oroscopy-guided placement of pedicle screws at the thoracolum-bar spine: single center experience of 4, 500 screws. Eur Spine J 2013; 22: 654-60.
17. Zausinger S, Scheder B, Uhl E, et al. Intraoperative computed tomography with integrated navigation system in spinal stabilizations. Spine 2009; 34: 2919-26.
18. Scheufl er KM, Franke J, Eckardt A, et al. Accuracy of image-guided pedicle screw placement using intraoperative computed tomography-based navigation with automated referencing. Part II: thoracolumbar spine. Neurosurgery 2011; 69: 1307-16.
19. Rampersaud YR, Foley KT, Shen AC, et al. Radiation exposure to the spine surgeon during fl uoroscopically assisted pedicle screw insertion. Spine 2000; 25: 2637-45.
20. Ul Haque M, Shuffl ebarger HL, O'Brien M, et al. Radiation exposure during pedicle screw placement in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: is fl uoroscopy safe? Spine 2006; 31: 2516-20. (Pubitemid 44527037)
21. National Council on Radiation Protection. Report No. 102 Medical X-ray, Electron Beam and Gamma-Ray Protection for Energies Up to 50 mev. Bethesda, MD; 1989.
22. Abdullah KG, Bishop FS, Lubelski D, et al. Radiation exposure to the spine in lumbar and thoracolumbar fusions with the use of an intraoperative computed tomographic 3-dimensional imaging system. Spine 2012; 37: E1074-8.
23. Gebhard FT, Kraus MD, Schneider E, et al. Does computerassisted spine surgery reduce intraoperative radiation doses? Spine 2006; 31: 2024-7; discussion 8. (Pubitemid 44297785)
24. Slomczykowski M, Roberto M, Schneeberger P, et al. Radiation dose for pedicle screw insertion. Fluoroscopic method versus computer-assisted surgery. Spine 1999; 24: 975-82; discussion 83.
25. Nakagawa H, Kamimura M, Uchiyama S, et al. The accuracy and safety of image-guidance system using intraoperative fl uoroscopic images: an in vitro feasibility study. J Clin Neurosci 2003; 10: 226-30. (Pubitemid 36358373)