Forcing contact inhibition of locomotion

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 25, Issue 7, 2015, Pages 373-375

  Roycroft, Alice ^a   Mayor, Roberto ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Actin; Biomechanics; Contact inhibition of locomotion; Forces; Repulsion

Indexed keywords

ACTIN; CADHERIN;

CELL ADHESION; CELL CONTACT; CELL COUNT; CELL MIGRATION; CELL PROLIFERATION; CELL SEPARATION; CONTACT INHIBITION; DISPERSION; HEART FIBROBLAST; HEART REPOLARIZATION; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SHORT SURVEY; TENSION; TUMOR INVASION; VELOCITY; ANIMAL; BIOMECHANICS; BLOOD CELL; CELL MOTION; CYTOLOGY; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EMBRYOLOGY; HUMAN; LOCOMOTION; NONMAMMALIAN EMBRYO; PHYSIOLOGY; XENOPUS LAEVIS; ZEBRA FISH;

ANIMALS; BIOMECHANICAL PHENOMENA; CELL ADHESION; CELL MOVEMENT; CONTACT INHIBITION; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EMBRYO, NONMAMMALIAN; HEMOCYTES; HUMANS; LOCOMOTION; XENOPUS LAEVIS; ZEBRAFISH;

EID: 84937637139     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2015.05.001     Document Type: Short Survey

References (10)

1. Abercrombie M., Heaysman J.E. Observations on the social behaviour of cells in tissue culture. I. Speed of movement of chick heart fibroblasts in relation to their mutual contacts. Exp. Cell Res. 1953, 5:111-131.
2. Abercrombie M. Contact inhibition and malignancy. Nature 1979, 281:259-262.
3. Stramer B.M., et al. Rediscovering contact inhibition in the embryo. J. Microsc. 2013, 251:206-211.
4. Davis J.R., et al. Emergence of embryonic pattern through contact inhibition of locomotion. Development 2012, 139:4555-4560.
5. Carmona-Fontaine C., et al. Contact inhibition of locomotion in vivo controls neural crest directional migration. Nature 2008, 456:957-961.
6. Astin J.W., et al. Competition amongst Eph receptors regulates contact inhibition of locomotion and invasiveness in prostate cancer cells. Nat. Cell Biol. 2010, 12:1194-1204.
7. Davis J.R., et al. Inter-cellular forces orchestrate contact inhibition of locomotion. Cell 2015, 161:361-373.
8. Theveneau E., et al. Collective chemotaxis requires contact-dependent cell polarity. Dev. Cell 2010, 19:39-53.
9. Kadir S., et al. Microtubule remodelling is required for the front-rear polarity switch during contact inhibition of locomotion. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124:2642-2653.
10. Moore R., et al. Par3 controls neural crest migration by promoting microtubule catastrophe during contact inhibition of locomotion. Development 2013, 140:4763-4775.