Collective Signal Processing in Cluster Chemotaxis: Roles of Adaptation, Amplification, and Co-attraction in Collective Guidance

PLoS Computational Biology

Volumn 12, Issue 7, 2016, Pages

  Camley, Brian A ^a   Zimmermann, Juliane ^b   Levine, Herbert ^b,c   Rappel, Wouter Jan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b RICE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Rice University   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BIOCHEMISTRY; CELL ADHESION; SIGNAL PROCESSING; STOCHASTIC MODELS; STOCHASTIC SYSTEMS;

CELL CLUSTERS; CELL-CELL ADHESION; CHEMICAL GRADIENTS; CHEMOATTRACTANTS; CHEMOTAXI; CLUSTER OF CELLS; EUKARYOTIC CELLS; SIGNAL-PROCESSING; SINGLE CELLS; STOCHASTIC DYNAMICS;

CELLS;

STROMAL CELL DERIVED FACTOR 1; CHEMOTACTIC FACTOR;

ADAPTATION; ARTICLE; CELL ADHESION; CELL CONTACT; CELL EXPANSION; CELL POLARITY; CELL SIZE; CELLULAR DISTRIBUTION; CHEMOTAXIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; GAP JUNCTION; INTRACELLULAR SIGNALING; NEURAL CREST CELL; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; PROTEIN SECRETION; SIGNAL NOISE RATIO; SIGNAL PROCESSING; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; METABOLISM; PHYSIOLOGY; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

CHEMOTACTIC FACTORS; CHEMOTAXIS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION;

EID: 84980025284     PISSN: 1553734X     EISSN: 15537358     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005008     Document Type: Article

References (97)

