Signaling by Cellular Protrusions: Keeping the Conversation Private

Trends in Cell Biology

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2016, Pages 526-534

  Buszczak, Michael ^a   Inaba, Mayu ^a,b   Yamashita, Yukiko M ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b HOWARD HUGHES MEDICAL INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

Asymmetric stem cell division; Cytonemes; Nanotubes; Stem cell niche

Indexed keywords

NANOTUBE;

CELL COMMUNICATION; CELL FUNCTION; CELL PROTUSION; CELL SELF-RENEWAL; EPIDERMIS CELL; GENETIC MANIPULATION; HOMEOSTASIS; MICROTUBULE; NONHUMAN; OVARY FOLLICLE CELL; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REVIEW; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; SOMATIC CELL; STEM CELL NICHE; ANIMAL; CELL SURFACE; CHEMISTRY; CILIUM; HUMAN; METABOLISM; STEM CELL;

ANIMALS; CELL SURFACE EXTENSIONS; CILIA; HUMANS; MICROTUBULES; NANOTUBES; SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION; STEM CELLS;

EID: 84974707518     PISSN: 09628924     EISSN: 18793088     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.tcb.2016.03.003     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Kornberg T.B. The contrasting roles of primary cilia and cytonemes in Hh signaling. Dev. Biol. 2014, 394:1-5.
2. Kornberg T.B., Roy S. Cytonemes as specialized signaling filopodia. Development 2014, 141:729-736.
3. Fairchild C.L., Barna M. Specialized filopodia: at the 'tip' of morphogen transport and vertebrate tissue patterning. Curr. Opin. Genet. Dev. 2014, 27:67-73.
4. Gerdes H.H., Carvalho R.N. Intercellular transfer mediated by tunneling nanotubes. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2008, 20:470-475.
5. Sherer N.M., Mothes W. Cytonemes and tunneling nanotubules in cell-cell communication and viral pathogenesis. Trends Cell Biol. 2008, 18:414-420.
6. Inaba M., et al. Nanotubes mediate niche-stem-cell signalling in the Drosophila testis. Nature 2015, 523:329-332.
7. Ramirez-Weber F.A., Kornberg T.B. Cytonemes: cellular processes that project to the principal signaling center in Drosophila imaginal discs. Cell 1999, 97:599-607.
8. Sato M., Kornberg T.B. FGF is an essential mitogen and chemoattractant for the air sacs of the Drosophila tracheal system. Dev. Cell 2002, 3:195-207.
9. Hsiung F., et al. Dependence of Drosophila wing imaginal disc cytonemes on Decapentaplegic. Nature 2005, 437:560-563.
10. Roy S., et al. Specificity of Drosophila cytonemes for distinct signaling pathways. Science 2011, 332:354-358.
11. Roy S., et al. Cytoneme-mediated contact-dependent transport of the Drosophila decapentaplegic signaling protein. Science 2014, 343:1244624.
12. Huang H., Kornberg T.B. Myoblast cytonemes mediate Wg signaling from the wing imaginal disc and Delta-Notch signaling to the air sac primordium. Elife 2015, 4:e06114.
13. Gradilla A.C., et al. Exosomes as Hedgehog carriers in cytoneme-mediated transport and secretion. Nat. Commun. 2014, 5:5649.
14. Cohen M., et al. Dynamic filopodia transmit intermittent Delta-Notch signaling to drive pattern refinement during lateral inhibition. Dev. Cell 2010, 19:78-89.
15. Sanders T.A., et al. Specialized filopodia direct long-range transport of SHH during vertebrate tissue patterning. Nature 2013, 497:628-632.
16. Caneparo L., et al. Intercellular bridges in vertebrate gastrulation. PLoS ONE 2011, 6:e20230.
17. Luz M., et al. Dynamic association with donor cell filopodia and lipid-modification are essential features of Wnt8a during patterning of the zebrafish neuroectoderm. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e84922.
18. Pyrgaki C., et al. Dynamic imaging of mammalian neural tube closure. Dev. Biol. 2010, 344:941-947.
19. Bischoff M., et al. Cytonemes are required for the establishment of a normal Hedgehog morphogen gradient in Drosophila epithelia. Nat. Cell Biol. 2013, 15:1269-1281.
20. Rojas-Rios P., et al. Cytoneme-mediated delivery of hedgehog regulates the expression of bone morphogenetic proteins to maintain germline stem cells in Drosophila. PLoS Biol. 2012, 10:e1001298.
21. Snyder J.C., et al. Lgr4 and Lgr5 drive the formation of long actin-rich cytoneme-like membrane protrusions. J. Cell Sci. 2015, 128:1230-1240.
22. Ohlstein B., et al. The stem cell niche: theme and variations. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2004, 16:693-699.
23. Morrison S.J., Spradling A.C. Stem cells and niches: mechanisms that promote stem cell maintenance throughout life. Cell 2008, 132:598-611.
24. de Cuevas M., Matunis E.L. The stem cell niche: lessons from the Drosophila testis. Development 2011, 138:2861-2869.
25. Tulina N., Matunis E. Control of stem cell self-renewal in Drosophila spermatogenesis by JAK-STAT signaling. Science 2001, 294:2546-2549.
26. Kiger A.A., et al. Stem cell self-renewal specified by JAK-STAT activation in response to a support cell cue. Science 2001, 294:2542-2545.
27. Schulz C., et al. A misexpression screen reveals effects of bag-of-marbles and TGFβ class signaling on the Drosophila male germ-line stem cell lineage. Genetics 2004, 167:707-723.