1. Malet-Engra G, Yu W, Oldani A, Rey-Barroso J, Gov NS, Scita G, et al. Collective Cell Motility Promotes Chemotactic Prowess and Resistance to Chemorepulsion. Current Biology. 2015;25:242. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2014.11.03025578904
2. Theveneau E, Marchant L, Kuriyama S, Gull M, Moepps B, Parsons M, et al. Collective chemotaxis requires contact-dependent cell polarity. Developmental Cell. 2010;19(1):39. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2010.06.01220643349
3. Bianco A, Poukkula M, Cliffe A, Mathieu J, Luque CM, Fulga TA, et al. Two distinct modes of guidance signalling during collective migration of border cells. Nature. 2007;448(7151):362. doi: 10.1038/nature0596517637670
4. Ellison D, Mugler A, Brennan MD, Lee SH, Huebner RJ, Shamir ER, et al. Cell–cell communication enhances the capacity of cell ensembles to sense shallow gradients during morphogenesis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016;p. 201516503.
5. Winklbauer R, Selchow A, Nagel M, Angres B, Cell interaction and its role in mesoderm cell migration during Xenopus gastrulation. Developmental Dynamics. 1992;195(4):290. doi: 10.1002/aja.10019504071304824
6. Rørth P, Collective guidance of collective cell migration. Trends in Cell Biology. 2007;17(12):575. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2007.09.00717996447
7. Camley BA, Zimmermann J, Levine H, Rappel WJ, Emergent collective chemotaxis without single-cell gradient sensing. Physical Review Letters. 2015;116:098101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.116.098101
8. Cai D, Dai W, Prasad M, Luo J, Gov NS, Montell DJ, Modeling and analysis of collective cell migration in an in vivo three-dimensional environment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016;p. 201522656.
9. Mugler A, Levchenko A, Nemenman I, Limits to the precision of gradient sensing with spatial communication and temporal integration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016;p. 201509597.
10. Cai D, Chen SC, Prasad M, He L, Wang X, Choesmel-Cadamuro V, et al. Mechanical feedback through E-cadherin promotes direction sensing during collective cell migration. Cell. 2014;157(5):1146. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2014.03.04524855950
11. Friedl P, Gilmour D, Collective cell migration in morphogenesis, regeneration and cancer. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2009;10(7):445. doi: 10.1038/nrm272019546857
12. Vedula SRK, Ravasio A, Lim CT, Ladoux B, Collective Cell Migration: A Mechanistic Perspective. Physiology. 2013;28(6):370. doi: 10.1152/physiol.00033.201324186932
13. Davis JR, Luchici A, Mosis F, Thackery J, Salazar JA, Mao Y, et al. Inter-cellular forces orchestrate contact inhibition of locomotion. Cell. 2015;161(2):361. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.01525799385
14. Collins C, Nelson WJ, Running with neighbors: coordinating cell migration and cell–cell adhesion. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2015;36:62–70. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2015.07.00426201843
15. Scarpa E, Szabó A, Bibonne A, Theveneau E, Parsons M, Mayor R, Cadherin switch during EMT in neural crest cells leads to contact inhibition of locomotion via repolarization of forces. Developmental Cell. 2015;34(4):421. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2015.06.01226235046
16. Roycroft A, Mayor R, Forcing contact inhibition of locomotion. Trends in Cell Biology. 2015;25(7):373. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.05.00125981318
17. Roycroft A, Mayor R, Molecular basis of contact inhibition of locomotion. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences. 2015;p. 1.
18. Lin B, Yin T, Wu YI, Inoue T, Levchenko A, Interplay between chemotaxis and contact inhibition of locomotion determines exploratory cell migration. Nature Communications. 2015;6. doi: 10.1038/ncomms7619
19. Levchenko A, Iglesias PA, Models of eukaryotic gradient sensing: application to chemotaxis of amoebae and neutrophils. Biophysical Journal. 2002;82(1):50. doi: 10.1016/S0006-3495(02)75373-311751295
20. Carmona-Fontaine C, Theveneau E, Tzekou A, Tada M, Woods M, Page KM, et al. Complement fragment C3a controls mutual cell attraction during collective cell migration. Developmental Cell. 2011;21(6):1026. doi: 10.1016/j.devcel.2011.10.01222118769
21. Carmona-Fontaine C, Matthews HK, Kuriyama S, Moreno M, Dunn GA, Parsons M, et al. Contact inhibition of locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration. Nature. 2008;456(7224):957. doi: 10.1038/nature0744119078960
22. Mayor R, Carmona-Fontaine C, Keeping in touch with contact inhibition of locomotion. Trends in Cell Biology. 2010;20(6):319. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2010.03.00520399659
23. Camley BA, Zhang Y, Zhao Y, Li B, Ben-Jacob E, Levine H, et al. Polarity mechanisms such as contact inhibition of locomotion regulate persistent rotational motion of mammalian cells on micropatterns. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014;111(41):14770. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1414498111
24. Abercrombie M, Contact inhibition and malignancy. Nature. 1979;281(5729):259. doi: 10.1038/281259a0551275
25. Desai RA, Gopal SB, Chen S, Chen CS, Contact inhibition of locomotion probabilities drive solitary versus collective cell migration. Journal of The Royal Society Interface. 2013;10(88):20130717. doi: 10.1098/rsif.2013.0717
26. Scarpa E, Roycroft A, Theveneau E, Terriac E, Piel M, Mayor R, A novel method to study contact inhibition of locomotion using micropatterned substrates. Biology Open. 2013;2(9):901. doi: 10.1242/bio.2013550424143276
27. Woods ML, Carmona-Fontaine C, Barnes CP, Couzin ID, Mayor R, Page KM, Directional Collective Cell Migration Emerges as a Property of Cell Interactions. PloS ONE. 2014;9(9):e104969. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.010496925181349
28. Selmeczi D, Mosler S, Hagedorn PH, Larsen NB, Flyvbjerg H, Cell motility as persistent random motion: theories from experiments. Biophysical Journal. 2005;89(2):912. doi: 10.1529/biophysj.105.06115015951372
29. Van Kampen NG, Stochastic Processes in Physics and Chemistry. vol. 1. Elsevier; 1992.
30. Szabo B, Szöllösi G, Gönci B, Jurányi Z, Selmeczi D, Vicsek T, Phase transition in the collective migration of tissue cells: experiment and model. Physical Review E. 2006;74(6):061908. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.74.061908
31. Yang H, Gou X, Wang Y, Fahmy TM, Leung AYH, Lu J, et al. A Dynamic Model of Chemoattractant-Induced Cell Migration. Biophysical Journal. 2015;108(7):1645. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.12.06025863056
32. Song L, Nadkarni SM, Bödeker HU, Beta C, Bae A, Franck C, et al. Dictyostelium discoideum chemotaxis: threshold for directed motion. European Journal of Cell Biology. 2006;85(9):981. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcb.2006.01.01216529846
33. Nakao H, Mikhailov AS, Turing patterns in network-organized activator-inhibitor systems. Nature Physics. 2010;6(7):544. doi: 10.1038/nphys1651
34. Othmer H, Scriven L, Instability and dynamic pattern in cellular networks. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 1971;32(3):507. doi: 10.1016/0022-5193(71)90154-85571122
35. Xu X, Li W, Huang G, Meyer R, Chen T, Luo Y, et al. Modulation of mouse neural crest cell motility by N-cadherin and connexin 43 gap junctions. The Journal of Cell Biology. 2001;154(1):217. doi: 10.1083/jcb.20010504711449002
36. Huang G, Cooper E, Waldo K, Kirby M, Gilula N, Lo C, Gap junction–mediated cell–cell communication modulates mouse neural crest migration. The Journal of Cell Biology. 1998;143(6):1725. doi: 10.1083/jcb.143.6.17259852163
37. Waters CM, Bassler BL, Quorum sensing: cell-to-cell communication in bacteria. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2005;21:319. doi: 10.1146/annurev.cellbio.21.012704.13100116212498
38. Bollenbach T, Kruse K, Pantazis P, González-Gaitán M, Jülicher F, Robust formation of morphogen gradients. Physical Review Letters. 2005;94(1):018103. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.94.01810315698137
39. Wade MH, Trosko JE, Schindler M, A fluorescence photobleaching assay of gap junction-mediated communication between human cells. Science. 1986;232(4749):525. doi: 10.1126/science.39614953961495
40. Hervé JC, Derangeon M, Gap-junction-mediated cell-to-cell communication. Cell and Tissue Research. 2013;352(1):21. doi: 10.1007/s00441-012-1485-622940728
41. Allbritton NL, Meyer T, Stryer L, Range of messenger action of calcium ion and inositol 1, 4, 5-trisphosphate. Science. 1992;258:1812. doi: 10.1126/science.14656191465619
42. Kloeden PE, Platen E, Numerical solution of stochastic differential equations. vol. 23. Springer; 1992.
43. Gomperts BD, Kramer IM, Tatham PE, Signal transduction. Academic Press; 2009.
44. Montell DJ, Yoon WH, Starz-Gaiano M, Group choreography: mechanisms orchestrating the collective movement of border cells. Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology. 2012;13(10):631. doi: 10.1038/nrm343323000794
45. Yi TM, Huang Y, Simon MI, Doyle J, Robust perfect adaptation in bacterial chemotaxis through integral feedback control. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2000;97(9):4649. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.9.4649
46. Takeda K, Shao D, Adler M, Charest PG, Loomis WF, Levine H, et al. Incoherent feedforward control governs adaptation of activated ras in a eukaryotic chemotaxis pathway. Science Signaling. 2012;5(205):ra2. doi: 10.1126/scisignal.200241322215733
47. Levine H, Rappel WJ, The physics of eukaryotic chemotaxis. Physics Today. 2013;66(2). doi: 10.1063/PT.3.188424363460
48. Skoge M, Yue H, Erickstad M, Bae A, Levine H, Groisman A, et al. Cellular memory in eukaryotic chemotaxis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2014;111(40):14448. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1412197111
49. Xiong Y, Huang CH, Iglesias PA, Devreotes PN, Cells navigate with a local-excitation, global-inhibition-biased excitable network. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010;107(40):17079. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011271107
50. Ma W, Trusina A, El-Samad H, Lim WA, Tang C, Defining network topologies that can achieve biochemical adaptation. Cell. 2009;138(4):760. doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2009.06.01319703401