28. Kawase E., et al. Gbb/Bmp signaling is essential for maintaining germline stem cells and for repressing bam transcription in the Drosophila testis. Development 2004, 131:1365-1375.
29. Shivdasani A.A., Ingham P.W. Regulation of stem cell maintenance and transit amplifying cell proliferation by TGF-β signaling in Drosophila spermatogenesis. Curr. Biol. 2003, 13:2065-2072.
30. Rustom A., et al. Nanotubular highways for intercellular organelle transport. Science 2004, 303:1007-1010.
31. Naphade S., et al. Brief reports: Lysosomal cross-correction by hematopoietic stem cell-derived macrophages via tunneling nanotubes. Stem Cells 2015, 33:301-309.
32. Chinnery H.R., et al. Cutting edge: Membrane nanotubes in vivo: a feature of MHC class II+ cells in the mouse cornea. J. Immunol. 2008, 180:5779-5783.
33. Onfelt B., et al. Structurally distinct membrane nanotubes between human macrophages support long-distance vesicular traffic or surfing of bacteria. J. Immunol. 2006, 177:8476-8483.
34. Wang X., Gerdes H.H. Transfer of mitochondria via tunneling nanotubes rescues apoptotic PC12 cells. Cell Death Differ. 2015, 22:1181-1191.
35. Islam M.N., et al. Mitochondrial transfer from bone-marrow-derived stromal cells to pulmonary alveoli protects against acute lung injury. Nat. Med. 2012, 18:759-765.
36. Vallabhaneni K.C., et al. Vascular smooth muscle cells initiate proliferation of mesenchymal stem cells by mitochondrial transfer via tunneling nanotubes. Stem Cells Dev. 2012, 21:3104-3113.
37. Liu K., et al. Mesenchymal stem cells rescue injured endothelial cells in an in vitro ischemia-reperfusion model via tunneling nanotube like structure-mediated mitochondrial transfer. Microvasc. Res. 2014, 92:10-18.
38. Pasquier J., et al. Preferential transfer of mitochondria from endothelial to cancer cells through tunneling nanotubes modulates chemoresistance. J. Transl. Med. 2013, 11:94.
39. Plotnikov E.Y., et al. Cytoplasm and organelle transfer between mesenchymal multipotent stromal cells and renal tubular cells in co-culture. Exp. Cell Res. 2010, 316:2447-2455.
40. Ahmad T., et al. Miro1 regulates intercellular mitochondrial transport and enhances mesenchymal stem cell rescue efficacy. EMBO J. 2014, 33:994-1010.
41. Burtey A., et al. Intercellular transfer of transferrin receptor by a contact-Rab8-dependent mechanism involving tunneling nanotubes. FASEB J. 2015, 29:4695-4712.
42. Gillette J.M., et al. Intercellular transfer to signalling endosomes regulates an ex vivo bone marrow niche. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:303-311.
43. Sowinski S., et al. Membrane nanotubes physically connect T cells over long distances presenting a novel route for HIV-1 transmission. Nat. Cell Biol. 2008, 10:211-219.
44. Gousset K., et al. Prions hijack tunnelling nanotubes for intercellular spread. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:328-336.
45. Arkwright P.D., et al. Fas stimulation of T lymphocytes promotes rapid intercellular exchange of death signals via membrane nanotubes. Cell Res. 2010, 20:72-88.
46. Luchetti F., et al. Fas signalling promotes intercellular communication in T cells. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e35766.
47. Watkins S.C., Salter R.D. Functional connectivity between immune cells mediated by tunneling nanotubules. Immunity 2005, 23:309-318.
48. Wang X., et al. Animal cells connected by nanotubes can be electrically coupled through interposed gap-junction channels. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 2010, 107:17194-17199.
49. Wang X., et al. Developing neurons form transient nanotubes facilitating electrical coupling and calcium signaling with distant astrocytes. PLoS ONE 2012, 7:e47429.
50. Morrison S.J., Scadden D.T. The bone marrow niche for haematopoietic stem cells. Nature 2014, 505:327-334.
51. Figeac F., et al. Nanotubular crosstalk with distressed cardiomyocytes stimulates the paracrine repair function of mesenchymal stem cells. Stem Cells 2014, 32:216-230.
52. Singla V., Reiter J.F. The primary cilium as the cell's antenna: signaling at a sensory organelle. Science 2006, 313:629-633.
53. Croyle M.J., et al. Role of epidermal primary cilia in the homeostasis of skin and hair follicles. Development 2011, 138:1675-1685.
54. Ezratty E.J., et al. A role for the primary cilium in Notch signaling and epidermal differentiation during skin development. Cell 2011, 145:1129-1141.
55. Ott C., et al. Primary cilia utilize glycoprotein-dependent adhesion mechanisms to stabilize long-lasting cilia-cilia contacts. Cilia 2012, 1:3.
56. McCoy-Simandle K., et al. Exosomes and nanotubes: control of immune cell communication. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2016, 71:44-54.
57. Gerdes H.H., et al. Tunneling nanotubes, an emerging intercellular communication route in development. Mech. Dev. 2013, 130:381-387.
58. Antanaviciute I., et al. Long-distance communication between laryngeal carcinoma cells. PLoS ONE 2014, 9:e99196.
59. Hase K., et al. M-Sec promotes membrane nanotube formation by interacting with Ral and the exocyst complex. Nat. Cell Biol. 2009, 11:1427-1432.
60. Schiller C., et al. LST1 promotes the assembly of a molecular machinery responsible for tunneling nanotube formation. J. Cell Sci. 2013, 126:767-777.