51. Fuller D, Chen W, Adler M, Groisman A, Levine H, Rappel WJ, et al. External and internal constraints on eukaryotic chemotaxis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2010;107(21):9656. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0911178107
52. Levine H, Kessler DA, Rappel WJ, Directional sensing in eukaryotic chemotaxis: a balanced inactivation model. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2006;103(26):9761. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0601302103
53. Sepúlveda N, Petitjean L, Cochet O, Grasland-Mongrain E, Silberzan P, Hakim V, Collective cell motion in an epithelial sheet can be quantitatively described by a stochastic interacting particle model. PLoS Computational Biology. 2013;9(3):e1002944. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.100294423505356
54. Angelini TE, Hannezo E, Trepat X, Fredberg JJ, Weitz DA, Cell migration driven by cooperative substrate deformation patterns. Physical Review Letters. 2010;104(16):168104. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.104.16810420482085
55. Angelini TE, Hannezo E, Trepat X, Marquez M, Fredberg JJ, Weitz DA, Glass-like dynamics of collective cell migration. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108(12):4714. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1010059108
56. Poujade M, Grasland-Mongrain E, Hertzog A, Jouanneau J, Chavrier P, Ladoux B, et al. Collective migration of an epithelial monolayer in response to a model wound. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104(41):15988. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0705062104
57. Petitjean L, Reffay M, Grasland-Mongrain E, Poujade M, Ladoux B, Buguin A, et al. Velocity fields in a collectively migrating epithelium. Biophysical Journal. 2010;98(9):1790. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2010.01.03020441742
58. Szabó A, Ünnep R, Méhes E, Twal W, Argraves W, Cao Y, et al. Collective cell motion in endothelial monolayers. Physical Biology. 2010;7(4):046007. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/7/4/04600721076204
59. Szabó A, Varga K, Garay T, Hegedűs B, Czirók A, Invasion from a cell aggregate: the roles of active cell motion and mechanical equilibrium. Physical Biology. 2012;9(1):016010. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/9/1/01601022313673
60. Marel AK, Zorn M, Klingner C, Wedlich-Söldner R, Frey E, Rädler JO, Flow and diffusion in channel-guided cell migration. Biophysical Journal. 2014;107(5):1054. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.07.01725185541
61. McCann CP, Kriebel PW, Parent CA, Losert W, Cell speed, persistence and information transmission during signal relay and collective migration. Journal of Cell Science. 2010;123(10):1724. doi: 10.1242/jcs.06013720427323
62. Kessin RH, Dictyostelium: evolution, cell biology, and the development of multicellularity. 38. Cambridge University Press; 2001.
63. Czirók A, Ben-Jacob E, Cohen I, Vicsek T, Formation of complex bacterial colonies via self-generated vortices. Physical Review E. 1996;54(2):1791. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.54.1791
64. Levine H, Rappel WJ, Cohen I, Self-organization in systems of self-propelled particles. Physical Review E. 2000;63(1):017101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.017101
65. D’Orsogna MR, Chuang YL, Bertozzi AL, Chayes LS, Self-propelled particles with soft-core interactions: patterns, stability, and collapse. Physical Review Letters. 2006;96(10):104302. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.10430216605738
66. Defamie N, Chepied A, Mesnil M, Connexins, gap junctions and tissue invasion. FEBS Letters. 2014;588(8):1331. doi: 10.1016/j.febslet.2014.01.01224457198
67. Theveneau E, Mayor R, Cadherins in collective cell migration of mesenchymal cells. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2012;24(5):677. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2012.08.00222944726
68. Buszczak M, Inaba M, Yamashita YM, Signaling by Cellular Protrusions: Keeping the Conversation Private. Trends in Cell Biology. 2016;. doi: 10.1016/j.tcb.2016.03.00327032616
69. McCoy-Simandle K, Hanna SJ, Cox D, Exosomes and nanotubes: Control of immune cell communication. The International Journal of Biochemistry & Cell Biology. 2016;71:44. doi: 10.1016/j.biocel.2015.12.006
70. Maruthamuthu V, Sabass B, Schwarz US, Gardel ML, Cell-ECM traction force modulates endogenous tension at cell–cell contacts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2011;108(12):4708. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1011123108
71. Mertz AF, Banerjee S, Che Y, German GK, Xu Y, Hyland C, et al. Scaling of traction forces with the size of cohesive cell colonies. Physical Review Letters. 2012;108(19):198101. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.108.19810123003091
72. Mertz AF, Che Y, Banerjee S, Goldstein JM, Rosowski KA, Revilla SF, et al. Cadherin-based intercellular adhesions organize epithelial cell–matrix traction forces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110(3):842. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1217279110
73. Trepat X, Wasserman MR, Angelini TE, Millet E, Weitz DA, Butler JP, et al. Physical forces during collective cell migration. Nature Physics. 2009;5(6):426. doi: 10.1038/nphys1269
74. Zimmermann J, Camley BA, Rappel WJ, Levine H, Contact inhibition of locomotion determines cell–cell and cell–substrate forces in tissues. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2016;113(10):2660. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1522330113
75. Rappel WJ, Nicol A, Sarkissian A, Levine H, Loomis WF, Self-organized vortex state in two-dimensional Dictyostelium dynamics. Physical Review Letters. 1999;83(6):1247. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1247
76. Sgro AE, Schwab DJ, Noorbakhsh J, Mestler T, Mehta P, Gregor T, From intracellular signaling to population oscillations: bridging size-and time-scales in collective behavior. Molecular Systems Biology. 2015;11(1):779. doi: 10.15252/msb.2014535225617347
77. Bhowmik A, Rappel WJ, Levine H, Excitable waves and direction-sensing in Dictyostelium discoideum: steps towards a chemotaxis model. Physical Biology. 2016;13(1):016002. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/13/1/01600226824302
78. Palsson E, Othmer HG, A model for individual and collective cell movement in Dictyostelium discoideum. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2000;97(19):10448. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.19.10448
79. Dallon JC, Othmer HG, A discrete cell model with adaptive signalling for aggregation of Dictyostelium discoideum. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 1997;352(1351):391. doi: 10.1098/rstb.1997.00299134569
80. Pálsson E, A cAMP signaling model explains the benefit of maintaining two forms of phosphodiesterase in Dictyostelium. Biophysical journal. 2009;97(9):2388–2398. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2009.08.02119883581
81. McLennan R, Schumacher LJ, Morrison JA, Teddy JM, Ridenour DA, Box AC, et al. Neural crest migration is driven by a few trailblazer cells with a unique molecular signature narrowly confined to the invasive front. Development. 2015;142(11):2014. doi: 10.1242/dev.11750725977364
82. Kessler DA, Levine H, Pattern formation in Dictyostelium via the dynamics of cooperative biological entities. Physical Review E. 1993;48(6):4801. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.48.4801
83. McLennan R, Dyson L, Prather KW, Morrison JA, Baker RE, Maini PK, et al. Multiscale mechanisms of cell migration during development: theory and experiment. Development. 2012;139(16):2935. doi: 10.1242/dev.08147122764050
84. Camley BA, Rappel WJ, Velocity alignment leads to high persistence in confined cells. Physical Review E. 2014;89(6):062705. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.89.062705
85. van Drongelen R, Pal A, Goodrich CP, Idema T, Collective dynamics of soft active particles. Physical Review E. 2015;91:032706. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevE.91.032706
86. Van Liedekerke P, Palm M, Jagiella N, Drasdo D, Simulating tissue mechanics with agent-based models: concepts, perspectives and some novel results. Computational Particle Mechanics. 2015;2(4):401. doi: 10.1007/s40571-015-0082-3
87. Li B, Sun SX, Coherent Motions in Confluent Cell Monolayer Sheets. Biophysical Journal. 2014;107(7):1532. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.08.00625296305
88. Basan M, Elgeti J, Hannezo E, Rappel WJ, Levine H, Alignment of cellular motility forces with tissue flow as a mechanism for efficient wound healing. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2013;110(7):2452. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1219937110
89. Zimmermann J, Hayes RL, Basan M, Onuchic JN, Rappel WJ, Levine H, Intercellular Stress Reconstitution from Traction Force Data. Biophysical Journal. 2014;107(3):548. doi: 10.1016/j.bpj.2014.06.03625099794
90. Coburn L, Cerone L, Torney C, Couzin ID, Neufeld Z, Tactile interactions lead to coherent motion and enhanced chemotaxis of migrating cells. Physical Biology. 2013;10(4):046002. doi: 10.1088/1478-3975/10/4/04600223752100
91. Bi D, Lopez J, Schwarz J, Manning ML, A density-independent rigidity transition in biological tissues. Nature Physics. 2015;. doi: 10.1038/nphys3471
92. Graner F, Glazier JA, Simulation of biological cell sorting using a two-dimensional extended Potts model. Physical Review Letters. 1992;69(13):2013. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.69.201310046374
93. Löber J, Ziebert F, Aranson IS, Collisions of deformable cells lead to collective migration. Scientific Reports. 2015;5. doi: 10.1038/srep0917225779619
94. Palmieri B, Bresler Y, Wirtz D, Grant M, Multiple scale model for cell migration in monolayers: Elastic mismatch between cells enhances motility. Scientific Reports. 2015;5. doi: 10.1038/srep11745
95. McLennan R, Schumacher LJ, Morrison JA, Teddy JM, Ridenour DA, Box AC, et al. VEGF signals induce trailblazer cell identity that drives neural crest migration. Developmental Biology. 2015;407(1):12. doi: 10.1016/j.ydbio.2015.08.01126278036
96. Szabó A, Mayor R, Modelling collective cell migration of neural crest. Current Opinion in Cell Biology. 2016;42:22. doi: 10.1016/j.ceb.2016.03.02327085004
97. Amselem G, Theves M, Bae A, Bodenschatz E, Beta C, A stochastic description of Dictyostelium chemotaxis. PloS ONE. 2012;7(5):e37213. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.003721322662138